Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S1270-9638(14)00230-2
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2014.11.005
Reference: AESCTE 3163
Please cite this article in press as: D.D. Nguyen, T.T. Pham, Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of
shear deformable imperfect eccentrically stiffened S-FGM circular cylindrical shells surrounded on elastic
foundations, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.11.005
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our
customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting,
typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during
the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers
that apply to the journal pertain.
Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of shear deformable imperfect
eccentrically stiffened S-FGM circular cylindrical shells
surrounded on elastic foundations
Abstract: This paper presents an analytical approach to investigate the nonlinear dynamic response
and vibration of imperfect eccentrically stiffened functionally graded thick circular cylindrical shells
surrounded on elastic foundations using both of the first order shear deformation theory and stress
function with full motion equations (not using Volmir's assumptions). Material properties are graded in
the thickness direction according to a Sigmoid power law distribution (S-FGM) in terms of the volume
fractions of constituents with metal - ceramic - metal layers. The S-FGM shells are subjected to
mechanical and damping loads. Numerical results for dynamic response of the shells are obtained by
Runge-Kutta method. The results show the influences of geometrical parameters, the volume fractions
of metal – ceramic – metal layers, imperfections, theelastic foundations, eccentrically stiffeners, pre–
loaded axial compression and damping loads on the nonlinear dynamic response and nonlinear
vibration of functionally graded cylindrical shells. The proposed results are validated by comparing
with other results reported in literature.
Keywords: Nonlinear dynamic response, vibration, Sigmoid FGM thick circular cylindrical shells, the
first order shear deformation theory, elastic foundations.
1. Introduction
The idea of FGMs was first introduced in 1984 by a group of Japanese material scientists
[1]. Functionally graded materials (FGMs) are composite materials obtained by combining and
mixing two or more different constituent materials, which are distributed along the thickness in
______________________
In thiss paper, wee research the nonlinear dynamiic and nonnlinear vibrration of im
mperfect
eccentricallly stiffened
d functionallly graded thick
t circulaar cylindriccal shells w
with metal-cceramic-
m
metal layerrs, which arre symmetric through the middle surface byy Sigmoid-laaw distribuution (S-
F
FGM) and surrounded
d on elastic foundation
ns using the first order shear deforrmation theeory and
stress functtion. The Volmir's
V assu
umption is not approppriate due too the fact thhat the rightt side of
equations of
o motion doesn’t eq
qual to Zerro [46]. Fuurthermore, in this paaper, we toook into
account off the presen
nce of stifffeners and elastic
e founndations. T
Therefore, tthe calculatting has
bbecome more
m compliicated. Thee Galerkin method aand Runge--Kutta metthod are uused for
dynamic analysis
a of the cylind
drical shells to give expressionn of naturaal frequenccies and
nnonlinear response. Nu
umerical reesult shows the effects of characteeristics of ffunctionallyy graded
m
materials, geometrical
g l and materrial propertties, elastic foundationns and ecceentrically sttiffeners
on the dynaamical behaavior of the shells.
2. Theoretiical formulations
2.1. Eccenttrically stifffened S-FGM thick circular cyylindrical sshells surrounded on
n elastic
foundation
ns.
Fig.1. Configuratio
C on of an ecccentrically stiffened S--FGM thickk circular cyylindrical shhell.
For an S-FGM cylindrical shell made of two different constituent materials with metal-
ceramic-metal layers, the volume fractions Vc z
and Vm z
can be written in the Sigmoid
£¦ 2 z h ¬N h
¦¦
¦ ,
N p 0, b z b 0,
¦ h ® 2
Vc z
¤
¦¦ 2 z h ¬N h (1)
¦¦ , 0b z b ,
¦ h ® 2
¦¥
Vm z
Vc z
1,
where the Young’s modulus E , the Poisson’s ratio O are expressed as:
£¦ 2 z h ¬N h
¦¦¦ , Ecm Ec - Em , N p 0, b z b 0,
h ® 2
E z
, S z
¯ < Em , Sm > < Ecm , Scm >¤¦
¢ ± ¦¦ 2 z h ¬N (2)
¦¦ , 0 b z b h , S S - S .
¦ h ® 2
cm c m
¦¥
O const.
with volume fraction index N dictates the material variation profile through the S-FGM shell
thickness, the subscripts m and c are metal and ceramic constituents respectively.
