Husna Bagam Chapter IV Chat

CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE 4.1
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT
SL.NO GENDER NO OF THE RESPONDENT % OF
RESPONDENT
1 Male 51 51.0
2 Female 49 49.0
TOTAL 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the gender is 51% of the respondent is male and 49% of the
respondent are female.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are male in the
organization.
CHART 4.1

51
50.5
50
percentage
51
49.5
49
49
48.5
48
Male Female
GENGER
TABLE 4.2
AGE OF THE RESPONDENT
SL.NO AGE NO OF THE % OF
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Upto 20years 20 20.0
2 20-30 years 24 24.0
3 30-40 years 30 30.0
4 Above 40 years 26 26.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the age is 20% of the respondent is age group is up to 20 years,
24% of the respondent is age group is 20-30 years, 30% of the respondent are age group is
30-40 years, 26% of the respondent are age group is above 40 years.
From the above analysis it is interpreted that majority of respondents age are 30-40.In this
aged workers percentage is 30.
CHART 4.2

30
Percentage
20
10
0
Upto 20-30
20years 30-40
years Above 40
years
years
AGE
TABLE 4.3
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT
SL.NO MARITAL NO OF THE % OF

STATUS RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Married 57 57.0
2 Unmarried 43 43.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the marital status of the respondent are 57% of the respondent are
married and 43% of the respondent are unmarried.
From the above analysis it is interpreted that majority of respondents are married workers in
the organization.
CHART 4.3
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT
TMARITAL STATUS OF THE

60 RESPONDENT
50
PERCENTAGE
40
30
20
10
0
Married Unmarried
MARITAL STATUS
TABLE 4.4
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
SL.NO EDUCATION NO OF THE % OF
1 SSLC 18 18.0
2 HSC 24 24.0
3 Diploma 23 23.0
4 UG 19 19.0
5 PG 16 16.0
Total 100 100.0
Source:Primary Data
The above table shows that the qualification of the respondent is 18% of the employee
are completed sslc, 24% of the employee are completed hsc, 23% of the employee are
completed diploma ,19% of the employee are completed ug , 16% of the employee are
completed pg.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are education in workers
are higher secondary school.
CHART 4.4
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
25
EDUCATION OF THE RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
SSLC HSC Diploma UG PG
EDUCATION
TABLE 4.5
DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPODNENT
SL.NO DEPARTMENT NO OF THE % OF
1 HR 8 8.0
2 Production 35 35.0
3 R&D 16 16.0
4 Accounts 18 18.0
5 Others 23 23.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the 08% of the employee are working in hr department,
35% of the employee are working in production department, 16% of the employee are
working in R&D department, 18% of the employee are working in account department, 23%
of the employee are working in other department.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are worked in
production department of the organization.
CHART 4.5
35
30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
HR Production R&D Accounts Others
DEPARTMENT
TABLE 4.6
YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE COMPANY
SL.NO EXPERIENCE NO OF THE % OF

1 Upto 2 years 15 15.0
2 2-6 years 28 28.0
3 6-10 years 29 29.0
4 Above 10years 28 28.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the 15% of the employee are working in organization is up
to 2 years, 28% of the employee are working in organization is 2-6 years, 29% of the
employee are working in organization is 6-10 years, 28% of the employee are working in
organization is above 10 years.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 29% of the workers
in 6-10 years experience person in this organization.
CHART 4.6
YEARS OF SERVICE IN COMPANY
EXPERIENCE
30 OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
5
0
1
2
3
4
EXPERIENCE
TABLE 4.7
MONTHLY INCOME
SL.NO MONTHLY NO OF THE % OF

INCOM RESPONDEN RESPONDEN
T T
1 Below 10000 23 23.0
2 10000-15000 30 30.0
3 15000-20000 26 26.0
4 Above 20000 21 21.0
Total 100 100.0

The above table shows that the 23% of the employee are earn the monthly income is
below 10000, 30% of the employee are earn the monthly income is10000-15000, 26% of the
employee are earn the monthly income is 15000-20000 and 21% of the employee are earn the
monthly income is above 20000.
in monthly income is 10000-150000.
CHART 4.7
MONTHLY INCOME
INCOME OF THE RESPONDENT

