Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proprietary notice
This document contains information that is proprietary and confidential to the Coast Metro
Consortium. Any reproduction, disclosure or other use of this document is expressly prohibited
except as the Coast Metro Consortium may authorize in writing.
Permission to copy and use this publication in part, or in its entirety, for non-profit educational
purposes within British Columbia and the Yukon, is granted to all staff of BC school board
trustees, including teachers and administrators.
Contents
Table of Contents
About the Coast Metro Consortium Science Project
The development process
Acknowledgements
About the Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in
Science, Grades 1-6
Relationship to BC Performance Standards
Levels of student performance
Using the regional standards
Aspects of Science
Key components
Science in Kindergarten
Performance Assessment of Science in Kindergarten
Life Science: Characteristics of Living Things
Sample Task: Local Finds
Chart
Physical Science: Properties of Objects and Materials
Sample Task: Mystery Boxes
Chart
Earth and Space Science: Surroundings
Sample Task: Winter Walk
Chart
Science in Grade 1
Life Science: Needs of Living Things
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Design a Habitat for a Slug
Physical Science: Force and Motion
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Classify Magnetic Effects
Earth and Space Science: Daily and Seasonal Changes
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Identify Aboriginal Seasonal Activities
Science in Grade 2
Life Science: Animal Growth and Changes
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Identify the Similarities and Differences Between
Bats and Birds
Physical Science: Properties of Matter
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Observe States of Matter of Water in Puddles
Earth and Space Science: Air, Water, and Soil
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Observe Soil Samples
Science in Grade 3
Life Science: Plant Growth and Changes
To come
Physical Science: Materials and Structures
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Build a Bridge for a Hot Wheels Car
Earth and Space Science: Stars and Planets
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Ask Questions of Aboriginal Elders
Science in Grade 4
Life Science: Habitats and Communities
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Impact of Human Choice on the Environment
Physical Science: Light and Sound
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Create a Sound Device
Earth and Space Science: Weather
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Measure Temperature
Science in Grade 5
Life Science: Human Body
Rating scale
Chart
Sample task: Test Your Reflexes
Physical Science: Forces and Simple Machines
Rating scale
Chart
Sample task: Design an Experiment
Earth and Space Science: Renewable and Non-Renewable Resources
To come
Grade 6
Life Science: Diversity of Life
Rating scale
Chart
Sample task: Adaptations to Biotic and Abiotic Factors in the
Environment
Physical Science: Electricity
Rating scale
Chart
Sample task: Dim the Light
Earth and Space Science: Exploration of Extreme Environments
Rating scale
Chart
Sample task: Saving the Penguin Eggs
Appendices
Appendix 1: Characteristics of performance tasks
Appendix 2: Attributes and Dispositions
Appendix 3: Making Connections
About the Coast Metro Consortium Science Project
The Development Process
The seeds for Coast Metro Consortium Science Project initiative were sown in
2004 at a Coast Metro Consortium meeting when Delta and Richmond
volunteered to be the lead districts in developing performance standards to
support the new elementary science curriculum.
The project has focused on building capacity for the thoughtful and meaningful
teaching of science in classrooms, including attention to the ways of knowing and
doing in the discipline of science, fidelity to the prescribed curriculum,
opportunities for students to do hands-on, minds-on science, the development of
performance tasks, and formative assessment. This has been a four-year journey
with seven school districts beginning with 39 teachers across grades 1 to 6 and
expanding to 53 teachers across Grade 1 to 9.
During the 2008-09 school year, grade teams from participating school districts
produced a draft document for grades 1-6 for response and feedback from
teachers across the province. At the same time, they continued to explore their
teaching practice in science and developed performance tasks. It is anticipated
that a draft document for grades 7-9 will be available for response and review in
the 2009-2010 school year.
The Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science describe
the professional judgments of participating Lower Mainland educators about
standards and expectations in science. They are intended as a resource to
support ongoing instruction and assessment. They emphasize criterion-
referenced assessment in which students’ performance is compared to explicit
criteria. The standards enable teachers, students, and parents to compare
student performance to regional standards.
Grade 1 Team
Janice Novakowski, Team Leader School District #38 (Richmond)
Linda Araki School District #38 (Richmond)
Michelle Hikida School District #38 (Richmond)
Lisa Schwartz School District #38 (Richmond)
Dee-Ann Wozney School District #38 (Richmond)
Grade 2 Team
Selina Millar, Team Leader School District #36 (Surrey)
Patricia Bowers School District #36 (Surrey)
Dave Ellis School District #36 (Surrey)
Dorothy Goodison School District #39 (Vancouver)
Gail Hayes School District #36 (Surrey)
Kirsten Rehnby School District #36 (Surrey)
Mary-Ellen Stewart School District #36 (Surrey)
Tammy Stubbings School District #36 (Surrey)
Grade 3 Team
May Wong, Team Leader School District #37 (Delta)
Sharron Cooke School District #38 (Richmond)
Candace Donaldson School District #36 (Surrey)
Fiona Gray School District #37 (Delta)
Jan Kroeker School District #37 (Delta)
Ellen Martin School District #37 (Delta)
Vanessa Morell School District #37 (Delta)
Leonard Pawer School District #38 (Richmond)
Doug Roch School District #37 (Delta)
Jacquie Schrier School District #37 (Delta)
Kevin Tozer School District #44 (North Vancouver)
Grade 4 Team
Jason Hewlett, Team Leader School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Andrea Mueller, Team Leader Consultant
Dario Demetlika School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Kirk Deutschmann School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Dave King School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Dawn Lessoway School District #38 (Richmond)
Terry Lindburg School District #43 (Coquitlam)
John Pringle School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Rob Seath School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Theo Towler School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Grade 5 Team
Diane Chretien, Team Leader School District #35 (Langley)
Dawn Holden, Team Leader School District #35 (Langley)
Carolyn Johnson, Team Leader School District #35 (Langley)
Dianne Chretien School District #35 (Langley)
Angela Davidson School District #35 (Langley)
Maureen Paterson School District #35 (Langley)
Kyla Regehr School District #35 (Langley)
Karen Walsh School District #35 (Langley)
Grade 6 Team
Don Gordon, Team Leader School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Eric Jones, Team Leader School District #48 (Sea to Sky)
Rob Sidley, Team Leader School District #41 (Burnaby)
Susan Tse, Team Leader School District #38 (Richmond)
Terry Borsoff School District #48 (Sea to Sky)
Heather Briske School District #36 (Surrey)
Lorrie Burnham School District #35 (Langley)
Merle Cuthbert School District #35 (Langley)
Yana Gallagher School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Marcia Garries School District #44 (North Vancouver)
Bryan Gidinski School District #41 (Burnaby)
Wendy Hibberd School District #48 (Sea to Sky)
Dave Hunt School District #48 (Sea to Sky)
Randall Hunter School District #37 (Delta)
Susan Johnston School District #44 (North Vancouver)
Ellen Leroux School District #41 (Burnaby)
Kevin Levenstein School District #38 (Richmond)
Matt Parker School District #48 (Sea to Sky)
Laurelei Primeau School District #43 (Coquitlam)
Marjorie Reimer School District #48 (Sea to Sky)
Shannon Sharp School District #44 (North Vancouver)
Janice Willcox School District #37 (Delta)
Kirby Young School District #48 (Sea to Sky)
About the Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards
for Performance Tasks in Science, Grades 1-6
Relationship to BC Performance Standards
The Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science
should not be confused with the BC Performance Standards in Reading, Writing,
Numeracy, and Social Responsibility. Although all have been developed for
voluntary use in BC schools and all are intended as resources to support ongoing
instruction and assessment, there are also important differences.