A
According to the Redd
dy’s first-orrder shear deformation
d n (FSDT) inn [48] whicch assumes that the
ttransverse normal stress is neglligible and normal doo not remaiin perpenddicular to thhe mid-
surface after deformaation. The displacemeent field foor an arbitrrary point w
within the shell is
assumed to
o be
u x, y, z
u0 ( x, y ) zGx x, y
,
v x, y, z
v0 ( x, y ) zGy x, y
, (4)
w x, y, z
w0 ( x, y ),
w
where u0 , v0 , w0 are thee displacem onent alongg the x, y, z
coordinaate directioons, and
ment compo
and x axes.
Based on
o the FS
SDT and von-Karma
v an nonlineaar strains-ddisplacemennt relationn which
accounts fo
or the modeerately largeer deflection
n and smalll strain, we obtain
sGx sv sG
Fx F0 x z , Fx F0 y 0 z y ,
sx sy sy
sG sG ¬
H xy H 0 xy z x y , (5)
sy sx ®
sw sw
H yz Gy , H zx Gx ,
sy sx
with
2
sv w 1 sw ¬
2
su 1 sw ¬
F0 x , F0 y ,
sx 2 sx ® sy R 2 sy ®
(6)
su sv sw sw
H 0 xy .
sy sx sx sy
E
T x , T y
1 O 2 ¡¢ Fx , F y
O F y , Fx
¯°± ,
(7)
E E E
T xy H xy , T xz H xz , T yz H yz .
2(1 O ) 2(1 O ) 2(1 O )
T xst , T yst
E0 Fx , Fy
, (8)
The constitutive stress-strain equations by Hook law for the shell material are omitted here for
brevity. The shell reinforced by eccentrically longitudinal and circumferential stiffeners is
shown in Fig. 1. The contribution of stiffeners can be accounted for using the Lekhnitsky
smeared stiffeners technique and the force and moment resultants of an eccentrically stiffened
S-FGM shell are shown as [27-28, 49-50]:
E A¬
N x I10 0 x F0 x I 20F0 y I11 C x
Dx I 21D y ,
sx ®
E0 Ay ¬
N y I 20F0 x I10 F0 y I 21Dx I11 C y
D y ,
s y ®
N xy I 30 H 0 xy 2 I 31Dxy ,
(9)
EI ¬
M x I11 Cx
F0 x I 21F0 y I12 0 x Dx I 22D y ,
s ® x
E I ¬
M y I 21F0 x I11 C y
F0 y I 22Dx I12 0 y D y ,
s y ®
M xy I 31H 0 xy 2 I 32Dxy ,
Qx KI 30 H xz ,
Qy KI 30 H yz ,
with
h /2
E( z)
I1 j ¨ 1 O ( z ) 2
z j dz , j 0, 2
h /2
h /2
E ( z )O ( z ) j
I2 j ¨ 1 O ( z ) 2
z dz, j 0, 2
h /2 (10)
h /2
E( z) 1
I3 j ¨ 2 (1 O ( z ) ¯±°
z j dz (I1 j I 2 j ),
2
j 0, 2
h /2 ¢¡
d x (hx )3 2
d y ( hy ) 3
Ix Ax ( z x ) , I y Ay ( z y ) 2 ,
12 12
E Az E Az
Cx 0 x x , C y 0 y y ,
sx sy
h hx h hy
zx , zy ,
2 2
Ax d x sx , Ay d y s y ,
where the coupling parameters C x , C y are negative for outside stiffeners and positive for inside
one; I x , I y are the second moments of cross-section areas; sx , s y are the spacing of the
longitudinal and circumferential stiffeners; z x , z y are the eccentricities of stiffeners with respect
to the middle surface of shell; and the width and thickness of longitudinal and circumferential
stiffeners are denoted by d x , hx and d y , hy respectively. Ax , Ay are the cross-section areas of
4
stiffeners. And K is correction factors, K [48, 51].
5
Form the constitutive relations Eq. (9), one can write inversely
sGx sG
F0 x A22 N x A12 N y B11 B12 y ,
sx sy
sG sG
F0 y A11 N y A12 N x B21 x B22 y , (11)
sx sy
sG sG
H 0 xy A66 N xy B66 ( x y ),
sy sx
in which
1 E A 1 E A
A11 ( I10 0 x ), A22 ( I10 0 y ),
% sx % sy
(12)
I 1
A12 20 , A66 ,
% I 30
and
E0 Ax ¬ E0 Ay ¬ 2
I 20 .
