or co-owners of the said account,... and their share
DOMINADOR M. APIQUE v. EVANGELINE APIQUE in... the deposits shall be presumed equal, unless FAHNENSTICH, GR No. 205705, 2015-08-05 the contrary is proved, pursuant to Article 485 of the Civil Code, which provides: Facts:
Art. 485. The share of the co-owners, in the benefits
Dominador and Evangeline are siblings as well as in the charges, shall be proportional to their respective interests. Any stipulation in a Evangeline left for Germany to work sometime in contract to the contrary shall be void. 1979.
The portions belonging to the co-owners in the co-
Evangeline executed General... and Special Powers ownership shall be presumed equal, unless the of Attorney... constituting Dominador as her contrary is proved. attorney-in-fact to purchase real property for her, and to manage or supervise her business affairs in The common banking practice is that regardless of the Philippines. who puts the money into the account, each of the named account holder has an undivided right to the she opened a joint savings account... with entire balance,... and any of them may deposit Dominador at and/or withdraw, partially or wholly, the funds without the... need or consent of the other,... Philippine Commercial International Bank... which during their lifetime. later became Equitable PCI Bank (EPCIB)
Nevertheless, as between the account holders, their
Dominador withdrew the amount of P980,000.00 right against each other may depend on what they from the subject account and, thereafter, deposited have agreed upon, and the purpose for which the the money to his own savings account with the account was opened and... how it will be operated. same bank
In this case,... It is... admitted... that: (a) the account
Evangeline learned of... such withdrawal was opened for a specific purpose, i.e., to facilitate... the transfer of needed funds for Evangeline demanded the return of the amount Evangeline's business projects;... and (b) Dominador withdrawn from the joint account, but to no avail. may withdraw funds therefrom "if"... there is a Hence, she filed a complaint need to meet Evangeline's financial obligations arising from said... projects. Evangeline claimed to be the sole owner of the money deposited in the subject account, and that Hence, while Dominador is a co-owner of the Dominador has no authority to withdraw the same. subject account as far as the bank is concerned — and may, thus, validly deposit and/or withdraw Dominador asserted,... , that he was authorized to funds without the consent of his co-depositor, withdraw funds from the subject account to answer Evangeline — as between him and for the expenses of Evangeline's projects,
Evangeline, his authority to withdraw, as well as the
Issues: amount to be withdrawn, is circumscribed by the purpose for which the subject account was opened. whether or not Evangeline is entitled to the return of the amount of P980,000.00 Dominador withdrew Dominador's right to obtain funds... was, thus, from their joint savings account with EPCIB conditioned on the necessity of funds for Evangeline's projects. Ruling:
Admittedly, at the time he withdrew the amount of
A joint account is one that is held jointly by two or P980,000.00 from the subject account, there was no more natural persons, or by two or more juridical project... being undertaken for Evangeline. persons or entities.
PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL INTERNATIONAL BANK (Formerly INSULAR BANK OF ASIA AND AMERICA), Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and FORD PHILIPPINES, INC. and CITIBANK, N.A., Respondents.
Rosa Villa Monna vs. Guillermo Garcia Bosque, F. H. GOULETTE, and R. G. FRANE: Partial substitution of agency did not authorize release of debtors from contract