Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 G.R. No. 169737 BLUE CROSS HEALTH CARE INC. NEOMI and DANILO OLIVARES
date promulgated
date filed (MTC) remarks (MTC) remarks
December 15, 2008
Metropolitan Trial Court
November 9, 2005 (MeTC) of Makati City August 22, 2006,
Metropolitan Trial Court of
Pasig City (MeTC) Brsnch
2007 72 July 15, 2009 dismissing the case
Metropolitan Trial Court MeTC rendered a Decision in
November 14, 2000 (MeTC) of Manila, Branch 9 June 10, 2004 favor of BPI
Amador’s Motion for
Order dated September Reconsideration (affirming its
6, 2004 earlier judgment
Metropolitan Trial Court of decision in favor of PSB and
March 30, 2006 Makati City, Branch 65 December 23, 2008 against Papa
Order, dated 14 May Papa moved for reconsideration
2009 (denied by the MeTC)
Municipal Trial Court in
Cities (MTCC) of Naga City Order dated July 24, denied the petitioners’ demurrer
December 12, 2000 Branch 1 2009 to evidence for lack of merit
Decision dated August 1,
2011 ruled in favor of the respondent
Metropolitan Trial Court
(MeTC) of Makati City,
April 7, 2005 Branch 66 August 16, 2006
August 3, 2000 MeTC in Pasay City
writ of preliminary
August 9, 2000 attachment August 17, 2000 implemented
urgent motion to dismiss
with application to charge
plaintiffs attachment bond
August 17, 2000 for damages
Chan opposed MeTC in Pasay City granted
Simons urgent motion to Simons urgent motion to dismiss
dismiss with application to with application to charge
charge plaintiffs attachment plaintiffs attachment bond for
August 29, 2000 bond for damages October 23, 2000 damages
Municipal Trial Court in
Cities (MTCC), Cagayan de Decision directing Otero to pay
July 28, 2005 Oro City February 14, 2007 Tan his outstanding obligation
MeTC dismissed the complaint
January 8, 2003 August 5, 2003 for lack of cause of action
date filed (RTC) remarks date promulgated (RTC) remarks
Manila City trial courts, the Regional Trial
Court, Branch 17 in Civil Case No. 02-
105256
Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Branch
30, in Civil Case No. 163661
February 26, 2009
RTC affirmed the assailed
decision in toto.
Regional Trial Court (RTC)
of Manila, Branch 26 February 10, 2005
RTC reversed and set aside the
October 14, 2009 MeTC decision
10 November 2009, PSB
filed its motion for RTC denied PSB's motion for
reconsideration Order dated 14 January 2010 reconsideration
Regional Trial Court (RTC) affirming with modification the
of Naga City December 12, 2011 decision of the MTCC
motion for reconsideration of February 2, 2012, the RTC issued a Joint
December 28, 2011 the decision of the RTC Order
Regional Trial Court (RTC) RTC affirmed the MeTC
of Makati City, Branch 146 March 14, 2007 Decision Decision
(RTC) in Pasay City upheld the
July 31, 2001 dismissal of Chans complaint
affirming the MTCC Decision
December 28, 2007 dated February 14, 2007
Order dated February 20, 2008
February 2, 2004 reversed the ruling of the MeTC
date filed (CA) remarks date promulgated (CA) REMARKS date promulgated (SC)
January 14, 2015
affirmed the Decisions of the
Petition for Review September 28, 2011 MeTC and RTC April 19, 2017
July 11, 2005 March 25, 2015
Resolution dated August denied the Motion for Partial
19, 2005 Reconsideration of BPI.
CA affirmed the 14 October 2009
decision dated 21 July decision and the 14 January 2010
2011 order of the RTC January 15, 2018
resolution, dated 1 PSB moved for reconsideration,
February 2012 but the same was denied by the CA
filed a petition for review with Decision dated March 17,
February 22, 2012 the CA. 2014 affirming the decision of the RTC October 12, 2016
petitioners filed Motion for Resolution dated August
Reconsideration 4, 2014 CA denied the same
REVERSED and SET ASIDE RTC
September 17, 2009 decision January 25, 2012
denied the petition for review filed
April 29, 2011 by Otero August 15, 2012
Resolution that denied Otero’s
December 13, 2011 Motion for Reconsideration
CA affirmed the decision of the
July 29, 2005 RTC March 21, 2012
September 21, 2005 denied reconsideration
Docket number Petitioner/s Respondent/s
Sheriff
Regional Trial Court (RTC) of
November 29, 1999 Mandaluyong City February 20, 2007
Sheriff issued a Sheriff’s Partial Report.
