Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Base Plates with Small Moments Base Plates with Large Moments
T=
0
2
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
AISC Design Guide 1, 2nd Edition
3
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
AISC Specification 360-10
4
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Other References
5
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Base Plates
TODAY’S TOPICS
6
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate and Anchor Rod
Materials and Details
7
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate Material, Fabrication and Finishing
Base Plate Material
• Typical A36 Steel.
• 1/8 in. (3 mm) increments to 1-1/4 in (32 mm) then ½ in. (6 mm).
• Minimum thickness ½ in. (13 mm): Typical minimum thickness is
¾ in. (20 mm).
8
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate Material, Fabrication and Finishing
Fabrication and Finishing
• Plate is thermally cut.
• Holes drilled or thermally cut.
• Specification Section M2.2 has requirements for thermal cutting.
• Finishing: Specification Section M2.8.
< 2 in. (50 mm) milling not generally required.
2 – 4 in.(50 – 100 mm) straightened by pressing or milling.
> 4 in. (100 mm) milling required.
Milling is needed only where column base bears.
• Bottom surface when grout is used need not be milled.
• Top surface not milled if complete-joint-penetration (CJP) welds.
11
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Materials and Details
Anchor Rod Material (AISC Design Guide 1)
16
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSEA)
OSEA Safety Standards for Steel Erection (2008)
• Minimum of four anchor rods.
• Base plate and anchor rods to resist eccentric gravity load of
300 lb (1,300 N), 18 in. (450 mm) from extreme outer face of
the column in each direction.
• 300 lb (1,300 N) represents weight of an iron worker with tools.
• Exception: No requirements for post-type columns weighing
less than 300 lb (1,300 N). 18 in.
• Anchor rods can be inside or outside
of column footprint. 300 lb
18
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plates for
Axial Compression
19
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Design Limit States
• Base Plate Bending
• Concrete Crushing
20
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Plate Bending
0.95h
0.95d 0.80d
2 f pu ( m ' 2 )
t p , min =
0 .9 F y
22
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Plate Bending
• Required concrete bearing area is less than bfd.
• “Lightly Loaded Base Plate”
bf
Bearing Area
23
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Plate Bending
• Concatenation of Heavy and Lightly Loaded Base Plates
24
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Concrete Crushing Design Strength
Specification Section J8. Column Bases and Bearing on Concrete
φc Pp = 0.65Pp
(a) On the full area of a concrete support
Pp = 0.85fc′A1 (J8-1)
(b) On less than the full area of a concrete support
Pp = 0.85fc′ A1 A 2 / A1 ≤ 1.7fc′ A1 (J8-2)
26
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Variation of φPn with Increasing Base Plate Thickness
φPn
m or n > λ n’
BN = bfd
λn’
Required tp
27
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Was the base plate too strong?
28
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plates for
Axial Tension
29
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Connection Limit States
30
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Anchor Rod Tensile Rupture Design Strength
φTn = φ FntAb
where φ = 0.75
Fnt = 0.75Fu (0.75 accounts for tensile area at threads)
Fu = specified minimum tensile strength of anchor rod
= 58 ksi (300 MPa) for Gr 36
= 75 ksi (400 MPa) for Gr 55
= 125 ksi (650 MPa) for Gr 125
31
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Concrete Pullout Design Strength
• Provisions in ACI 318-10, Section D5.3
• Design pullout design strength of headed
anchor rod or anchor rod with nut:
φNp = φ ψ4Abrg8f’c
where φ = 0.70
ψ4 = 1.4 for no cracking, 1.0 if cracking exists
Abrg = net bearing area of the anchor rod head or nut, in2
f’c = specified compression strength of concrete, psi
32
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Concrete Pullout Strength
• AISC Design Guide 1 Table for Strengths with Heavy Hex Nuts
g2
g1
35
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Base Plate Bending Strength
• Other possible bend lines.
Critical
Section
Critical bf + 1 in.
Section
37
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Connection Limit States
• Concrete Crushing
• Anchor Rod Tensile Strength
• Concrete Pull-out Strength
• Concrete Anchorage Tensile Strength
• Base Plate Bending Strength
Cases
• T = 0 (Relatively small moment)
• T > 0 (Relatively large moment)
38
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Limit for T = 0
∑Fy = 0 with T=0 Base Plate is B by N in plan.
Pr = qY = fpBY
∑Mo = 0
Pre = qY2/2 – PrN/2
Solving
T=0
e = N/2 – Y/2 only if fp < fp,max
Y = N - 2e
with
fp ,max = 0.65x0.85fc′ A 2 / A1 ≤ 0.65x 1.7fc′
Then ecrit = N/2 –Pr/(2Bfp,max) If e < ecrit, T =0, Y = N-2e with
ecrit = N/2 –Pr/(2Bfp,max)
39
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
For T > 0
e > ecrit and fp = fp,max (qmax = fp,max B)
∑Fy = 0 o
Pr – T – fp,maxBY =0
∑Mo = 0
T(N/2+f) + Pr(N/2) – Pre – fp,maxBY2/2 = 0
41
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Shear Anchorage of Base Plates
Methods for Transferring Shear Forces (ACI 318-10 and ACI 349-06)
• Friction between base plate and grout or concrete surface.
φVn = φμPu < φ0.2fc’Ac or φ800Ac
where φ = 0.75
μ = coefficient of friction = 0.4
Pu = factored compressive axial force
Ac = plan area of base plate, BN
• Bearing of the column and base plate and/or shear lug against
concrete.
43
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection
Procedures
44
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
Anchor rods are positioned and placed in the concrete before it
cures. Plastic caps are placed over the anchor rods to protect
laborers.
