You are on page 1of 89

XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero

Anclas y Placas Base para


Columnas
Thomas M. Murray, PhD, P.E.
Emeritus Professor Virginia Tech

Del 4 al 7 de marzo de 2015. México D.F.


Types of Column Base Plates
Compressive Axial Loads Tensile Axial Loads

Base Plates with Small Moments Base Plates with Large Moments

T=
0

2
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
AISC Design Guide 1, 2nd Edition

3
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
AISC Specification 360-10

PERTINENT SECTIONS AND TABLES


Chapter J DESIGN OF CONNECTIONS
Table J3.2 Nominal Strength of
Fasteners and Threaded Parts
J8. Column Bases and Bearing on
Concrete
Chapter M FABRICATION and ERECTION
M2.2 Thermal Cutting
M2.8 Finish of Column Bases
M4.4 Fit of Column Compression Joints
and Base Plates

4
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Other References

5
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Base Plates

TODAY’S TOPICS

• Base Plate and Anchor Rod Material and Details


• Base Plates for Axial Compression
• Base Plates for Axial Tension
• Base Plates for Axial Compression and Moment
• Shear Anchorage
• Column Erection Procedures
• Anchor Rod Placement Problems

6
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate and Anchor Rod
Materials and Details

7
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate Material, Fabrication and Finishing
Base Plate Material
• Typical A36 Steel.
• 1/8 in. (3 mm) increments to 1-1/4 in (32 mm) then ½ in. (6 mm).
• Minimum thickness ½ in. (13 mm): Typical minimum thickness is
¾ in. (20 mm).

8
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate Material, Fabrication and Finishing
Fabrication and Finishing
• Plate is thermally cut.
• Holes drilled or thermally cut.
• Specification Section M2.2 has requirements for thermal cutting.
• Finishing: Specification Section M2.8.
< 2 in. (50 mm) milling not generally required.
2 – 4 in.(50 – 100 mm) straightened by pressing or milling.
> 4 in. (100 mm) milling required.
Milling is needed only where column base bears.
• Bottom surface when grout is used need not be milled.
• Top surface not milled if complete-joint-penetration (CJP) welds.

Note: Milled area


is only at column
base location.
9
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate Material, Fabrication and Finishing
Base Plate Welding
• Fillet welds preferred up to ¾ in. (20 mm) then groove welds.
• Avoid all around symbol.
• Weld for wide-flange columns subject to axial compression:
Weld on one side of column flanges
to avoid rotating the section.

• HSS subject to axial compression: Weld flats only.

• Exception: Weld all around when corrosion is a consideration.


10
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plate Material, Fabrication and Finishing
Base Plate Welding
• Shear, Tension, Moment, and Combinations:
Size weld for forces not all around.
No weld at fillets of wide-flange columns.
Must weld at corners of HSS if tension or moment exists.
• Shop welding preferred.
• Very heavy base plates may be field welded after grouting.

Note: Milled area


is only at column
Leveling base location.
screw

11
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Materials and Details
Anchor Rod Material (AISC Design Guide 1)

• Preferred material is ASTM F1554 Gr 36 except when there is


high tension and/or high moment.
• X-threads eXcluded; N-threads iNcluded in shear plane.
12
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Materials and Details
Anchor Rod Material
• Use Unified Course (UNC) threads.
• Standard Hex Nuts permitted but Heavy Hex nuts required for
oversize holes and with high strength anchor rods.
• Hooked anchor rods have very low pull-out strength but OK for
axial compression only.
• Headed rods or rods with nuts are preferred.

Headed Rods Rods with Nuts


13
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Materials and Details
Anchor Rod Material
• Use of plate washers at bottom of rods can cause erection
problems and should be avoided.
• Drilled-in epoxy anchor rods may be used for light loads.

• Wedge-type anchors should not be used because


of potential loosing during erection.

XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.


Anchor Rod Materials and Details
Anchor Rod Holes and Washers
• Oversize holes required because of placement tolerances.
• Recommended hole and washer sizes are in AISC Design Guide
1 (Table 2.3) and AISC 14th Ed. Manual (Table 14-2).

• Smaller holes may be used when axial compression only.


