TOPIK NO KETERANGAN DITEMUKAN DIHALAMAN DAN

PENJELASAN

Judul dan a. Indicate the study’s a) Ya. Pada halaman 1

abstrak design with a commonly b) Ya. Pada halaman 1
used term in the title or
the abstract
b. Provide in the abstract an
informative and balanced
summary of what was
done and what was
found
Introduksi

Background/rat 2 Menjelaskan latar belakang Ya. Pada halaman 1 dan 2 , “Stigma toward

ionale yang ilmiah dan rasional people living with HIV is pervasive in China
mengapa penelitian perlu and related to poor service
dilakukan. utilization,psychosocial distress, and
diminished quality of life. In an effort to
identify mechanisms to reduce HIV stigma
and its negative consequences, we examined
whether social support mediates therelation
between enacted stigma and both depressive
symptoms and quality of life among 120 HIV
outpatients in Beijing, China.”

Tujuan 3 Menyebutkan tujuan yang Ya. Pada halaman 2, ‘In China,high levels of
jelas/spesifik, termasuk support have been associated with better
menyebutkan hipotesis yang quality of life.10 These findings led us to
diajukan. hypothesize that social support might be an
effective mechanism to reduce depression
and improve quality of life.”
Bahan dan Cara

Bahan 4 Menjelaskan bagaimana data Ya. Pada halaman 2 dan 4, “ In the present
dikumpulkan dan disiapkan report, we focused on baseline data obtained.
Participants were PLWH who received care
at Ditan Hospital. Given the cross sectional
nature of the data. ”

Participant 5 Kriteria subyek penelitian Ya. Pada halaman 2, “ Participants were

subyek PLWH who received care at Ditan Hospital, a
penelitian facility specializing in infections diseases in
Beijing, China. Data were collected between
December 2006 and April 2008.”

Intervensi 6 Menjelaskan intervensi Ya. Pada halaman 2, ” Eligible participants

yang dilakukan pada tiap were HIV-positive Mandarin-speaking adults
kelompok perlakuan (at least 18 years of age). Participants who
 dengan detail. Termasuk were cognitively impaired or actively
bagaiman dan kapan psychotic were excluded.Participants were
intervensi diberikan recruited from the AIDS clinic or from a
hospital-based HIV/AIDS support group.
Interviews were conducted after written
informed consent was obtained, and
participants were paid the equivalent of
US$15”.

Outcome 7 Ya. Pada halaman 2 dan 3, “ Socio-

demographic variables—We assessed
participants’ age, gender, marital/partner
status, highest grade of school completed,
income, and employment status. Stigma was
assessed using a modified version of the HIV
Stigma Scale Five items from the personalized
stigma subscale were examined, with higher
values indicating greater stigma.. Depressive
symptoms is a screening measure used to
examine the prevalence of psychological
distress in community samples. Quality of Life
(The Medical Outcomes Study) used to
measure overall quality of life of persons with
HIV across the globe. Social support is a
psychometrically sound measure of perceived
social support for people with chronic
diseases”
Besar sampel 8 Cara untuk mengukur paparan, Ya. Pada halaman 2 dan 3, “ Socio-
perancu dan outcome yang demographic variables—We assessed
berpengaruh terhadap participants’ age, gender, marital/partner
rehabilitas dan validitas
status, highest grade of school completed,
penelitian.
income, and employment status. Stigma
was assessed using a modified version of
the HIV Stigma Scale. Depressive
symptoms is a screening measure used to
examine the prevalence of psychological
distress in community samples. Five items
from the personalized stigma subscale
were examined, with higher values
indicating greater stigma. Quality of Life
(The Medical Outcomes Study) HIV health
survey18 consists of 35 questions, and has
been used to measure overall quality of life
of persons with HIV across the globe. To
score the MOS-HIV, the raw item scores of
each subscale are summed and
transformed into a 0–100 scale. Higher
scores indicated better health. Social
support Survey (MOS-SSS-C) We used
the19-item survey in our study, and total
scores on the scale were derived by
 summing the scores for all 19 items.