% I10 I10
s ®
x s ® y
According to first order shear deformation theory, the equations of motion are [48, 51]:
sN x sN xy s 2u s 2G
I 0 2 I1 2x , (13a)
sx sy st st
sN xy sN y
s 2v s 2Gy
I 0 2 I1 2 , (13b)
sx sy st st
sM x sM xy s 2G x s 2u
Qx I 2 I 1 , (13d)
sx sy st 2 st 2
sM xy sM y s 2v s 2Gy
Qy I 2 I1 2 , (13e)
sx sy st 2 st
h /2
Ii ¨ S z
z i dz , i=0, 2, (14)
h /2
f x, y
is stress function defined by
N x f , yy , N y f, xx , N xy f, xy . (15)
s 2u I1 s 2Gx
, (16)
st 2 I 0 st 2
2
s 2v I1 s Gy
. (17)
st 2 I o st 2
Substituting Eqs. (15), (16) and (17) into Eqs. (13c-13e) leads to
sQx sQx s 2 f s 2 w s2 f s2w s2 f s2w
2 2 q k1w
sx sy sy sx 2 sxsy sxsy sx 2 sy 2
(18)
s2w s2w¬ 1 s2 f s2w sw
k2 2 2 I 2F I 0 ,
sx sy ® R sx 2 0 2
st st
sM x sM xy I 2 ¬ s 2G
Qx I 2 1 2x , (19)
sx sy I 0 ® st
sM xy sM y I12 ¬ s Gy
2
Qy I 2 2 . (20)
sx sy I o ® st
By substituting Eq. (11) into Eq. (9) and then into Eqs. (18)-(20), the system of motion Eqs.
(18) - (20) are rewritten as follows
s2w sw
H11 w
H12 Gx
H13 Gy
P1 w, f
q I 0 2 2FI 0 ,
st st
I 2 ¬ s 2G
H 21 w
H 22 Gx
H 23 Gy
P2 f
I 2 1 2x , (21)
I 0 ® st
I12 ¬ s Gy
2
H 31 w
H 32 Gx
H 33 Gy
P3 f
I 2 2 ,
I ® st
0
in which
E0 I x
D11 I12 B11 ( I11 Cx ) I 21B21 ,
sx
E0 I y
D22 I12 B22 ( I11 C y ) I 21B12 ,
sy
D12 I 22 B12 ( I11 Cx ) I 21B22 ,
D21 I 22 B21 ( I11 C y ) I 21B11 ,
D66 I 32 I 31B66 .
Assume that w x, y
is a known function representing initial small imperfection, Eqs. (21) for
an imperfect S-FGM circular cylindrical shell can be modified as the following form [19-20]:
s2w sw
H11 w
H12 Gx
H13 Gy
P1 w, f
P1' ( w* , f ) q I o 2
2F I 0 ,
st st
I12 ¬ s 2Gx
*
H 21 w
H 22 Gx
H 23 Gy
P2 f
H 21 ( w ) I 2 2 , (23)
I ® st
0
I12 ¬ s Gy
2
H 31 w
H 32 Gx
H 33 Gy
P3 f
H 31 ( w ) I 2 2 ,
*
I ® st
o
and
s 2 w* s 2 w* s 2 f s 2 w* s 2 f s 2 w* s 2 f s 2 w*
P w , f
KI 30
1
' *
KI 30 2 2 . (24)
sx 2 sy 2 sy sx 2 sxsy sxsy sx 2 sy 2
2 2
s 2F0 x s F0 y s H 0 xy s2w s2w s2w s 2 w s 2 w* s 2 w s 2 w*
2
sy 2 sx 2 sxsy sxsy sx 2 sy 2 sxsy sxsy sx 2 sy 2
(25)
s 2 w s 2 w* 1 s 2 w
2 .
sy sx 2 R sx 2
From the constitutive relations (11) in conjunction with Eq. (15) one can write
s2 f s2 f sG sG
F0 x A22 2 A12 2 B11 x B12 y ,
sy sx sx sy
s2 f s2 f sG sG
F0 y A11 2 A12 2 B21 x B22 y , (26)
sx sy sx sy
s2 f sG sG
H 0 xy A66 B66 ( x y ).