With those cautions, the Coast Metro Consortium offers these regional standards
to teachers across the province for piloting, review, and response.
Levels of Student Performance
The Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science describe
levels of achievement in key areas of learning. The performance standards
answer the questions: “How good is good enough? What does it look like when a
student’s work has met the expectations at this grade level?”
The Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science were not
designed to reflect outcome-by-outcome matching of curriculum. However, they
were developed in relation to the prescribed curriculum that sets out grade level
expectations in the form of prescribed learning outcomes.
The Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science use the
same four levels of student performance as the BC Performance Standards for
Reading, Writing, Numeracy, and Social Responsibility.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
• the work exceeds grade-level expectations in significant ways
• the student may benefit from extra challenges
Using the Regional Standards
Teachers use a variety of methods to gather the information they need to assess,
evaluate, and report on student learning. Possible methods include observations,
student work portfolios, conferences, self- and peer assessment, classroom
tests, and performance tasks.
The Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science
give teachers one way to assess students’ abilities to apply their learning in
realistic performance tasks. Used with other methods, they can be an important
part of a comprehensive assessment and evaluation system.
Guidelines
The standards:
• should be used as part of regular classroom learning activities, within the
context of ongoing classroom instruction.
• provide resources for assessing and evaluating the quality of a specific
piece or a collection of student work from various subject areas. They can
help to develop a profile of student achievement, typically based on three
to seven pieces of work.
• assume that in most cases teachers are observing students as they work.
Often, some evidence needed to make decisions comes from
observations and conversations with students.
• allow for teachers to intervene where students are unable to complete a
task independently. The level of assistance required is often one of the
criteria for determining whether or not a student’s work falls within grade-
level expectations.
• may be adapted as needed. For example, this might include creating
class-developed rating scales in age-appropriate language, developing
IEPs or other tailored evaluation, or adjusting expectations for different
times of the year.
The Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science are
intended to support instructional decision-making. Teachers may want to
consider the following questions as they plan instruction:
• How do these standards match my/our expectations for students at this
level?
• What kinds of instructional strategies and learning opportunities will help
most students develop the skills they need to meet these expectations?
• What additional support and interventions will be needed to help all
students meet these expectations?
• If there are some students for whom these expectations are not
appropriate, what expectations should they meet?
• What evidence do I/we need to collect to find out if students are making
progress towards the expectations?
Adaptations
Some students may require adaptations in order to meet the prescribed learning
outcomes in the science curriculum for their grade. None of these adaptations
should affect how the students’ work is assessed using the rating scales because
they are working on the same grade level science learning outcomes as other
students. Some adaptations, such as having someone read material aloud to the
student, or scribe for the student, would be modifications in the Language Arts
curriculum if the learning outcomes being addressed were about reading and
writing respectively, but these are always adaptations, not modifications, in the
Science curriculum. With the use of adaptations, ESL students will likely be able
to work on grade level science learning outcomes before they can work on grade
level Language Arts learning outcomes.
Very few students, likely students with special needs in low incidence categories,
may require modifications to their science program. The work of these students
should not be assessed using the grade level rating scales. It should be
assessed in relation to the goals set out in the individual student’s Individual
Educational Plan (IEP). It is possible that an aspect of a rating scale from a
previous grade might be used or modified to assist with this assessment.
Purposes
How the Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in
Science are used depends on the purpose for which they will be used. The first
priority is to improve learning. The chart on the next page provides some
examples of purposes and uses.