Metode statistik 9 Pentingnya penentuan besar sa Tidak

mpel pada studi observasional
tergantung pada konteks.
Peneliti harusmampu
menjabarkan kalkulasi
penentuan besar sampeldan
pertimbangan lain yang
menentukan besar
sampel.(penjelasan cara
perhitungan besar sampel yang
dilakukan,berikan alasannya)

Alur penelitian 10 Menjelaskan waktu penelitian Tidak

dan follow up

Outcome dan 11 Untuk tiap outcome utama dan Tidak ada

estimasi sekunder, ringkasan atas hasil
bagi tiap kelompok.

Diskusi

Interpretasi 12 Interpretasi hasil, memperhitungkan Ya. Pada halaman 3 “We

hipotesis penelitian, sumber bias atau first examined bivariate
ketidaktepatan dan bahaya yang relationships between
berhubungan dengan keragaman analisis variables of interest
dan outcome through calculation of
correlation coefficients
using listwise deletion of
cases with missing data.
For mediation analyses,
our small sample size
prompted us to follow
Baron and Kenny’s
stepwise guidelines on
investigating mediation
through regression
analysis.23 We first tested
whether social support
mediated the impact of
stigma on depressive
symptoms, and then
tested whether social
support mediated
between the impact of
stigma on quality of life.
Each analysis involved
three steps. In Step A,
social support was
regressed onto stigma. In
Step B, depressive
symptomatology was
regressed onto stigma. In
Step C, we tested for
formal mediation by
conducting multiple
regression in which
depressive
symptomatology was
regressed onto both
 stigma and social support.

Generalizability 13 Apakah hasil penelitian dapat digeneralisasikan di Ya, Pada halaman 3, “

masyarakat One hundred and twenty
participants completed
baseline assessments,
with 82% male and a
mean age of 36 years (SD
= 8.0). Full socio-
demographic and clinical
information are presented
in Table 1. Sixty percent
of participants were on a
combination of D4T, 3TC,
and nevirapine”.

Overall 14 Interpretasi umum terhadap hasil dalam konteks Ya, Pada halaman 3 dan
evidence bukti terkini 8,“Full socio-demographic
and clinical information
are presented in Table 1”.

Ya, Pada halaman 4 dan

7, “we found that stigma
was associated with both
social support (β = −0.26,
p < 0.01) and depressive
symptoms (β =0.22, p <
0.05). With both stigma
and social support in the
model with depressive
symptomatology, the beta
for social support
remained significant (β =
−0.23, p < 0.05), but
stigma became non-
significant (β = 0.16, p =
0.09), suggesting full
mediation. Parallel
analyses with quality of
life indicated stigma
significantly predicted
social support (stats) and
quality of life (β = −0.22, p
< 0.05). When both social
and stigma were included
in the same model, social
support remained a
significant predictor of
quality of life (β = 0.25, p
< 0.05) but stigma
became non-significant (β
= −0.15, p = 0.15), again
suggesting full mediation.

Figure 1 (1a and 1b)

Ya, Pada halaman 9, “

Table 2”.

Tidak ada

Ya, Pada halaman 4, “ we

found high levels of
stigma, associated with
depressive symptoms and
poorer quality of life. Our
results indicated that
social support mediated
the association between
stigma and depressive
symptoms/quality of life.

Ya, Pada halaman 4, “

There are some
limitations to note in this
study. First, the relatively
small sample size limited
our ability to use more
powerful statistical
techniques, such as
structural equation
modeling. Second, the
survey relied on
interviews for data
collection, increasing the
likelihood for social
desirability bias”.

Ya, Pada halaman 4, “

Finally, causal inferences
should be drawn
cautiously, given the
cross sectional nature of
the data”.

Ya, Pada halaman 4, “

Therefore, stigmas can be
particularly problematic
within Chinese culture that
is oriented toward
collectivism, Consistent with
an ecological framework,
our results suggest that
treatment programs should
consider interactions
between factors at the
intrapersonal (e.g.
depression, stigma) and
interpersonal (i.e., social
support) levels.
Furthermore, these findings
suggest that social support
would be a critical
component to stigma
reduction interventions for
PLWH.