• Plate washers required when tension and/or moment.
15
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rods Material and Details
Anchor Rod Sizing and Layout
• Recommendations
Use ¾ in. (22 mm) minimum diameter anchor rods.
Use F1554 Grade 36 material up to about 2 in. (50 mm) diameter.
Thread at least 3 in. (75 mm) beyond what is needed.
Minimum ½ in. (12 mm) distance between edge of hole and
edge of plate.
Use symmetrical pattern whenever possible.
• Provide ample clearance for nut tightening.
• Coordinate anchor rodplacement with reinforcement location.

16
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSEA)
OSEA Safety Standards for Steel Erection (2008)
• Minimum of four anchor rods.
• Base plate and anchor rods to resist eccentric gravity load of
300 lb (1,300 N), 18 in. (450 mm) from extreme outer face of
the column in each direction.
• 300 lb (1,300 N) represents weight of an iron worker with tools.
• Exception: No requirements for post-type columns weighing
less than 300 lb (1,300 N). 18 in.
• Anchor rods can be inside or outside
of column footprint. 300 lb

Note: ¾ in. (20 mm) diameter anchor


rods on a 4 in. by 4 in. (100 mm by
100 mm) pattern is generally sufficient.
17
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design of Column Base Plates

DESIGN LIMIT STATES


• Base Plate Bending Strength
• Concrete Crushing
• Concrete Anchorage for Tension Forces
• Shear Resistance
• Anchor Rod Tension Design
• Anchor Rod Pull-Out Strength

18
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plates for
Axial Compression

19
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Design Limit States
• Base Plate Bending
• Concrete Crushing

20
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Plate Bending

fpu = Pu /(BxN) = pressure due to column load


Let m’ = max(n and m)
Mu= fpu (1) (m’2/2) < φMp
φMp = 0.9 Fy Zx = 0.9x Fy (1 x tp2/4)
Substituting: 2 f pu ( m ' 2 )
t p , min =
0 .9 F y
21
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
HSS Sections
• Bend lines.

0.95h

0.95d 0.80d

2 f pu ( m ' 2 )
t p , min =
0 .9 F y

22
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Plate Bending
• Required concrete bearing area is less than bfd.
• “Lightly Loaded Base Plate”

bf

Bearing Area
23
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Column Base Plate Bending
• Concatenation of Heavy and Lightly Loaded Base Plates

Replace m′′ with l = max {m, n, λn′′}, where


2 X
λ = ≤ 1 .0
1+ 1-X
1
n′ = db f
4 2f pu  2
 4db f  Pu t p ,min =
X=  0.9Fy
 (d + b )2  φPp
 f 

24
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Concrete Crushing Design Strength
Specification Section J8. Column Bases and Bearing on Concrete
φc Pp = 0.65Pp
(a) On the full area of a concrete support
Pp = 0.85fc′A1 (J8-1)
(b) On less than the full area of a concrete support
Pp = 0.85fc′ A1 A 2 / A1 ≤ 1.7fc′ A1 (J8-2)

where fc’ = specified compressive strength of concrete, ksi (MPa)


A1 = area of steel bearing on concrete, in.2 (mm2)
A2 = area of the portion of the supporting surface that is
geometrically similar to and concentric with the
loaded area, in.2 (mm2)
Note: The limit < 1.7f’c is equivalent to A2/A1 < 4
25
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Areas A1 and A2
Pp = 0.85fc′ A1 A 2 / A1 ≤ 1.7fc′ A1
where A1 = area of steel bearing on concrete, in.2
A2 = area of the portion of the supporting surface that is
geometrically similar to and concentric with the
loaded area, in.2
Example. Column supported by a concrete wall.

A1 = 12 x 14.5 = 174 in2


A2 = (3+12+3)(3+14.5+3)
= 369 in2

26
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Variation of φPn with Increasing Base Plate Thickness

φPn
m or n > λ n’

BN = bfd
λn’
Required tp
27
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression
Was the base plate too strong?

28
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plates for
Axial Tension

29
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Connection Limit States

• Anchor Rod Tensile Rupture Strength


• Concrete Pull-out Strength
• Concrete Anchorage Tensile Strength
• Base Plate Bending Strength

30
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Anchor Rod Tensile Rupture Design Strength

φTn = φ FntAb

where φ = 0.75
Fnt = 0.75Fu (0.75 accounts for tensile area at threads)
Fu = specified minimum tensile strength of anchor rod
= 58 ksi (300 MPa) for Gr 36
= 75 ksi (400 MPa) for Gr 55
= 125 ksi (650 MPa) for Gr 125

Notes: Ab is the nominal area of the anchor rod = πd2/4.