Assessment for Learning Assessment as Learning Assessment of Learning
Formative assessment is Formative assessment is Summative assessment
ongoing in the classroom ongoing in the classroom occurs at end of year or at
• teacher assessment, • self-assessment key stages
student self-assessment, • provides students with • teacher assessment
and/or student peer information on their own • in BC this is criterion-
assessment achievement and prompts referenced, based on
• criterion-referenced – them to consider how they provincial curriculum
criteria based on provincial can continue to improve their • information on student
curriculum, reflecting learning performance can be shared
performance in relation to a • student-determined criteria with parents/guardians,
specific learning task based on previous learning school and district staff
• involves both teacher and and personal learning goals • used to make judgments
student in a process of • students use assessment about students’ performance
continual reflection and information to make in relation to regional
review adaptations to their learning standards
• teachers adjust their plans process and to develop new
and engage in corrective understandings
teaching in response to what
they find out
Purpose: Use the Draft Purpose: Use the Draft Purpose: Use the Draft
Regional Standards to focus Regional Standards to Regional Standards to
and monitor learning, engage students in monitor and report on
provide feedback and, discussing, reflecting on, student learning.
adjust instruction. assessing and shaping their Example uses/adaptations:
Example uses/adaptations: own learning. • Document individual student
• Design learning activities Example uses/adaptations: progress in key areas of
and assessment tasks to • Work with students to learning.
provide evidence of the develop ‘kid-friendly’ • Use the regional standards
aspects of learning and the versions of the regional to identify students will
criteria described in the standards that are relevant benefit from intervention.
regional standards. to learning intentions • Adapt the regional
• Develop a profile of a class • Provide copies of the standards to guide reporting
or group of students to regional standards for discussions with parents.
support instructional student reference and self-
decision-making. assessment. Note: The draft and regional
• Focus instruction around • Work with students to nature of the Coast Metro
selected criteria or aspects develop class criteria, based Regional Standards for
from the regional standards, on the regional standards, Performance Tasks in
based on ongoing for specific purposes. Science, as well as the lack of
assessments. • Use the regional standards a validation study, limit their
• Use criteria from the to guide conference and use for district-wide
regional standards to build group discussions about assessments and plans to
shared understanding; make learning intentions and improve achievement.
learning intentions explicit. evidence of learning.
• Use criteria from the • Use criteria from the
regional standards to give regional standards to
students feedback on develop/ use various self-
specific aspects of their assessment prompts and
learning, and on specific formats.
learning tasks. • Have students use selected
criteria from the regional
standards to guide peer
feedback.
Aspects of Science
The Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science
describe student achievement in the three broad disciplines of science
addressed by the provincial curriculum:
• Life Science
• Physical Science
• Earth and Space Science.
The draft regional standards are intended to help teachers assess the extent to
which students are able to apply the skills and processes, attitudes and
dispositions, and knowledge and understanding of science in purposeful, age-
appropriate science tasks related to the provincial curriculum and to make
connections among science, technology, society, and the environment.
The draft regional standards focus on four aspects of science that are consistent
with the goals of the provincial curriculum:
Skills and processes that the provincial curriculum prescribes for each grade are
indicated in bold on the rating scales. Skills and processes from previous grades
are listed as well.
Evidence for Skills and Processes in hands-on performance tasks comes largely
from teacher observations and conferencing with students, although some may
come from the assessment of written work.
Attitudes and Dispositions
• has a positive attitude towards science
• demonstrates the habits of mind of science
• recognizes and uses science
Students will have varying attitudes and dispositions depending on their previous
experiences and personal qualities but the development of these can be fostered
in classroom science activities.
Making Connections
• connections to personal experience and prior knowledge
• connections among science, technology, society, and the environment
The Draft Coast Metro Regional Standards for Performance Tasks in Science
include three rating scales at each grade level – Life Science, Physical Science,
and Earth and Space Science. These rating scales are identical within each
grade for the first three aspects – Skills and Processes, Attitudes and
Dispositions, and Making Connections, and differ only for the fourth aspect –
Knowledge and Understanding of Science Concepts.
Key Components
Rating scale. This scale describes the four levels of performance for each of the
four aspects of science.
Chart. This chart has the description of the four “Aspects” from the rating scale in
the first column and the description of “Fully Meets Expectations” in the second
column. The third column, which is blank, can be used by teachers when they
are planning tasks or as a template for making observations as students work.
Sample task. This is a performance task developed by practising teachers to
provide opportunities to assess student work in science. Teachers may use the
tasks as given or as models. Each sample task identifies the context, the
prescribed learning outcomes, both skills and processes and content outcomes,
that are addressed, and the process that was used in the class.
Student Samples
1 Level of work.
By the end of the school year, kindergarten students may be evaluated in relation
to the skills and processes of science, after having a year’s worth of experiences.
Content knowledge is best assessed during the time of focused concentration on
the particular content, for example, during a study of local plants. When planning
classroom experiences, opportunities should be provided for students to apply
the skills and processes of science that they have been practicing.
Note: Any small animals could be used for this task – worms, sowbugs, snails,
ladybugs, butterflies, etc.
Learning Outcomes
Process
The students were asked to design a habitat to meets the needs of a slug, if the
class was going to keep a slug in their classroom for a few days. The students
were asked to draw, label and explain their thinking and choices. The teachers
interviewed each student for further explanation and connection making.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student created a make-believe house (like a dollhouse) instead of a slug
habitat, not considering the needs of the animal. The student seemed to not
understand the task being asked her and had no engagement with the science
aspect of the task, but instead focused on “decorating” the house she designed.
• uses limited science vocabulary or details when she was discussing her
slug house
• needs support to record and organize her thoughts and drawings
• shows some interest in the task
• when prompted, is able to make a personal connections to what a house
was in relation to an animal habitat
• when prompted, is unable to identify the needs of a slug
MEETS EXPECTATIONS (MINIMAL LEVEL)
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was interested in the task and is enthusiastic about science. He was
able to identify some basic needs of a slug. Even with prompting, he could not
make a personal connection to the animal or its needs.
The student:
• uses limited science vocabulary or details in describing his thinking
• drawings are limited in detail
• seeks opportunities to do science activities; very enthusiastic
• unable to make a personal connection, even with prompting
• able to identify some needs of a slug
• able to explain or show how some of the slug’s needs would be met in the
habitat he designed
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student approached the task confidently and was eager to explain his
thinking. When interviewed, he was able to orally provide examples of how the
slug’s needs were met. For example, holes in the habitat for air and carrots for
food.