Branch 30, Regional Trial Court Thereafter, petitioners filed this petition for
February 7, 2001 (RTC) July 19, 2011 certiorari
Regional Trial Court of Cebu City,
January 22, 2008 Branch 6 May 20, 2009
May 29, 2009 motion for reconsideration
Order granted in part the motion for
September 22, 2009 reconsideration
Regional Trial Court of San Jose,
August 20, 2003 Camarines Sur, Branch 58 May 5, 2009
Litonjua Group filed a Complaint
for Collection of Sum of Money
with Damages against PSE Pasig
City Regional Trial Court (RTC),
October 10, 2006 Branch 154 22 February 2010 Decision
Regional Trial Court of Makati,
April 24, 1998 Branch 64 June 27, 2006 decision
October 30, 2006 order partial motion for reconsideration
Regional Trial Court of Makati
September 2, 2002 City, Branch 143 September 6, 2005 ruled in favor of respondent
Regional Trial Court of Manila, RTC adjudged the original defendants
December 17, 1997 Branch 49 June 20, 2001 jointly and severally liable to Westmont
December 17, 1997 Writ of Preliminary Attachment February 19, 1998
directing the attachment of properties
appearing under the names of other
persons, but which were under the control
Order dated March 24, 1998 of the original defendants
partial motion for reconsideration
from June 20, 2001 RTC Decision Order dated July 19, 2001 denied June 20, 2001 RTC decision
Resolution dated October 24,
May 9, 2007 motion for reconsideration 2007 denied May 9, 2007 MR
Regional Trial Court, Branch 171,
May 28, 2007 Valenzuela City, September 19, 2008
date filed (CA) remarks date promulgated (CA) REMARKS
CA reversed and set aside the RTC
decision and, accordingly, dismissed
petitioner’s complaint. Petitioner filed a
October 28, 2009 Resolution Motion for Reconsideration
CA dismissed petitioners’ certiorari
petition and affirmed the Orders of the
Decision dated March 27 2012 RTC reinstating the Writ of Attachment
Petitioners filed a motion for
reconsideration against said March 27,
Resolution dated September 11, 2012 2012 decision
CA affirmed the RTC’s Order dated
Decision dated December 19, 2012 September 22, 2009
DENIED the January 24, 2013 MR by
Resolution dated August 8, 2013 Province of Cebu
motion for
April 10, 2012 reconsideration Resolution dated July 14, 2014 denied April 2012 MR
Decision dated 23 May 2012
Resolution dated 17 October 2012
September 16, 2008 decision
December 8, 2008 resolution
Resolution dated April 13, 2009 motion for reconsideration
CA affirmed the June 20, 2001 RTC
November 8, 2006 Decision
April 23, 2007
denied due course and dismissed Bank
of the Philippine Islands’ Petition for
February 26, 2013 Certiorari.
August 13, 2013 Resolution that denied reconsideration
reversed the September 24, 2003 RTC
September 11, 2009 Decision Decision
November 24, 2009 Resolution
January 11, 2013
date promulgated
date filed (SC) remarks (SC) SC DIVISION
July 23, 2014 THIRD DIVISION
April 13, 2015 THIRD DIVISION
June 28, 2016 FIRST DIVISION
December 5, 2016 THIRD DIVISION
GRANT the petition and reverse the
September 16, 2008 decision and
December 8, 2008 resolution of the SECOND
Court of Appeals June 15, 2015. DIVISION
June 29, 2015 FIRST DIVISION
July 8, 2015 FIRST DIVISION
SECOND
July 22, 2015 DIVISION
February 27, 2017 THIRD DIVISION
June 25, 2014 THIRD DIVISION