AISC 14th Ed. Manual Table 7-17 shows actual tensile areas.

31
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Concrete Pullout Design Strength
• Provisions in ACI 318-10, Section D5.3
• Design pullout design strength of headed
anchor rod or anchor rod with nut:
φNp = φ ψ4Abrg8f’c
where φ = 0.70
ψ4 = 1.4 for no cracking, 1.0 if cracking exists
Abrg = net bearing area of the anchor rod head or nut, in2
f’c = specified compression strength of concrete, psi

Note: Hooked anchor rods are not recommended with tensile


loadings because of low pullout strength.

32
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Concrete Pullout Strength
• AISC Design Guide 1 Table for Strengths with Heavy Hex Nuts

Note: ψ4 = 1 kN = 4.448 x kips N/mm2 = 6.895x10-3 x psi


33
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Concrete Breakout Strength
• Provisions in ACI 318-10, Section D4.2.2

Full breakout cone

Breakout cone for group anchors Breakout cone near edge


34
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Base Plate Bending Strength
• AISC Design Guide 1 recommended bend lines.

g2

g1

Alternate Critical Section is the


full width of the base plate as
shown on the left side above.

35
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Base Plate Bending Strength
• Other possible bend lines.

Critical
Section
Critical bf + 1 in.
Section

Similar to Extended End-Plates

For all cases:


Define: x = distance from center of anchor rod(s) to critical section
w = width of critical section
4 Tu x
Tu = force in anchor rod(s) t p , min =
φMn = 0.9Fywtp2/4 = Mu = Tux 0 .9 Fy w
36
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Base Plates for Axial
Compression and Moment

37
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Connection Limit States

• Concrete Crushing
• Anchor Rod Tensile Strength
• Concrete Pull-out Strength
• Concrete Anchorage Tensile Strength
• Base Plate Bending Strength
Cases
• T = 0 (Relatively small moment)
• T > 0 (Relatively large moment)
38
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Limit for T = 0
∑Fy = 0 with T=0 Base Plate is B by N in plan.
Pr = qY = fpBY
∑Mo = 0
Pre = qY2/2 – PrN/2
Solving
T=0
e = N/2 – Y/2 only if fp < fp,max
Y = N - 2e
with
fp ,max = 0.65x0.85fc′ A 2 / A1 ≤ 0.65x 1.7fc′
Then ecrit = N/2 –Pr/(2Bfp,max) If e < ecrit, T =0, Y = N-2e with
ecrit = N/2 –Pr/(2Bfp,max)
39
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
For T > 0
e > ecrit and fp = fp,max (qmax = fp,max B)
∑Fy = 0 o
Pr – T – fp,maxBY =0
∑Mo = 0
T(N/2+f) + Pr(N/2) – Pre – fp,maxBY2/2 = 0

Solving the resulting quadratic equation

Note: If the quantity in the N 2 2Pr (e + f )


Y = (f + N / 2 ) (f + )
radical is less than zero, 2 f p ,max B
a larger base plate is T = f p ,max B Pr
required.
40
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Shear Anchorage
of Base Plates

41
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Shear Anchorage of Base Plates
Methods for Transferring Shear Forces (ACI 318-10 and ACI 349-06)
• Friction between base plate and grout or concrete surface.
φVn = φμPu < φ0.2fc’Ac or φ800Ac
where φ = 0.75
μ = coefficient of friction = 0.4
Pu = factored compressive axial force
Ac = plan area of base plate, BN
• Bearing of the column and base plate and/or shear lug against
concrete.

φPu,brg = 0.55fc’Abrg where Abrg = vertical bearing area


42
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Shear Anchorage of Base Plates
Methods for Transferring Shear Forces (ACI 318-10 and ACI 349-06)
• Using shear strength of the anchor rods.
Not recommended because of oversize holes in base plate.

• Hairpins and Tie Rods

43
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection
Procedures

44
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
Anchor rods are positioned and placed in the concrete before it
cures. Plastic caps are placed over the anchor rods to protect
laborers.

45
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
Concrete block-outs may be made so that the base plate and
anchor rods are recessed below floor level for safety and aesthetics
in the completed building.

46
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
May have to increase hole sizes because of misplaced anchor
rods.

47
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
Anchor rodnuts below the plate are set at proper elevation and
then column is erected. Grout will be placed under and around the
base plate to transfer axial forces to the concrete below.

48
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Column Erection Procedures
At least it should be!

49
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

50
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location – a very common problem.