30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Below 10000 10000-15000 15000-20000 Above 20000
MONTHLY INCOM
TABLE 4.8
SATISFIED WITH THE EXISTING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

1 Strongly agree 17 17.0
2 Agree 24 24.0
3 Neutral 27 27.0
4 Disagree 15 15.0
5 Strongly disagree 17 17.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with the
existing performance appraisal system is needed in organization, 24% of the respondent are
said that agree, , 27% of the respondent are says that neutral that existing performance
appraisal system, 15% of the respondent are says that disagree that existing performance
appraisal system, 17% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that existing
performance appraisal system.
are satisfied and existing of performance.
CHART 4.8
SATISFIED WITH THE EXISTING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE OF THE RESPONDENT
30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
PERFORMANCE
TABLE 4.9
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IS NEEDED IN ORGANIZATION
2 Agree 22 22.0
3 Neutral 24 24.0
4 Disagree 22 22.0
Total 100 100.0
existing performance appraisal system is needed in organization, 22% of the respondent are
said that agree, , 24% of the respondent are says that neutral that performance appraisal
system, 22% of the respondent are says that disagree that performance appraisal system,
15% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .
in needed to the performance of the organization.
CHART 4.9
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IS NEEDED IN ORGANIZATION
25
NEED OF THE RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
agree disagree
PERFORMANCE NEED
TABLE 4.10
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSESSED BY SELF,
SUPERIOR OR CONSULTANT

2 Agree 15 15.0
3 Neutral 28 28.0
4 Disagree 23 23.0
Total 100 100.0
performance of the organization is assessed , 15% of the respondent are says that agree,
28% of the respondent are says that neutral with performance of the organization is
assessed, 23% of the respondent are says that disagree ,24% of the respondent are says that
strongly disagree with performance of the organization is assessed.
are self superior of the organization.
CHART 4.10
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSESSED BY SELF,
SUPERIOR OR CONSULTANT
ORGANIZATION OF THE RESPONDENT

30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
agree disagree
ORGANIZATION
TABLE 4.11
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HELPS TO WIN COOPERATION AND TEAM
WORK

2 Agree 19 19.0
3 Neutral 31 31.0
4 Disagree 25 25.0
Total 100 100.0

The above table shows that the 13% of the respondent are strongly agree with the win
cooperation and team work , 19% of the respondent are says that agree, 31% of the
respondent are says that neutral , 25% of the respondent are says that disagree that win
cooperation and team work ,12% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with win
cooperation and team work.
are performed in team work in organization.
CHART 4.11
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HELPS TO WIN COOPERATION AND TEAM
WORK
TEAM WORK OF THE RESPONDENT

40
PERCENTAGE
30
20
10
0
agree disagree
TEAM WORK
TABLE 4.12
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL IN REDUCING GRIEVANCE

AMONG THE EMPLOYEES

2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 28 28.0
4 Disagree 19 19.0
Total 100 100.0
reducing grievance among the employees, 23% of the respondent are says that agree, 28%
of the respondent are says that neutral , 19% of the respondent are says that disagree ,13%
of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with reducing grievance among the
employees.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the
employees are helpful reducing the organization.
CHART 4.12
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL IN REDUCING GRIEVANCE

AMONG THE EMPLOYEES
30
EMPLOYEES OF THE RESPONDENT
25
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
EMPLOYEES
TABLE 4.13
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL FOR IMPROVING PERSONNEL
SKILL
2 Agree 29 29.0
3 Neutral 21 21.0
4 Disagree 21 21.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the 12% of the respondent are strongly agree with
performance appraisal is helpful for improving personnel skill , 29% of the respondent are
says that agree, 21% of the respondent are says that neutral , 21% of the respondent are
says that disagree ,17% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with performance
appraisal is helpful for improving personnel skill.
employees are improving personal skill in the organization.
CHART 4.13
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL FOR IMPROVING PERSONNEL
SKILL
IMPROVING OF THE RESPONDENT