The student:
• able to record and organize his thoughts about the slug habitat with
pictures and words
• orally describes his thinking about the slug’s needs
• shows an interest in science activities
• demonstrates curiousity while designing his habitat
• able to provide a personal example (where he had seen a slug before)
• able to identify the needs of a slug
• able to show and describe how he slug’s needs would be met in the
habitat that he designed
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was very interested in the task and enthusiastic about designing the
habitat. She applied background knowledge to the task, considering what
aspects of a habitat would be important for a slug.
Learning Outcomes
Process
The students were given a collection of classroom objects such as pencils,
erasers, scissors, paperclips, elastic band and coins. The students worked in
partners and were given a magnet. Students were asked to sort the objects into
groups and then give a name to their groups.
Note: The teacher used the term “sort” as this class had a high ESL population
and did not seem confident with the term “classify”.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student needed many prompts in order for him to be able to describe one
thing he learned and noticed about the task. The student did not understand the
concept of putting items in groups and randomly tested each object with the
magnet.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was interested in the task but did not ask further questions or extend
the task for himself. He sorted the objects into two distinct categories but couldn’t
generalize how the objects in each category were similar.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student approached the task confidently but was shy to orally communicate
her thinking. She used scientific vocabulary to record how she sorted the objects
into two distinct groups.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student has had many rich science experiences at home and has a very
developed vocabulary. He was very engaged in the task and was curious and
inquisitive about his findings.
Learning Outcomes
Process
The students were shown a chart divided into four quadrants, one for each
season of the year. The students were asked to create their own chart, labeling
each section with a season’s name. The students were asked to draw, label or
write about different traditional Aboriginal activities that occur in each season,
explaining the importance of each activity.
After completion of the four season charts in their science notebooks, the
students had an opportunity to share and discuss their work with each other. As
an extension to this task, the teacher provided an opportunity to the students to
refine their thinking and to represent their understanding of this content in
another way. Connecting to the idea of a medicine wheel, the students created
large circular posters divided into four parts. There were two layers with the top
layer having drawings for each season, with each of the four parts lifting up to
reveal word labels and writing underneath. These posters were proudly displayed
on a bulletin board in the school. See an example of a student-created poster on
the next page.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was able to complete the task with adult support and prompting. An
adult scribed his thinking while the student was able to create drawings for each
season. The student was able to think of one object or event for each season.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student needed some support to generate and record his ideas. The teacher
felt the student had some confusion about some of the summer and fall activities,
or just recorded his thoughts in a way that was not clear to the reader. The
student referred to previous science experiences such as the preserved fruit
observations and examining cooking baskets.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student had been very engaged in the science experiences leading up to
this task. She confidently was able to record at least one event or object that
related to each season, and also explained why that seasonal activity was
important to Aboriginal peoples.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was very interested in sharing her knowledge that she had acquired
in experiences related to this task. The student asked many thoughtful questions
and contributed to class discussions. She made connections to her previous
knowledge about fishing in ponds and streams.
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students were asked to compare bats and birds through group discussions of
what was similar and what was different. Students were then asked to work
individually to do three things:
• draw a Venn diagram to summarize the similarities and differences
between bats and birds
- write about the similarities and differences
- draw the lifecycles of a bat and a bird
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student initially focussed on the task but very quickly lost interest. While he
demonstrated interest in the story at the beginning, he had great difficulty
maintaining focus. Offers of scribing and verbal communication did not enable
this student to complete the task.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student enjoyed the story but was extremely cautious about approaching
and completing the task. She was very hesitant about sharing information even
when prompted. Information drawn out through prompting was inaccurate.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student independently completed the task. She was enthusiastic, curious,
asked questions, and demonstrated critical thinking by making personal
connections. While completing the task, she related her observations and made
inferences. She said she would like to see bats.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was quiet but eager. She capably demonstrated her knowledge and,
if she did not know something, she sought out more information. She asked
questions without prompting and made connections to prior learning.
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students were asked to observe a puddle. They were then asked to identify the
state of matter of water in the puddle. Each student had a clipboard, paper, and a
magnifying glass as well as access to thermometers, plastic cups, and rulers.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was not interested in looking at the puddle. He required significant
prompting to identify the states of matter and one-to-one support from the
teacher to complete the task.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was very reluctant to participate. She would try to move away from
the puddle if she thought the teacher was not watching. A significant amount of
teacher prompting was required for the student to complete the task.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was excited about the task. She spent a significant amount of time
observing and discussing her observations. She recorded personal connections
as she made her observations about the states of matter seen in the puddle.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was enthusiastic and eager to get started with the task. He wanted
to spend more time testing different ideas about the states of matter found in the
puddle. He posed many questions that demonstrated “testing” of prior
knowledge.
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students were given three different soil samples and asked to use their senses of
sight, touch, and smell to make and record observations. They could also draw a
picture of each sample if they wished.
Students were then asked to make and record observations and inferences
about what was in each soil sample, and to make inferences about where each
sample may have come from.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was very interested in the activity but needed significant teacher
support to stay on task. The student was not able to make personal connections
even with significant teacher prompting. He did not complete the task,
is able to make record some observations when prompted
is unable to draw a relevant diagram
is not able to make personal connections to prior experiences
is unable to make inferences
MEETS EXPECTATIONS (MINIMAL LEVEL)
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was attentive, engaged and enthusiastic. Teacher support was
required for the student to make limited observations. The student was reluctant
to use senses other than sight. She could not make any personal connections to
prior learning or experience about soil.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was enthusiastic and completed the task independently. While
completing the task, she wondered aloud, posing many questions about the
sample soils. Her conversations included many personal connections to prior
knowledge and experiences.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was constantly engaged while completing the task. As she made her
observations, she made personal connections. After completing the task, she
extended the activity by looking for similarities and differences in the soils in her
backyard. She also extended the activity to look at sans in her backyard.