51
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location.

52
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location.

53
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Problems with anchor rod placement.

The following photographs are


courtesy of Fisher & Kloiber- AISC
Field Fixes Presentation.

54
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location. Column strength?

55
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods in the wrong location because
of misreading the drawing.

56
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rod too short.

57
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods too long.

58
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Shop rework required for column and base plate.

59
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Poor Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods run over by a crane.

60
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Poor Anchor Rod Placement
Anchor rods run over by something.

61
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement
Instituto Mexicano de la Construcción en Acero A. C. (IMCA)
The soon to be published IMCA Code of Standard Practice will
• Require the fabricator to provide templates for anchor rod
setting.
• Require the templates be designed to insure the correct
position both vertically and horizontally.
• Require the templates to insure the correct length of the
anchor rod above the concrete surface.
• Require the templates to leave permanent marks of the
building axes in the concrete surface.
• Require that the price of the templates be the average price
of the structural steel.
62
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

63
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

64
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

Leveling nuts
to be adjusted
prior to setting
column.

65
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

66
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

67
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
68
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

69
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

Grout Holes

70
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

71
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

72
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Anchor Rod Placement

73
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero

Gracias!!

74
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Ex.: Determine if the base plate shown is adequate.
Pu = 250 kips
Column: W10x33 d = 9.73 in. bf = 7.96 in.
PL 1-½ x 18 x 1’-6” F1554 Gr 36
Concrete Pedestal:
24 in. by 24 in. (assume square)
fc′ = 3.0 ksi

o o

18”
24”
o o

18”
24”

75
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Concrete Crushing

A1 = 18 x 18 = 324 in2 (Plan area of base plate)


A2 = 24 x 24 = 576 in2 (Plan area of concrete pedestal)
A2/A1 = 576/324 = 1.78 < 4

A2
φPp = φ 0.85 fc′A 1 o o
A1

18”
24”
= 0.65 (0.85 × 3.0 ) (324 ) 1.78
o o
= 716 kips > 250 kips OK
18”
24”

76
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending
2f pu  2
tp = where l = max {m, n, λn′′}
0.9Fy 7.96”

Column: W10x33 d = 9.73 in. bf = 7.96 in.


n = 5.82 in. m = 4.38 in. 4.38”

λn’:
9.73” 9.24” 18”
2 X
λ =
1+ 1-X 4.38”

4 db f
X =
(d + b f )2 5.82 6.37 5.82
18”
n′= (1 / 4 ) db f
77
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending
Column: W10x33 d = 9.73 in. bf = 7.96 in.
n = 5.82 in. m = 4.38 in.
λn’:
n ′ = (1 / 4 ) db f 7.96”

= (1 / 4 ) 9 .73 x 7 .96
= 2 .20 in . 4.38”

 4db f  Pu 9.73” 9.24” 18”


X=  
 (d + b )2  φPp
 f  4.38”
 4x9.73x7.96  250
=  
2  716
= 0.346
 (9.73 + 7.96 )  5.82 6.37 5.82
18”

78
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending
λn’:
2 X 2 0 . 346
λ = =
1+ 1-X 1 + 1 - 0 . 346 7.96”

= 0 . 650 ≤ 1 . 0
λ n ' = 0 . 650 x 2 . 20 = 1 . 43 in . 4.38”

9.73” 9.24” 18”

4.38”
l = max {m, n, λn′′}
= max {4.38, 5.82, 1.43} = 5.82 in.
5.82 6.37 5.82
fpu = Pu /BN = 250/(18x18) 18”
= 0.772 ksi
79
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression -- Example
Plate Bending

2f pu  2 2 x 0.772 x 5.82 2 7.96”


tp = =
0.9Fy 0.9 x 36
4.38”
= 1.27 in . ≤ 1.5in . OK
9.73” 9.24” 18”

4.38”

PL 1-½ x 18 x 1 ft 6 in. A36 5.82 6.37 5.82


is Adequate. 18”

80
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Tensile (Uplift) Forces
Ex. Determine the design strength, φTn, for the limit
state of anchor rod tension rupture. 4 - ¾ in.
(20 mm) diameter, F1554 Grade 36 (Fu = 58 ksi)
anchor rods

φTn = 4 x 0.75 (0.75Fu) Ab


= 4 x 0.75 (0.75x58)(πx0.752/4)
= 4 x 14.4 kips (4 x 53 kN)
= 57.6 kips (212 kN)