sxsy sy sx
Setting Eq. (26) into Eq. (25) gives the compatibility equation of the imperfect S-FGM shell as
s4 f s4 f s4 f s 3Gx s 3Gy s 3Gx
A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 B21 3 B12 ( B66 B11 )
sx sy s x sy sx sy 3 sxsy 2
s 3Gy
( B66 B22 ) (27)
sx 2sy
s2w s2w s2w s 2 w s 2 w* s 2 w s 2 w* s 2 w s 2 w* 1 s 2 w ¬
2 2 2 0.
sxsy sx sy 2 sxsy sxsy sx 2 sy 2 sy sx 2 R sx 2 ®
Eqs. (23) and (27) are basic nonlinear equations in terms of variables w , f and used to
investigate the nonlinear vibration of thick S-FGM circular cylindrical shells surrounded on
elastic foundations using the first order shear deformation theory.
w M x 0, N x N x 0 , N x 0 Px h at x 0, L. (28)
The mentioned conditions (28) can be satisfied identically if the buckling mode shape is
chosen by
w x, y, t
W t
sin Mm x sin En y,
Gx x, y, t
' x t
cos Mm x sin En y, (29)
Gy x, y, t
' y t
sin Mm x cos En y,
mQ n
where Mm , En , m, n 1, 2,... are the natural numbers of half waves in the
L R
corresponding direction x, y . W (t ) is the time dependent total amplitude and ' x , ' y are the
The initial imperfection w* is assumed to have the same form of the shell deflection w , i.e.
w* x, y
W0 sin Mm x sin En y, (30)
in which W0 is known initial amplitude.
Substituting Eqs. (29) and (30) into the compatibility equation (27), we define the stress
function as
1
f x, y, t
U1 t
cos 2Mm x U 2 t
cos 2En y U 3 (t )sin Mm x sin En y Px hy 2 , (31)
2
with
En2 Mm2
U1 W W W0
, U 2 W W W0
,
32 A11Mm2 32 A22En2
Mm2
U3 W
R ¡¢ A11Mm4 A22En4 ( A66 2 A12 )Mm2 En2 ¯°±
(32)
B21Mm3 ' x (t ) B12En3' y (t ) ( B66 B11 )MmEn2' x (t ) ( B66 B22 )Mm2 En ' y (t )¯
¡ ±° .
¢
A11Mm4 A22En4 ( A66 2 A12 )Mm2 En2 ¯
¡¢ °±
Replacing Eqs. (29) and (31) into the equations of motion (23) and then applying Galerkin
method we obtain
,
H 31W H 32' x H 33' y a9 (W W0 ) a10W (W 2W0 ) S1' y
Taking linear parts of Eqs. (33) and putting q 0 , the natural frequencies of the perfect shell
can be determined directly by solving determinant
H11 a1 I 0 X 2 H12 H13
H 21 a7 H 22 S1X 2 H 23 0. (34)
H 31 a9 H 32 H 33 S1X 2
Solving Eq. (34) yields three angular frequencies of the S-FGM cylindrical shell in the axial,
circumferential and radial directions, and the smallest one is being considered.
frequency of the load). The system Eqs. (33) have the form
d 2W dW
Io 2
2F I 0 H11W H12' x l13' y H14 (W W0 )' x H15 (W W0 )' y
dt dt
a1 (W W0 ) a2W (W W0 ) a3W (W 2W0 ) a4W (W W0 )(W 2W0 ) a5Q sin 8t a6 , (35)
H W H ' H ' a (W W ) a W (W 2W ) S ' ,
21 22 x 23 y 7 0 8 0 1 x
.
H 31W H 32' x H 33' y a9 (W W0 ) a10W (W 2W0 ) S1' y
By using Eqs. (35), three aspects are taken into consideration: fundamental frequencies of
natural vibration of the S-FGM cylindrical shell, frequency-amplitude relation of nonlinear
response and vibration of S-FGM shell. The nonlinear dynamical responses of the S-FGM
cylindrical shells can be obtained by solving this equation combined with initial conditions to
dW
be assumed as W (0) 0, (0) 0 by using the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method.