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students were provided with two blocks, one sheet of paper and a Hot Wheels
car. They were asked to construct a bridge that would support the weight of the
car. They worked in pairs to design and build a bridge, test it, and suggest
modifications and improvements.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student lacked engagement with the task and did not persevere with
process of testing and modifying his design.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student lacks confidence and relied heavily on her partner to complete the
task.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student persevered with the task and considered alternative techniques.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student is naturally inquisitive, particularly about science, and transferred
what he was learning at school about structures to his play-based constructions
at home. The student orally explained his reasoning and design changes but his
recording skills were limited.
Learning Outcomes
Process
The students brainstormed how they used the sun, moon and starts to help them
and what importance they had to them. The students reviewed important aspects
of Aboriginal culture and beliefs that they had been introduced to. The students
were asked to create questions for First Nations elders to answer so that we
could better understand the special significance of celestial objects, both
traditionally and currently.
Many students wrote their questions in letter format as the questions were being
taken to elders to read.
The responses to the questions were shared with the class at a later time and
many powerful connections were made.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was able to complete the task with adult support and prompting.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was able to complete the task with some adult and peer support.
This student has a designation as ESL level 2.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student was able to complete the task independently and confidently shared
his questions with his peers.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student made connections between culture and science and was able to
create complex questions independently. The student’s fine motor skills (printing)
are weak, so the teacher re-wrote his questions so that they could be shared with
others.
• asks thoughtful and insightful questions with the purpose of writing for an
elder
• uses different types/levels of questions
• is very curious about science and has vast background knowledge around
science concepts and vocabulary
• makes relevant connections and connects science to the world around
him
• thorough understanding of relevant science concepts
• strong understanding of significance of Aboriginal peoples within a
Canadian context
• connects the significance of celestial objects in his own life as he thought
of questions to ask the elders
Transcription:
1. Do you have special names for the sun and the moon?
2. Do you use the moon to tell days?
3. What is the most useful – the sun, the moon, or the stars?
4. Do you have sun celebrations?
Science in Grade 4
Life Science: Habitats and Communities
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Impact of Human Choice on the Environment
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students were asked to create a class web showing how human choices and actions
impact the environment (e.g. oil spills, garbage, cutting trees, etc.) reviewing key
vocabulary. They then went on a habitat walk where they drew individual webs
followed by detailed pictures and written explanation of how the local environment
has been affected by human choice. After the walk, there was a class discussion to
develop a “How Humans Impact the Environment” web on the board. Students were
asked to complete a Making Connections question before proceeding. They were
then asked to use their knowledge of how humans impact the environment to draw
and explain their plan for a new school that they predict would have minimal impact
on the environment. Throughout the task, the teacher observed and recorded
students’ attitudes using the “Attitudes and Dispositions” checklist.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student designed his future school but it was based on imagination with no
consideration of realistic effects of human impact on the environment.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
Based on the human impact nature walk the student was able to draw a school
that had minimal impact on the environment. The student illustrated many
examples but did not explain them clearly.
• prediction is logical but lacks explanation (e.g.; picture has many ideas but
no explanation)
• at times shows some interest in the task
• makes general connections but provides no explanation (e.g.; no effect of
personal choice)
• gives simple examples of human choices but does not identify effects on
the environment
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
Based on the human impact nature walk, the student drew a school that had
minimal impact on the environment. The student explained his choice for the
school design. The student showed an increased level of interest in this task
compared to other learning activities.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
Based on the human impact nature walk, the student drew a school that had
minimal impact on the environment. The student’s design and explanations were
insightful. The student was curious during the task and asked many questions.
The student’s questions clearly showed a high level of thought regarding the
task.
Learning Outcomes
Process
After exploring how sound is created, and how volume and pitch are altered,
students were asked to apply their knowledge to create their own sound device.
The device had to be able to produce a sound, alter the volume, and alter the
pitch, and had to be an original design (not a copy of something seen
elsewhere). Students came up with their idea and drew a detailed diagram. They
were asked to predict how their device would work, based on existing knowledge,
before building their device. Materials were brought to school by the students
who then made their devices. Once built, students partnered up to share, then
had to give a full, written explanation of how their device worked. After sharing
with the whole class, students were asked to make some connections about how
sound applies to their lives, and comment on the extent to which they enjoyed
the task.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student created a sound device but her diagram and explanations
demonstrated some confusion about the properties of sounds. The student did
not make connections about the properties of sound to her life.
• prediction is incomplete
• shows a social interest in learning but not specific to the science activity
• connections are simple lists of sound examples (e.g.; watching TV,
listening to music, kettle whistling)
• confusion about properties of sound (e.g.; “shake it hard and you get a
higher sound”)
MEETS EXPECTATIONS (MINIMAL LEVEL)
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student created a sound device with a clear diagram. His explanations
showed some confusion or were incomplete. The student did not make
connections about the properties of sound to his life but simply listed examples.
• prediction is simple or vague (e.g.; “It can alter the volume by the way you
shake it.”)
• shows interest in hands-on learning but not specific to the science activity
• connections are not specific to the context of the task (e.g.; volume, pitch,
vibration)
• needs support to identify properties of sound (e.g.; teacher prompts to
clarify between concepts of volume and pitch)
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student created a sound device with a clear diagram. Her explanations
demonstrated an understanding of most properties of sound. The student was
very enthusiastic during the task and was eager to share her design with the
teacher and others.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student created a sound device with a detailed diagram. His explanations
demonstrated an understanding of all properties of sound. As the student was
building his sound device he stopped to explain his reasons for choosing specific
materials and their effect on the sound of his device.
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students were shown how to read and record the temperature using a
thermometer located outside the classroom. For five straight days, students
collected and recorded the temperature both in the morning and afternoon, then
created line graphs of the temperature. The teacher measured and recorded the
temperature at each specified time in order to be able to check the accuracy of
the students’ measurement and recording. Students used the temperature data
to make up three questions and to provided reasonable answers based on the
patterns they observed. The teacher observed students while they were
collecting, recording, and interpreting the data, with particular attention to science
attitudes.
After completing the recording and interpretation of the data, students were
asked the following questions:
• Have you ever used the measurement/knowledge of temperatures in your
life? Explain.