30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly
Agree
agree Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
IMPROVING
TABLE 4.14
TRAINING PROGRAMMERS ARE EFFECTIVE FOR INDIVIDUAL AND
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT

2 Agree 18 18.0
3 Neutral 32 32.0
4 Disagree 28 28.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the 09% of the respondent are strongly agree with effective
for individual and organization development , 18% of the respondent are says that agree
with effective for individual and organization development , 32% of the respondent are says
that neutral , 28% of the respondent are says that disagree ,13% of the respondent are says
that strongly disagree with effective for individual and organization development.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 32% of the employees
are effective and development in the organization.
CHART 4.14
TRAINING PROGRAMMERS ARE EFFECTIVE FOR INDIVIDUAL AND
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT OF THE RESPONDENT

35
30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
5
0
agree disagree
DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 4.15
THE PERFORMANCE RATINGS WERE DONE PERIODICALLY

2 Agree 20 20.0
3 Neutral 30 30.0
4 Disagree 19 19.0
Total 100 100.0
performance ratings were done periodically, 20% of the respondent are says that agree with
performance ratings were done periodically, 30% of the respondent are says that neutral ,
19% of the respondent are says that disagree ,14% of the respondent are says that strongly
disagree with performance ratings were done periodically.
are high level of the performance rating in this organization.
CHART 4.15
THE PERFORMANCE RATINGS WERE DONE PERIODICALLY
RATINGS OF THE RESPONDENT

30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly
Agree
agree Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
RATING
TABLE 4.16
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM HELPS TO IDENTIFY THE
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE EMPLOYEE

2 Agree 25 25.0
3 Neutral 21 21.0
4 Disagree 22 22.0
Total 100 100.0
The above table shows that the 21% of the respondent are strongly agree with identify
the strength and weakness of the employee , 25% of the respondent are says that agree,
21% of the respondent are says that neutral with identify the strength and weakness of the
employee , 22% of the respondent are says that disagree ,11% of the respondent are says
that strongly disagree that identify the strength and weakness of the employee.
are strength and weakness of the organization.
CHART 4.16
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM HELPS TO IDENTIFY THE
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE EMPLOYEE
25
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
agree disagree
STRENGTH & WEAKNESS
TABLE 4.17
THE PERFORMANCE RATING IS HELPFUL FOR THE MANAGEMENT TO
PROVIDE EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING

2 Agree 21 21.0
3 Neutral 23 23.0
4 Disagree 26 26.0
Total 100 100.0
management to provide employee counselling, 21% of the respondent are says that agree,
23% of the respondent are says that neutral , 26% of the respondent are says that disagree
,15% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that management to provide employee
counselling.
are attened the organization counselling.
CHART 4.17
THE PERFORMANCE RATING IS HELPFUL FOR THE MANAGEMENT TO
PROVIDE EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING
30
EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING OF THE
25
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
COUNSELLING
TABLE 4.18
MANAGEMENT FIXES SALARY THROUGH THE PERFORMANCE RATING

2 Agree 20 20.0
3 Neutral 26 26.0
4 Disagree 28 28.0
Total 100 100.0

The above table shows that the 14% of the respondent are strongly agree with salary
through the performance rating , 20% of the respondent are says that agree with salary
through the performance rating , 26% of the respondent are says that neutral , 28% of the
respondent are says that disagree ,12% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that
salary through the performance rating.
employees are fixed salary in this organization.
CHART 4.18
MANAGEMENT FIXES SALARY THROUGH THE PERFORMANCE RATING
30
FIXES SALARY OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
agree disagree
FIXES SALARY
TABLE 4.19
PERFORMANCE RATING HELPS TO FIX INCREMENT
2 Agree 18 18.0
3 Neutral 31 31.0
4 Disagree 29 29.0
Total 100 100.0
performance rating helps to fix increment , 18% of the respondent are says that agree with
performance rating helps to fix increment, 31% of the respondent are says that neutral , 29%
of the respondent are says that disagree that performance rating helps to fix increment ,11%
of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .
are fixes increment in the organization.
CHART 4.19
PERFORMANCE RATING HELPS TO FIX INCREMENT
FIX INCREMENT OF THE RESPONDENT

