You are on page 1of 9

MSc Pol

Preventing Terrorism in Multicultural Europe 271016 (6444SPTMUY)


No. of responses = 13

Survey Results

Legend Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev. Mean

25% 0% 50% 0% 25%


Question text Left pole Right pole n=No. of responses
av.=Mean
dev.=Std. Dev.
ab.=Abstention

1 2 3 4 5
Scale Histogram

General

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7,7% 38,5% 38,5% 15,4%


How would you rate the overall quality of this course on n=13
av.=8,6
a scale from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) dev.=0,9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 23,1% 53,8% 15,4% 7,7%


How would you evaluate the course material on a scale n=13
av.=8,1
from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) dev.=0,9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0% 0% 7,7% 38,5% 53,8%


The provision of course information (e.g. e-prospectus, disagree agree n=13
av.=4,5
blackboard) is good dev.=0,7

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 61,5% 38,5% 0%
In the light of the number of ECs awarded for this course too light too heavy n=13
av.=3,4
(1 EC = 28 hours), the actual study load of this course is dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

Organization
0% 0% 0% 23,1% 76,9%
The course is well designed disagree agree n=13
av.=4,8
dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 15,4% 23,1% 61,5%


The course is well organized disagree agree n=13
av.=4,5
dev.=0,8

1 2 3 4 5

Classes
0% 0% 0% 53,8% 46,2%
How many classes did you attend? (1= less than 25%, 1 5 n=13
av.=4,5
2= 25-50%, 3= 51-75%, 4= more than 75%, 5= all) dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0% 30,8% 69,2%
How much did you learn from the classes? very little very much n=13
av.=4,7
dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 1


Assignments
0% 0% 0% 23,1% 76,9%
The assignments in this course were instructive disagree agree n=13
av.=4,8
dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0% 23,1% 76,9%
The assignments in this course covered the assigned disagree agree n=13
av.=4,8
reading and the lectures dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 23,1% 38,5% 38,5%


The feedback on my assignments was instructive disagree agree n=13
av.=4,2
dev.=0,8

1 2 3 4 5

Instructor(s) FR

0% 0% 0% 38,5% 61,5%
The instructor explained the course material clearly disagree agree n=13
av.=4,6
dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0% 15,4% 84,6%
The instructor stimulated my thinking disagree agree n=13
av.=4,8
dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0% 16,7% 83,3%
The instructor stimulated active involvement in the disagree agree n=12
av.=4,8
course dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0% 23,1% 76,9%
How would you evaluate Francesco Ragazzi? very poor very good n=13
av.=4,8
dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

Knowledge and understanding gained

0% 0% 0% 15,4% 84,6%
The course deepened my knowledge and understanding disagree agree n=13
av.=4,8
of the subject of the course dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 2


Profile
Subunit: FSW Politicologie
Name of the instructor: MSc Pol
Name of the course: Preventing Terrorism in Multicultural Europe 271016
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

General

How would you rate the overall quality of this course


on a scale from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) n=13 av.=8,6 md=9,0 dev.=0,9

How would you evaluate the course material on a


scale from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) n=13 av.=8,1 md=8,0 dev.=0,9

The provision of course information (e.g. e- disagree agree


prospectus, blackboard) is good n=13 av.=4,5 md=5,0 dev.=0,7

In the light of the number of ECs awarded for this too light too heavy
course (1 EC = 28 hours), the actual study load of n=13 av.=3,4 md=3,0 dev.=0,5
this course is

Organization

The course is well designed disagree agree


n=13 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4

The course is well organized disagree agree


n=13 av.=4,5 md=5,0 dev.=0,8

Classes

How many classes did you attend? (1= less than 1 5


25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 51-75%, 4= more than 75%, n=13 av.=4,5 md=4,0 dev.=0,5
5= all)
How much did you learn from the classes? very little very much
n=13 av.=4,7 md=5,0 dev.=0,5

Assignments

The assignments in this course were instructive disagree agree


n=13 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4

The assignments in this course covered the disagree agree


assigned reading and the lectures n=13 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4

The feedback on my assignments was instructive disagree agree


n=13 av.=4,2 md=4,0 dev.=0,8

Instructor(s) FR

The instructor explained the course material clearly disagree agree


n=13 av.=4,6 md=5,0 dev.=0,5

The instructor stimulated my thinking disagree agree


n=13 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4

The instructor stimulated active involvement in the disagree agree


course n=12 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4

How would you evaluate Francesco Ragazzi? very poor very good
n=13 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4

02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 3


Knowledge and understanding gained

The course deepened my knowledge and disagree agree


understanding of the subject of the course n=13 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4

02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 4


Comments Report

Open Comments

Comments:

02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 5


02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 6
02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 7
02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 8
02.12.2016 EvaSys evaluation Page 9

You might also like