• In your family’s life? Explain?
• How is your environment (where you live, your school, etc.) affected by
the measurement/knowledge of temperatures? Explain.
Note: In rating the student’s work as NY, MM, FM or EE, the teachers placed the
most emphasis on the skills and processes aspect as that was the focus of the
task (measuring and recording).
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student recorded temperatures over a five day period and graphed data.
The student’s questions were based on prior knowledge, not the data collected.
• does not use or refer to the recorded temperature (data) while generating
questions for interpretation
• shows some interest in the task
• makes general connections (e.g.; referring to the Weather Channel)
• uses thermometer appropriately to measure temperature
MEETS EXPECTATIONS (MINIMAL LEVEL)
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student recorded temperatures over a five day period and graphed data.
The student asked simple questions but did not look at all data when making
interpretations.
• makes simple interpretations of data, but only considers data for single
days.
• shows some interest in the task
• makes general connections with no explanation (e.g.; “If it is cold outside I
would have to wear a jacket.”)
• records temperature appropriately
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student recorded temperatures over a five day period and graphed data.
The student recorded several questions based on collected data.
Note: The teacher asked this student to look for and record general trends before
asking their interpretive questions. This student was not observed got Attitudes
and Dispositions.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student recorded temperatures over a five day period and graphed data.
Showing a high level of interest, the student developed several questions based
on collected data. The student provided interpretations that were insightful.
• uses collected data over several days to make reasonable and insightful
interpretations (e.g.; “There were more clouds near the end of the week.
Heat bounced down with clouds.”)
• uses appropriate science terminology (e.g.; “hotter, heat, warmed up”)
• demonstrates a high level of interest by frequently asking questions
• makes specific connections (e.g.; If it was going to be really cold and it
might snow, you would know not to wear a T-shirt and shorts.”)
• records temperature appropriately.
Science in Grade 5
Life Science: Human Body
Rating Scale
Chart
Sample Task: Test Your Reflexes
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students worked with a partner to test each other’s reflexes. One partner sat in a
chair with their hand sideways and open wide ready to catch a ball after the first
bounce. The other partner counted to three then dropped the ball. The students
were asked to evaluate the scientific fairness of the task based on the
understanding of keeping all variables the same except the one being tested, in
this case the ability to catch the ball or not (reflexes). The students were then
asked to evaluate their results and apply their knowledge of the nervous system.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was enthusiastic and focused. His English is developed enough that
he should be have been able to perform this task. He was engaged in the
activity, but required much direction and redirection to complete the experiment.
He understood that the experiment involved catching a ball but was unable to link
it to the function of the nervous system and the concept of fair testing.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was able to provide basic information about the controls in the
experiment, but was did not understand the concept of a variable. His responses
to questions were very personalized rather than scientific. His understanding of
“fair test” is emerging but he could not explain why this experiment was fair.
• understands the definition of fair testing, but is not able to apply the
definition to experiments
• able to make a prediction based on prior knowledge
• explanations were simple and incomplete
• able to understand controls and give example but was unable to identify
the variable in the experiment
• requires scaffolding to link prior knowledge to new information and
activities
• shows interest in science
• explanations are simple, incomplete and, in some cases, inaccurate
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student does not usually complete classroom work without support and
encouragement. He completed this experiment with his partner. He showed great
interest and completed the written work independently. He followed the
procedure independently, recorded accurately and provided good explanation for
his thinking. He was able to explain and identify variables, and controls. He was
able to link his knowledge and processes to his personal life.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was able to complete the experiment independently and guide
classmates, as needed. She correctly concluded that the experiment was fair and
explained why.
• identifies and explains the concept of fair testing, including variables and
controls
• follows scientific procedure independently and efficiently
• work is clear, detailed, and logically organized using appropriate scientific
language
• able to synthesize knowledge of reflexes and apply it to personal life
• able to identify potential factors that could impair reflexes
• frequently asks questions and formulates hypotheses
Physical Science
Prescribed Learning Outcomes
The BC performance standards for Grade 5 Physical Science reflect the following
prescribed learning outcomes from Grade 5 of the Science K to 7 Integrated
Resource Package (2005).
Learning Outcomes
Process
Students were asked to work individually to design an experiment to test which
substance would act as the best lubricant on a ride. The proposed ride had
sliders that would go down an incline plane. The goal was to make the ride as
fast as possible.
Students designed the experiments one day and then tested them the next. They
were presented with the possibility that they might have to test each otherʼs
experiments so they should include as much detail as possible in their procedure.
All students did their own experiment. As an extension, some students later
exchanged procedures and replicated each otherʼs experiments.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student was given additional prompting and support to complete the task.
He was also encouraged to use full sentences when answering questions and
explaining his thinking. The student included a step in the procedure that was not
possible with the supplies provided, the timing of the pennies. He did not realize
this and then did not adjust while doing the experiment. The student attempted to
make explanations when prompted but his explanations were often those
provided in class or included inaccuracies.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student enjoys the hands-on tasks and is interested in science concepts. He
made reference to prior knowledge but was uncertain how to use it. The student
was able to identify some variables with prompting. He required support to
identify some impacts of personal actions on the environment. He was able to
show how some forces affect the movement of objects. The student asked
relevant questions but did not hypothesize about possible outcomes.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
This student shows a keen interest in science concepts. He asked relevant
questions and hypothesized about possible outcomes. He made use of prior
knowledge in his explanations and explorations. The student was able to give
examples of ways simple and compound machines are used in daily life but
relied on examples used in class. He was comfortable explaining how various
forces affect the movement of objects.
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student actively looks for ways to engage in science and extend his learning.
He asked relevant questions, hypothesized about possible outcomes, and
offered explanations from a store scientific knowledge. He has a well-developed
understanding and could explain how various forces affect the movement of
objects. The student was able to demonstrate and explain the mechanical
advantage of various simple machines. He is inquisitive by nature and regularly
uses scientific evidence to make sense of the world.