dt
For further research, we next consider the hypothetical case of rotations ' x , ' y exist, but the
inertial forces caused by the rotation angles ' x , ' y are small so they can be ignored. The
Solving the second and third obtained equations with respect to ' x and ' y then substituting
d 2W dW
Io 2
2FI 0 bW
1 b2 (W W0 ) b3W (W W0 ) b4W (W 2W0 )
dt dt (37)
b5W (W W0 )(W 2W0 ) b6 (W W0 ) 2 a5Q sin 8t a6 ,
In other hand, from Eq. (37) the fundamental frequencies of a perfect shell can be
determined approximately by an explicit expression
(b1 b2 )
Xmn . (38)
I0
Consider nonlinear vibration of a perfect shell, Eq. (37) has of the form
d 2W dW
Io 2
2FI 0 (b1 b2 )W (b3 b4 b6 )W 2 b5W 3 a5Q sin 8t a6 . (39)
dt dt
d 2W dW
2
2F JW 3 - GW 2 W
Xmn
2
F sin 8t M 0, (40)
dt dt
(b3 b4 b6 ) b5 aQ a
and G ,J ,F 5 ,M 6 .
(b1 b2 ) (b1 b2 ) Io I0
Seeking solution as W A sin 8t and applying Galerkin procedure to Eq. (40), the
amplitude-frequency relation of nonlinear forced vibration is obtained
4F 2 8 3 J 2 ¬ F 4M
82 8 X mn 1 GA
A
®
. (41)
Q 3Q 4 A AQ
4F 8 3 J 2 ¬ F 4M
C2 C 1 GA A 2 . (42)
QXmn
3Q 4 ® 2
AXmn AQXmn
For the nonlinear vibration of the shell without damping, this relation has of the form
8 3 J 2 ¬ F 4M
C 2 1 GA A 2 . (43)
3Q 4 ® 2
AXmn AQXmn
If F 0 , i.e. no excitation acting on the shell, the frequency-amplitude relation of the free
nonlinear vibration is obtained
2 8 3 J 2 ¬ 4 M
1 GA
2
X NL X mn A . (44)
3Q 4 ® AQ
In order to illustrate the present approach, we consider an FGM shell that consists of aluminum
(metal) and alumina (ceramic) with the following properties [46]
Ec 380q109 N / m 2 , Sc 3800kg / m3 ,
Em 70q109 N / m 2 , Sm 2702kg / m3 ,
vm 0.3177, O c 0.24.
hx hy 0.01m, d x d y 0.0025m,
2Q R L
m n 1, s x , sy ,
ns nr
where ns and nr are the number of strings, rings of the shell, respectively.
4.1. Validation
To validate the analysis, result for the natural frequencies of the isotropic circular cylindrical
shell obtained from expression Eq. (34) with N 0 (in this case, the S-FGM shell and the P-
FGM shell are same and they are made of full metal) is compared with Loy et al. [18]. In Table
1, the comparison shows that the present result is agreed well with those in the literature.
Fig. 2 and Table 2 show the comparison of dynamic response of the S-FGM shells in this paper
based on the first order shear theory and the results in Bich et al. [12] for the P-FGM shell
based on the classic theory with the same geometrical parameters without elastic foundations.
Clearly, in Table 2 we can see that there is very a little difference between natural frequencies,
but in Fig. 3, it is easy to recognize that the obtained amplitudes of frequency in this paper of
the S-FGM shell are smaller than the one of the P-FGM shell in [12].
Table 1
Comparison of natural frequencies (Hz) for the isotropic shells with N 0 (full metal),
m n 1, h / R 0.002, L / R 20, k1 k2 0.
0 12.921 12.898
Table 2
Comparison of variation of natural frequencies ( s1 ) against with volume fraction index N
with m n 1, L / R 2, h / R 0.002,
N 0 1 2 5 d
Natural frequencies X ( s1 ) 3702.6463 3605.410 3566.6169 3523.7947 3476.2697
Bich and Nguyen [12]
-4
x 10 Present
2
Bich [12]
1.5
0.5
A(m)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
t(s)
Fig. 3. Dynamic response of imperfect eccentrically stiffened FGM circular cylindrical shells.
-4
x 10 Using the full order equations (35)
2
Using equation (37)
1.5
0.5
A(m)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
t(s)
Fig. 4. The comparison of the nonlinear response calculated by the approximate Eq. (37) and
the full order Eqs. (35).
L / R 2, R / h 45, N 1, Px 0, m n 1, k1 k2 0, N 1,W0 0, F 0.1, q 3000sin(600t )
In this section, we use the above formulation to investigate the effects of the geometrical
characteristics of the shell, the pre-loaded axial compression, the elastic foundations and
dimensional ratios on the nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM circular cylindrical shells.