45
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
Concrete block-outs may be made so that the base plate and
anchor rods are recessed below floor level for safety and aesthetics
in the completed building.
46
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
May have to increase hole sizes because of misplaced anchor
rods.
47
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
Anchor rodnuts below the plate are set at proper elevation and
then column is erected. Grout will be placed under and around the
base plate to transfer axial forces to the concrete below.
48
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
At least it should be!
49
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
50
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location – a very common problem.
51
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location.
52
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location.
53
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Problems with anchor rod placement.
54
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location. Column strength?
55
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location because
of misreading the drawing.
56
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rod too short.
57
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods too long.
58
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Shop rework required for column and base plate.
59
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Poor Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods run over by a crane.
60
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Poor Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods run over by something.
61
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Instituto Mexicano de la Construcción en Acero A. C. (IMCA)
The soon to be published IMCA Code of Standard Practice will
• Require the fabricator to provide templates for anchor rod
setting.
• Require the templates be designed to insure the correct
position both vertically and horizontally.
• Require the templates to insure the correct length of the
anchor rod above the concrete surface.
• Require the templates to leave permanent marks of the
building axes in the concrete surface.
• Require that the price of the templates be the average price
of the structural steel.
62
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
63
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
64
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Leveling nuts
to be adjusted
prior to setting
column.
65
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
66
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
67
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
68
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
69
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Grout Holes
70
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
71
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
72
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
73
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero
Gracias!!
74
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Ex.: Determine if the base plate shown is adequate.
Pu = 250 kips
Column: W10x33 d = 9.73 in. bf = 7.96 in.
PL 1-½ x 18 x 1’-6” F1554 Gr 36
Concrete Pedestal:
24 in. by 24 in. (assume square)
fc′ = 3.0 ksi
o o
18”
24”
o o
18”
24”
75
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Concrete Crushing
A2
φPp = φ 0.85 fc′A 1 o o
A1
18”
24”
= 0.65 (0.85 × 3.0 ) (324 ) 1.78
o o
= 716 kips > 250 kips OK
18”
24”
76
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending
2f pu 2
tp = where l = max {m, n, λn′′}
0.9Fy 7.96”
λn’:
9.73” 9.24” 18”
2 X
λ =
1+ 1-X 4.38”
4 db f
X =
(d + b f )2 5.82 6.37 5.82
18”
n′= (1 / 4 ) db f
77
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending
Column: W10x33 d = 9.73 in. bf = 7.96 in.
n = 5.82 in. m = 4.38 in.
λn’:
n ′ = (1 / 4 ) db f 7.96”
= (1 / 4 ) 9 .73 x 7 .96
= 2 .20 in . 4.38”
78
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending
λn’:
2 X 2 0 . 346
λ = =
1+ 1-X 1 + 1 - 0 . 346 7.96”
= 0 . 650 ≤ 1 . 0
λ n ' = 0 . 650 x 2 . 20 = 1 . 43 in . 4.38”
4.38”
l = max {m, n, λn′′}
= max {4.38, 5.82, 1.43} = 5.82 in.
5.82 6.37 5.82
fpu = Pu /BN = 250/(18x18) 18”
= 0.772 ksi
79
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending
4.38”
80
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Ex. Determine the design strength, φTn, for the limit
state of anchor rod tension rupture. 4 - ¾ in.
(20 mm) diameter, F1554 Grade 36 (Fu = 58 ksi)
anchor rods
81
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 1. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 940 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution: Conservatively assume A2/A1 = 1
fp ,max = 0.65x0.85fc′ A 2 / A1
= 0.65x0.85x4.0 1.0 = 2.21 ksi
e = Mu/Pu = 940/376 = 2.50 in.
ecrit = N/2 –Pr/(2Bfp,max)
= 19.0/2 – 376/(2x19.0x2.21)
= 5.02 in.
e = 2.50 < ecrit = 5.02 → T = 0 and
Y = N-2e = 19.0 – 2x 2.50 = 14.0 in.
82
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 1. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 940 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:
fp = Pu/(BY) = 376/(19.0x14.0) = 1.41 ksi < Fp,max = 2.21 ksi
2f pu n 2 2 x1.41x 4.62 2
tp = = = 1.36 in .
0.9Fy 0.9 x 36
Use PL 1½ x 19 x 1ft 7 in. A36
4 – ¾ in. Anchor Rods x 12 in.
F1554 Gr 36 w/ heavy hex nuts
83
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution:
fp ,max = 0.65x0.85fc′ A 2 / A1
= 0.65x0.85x4.0 1.0 = 2.21 ksi
2f pu m 2 2 x1.82 x 4.62 2
tp = = = 1.54 in .
0.9Fy 0.9 x 36
86
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:
Tu = fp,max BY – Pu
= 2.21x19.0x10.9 – 376 = 81.7 kips
Try 2 – Anchor Rods each Side
Required plate thickness:
x = f – 0.95d/2 = 8.0 -0.95x12.7/2
= 1.96 in.
x
w = bf + 1.0 = 12.2 + 1.0 = 13.2 in. f
4Tu x 4 x 81 .7 x1.96
t p ,min = = = 1.22 in . Use PL1 ½ x 19 x
0.9Fy w 0.9 x 36 x13 .2 1ft 7 in. A36
Compression controls
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
87
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:
Tu,rod = 81.7/2 = 40.9 kips per anchor rod
Try 1 -1/4 in. diameter A1554 Gr 36, Fu = 58 ksi
Check Pullout:
From AISC Design Guide 1, Table 3.2, φTn = 70.1 kips > 40 kips OK
88
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.