United States Supreme Court has confirmed that the Second Amendment applies “to all instruments

that constitute bearable arms,”.

ARMS. Anything that a man wears for his de-

fense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger,
to cast at or strike at another. Co.Litt. 161b,
162a; State v. Buzzard, 4 Ark. 18.

The United States Supreme Court quoting the rules of criminal and civil procedure said:

“The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner concealed on or about the person is
not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” Wharton’s
Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197.

ARMS. Anything that a man wears for his de-

fense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger,
to cast at or strike at another. Co.Litt. 161b,
162a; State v. Buzzard, 4 Ark. 18.

The United States Supreme Court quoting the rules of criminal and civil procedure said:

“The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner concealed on or about the person is
not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” Wharton’s
Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197.

so basically if you can hold it and use it as a weapon, you cant stop a militia from having that
'bearable arm'. Yes & "militia" has been confirmed & reaffirmed, several times over the years, to
mean every American not in a military uniform.
Okay, does this mean that the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968
are null and void ?

Yes. IF they interfere with our rights to life, liberty, and property, they are null and void. WHY
do we give power to a bunch of gangsters with fully auto weapons to protect our Senators and
Presidents, that we do not allow ourselves to protect the future progeny of the Republic? The
answer is simple. CONGRESS has perverted the rule of law.