Table 3 shows that there are small differences between the natural frequencies from Eqs. (34)
and the one in Eq. (38). The obtained results also show that the natural frequencies of stiffened
shells are greater than ones of un-stiffened shells. The natural frequencies of stiffened and un-
stiffened FGM circular cylindrical shells observed to be dependent on the constituent volume
fractions, they decreases when increasing the power index N , furthermore with greater value
N the effects of stiffeners is observed to be stronger.
Table 3
Comparison of frequencies ( s1 ) calculated by Eq. (34) and Eq. (38) of the S-FGM shell with
R / h 45, L / R 2.
When the natural frequency of the shell is near to the frequency of the excitation, the
fluctuation amplitude-time curves have special shapes. Fig. 5 shows the nonlinear dynamic
responses of S-FGM shells with volume fraction index N 1 , natural frequency of the shell
X 1643 s1
under excitation 8 1775.6 s1
. The nonlinear dynamic responses with
8 1574.7 s1
are shown in Fig.6. The nonlinear dynamic responses with N 5 ,
X 1250.1 s1
, 8 1215.2 s1
are shown in Fig. 7. From above obtained figures, the
beating vibration phenomenon is observed when the frequency of the excitation is near to the
natural frequency of the shell. The number of the beats is smaller when increasing the power
law index N , i.e. the period of beat of nonlinear response is longer when the power law index
N increases.
-3
x 10
3
1
W(m)
-1
-2
-3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
t(s)
-3
x 10
4
1
W(m)
-1
-2
-3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
t(s)
Fig.6. Nonlinear response of the S-FGM shell with N 2 .
L / R 2, R / h 45, Px 0, m n 1, k1 k2 0,W0 0, F 0.1, Q 3000( N / m 2 )
-3
x 10
4
1
W(m)
-1
-2
-3
-4
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
t(s)
Fig. 8 shows the effects of the power law index N on the nonlinear dynamic response S-FGM
cylindrical shells. As can be seen, the amplitudes of nonlinear vibration of S-FGM shells
increase when increasing the power law index N . Fig. 9 depicts the influence of ratio length
L / R on the nonlinear response of S-FGM cylindrical shells. As can be observed, when the
ratio L / R decreases the amplitude of nonlinear dynamic decreases.
Fig. 10 shows influence of initial imperfection on nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM
shell. The increase imperfection will lead to the increase of the amplitude of maximum
deflection. Fig. 11 shows the effects of the ratio thickness R / h on the nonlinear dynamic
response of the S-FGM circular cylindrical shells. As our expectation, the amplitude of
nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shell decreases when decreasing the ratio R / h . Fig.
12 shows the effect of pre-loaded axial compression Px on the nonlinear response of the S-
FGM circular cylindrical shells. From the graph we can see that the amplitude of vibration of
the shells increases when the value of axial compressive load increases.
-4
x 10
4 N=1
N=2
3 N=3
1
W(m)
-1
-2
-3
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04
t(s)
Fig. 8. Effect of power law index N on nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shells.
L / R 2, R / h 45, Px 0, m n 1, k1 k2 0,W0 0, F 0.1, q 3000sin(2000t )
x 10
-4 L/R=2
1.5
L/R=1.5
L/R=1
1
0.5
0
W(m)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04
t(s)
Fig. 9. Effect of power law index L / R on nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shells.
R / h 45, N 1, Px 0, m n 1, k1 k2 0,W0 0, F 0.1, q 3000sin(600t )
-4
x 10 Wo=0
3
Wo=1e-5
Wo=5e-5
-1
-2
-3
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08
W(m)
Fig. 10. Influence of initial imperfection on nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shells.
-4
x 10
1.5
R/h=40
R/h=35
1
R/h=30
0.5
0
W(m)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05
t(s)
Fig. 11. Effect of power law index R / h on nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shells.
L / R 2, Px 0, m n 1, N 1, k1 k2 0,W0 0, F 0.1, q 3000sin(600t )
x 10
-4
Px=0
2
Px=300(MPa)
Px=600(MPa)
1.5
0.5
W(m)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
t(s)
Fig. 12. Effect of pre-loaded axial Px compression on nonlinear response of the S-FGM shells.