81
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 1. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 940 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution: Conservatively assume A2/A1 = 1
fp ,max = 0.65x0.85fc′ A 2 / A1
= 0.65x0.85x4.0 1.0 = 2.21 ksi
e = Mu/Pu = 940/376 = 2.50 in.
ecrit = N/2 –Pr/(2Bfp,max)
= 19.0/2 – 376/(2x19.0x2.21)
= 5.02 in.
e = 2.50 < ecrit = 5.02 → T = 0 and
Y = N-2e = 19.0 – 2x 2.50 = 14.0 in.
82
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 1. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 940 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:
fp = Pu/(BY) = 376/(19.0x14.0) = 1.41 ksi < Fp,max = 2.21 ksi

m = (N-0.95d)/2 = (19.0-0.95x12.7)/2 = 3.47 in.


m = (B-0.80bf)/2 = (19.0-0.80x12.2)/2 = 4.62 in.

2f pu n 2 2 x1.41x 4.62 2
tp = = = 1.36 in .
0.9Fy 0.9 x 36
Use PL 1½ x 19 x 1ft 7 in. A36
4 – ¾ in. Anchor Rods x 12 in.
F1554 Gr 36 w/ heavy hex nuts
83
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution:
fp ,max = 0.65x0.85fc′ A 2 / A1
= 0.65x0.85x4.0 1.0 = 2.21 ksi

e = Mu/Pu = 2500/376 = 6.65


ecrit = N/2 –Pr/(2Bfp,max)
= 19.0/2 – 376/(2x19.0x2.21)
= 5.02 in.
N 2 2Pr (e + f )
e = 6.65 > ecrit = 5.02 → T > 0 and Y = ( f + N / 2 ) − ( f + ) −
2 fp ,max B
84
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:
N 2 2Pr (e + f )
Y = (f + N / 2 ) − (f + ) −
2 fp ,max B
19.0 2 2x 376(6.65 + 8.0)
= (8.0 + 19.0 / 2) − (8.0 + ) −
2 2.21x19.0
= 10.9 in.
fp = Pu/(BY)
= 376/(19.0x10.9)
= 1.82 ksi < fp,max 2.21 ksi
85
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:

m = (N - 0.95d)/2 = (19.0-0.95x12.7)/2 = 3.47 in.


n = (B - 0.80bf)/2 =(19.0-0.80x12.2)/2 = 4.62 in.

2f pu m 2 2 x1.82 x 4.62 2
tp = = = 1.54 in .
0.9Fy 0.9 x 36

Need to check tension side.

86
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:
Tu = fp,max BY – Pu
= 2.21x19.0x10.9 – 376 = 81.7 kips
Try 2 – Anchor Rods each Side
Required plate thickness:
x = f – 0.95d/2 = 8.0 -0.95x12.7/2
= 1.96 in.
x
w = bf + 1.0 = 12.2 + 1.0 = 13.2 in. f
4Tu x 4 x 81 .7 x1.96
t p ,min = = = 1.22 in . Use PL1 ½ x 19 x
0.9Fy w 0.9 x 36 x13 .2 1ft 7 in. A36
Compression controls
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
87
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.
Solution Continued:
Tu,rod = 81.7/2 = 40.9 kips per anchor rod
Try 1 -1/4 in. diameter A1554 Gr 36, Fu = 58 ksi

φTn = 0.75 (0.75Fu) Ab


= 0.75 (0.75x58)(π1.252/4)
= 40.0 kips < 40.9 kips NG
Use 1 ½ in. diameter A1554 Gr36 anchor rods, φTn = 57.6 kips

Check Pullout:
From AISC Design Guide 1, Table 3.2, φTn = 70.1 kips > 40 kips OK
88
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.
Design for Axial Compression and Moment
Ex. 2. Determine required plate thickness and anchor rod diameter.
Given: Pu = 376 kips Mu = 2500 in-kips W12x96 A992
N = 19 in. B = 19 in. A2/A1 = 1 < 4 d = 12.7 in. bf = 12.2 in.
fc’ = 4.0 ksi Fy = 36 ksi f = 8 in.

Use PL 1½ x 19 x 1ft 7 in. A36


4 – 1½ in. Anchor Rods x 12 in. F1554 Gr 36
w/ heavy hex nuts at bottom.
89
XIII Simposio Internacional de Estructuras de Acero. Marzo 4 a 7, 2015. México D.F.

You might also like