Learning Outcomes
Process
The students were asked to design an environment and define its temperature,
altitude, precipitation, latitude and other features (e.g., vegetation, volcanoes,
mountains, water sources). Students were then asked to design an animal that was
suited to this environment. The animal was required to have 3 adaptations to non-
living factors in its environment (e.g., temperature) and 3 adaptations to living (biotic)
factors in its environment (e.g., food supply, predators). Students were asked to
identify each adaptation, label it as related to living or non-living factors in the
environment, and explain its how it helps the animal survive in this environment.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• needs support to communicate ideas
• gives some simple examples of adaptations to biotic factors only; many
are not linked to biome features
MEETS EXPECTATIONS (MINIMAL LEVEL)
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• needs some support to communicate idea
• gives simple examples of adaptations, some are fanciful, or not linked to
biome features
• has some difficulty distinguishing between adaptations related to abiotic
versus biotic factors
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• gives clear explanations for the her ideas
• explains all adaptations but some explanations are incomplete or not
explicitly linked to biome features
• demonstrates an excellent understanding of adaptations related to biotic
factors
• has some difficulty distinguishing between adaptations related to abiotic
versus biotic factors; all adaptations identified relate to biotic factors
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• gives clear, detailed explanations for the their ideas
• uses scientific evidence to make sense of world, connecting all
adaptations to the appropriate biome features
• explains all adaptations clearly in detail
• is able to accurately distinguish between adaptations related to abiotic and
biotic factors in the environment
Physical Science
Prescribed Learning Outcomes
The BC performance standards for Grade 6 Physical Science reflect the following
prescribed learning outcomes from Grade 6 of the Science K to 7 Integrated
Resource Package (2005).
• can explain the difference between • can explain how static electricity can
static and current electricity in terms of become current electricity due to
electrons electron flow
• given examples of circuits, is able to • given examples of circuits, is able to
identify closed, open, series and accurately identify a closed, open
parallel circuits circuit, series and parallel circuits and
• is able to explain that electricity can be can label the path electrons will follow
transformed into light, heat, sound, • may explain how electricity can be
motion, or magnetic effects transformed into light, heat, sound,
• is able to give examples of renewable motion, or magnetic effects
and non-renewable sources of • is able to identify the pros and cons of
electricity various methods of electricity
production
Chart for Planning or Observation: Grade 6 Physical
Science
Aspect Fully Meets Expectations
Learning Outcomes
Process
The students were asked to recreate a direct circuit using a battery, switch, bulb,
and insulated wires and observe the amount of light created. Then they were asked
to insert non -insulated wire in the form of steel wool into the circuit and observe the
amount of light created, then reduce the amount of steel by half, and then again,
each time noting the amount of light created. Students are asked to explain their
results.
In the second part, students are asked to propose what else they could investigate
using the steel wool. They are expected to design an experiment to test their
proposal, conduct the experiment, record results, and offer explanations.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• needs support to identify a problem and possible variables, and to create
a plan for testing
• communicates results but these are incomplete and confusing
• is not able to pose questions to test
• is able to make vague connections to prior knowledge; may just be using
known vocabulary
• is able to identify the transformation of electricity into light and heat but
cannot explain it
MEETS EXPECTATIONS (MINIMAL LEVEL)
NY MM FM EE
Skills and
Processes
Attitudes and
Dispositions
Making
Connections
Knowledge &
Understanding of
Science Concepts
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• identifies material (steel wool) as a possible variable to test
• has an incomplete plan for testing
• is able to communicate results but they are incomplete and lack
explanation
• asks good questions to follow up the experiment
• is able to make vague connections to prior knowledge
• is able to explain that electricity is transformed into light and heat
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• identifies material as a possible variable
• has a complete plan for testing both materials, drawing on prior knowledge
• communicates results clearly (but needs definition of ‘sturdy’)
• asks good questions to follow up the experiment
• is able to ask questions that show curiosity and connections to prior
knowledge
• is able to explain that electricity is transformed into light and heat
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• identifies length as a variable that will affect the outcome of the
experiment and identifies that width must be held constant in the two
samples
• has a clear plan for testing the identified problem and evaluating the
results
• communicates the results clearly and goes beyond to discuss brightness
as well
• is able to ask questions that show depth of curiosity and connections to
prior knowledge
• explains why and how electricity is transformed into light and heat
Earth and Space Science
Prescribed Learning Outcomes
The BC performance standards for Grade 6 Earth and Space Science reflect the
following prescribed learning outcomes from Grade 6 of the Science K to 7
Integrated Resource Package (2005).
Making • with support, may be able to identify • is able to make some connections to
Connections relevant connections to personal prior experiences or knowledge, these
• connections to experiences or prior knowledge may be vague or inaccurate
personal • with support, can identify ways science • is able to explain some links between
experience and uses technology, but may not science and technology, may contain
prior knowledge understand provided examples of how some inaccuracies
• connections scientific knowledge has been used to • if prompted, is able to identify some
among science, develop technologies impacts of personal actions on the
technology, • with support, can identify some impacts environment
society, and the of personal actions on the environment
environment
Knowledge and • may be able to give an example of an • gives examples of extreme
Understanding extreme environment but may not environments but may identify only
of Science accurately identify any characteristics the most obvious characteristics
Concepts that make it extreme • may need support to assess the
• may not be able to assess a suggested effectiveness of a suggested
technology technology
• with prompting, is able to give an • is able to give an example of
example of technology used in the technology used in the exploration of
exploration but may not be able to a particular extreme environment
match it to a particular environment
Fully Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Learning Outcomes
Process
The students were asked to watch the Planet Earth video on penguins and the
Antarctic to learn about environmental conditions and the difficulties in conducting
research there. Students were given the task in the form of a fictional letter outlining
the requirements for their designs. They were all given the same set of materials to
choose from for their task of designing an insulating container for an egg to keep it
from freezing. Students were asked to develop a design, then seek teacher approval
prior to building and testing the design. Groups needed to conduct two tests to keep
their eggs from freezing with the second test using fewer supplies for insulating the
egg. Results were assessed and discussed.