L / R 2, R / h 45, m n 1, N 1, k1 k2 0,W0 0, F 0.1, q 3000sin(2000t )
Figs. 13 and 14 show influence of elastic foundations on the nonlinear dynamic response of the
S-FGM shell. Obviously, elastic foundations played negative role on dynamic response of the
shell: the larger k1 and k2 coefficients are, the larger amplitude of deflection is. Fig 15 shows
the effect of eccentrically stiffeners the nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shell.
Clearly, the stiffeners played positive role in reducing amplitude of maximum deflection.
Fig. 13. Effect of the linear Winkler foundation on nonlinear dynamic response of the shells.
L / R 2, R / h 45, N 1, k1 (GPa.m), Px 0, m n 1,W0 0, F 0.1, q 3000sin(600t )
Fig.14. Effect of the Pasternak foundation on nonlinear dynamic response of the shells.
L / R 2, R / h 45, k2 (GPa.m), N 1, Px 0, m n 1,W0 0, F 0.1, q 3000sin(600t )
-4
x 10 Eccentrically Stiffened S-FGM shell
3
S-FGM shell without eccentrically stiffened shell
1
W(m)
-1
-2
-3
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
t(s)
The effect of excitation force amplitude Q on nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shell
is shown in Fig. 16. Three values of Q are used. As can be observed, the increase in excitation
force amplitude will lead to the increase of the S-FGM nonlinear response amplitudes.
Fig. 16. Effect of excitation force Q on nonlinear dynamic response of the S-FGM shells.
L / R 2, R / h 45, m n 1, N 1, k1 k2 0,W0 0, F 0.1, 8 600 s1
Fig. 17 shows the effect of excitation force Q on the frequency –amplitude of nonlinear
vibration of S-FGM circular cylindrical shells. Fig. 18 shows the effects of the external forces
and stiffeners on frequency – amplitude in forced vibration. Clearly, the amplitude of stiffened
shells is smaller one of un-stiffened shells.
Fig.17.The
T frequen
ncy – amplittude curve iin case of fforced vibraation.
L / R 2, R / h 45, m n 1, N 1, k1 k2 0,W0 0, F 0.1, 8 600 s1
5. Conclusions
This pap n analyticall approach to investigaate the nonnlinear dynaamic response and
per used an
vvibration of
o imperfecct eccentriccally stiffen
ned S-FGM
M thick cirrcular cylinndrical shellls with
m
metal-ceram
mic-metal layers
l using
g both of the
t first ordder shear ddeformationn theory annd stress
function. The urround on eelastic founndations andd subjected to axial
T S-FGM shell is assumed to su
and transveerse mechan
nical and damping
d mic response of the
loaads. Numerrical resultss for dynam
F
FGM shell are obtaineed by Rung
ge-Kutta method. The results obttained show
w the effectts of the
m
mechanicall loads, elaastic found
dations, outtside stiffenners and thhe dimensioonal ratios on the
dynamic response of the S-FGM circular cylindrical shell. The proposed results are validated
by comparing with other results reported in the literature.
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the Grant “Nonlinear analysis on stability and dynamics of
functionally graded shells with special shapes” code QG.14.02 of Vietnam National
University, Hanoi. The authors are grateful for this support.
