TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES
P. Casal Campus, Manila
ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR511S4)
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTATION FORM FOR CHAPTER 4A: BUILDING SPACE PROGRAM
THESIS PROPONENT : _____________________________________________________________________________
PROJECT TITLE AND LOCATION : _____________________________________________________________________________
NO. DESCRIPTION LESS SATISFACTORY
The proponent was not able to
identify most of the spaces /
areas to be used by each user
type, in sequential order,
based on the analyzed user
4A1 User Flow Analysis flow and/or organizational
chart of users, resulting to a
very vague and/or erroneous
user flow analysis
1 pt
The proponent was not able to
correctly create a space
adjacency matrix based on the
user flow analysis and
proposed function of each
Space Adjacency
4A2 space, with a several entries
Matrix that were erroneous and/or
that the proponent cannot
successfully justify
1 pt
The proponent was not able to
clearly discuss the identified
design constraints, with most
parts of the discussion either
lacking or erroneous or
4A3a Design Constraints incompatible with the design
philosophy
1 pt
The proponent was not able to
clearly discuss verbally and
graphically how the design
considerations will be applied
in the proposed project, with
most parts either lacking or
4A3b Design Techniques vague and/or no graphical
discussion of the application of
the techniques in the proposed
project were given
1 pt
The proponent was not able to
correctly derive the total
number of users at any given
Accuracy of time in the proposed project
based on the shown demand
4A4a Computation for analysis source and proposed
Demand Analysis distribution of user
1 pt
SATISFACTORY
The proponent was able to
identify most of the spaces /
areas to be used by each user
type, in sequential order,
based on the analyzed user
flow and/or organizational
chart of users, with a few errors
and/or ambiguity in the user
flow analysis
3 pts
The proponent was able to
correctly create a space
adjacency matrix based on the
user flow analysis and
proposed function of each
space, with a few minor entries
that were erroneous and/or
that the proponent cannot
successfully justify
3 pts
The proponent was able to
discuss the identified design
constraints, but with a few
points in the discussion that
are missing and/or erroneous
or the proponent was not able
to relate the design
considerations to the design
philosophy
3 pts
The proponent was able to
discuss verbally and
graphically how the design
considerations will be applied
in the proposed project, but
with a few points in the
discussion that are missing
and/or the graphical discussion
of the application of the
techniques in the proposed
project were vague
3 pts
The proponent was able to
derive the total number of
users at any given time in the
proposed project based on the
shown demand analysis
source and proposed
distribution of user with a few
minor corrections
3 pts
VERY SATISFACTORY REMARKS
The proponent was able to
identify all the spaces / areas to
be used by each user type, in
sequential order, based on the
analyzed user flow and/or
organizational chart of users
5 pts
The proponent was able to
correctly create a space
adjacency matrix based on the
user flow analysis and
proposed function of each
space
5 pts
The proponent was able to
clearly discuss the identified
design constraints, including
the derivation of these
considerations from the design
philosophy
5 pts
The proponent was able to
clearly discuss verbally and
graphically the various ways of
how the design considerations
will be applied in the proposed
project
5 pts
The proponent was able to
correctly derive the total
number of users at any given
time in the proposed project
based on the shown demand
analysis source and proposed
distribution of user
5 pts
 The proponent was not able to
correctly compute for most of
the building space program in
Accuracy of relation to the demand
Computation for analysis, with several entries
4A4b that were erroneous and/or
Building Space
that the proponent cannot
Program successfully justify
The proponent was able to The proponent was able to
correctly compute for most of correctly compute for all the
the building space program in building space program in
relation to the demand analysis relation to the demand analysis
with a few minor entries that
were erroneous and/or that the
proponent cannot successfully
justify

1 pt
The proponent was not able to
correctly create a block plan
based on the user flow analysis
Adherence of Block and space adjacency matrix,
with several entries that were
4A4c Plan to Space erroneous and/or that the
Adjacency Matrix proponent cannot successfully
justify
3 pts 5 pts
The proponent was able to The proponent was able to
correctly create a block plan correctly create a block plan
based on the user flow analysis based on the user flow analysis
and space adjacency matrix, and space adjacency matrix
with a few minor entries that
were erroneous and/or that the
proponent cannot successfully
justify

1 pt 3 pts 5 pts
The proponent was not able to The proponent was able to The proponent was able to
Accuracy of correctly compute for most of correctly compute for most of correctly compute for all the
Computation for the building spatial the building spatial building spatial requirements in
requirements in relation to the requirements in relation to the relation to the project type and
Building Spatial
4A4d project type and pertinent law project type and pertinent law pertinent law provisions
Requirements provisions provisions with a few minor
based from corrections
Pertinent Laws
1 pt 3 pts 5 pts
The discussions under Building The discussions under Building The discussions under Building
Space Program was not Space Program was mostly Space Program was very
comprehensive and/or comprehensive and organized comprehensive and organized
unorganized that the juror can that the juror can clearly that the juror can clearly
have the notion that the assess that the proponent was assess that the proponent was
proponent was not able to plan able to plan the structures with able to plan the structures with
Overall the structures with optimized mostly optimized user flow and optimized user flow and spatial
Cohesiveness of user flow and/or keep the spatial provisions that are provisions within bounds of
Building Space spatial provisions within mostly within bounds of pertinent building laws,
bounds of pertinent building pertinent building laws, requirements and/or
Program laws, requirements and/or requirements and/or regulations
regulations because of several regulations, with a few minor
errors in optimization and/or errors in optimization and/or
adherence adherence

1 pt 2 pts 3 pts

_______________________________________
Signature Over Printer Name of Thesis Adviser