Professional Documents
Culture Documents
d2 v k 2
= − g + v (1)
dt2 m
Here, g is the acceleration due to gravity, kv2 is the drag force and m is the mass of
falling body. The solution is obtained numerically by using Euler algorithm and Euler-
Richardson algorithm.
1. Since there is an air resistance acting on the falling body, the falling body will attain
the terminal velocity. This terminal velocity can be calculated by letting acceleration
term in equation 1 zero.
0
d2 v k 02
= − g + v =0 (2)
dt2 m
q
0 gm
This will give terminal velocity v = k . For our specific problem, this turns out
to be 180.73 m/s.
2. Since this body is falling with velocity damping, the time of fall gets longer than
without velocity damping. This can be checked by plotting graph without and with
air resistance.
0.0.4 Graphs
Here, the mass of the falling body is 1 kg falling from a heightof 10,000 with drag coeffi-
cient k=3 ∗ 10− 4 kg/m.
Figure 1: Height vs Time using Euler algorithm[No.of steps=68102]
Figure 5: *
Velocity vs Time using Euler algorithm: iterations(9,15,69,682,6811,68102,6810046)
The graph for velocity vs Time in Euler richardson methods for iterations(8,15,69,683,6811,68102)
is plotted in figure 6.
Figure 6: *
Velocity vs Time using EulerRichardson algorithm: iterations(9,15,69,682,6811,68102)
It has also similar behavior in terms of stability like Euler method however, it gets
stable with even lower number of iterations. Thus, number of iterations to get stable is
around 680.
It is clear from figure 5 and 6 that there is a difference in the possible time steps in these
different schemes. In general, eulerrichardson gets stable even with larger time steps
while this is not true for euler algorithm.