Appendix A
2 2¬
2 ¯
¡ m Q °
¡ L2 R ® m Q °
2 2
n ¬°
2
H11 ¡¡ k k ,
¡ A m Q A m 2 n 2 Q 2 ¬ L R 2 ®°°
4 4 1 2 2
n4
¡ 11 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 °
L R ®
22
¡¢ L R4 °±
2 3 3¯
¡ ( B66 B11 ) mn 2Q B21 m Q °
mQ m 2 Q 2 ¬ ¡¢ LR L3 °±
H12 KI 30 ,
L L2 R ® m 4 Q 4 n4 m 2 n 2 Q 2 ¬
A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2
L R LR ®
m2n Q 2 n3 ¯°
¡ ( B B ) B
n m 2Q 2 ¬ ¡ 66
¢
22
L2 R
12
R 3 ±°
H13 KI 30 2 ,
R L R ® m 4Q 4 n4 m 2 n 2 Q 2 ¬
A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2
L R LR ®
2 3 3¯
¡ ( B66 B11 ) mn 2Q B21 m Q °
8mnQ 2 ¡¢ LR L3 °±
H14 ,
LR m 4 Q 4 n4 m 2 n 2 Q 2 ¬
A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2
L R LR ®
m2n Q 2 n 3 ¯°
¡ ( B B ) B
8mnQ 2 ¡¢ 66 22
L2 R L °±
12 3
H15 ,
LR m 4 Q 4 n4 m 2 n 2 Q 2 ¬
A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2
L R LR ®
m 2Q 2 n 2 ¬ m2Q 2 ¬
a1 KI 30 2 2 h Px 2 ,
L R ® L ®
m 2 Q 2 ¬
8mnQ 2 L2 R ®
a2 ,
3LR m 4 Q 4 n4 m 2 n 2 Q 2 ¬
A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2
L R LR ®
1 nL ¬
a3 ,
6 A11mR 2 ®
1 m 2Q 2 n 2 ¬ m 2Q 2 R 2 n 2 L2 ¬
a4 2 2 2 ,
8 L R ® L A22 n 2 R 2 A11m 2Q 2 ®
16
a5 ,
mnQ 2
16h Px ¬
a6 ,
mnQ 2 R ®
m 3n 2 Q 3 ¬ m 5Q 5 ¬
B21 5
L3 R 3 ® L R ®
H 21 ( B11 B66 ) ,
m 4Q 4 n 4
m 2 2 2¯
n Q m 4Q 4 n 4
m 2 2 2¯
n Q
¡ A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 ° ¡ A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 °
¡¢ L R L R °± ¡¢ L R L R °±
2
m 3Q 3 2 ¯
¡ B21 3 ( B66 B11 ) mn 2Q °
mQ ¬
2
n¬
2
¡¢ L LR °±
H 22 D11 D66 KI 30 ,
L ® R ® m 4Q 4 n 4
m 2 2 2¯
n Q
¡ A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 °
¡¢ L R L R °±
3 3 3 5 5¯
¡ B21 B12 m 3n Q3 B21 ( B66 B22 ) m 5nQ °
mnQ ¡¢ LR L R °±
H 23 D12 D66
,
LR m 4Q 4 n 4
m 2 2 2¯
n Q
¡ A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 °
¡¢ L R L R °±
mQ ¬
a7 KI 30
L ®
4 B21 n ¬
a8
3 A11 LR 2 ®
m 2Q 2 ¬
m 2 nQ 2 L2 R ®
H 31 ( B22 B66 )
L2 R m 4Q 4 n 4
m 2 2 2¯
n Q
¡ A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 °
¡¢ L R L R °±
m 2Q 2 ¬
L2 R ® n3
B12 ,
m 4Q 4 n 4
m 2 2 2¯
n Q R3
¡A A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 °
¡¢ 11 L4 R L R °±
2 n6 2 4 2¯
¡ B12 6 B12 ( B66 B22 ) m 2n Q4 °
mnQ ¡¢ R L R °±
H 32 D21 D66
LR m 4Q 4 4 2 2 2¯
¡ A11 4 A22 n 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) m 2n Q2 °
¡¢ L R L R °±
2
3 2 2 2¯
¡ B12 n 3 ( B66 B22 ) m 2n Q2 °
¢¡ R L R ±°
2 2
mQ ¬ n¬
H 33 D66 D22 KI 30 ,
L ® R ® m 4Q 4 n 4
m 2 2 2¯
n Q
¡ A11 4 A22 4 ( A66 2 A12 ) 2 2 °
¡¢ L R L R °±
n¬
a9 KI 30 ,
R ®
4 B12 mQ
a10 ,
3 A22 L2 R
I12
S1 I 2 .
I0
Appendix B
H 21H 33 H 23 H 31 H H H 32 H 21
b1 H11 H12 H13 22 31 ,
H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23 H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23
a7 H 33 a9 H 23 a H a9 H 22
b2 a1 H12 H13 7 32 ,
H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23 H 32 H 23 H 22 H 33
H 21H 33 H 23 H 31 H H H 32 H 21
b3 a2 H14 H15 22 31 ,
H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23 H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23
a8 H 33 a10 H 23 a H a10 H 22
b4 a3 H12 H13 8 32 ,
H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23 H 32 H 23 H 22 H 33
a10 H 23 a8 H 33 a H a8 H 32
b5 H14 H15 10 22 ,
H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23 H 32 H 23 H 22 H 33
a9 H 23 a7 H 33 a H a7 H 32
b6 H14 H15 9 22 .
H 22 H 33 H 32 H 23 H 32 H 23 H 22 H 33
References