35
30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
5
0
agree disagree
FIX INCREMENT
TABLE 4.20
TRANSFER, DEMOTION, SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL IS BASED ON
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 24 24.0
4 Disagree 17 17.0
Total 100 100.0
INTERPRETATION
dismissal is based on performance appraisal, 23% of the respondent are says that agree with
dismissal is based on performance appraisal, 24% of the respondent are says that neutral ,
17% of the respondent are says that disagree ,20% of the respondent are says that strongly
disagree with dismissal is based on performance appraisal.
employees are based performance in the organization.
CHART 4.20
TRANSFER, DEMOTION, SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL IS BASED ON
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
25
BASED PERFORMANCE OF THE
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
agree disagree
BASED PERFORMANCE
TABLE 4.21
THE DESIRED TARGET OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ACHIEVED THROUGH
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

2 Agree 19 19.0
3 Neutral 26 26.0
4 Disagree 20 20.0
Total 100 100.0
achieved through the performance appraisal, 19% of the respondent are says that agree with
, 26% of the respondent are says that neutral , 20% of the respondent are says that disagree
with achieved through the performance appraisal,20% of the respondent are says that
strongly disagree the achieved through the performance appraisal.
employees are achieve the performance in the organization.
CHART 4.21
THE DESIRED TARGET OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ACHIEVED THROUGH
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
30
TARGET OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
agree disagree
TARGET
TABLE 4.22
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INCREASES EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION

2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 29 29.0
4 Disagree 14 14.0
Total 100 100.0
performance appraisal increases employee motivation, 23% of the respondent are says that
agree with , 29% of the respondent are says that neutral , 14% of the respondent are says
that disagree ,20% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that performance
appraisal increases employee motivation.
are increases the motivation in this organization.
CHART 4.22
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INCREASES EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION
30
MOTIVATION OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
agree disagree
MOTIVATION
TABLE 4.23
APPRAISAL SYSTEM KEEPS ON THE MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT AND FAILURE
OR SUCCESS OF WORK

2 Agree 18 18.0
3 Neutral 22 22.0
4 Disagree 23 23.0
Total 100 100.0

achievement and failure or success of work, 18% of the respondent are says that agree with
achievement and failure or success of work , 22% of the respondent are says that neutral that
achievement and failure or success of work, 23% of the respondent are says that disagree
,21% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .
are achievement and failure in the organization.
CHART 4.23
APPRAISAL SYSTEM KEEPS ON THE MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT AND FAILURE

OR SUCCESS OF WORK
ACHIEVEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT

25
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
agree disagree
ACHIEVEMENT
TABLE 4.24
HAVE A SEPARATE COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL RESULT

2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 28 28.0
4 Disagree 23 23.0
Total 100 100.0

The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with review
the performance appraisal result , 23% of the respondent are says that agree , 28% of the
respondent are says that neutral , 23% of the respondent are says that disagree with review
the performance appraisal result ,09% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that
review the performance appraisal result.
employees are separate committee in this organization.
CHART 4.24
HAVE A SEPARATE COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE

APPRAISAL RESULT
30
COMMITEE OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
agree disagree
COMMITEE

Husna Bagam Chapter IV Chat

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Husna Bagam Chapter IV Chat

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER IV

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT

AGE OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO MARITAL NO OF THE % OF

TMARITAL STATUS OF THE

SL.NO EXPERIENCE NO OF THE % OF

SL.NO MONTHLY NO OF THE % OF

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

INCOME OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

ORGANIZATION OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

TEAM WORK OF THE RESPONDENT

THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL IN REDUCING GRIEVANCE

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL IN REDUCING GRIEVANCE

IMPROVING OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

DEVELOPMENT OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

RATINGS OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

FIX INCREMENT OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

APPRAISAL SYSTEM KEEPS ON THE MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT AND FAILURE

ACHIEVEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

HAVE A SEPARATE COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE

You might also like