NOT YET WITHIN EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• needs support to identify criteria for success and to create a plan for
testing; plan is confusing in parts
• communicates results but these are incomplete and incldue little
explanation
• shows little curiosity
• is able to makes vague connections to prior knowledge
• tries to assess the effectiveness of the technology but provides a very
brief explanation
MEETS EXPECTATIONS (MINIMAL LEVEL)
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• identifies the problem and criteria for success but these are somewhat
confusing
• communicates results briefly with little explanation or assessment
• shows little curiosity
• is able to makes connections to prior knowledge although these are not
always relevant
• is able to make some vague links between science and technology
• tries to assess the effectiveness of the technology; explanation is very
brief
FULLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• clearly identifies problem and criteria for success
• develops a clear plan for testing
• evaluates results
• communicates results clearly but briefly
• shows curiosity by asking relevant scientific questions
• makes connections to prior knowledge both from class and home
• makes some links between science and technology
• is able to assess the effectiveness of the suggested technology
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
NY MM FM EE
Skills and Processes
Making Connections
Teacher’s Observations
The student:
• clearly identifies problem and criteria for success
• develops a plan for testing that is clear and
• evaluates results
• communication of results is clear and detailed
• shows strong curiosity, asking relevant scientific questions based on
results
• makes connections to prior knowledge both from class and home
• makes strong links between science and technology explaining how they
interact
• assesses the effectiveness of the technology and makes additional
suggestions
Invitation to participate in the project
The Coast Metro Consortium Science Project invites teachers across the
province to participate in piloting these draft regional standards for performance
tasks in Science K-6 during the 2009-2010 school year.
Teachers are invited to try the tasks in this document with their classes or to
develop other performance tasks. In either case, participating teachers are
invited to send the Project a task write-up and class set of student work. We may
use some of these examples in the final document.
❑ Address all or most of the four aspects on the scale – Skills &
Processes, Attitudes & Dispositions, Making Connections, and
Knowledge & Understanding of Science Concepts
Use the draft charts to help you think about how you could collect
information about student performance in relation to each of the four
aspects on the scale - Skills & Processes, Attitudes & Dispositions,
Making Connections, and Knowledge & Understanding of Science
Concepts. Some Skills and Processes, for example, recording, are easily
seen in written work, but most require teacher observation. Attitudes and
Dispositions are best ascertained by teacher observation and listening.
Questions on Making Connections and Knowledge & Understanding of
Science Concepts can be built into the task but teachers can listen and
observe and question to elicit additional information. Please consider
recording observations and/or what students said in conferencing or in
response to questioning and prompts. These can be recorded on post-it
notes and attached to the student samples.
❑ Name of Task
Do not agonize over this; we simply need something to call it.
❑ Context
Use the form “The class was working on a unit on…” or something similar
to describe the context in the past tense. If there is anything quite
extraordinary about the class, it could also be noted here; e.g., and ESL
reception class. In deciding on the voice and amount of information,
remember that your audience is your teacher colleagues.
❑ Learning outcomes
Use the prescribed learning outcomes verbatim, even if whole outcome
does not apply. Do not revise the outcome, add additional outcomes, or
use achievement indicators.
❑ Process
Use the form “Students were asked to…” to describe the task in the past
tense. Again, remember that your audience is teachers.
❑ A highlighted scale
Highlight a draft scale for each student sample and staple the highlighted
scale to the student sample.
Grade: _____
Name of task: _________________________________________________________
Name of teacher:
_______________________________________________________
School/District:
________________________________________________________
Context:
e.g., The class was doing a unit on…
Learning Outcomes:
i.e., verbatim from the IRP
Process:
e.g., The students were asked to…
Appendix 1: Characteristics of Performance Tasks
Essential and valid
• task based on identified learning outcomes in grade-level curriculum
• task focuses on key concepts, skills and processes, in curriculum, NOT
tangential
• task deals with "big ideas", big issues in the curriculum and subject discipline
• task stimulates students to make connections and generalizations that will
increase their understanding of the important concepts and processes
Open-ended
• students have some choice selecting or shaping the tasks
• task provides opportunities for decision-making
• task has a variety of acceptable approaches
• task is equitable, allows for a variety of learning styles
• task allows for a broad range or performance
• task leads naturally to extensions
• task has a variety of acceptable solutions, NOT one right answer or set of
answers
• requires complex performance beyond what could be assessed by a typical
pencil and paper assessment
• extended task that involves sustained work and often takes several days
• task is "freeing", it encourages students to be divergent thinkers and
thoughtful risk takers
Engaging, valued
• task is meaningful to students
• task is interesting and engaging for students, it promotes persistence
• students value the outcome of the task
• task stimulates and sustains their thinking
• task is thought-provoking
• task fosters persistence
Appendix 2: Attributes and Dispositions
Attitudes and Dispositions Chart: Teachers can use this chart as they develop performance
tasks or as a template for taking notes while observing students.
Prior knowledge
• Have you ever seen this
before?…where?…when?
• Where else might you find something
like this?
• How is this like something you
already know?
Personal experience
• Have you ever used this
information?…has your family?
• How does this affect people?
…you?…your family?…people who
live in other places?
Technology
• How have people used this scientific
understanding to invent things?
• What technology has arisen as a
result of this scientific
understanding?
• What scientific knowledge is this
technology based on?
• How has this technology affected
you?…individual people?…society?
…the environment?
Environment
• How does your environment affect
you?
• How does your environment affect
the science you need to know?
• How does your environment affect
the technology you are interested in?
Society
• Why do you think scientists study
this?
• How can people use this information
in their lives?
• How has this scientific understanding
helped society?
• How does our society decide what
science is studied? …what
technology is developed? …how we
use the environment?