Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philippines
Unlike the United States of America, which has an “at-will employment” doctrine, employers in
the Philippines can only terminate their relationship with an employee if a “just” or “authorized”
cause, as defined under the law, has been established, after undergoing due process. Thus,
terminating an employee in the country is taken VERY seriously and can be a complex process,
especially since, when in doubt, the Labor Code of the Philippines is construed in favor of labor.
Termination by Employer
According to Article 282 of the Labor Code, an employer can terminate an employee for just
causes, which could be any of the following:
serious misconduct or willful disobedience by the employee of the lawful orders of his
employer or representative in connection with his work;
gross and habitual neglect by the employee of his duties;
fraud or willful breach by the employee of the trust reposed in him by his employer or
duly authorized representatives;
commission of a crime or offense by the employee against the person of his employer or
any immediate member of his family or his duly authorized representatives; and
other similar causes.
Employers can also terminate an employee based on authorized causes like business and health
reasons. Art. 283 of the Labor Code states that an employee can be terminated due to business
reasons such as:
For termination of employment based on health reasons, employers are allowed to terminate
employees found suffering from any disease and whose continued employment is prohibited by
law or is prejudicial to his health as well as to the health of his co-workers (Art. 284, Labor
Code). The employer must obtain from a competent public health authority a certification that
the employee’s disease is of such a nature and at such a stage that it can no longer be cured
within a period of six (6) months even with medical attention.
Voluntary Resignation
This type of termination is strengthened by the provisions of Art. 285 of the Labor Code which
recognizes two kinds of termination an employee can initiate – without just cause and with just
cause. If the resignation is without just cause, the employee must give a one (1) month advance
written notice for resignation (commonly referred to as a “resignation letter”) to the employer to
enable them to look for a replacement and prevent work disruption. If the employee fails to
provide a resignation letter, he or she runs the risk of incurring liability for damages.
If the resignation is with just cause, however, the employee need not serve a resignation notice.
Art. 285 indicates the just causes for resignation as follows:
It should be noted that employees who voluntarily resign from work are not entitled to separation
pay. Philippine laws only grant separation pay to those who were dismissed from service not due
to their own fault or negligence but for reasons that are beyond their control, i.e. business
closure, cessation of operation, retrenchment (reduction of costs) to prevent losses, etc. However,
there are at least two cases where employees who resign voluntarily may be entitled to separation
pay, and they are as follows:
1. A written notice, commonly referred to as a notice to explain specifying the grounds for
termination and giving the employee ample opportunity to explain their side;
2. A hearing or conference to allow the employee to respond to the charge/s, present
evidence, or rebut the evidence presented against them; and
3. A notice of decision indicating the justification for termination as well as the
corresponding sanctions (if any) after due consideration of all evidence.
1. Submission of a written notice of dismissal to the employee specifying the grounds for
dismissal at least 30 days before the date of termination; and
2. A copy of the notice which shall be provided to the Regional Office of the Department of
Labor and Employment (DOLE) where the employer is located.
-The right to security of tenure is a Constitutional guarantee that means an employee cannot be
dismissed from the service for causes other than those provided by the law and only after due
process is accorded to them.
Can an employee be placed under suspension while the investigation and/or hearing for the
charges filed against them is ongoing?
-Yes, but only on grounds where the employee’s continued presence inside the company
premises poses a serious and imminent threat to the life or property of the employer and/or the
other employees in the company. The suspension, commonly referred to as “preventive
suspension”, shall not last for more than thirty (30) days.
According to Section 9 of Rule XXIII, Book V of the Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor
Code, as amended by Department Order No. 9, Series of 1997, an employee should be reinstated
to their former position or in a substantially equivalent position after the prescribed 30-day
period. If this could not be possible, the employer can extend the period of suspension provided
that during such period, he or she pays the wages and other benefits due to the employee. In such
cases, the worker shall not be bound to reimburse the amount paid to him during the extension if
the employer decides, after completion of the investigation and/or hearing, to dismiss the worker.
-Yes. The legality of a dismissal may be questioned before the Labor Arbiter of a Regional
Arbitration Branch of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) of the Philippines,
through a complaint for illegal dismissal. In establishments with a collective bargaining
agreement (CBA), the dismissal may be questioned through the grievance machinery established
under the CBA. If the complaint is not resolved at this level, it may be submitted to voluntary
arbitration.
-An employee may question their dismissal based on substantive or procedural grounds:
the substantive aspect pertains to the absence of a just or authorized cause supporting the
dismissal; and
the procedural aspect refers to the failure of the employer to give the employee the
opportunity to explain their side.
Suppose the employer denies dismissing the employee, who has the duty to prove that the
dismissal is without valid cause?
-The employee must elaborate, support, or substantiate their complaint that they were dismissed
without valid cause.
In cases of illegal dismissal, who has the duty of proving that the dismissal is valid?
-The employer.
What is the sanction if the employer failed to observe procedural due process in cases of legal
and authorized termination?
-The employee is entitled to payment of indemnity or nominal damages in a sum of not more
than 30,000 pesos in cases of termination for just causes and not more than 50,000 pesos for
authorized causes.
-An employee who is dismissed without just cause is entitled to any or all of the following:
What is reinstatement?
-Reinstatement means restoration of the employee to the position from which they were unjustly
removed.
Can an employee be reinstated to their previous position if they were proven to be illegally
dismissed?
-Yes. When a Labor Arbiter rules for an illegal dismissal, reinstatement is immediately
executory even when pending approval by the employer. The employee should be treated in a
matter involving seniority and continuity of employment as though they had not been dismissed
from work.
-Under the provisions of Art. 223 of the Labor Code, an employee shall be either admitted back
to work under the same terms and conditions prevailing prior to their dismissal or, at the option
of the employer, be reinstated by payroll. Payroll reinstatement is a means of paying wages and
other benefits to the employee without allowing or requiring them to physically report to work.
-Yes. When an establishment no longer exists at the time an order for reinstatement is made, the
employee can claim benefits. An employee is entitled to separation pay equivalent to one-month
pay or at least one-month pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. A fraction of at least
six months shall be considered as one whole year.
The period of service is deemed to have lasted up to the time of closure of the establishment. The
employee has the right to claim backwages to cover the period between dismissal from work and
business closure.
-Full backwages refer to all compensations, including allowances and other benefits with
monetary equivalent that should have been earned by the employee but was not collected
because of unjust dismissal. It includes all the amount they could have earned starting from the
date of dismissal up to the time of reinstatement.
-The amount given to the employee depends on the specific authorized cause for their
termination, which could be any of the following:
Constructive dismissal is illegal and usually occurs when an employee resigns as a result of
unfavorable work conditions instigated by the employer. It is typically resorted to by employers
who do not want to undergo the procedural due process involved in legally terminating an
employee.
-If the strike was organized for a valid purpose and conducted through means allowed by law,
the mere participation of an employee therein is not sufficient ground for an employer to
terminate their employment. An employee who participates in a lawful strike is not deemed to
have abandoned their employment but is merely exercising their constitutional right to self-
organization to protect their rights as an employee and/or obtain better working conditions.
However, if the strike was staged for a purpose not recognized by law, an employee who
knowingly participates in the commission of illegal acts during the strike may be declared to
have lost their employment status.
An exhaustive list of the labor policies in the Philippines, including those with regard to
Employee Separation, can be found in the official government publication of the Labor Code of
the Philippines (http://bwc.dole.gov.ph/images/Downloads/LaborCodeofthePhilippines2017.pdf)