Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT: The speed reduction, additional resistance or slamming caused by the large amplitude of the ship
motions, should be completely restricted for a high-speed oceangoing vessel because of the delivery punctuality and the high
value of the cargo. A promising ship form for such the oceangoing vessel is a so-called “Resonance-Free SWATH (RFS)”. It
has negative restoring moments due to the extraordinary small water plane area. As a consequence, the resonance peak is
removed from the motion response. The attitude of the RFS with negative restoring moments is adjusted by four pairs of
controlling fins attached to the fore and aft ends of the lower hulls. In the previous works, the quasi-steady values of the lift-
curve slope are usually adopted in the motion equations of the frequency domain. However, when working in waves, the
controlling fins are not in a steady state. The lift coefficient is no longer a constant. In addition, there exist a phase lag
between the movement of the attack angle and the fin-generated lift. In the present work, the theoretical prediction using the
frequency-domain 3D-Rankine Panel Method and the experiment to analyze the phenomena of the lift generation including
the phase lag and the interaction among the fins, the lower hulls and the struts have been carried out. The results show that
the unsteady characteristics of the fin-generated lift are functions of the encounter frequency or the reduced frequency. Also
the effects of the fore fins, the lower hulls and struts on the lift curve-slope of the aft fins are discussed.
moment acting on the fins attached to the RFS, −0.019 m. Four pairs of horizontal controlling fins
especially the unsteady characteristics of fin- and two pairs of vertical rudders are attached to the
generated lift, are presented and discussed. lower hulls. Each fin has the following
configuration: plane area A= 0.001518 m2, chord
2 EXPERIMENTS length c=0.0357 m (base side) or 0.0278 m (tip side),
span s=0.0478 m, aspect ratio s2/A=1.51 and the
2.1 Model and model basins
symmetrical wing profile of NACA0012.
In this study, experiments to measure the lift forces
acting on the fore and aft fins of the RFS advancing O P θ
in still water have been carried out. The motion of
G
A
hull is fixed, and the fore fins and the aft fins are 783
x
B
83.3
166.7 833.3 833.3 166.7
(from C.L.) (from C.L.)
y
P.V.
O x
A B
783
2000
35.7 F.V.
z 35.7 Detail of B
Detail of A
27.8 27.8
83.3
38.5
Figure 1. Overview of RFS model O y
26.1 φ77
409
166.7 166.7
Table 1. Principal particulars of RFS model 486
2
X HSMV - Naples, October 2014
Also, 0or Kindicates the amplitude, the angular
frequency or the wave number of the incident wave
respectively. edenotes the encounter angular
frequency and g the gravity acceleration. s means
the steady wave field, j the unsteady wave field.
For the steady potential s , the following boundary
conditions at the free surface S F , at the body
surface S H and at the wake sheets S W of the fins are
satisfied.
2s
U2 g s 0 on z=0 (5)
x 2
z
Figure 3. Assembly of controlling fins (unit: mm) s
n1 on SH (6)
n
P P P 0 on SW (7)
2.3 Experimental conditions
The tests of measuring the fin-generated lift have Where n is the unit normal vector on the body
been carried out under the condition of advancing surface pointing into the fluid. Kutta condition that
speed of U=1.918 m/s (Fn=0.433) in still water. the pressure difference P P P between the
During experiment, the fore and aft fins are forced to upside and downside of the wake sheet leading out
rotate sinusoidally in a frequency range of = 0-20 of the trailing edge of the underwater fin is equal to
rad/s with the rotating amplitude of 10 deg zero is described in Equation (7). On the other hand,
respectively. In the mode to control the heave for the unsteady potential j , the following
motion, both fore and aft fins rotate in the same
boundary conditions are satisfied.
phase, while in the mode to control the pitch motion,
they rotate in the inverse phase.
j 2 j j
e j i 2Ue
2
U 2 g 0
3 THEORETICAL CALCULATIONS x x 2
z
on z=0 (8)
3.1 Mathematical formulation j U
nj m j ( j 1 6)
In this study, a three dimensional frequency-domain n ie
Rankine Panel Method (RPM) based on the potential 7
on SH (9)
theory12),13) has been applied to calculate the 0
n n
hydrodynamic forces and moments.
P P P 0
on SW (10)
a) Boundary conditions
Describing as r ( x, y , z ), V ( x s ) ,
When the ship is advancing at the constant forward
speed U in oblique regular waves encountered at the (n1 , n2 , n3 ) n, (n4 , n5 , n6 ) r n (11)
angle of and the fluid is assumed to be irrotational
( m1 , m2 , m3 ) ( n )V , ( m4 , m5 , m6 ) ( n )( r V )
and ideal, the velocity potential governed by
(12)
Laplace’s equation can be expressed as
Where, mj in Equation (12), which is a so-called m-
( x, y, z; t ) U [ x s ( x, y, z )] Re[ ( x, y, z )e iet ] (1)
term, is an influence term from the steady flow to
the unsteady flow on the body surface, that is, it
Where represents the effect of the forward speed on the
unsteady flow. Assuming that the influence of it is
6
gA small,
(0 7 ) ie j j (2)
0 j 1
the radiation condition at the infinite far field are Here Lf or La indicates the lift generated by the fore
satisfied for s and j . or aft fin, (xf, yf, zf) or (xa, ya, za) the coordinate of
the fore or aft fin, and l0 z f z a .
b) Hydrodynamic forces and lift forces
c) Kutta condition
The pressure in the unsteady flow
When the difference of the velocity potential
P( x, y, z; t ) Re[ p( x, y, z ) e iet ] (14) between the upside and downside of the wake sheet
SW in the unsteady problem is expressed by j , the
is obtained by Bernoulli equation as follows. following equation is obtained.
p ( x, y,z ) (i e U ) (15) P (i e U ) j ( x , y , z ) 0
x on SW (21)
x
In this study, the hull has no oscillation and only the Accordingly,
fin rotates around its axis in still water. Accordingly, j ( xT , yT , z T ) jT jT A( yT , z T ) e ikxT (23)
the diffraction problem is not solved and only the A( yT , zT ) ( ) e
jT
jT
ikxT
(24)
radiation problem is discussed now. The boundary
condition at the body surface of Equation (9) is Where the coordinate at the trailing edge of the fin is
rewritten as follows. expressed as (xT, yT, zT), velocity potential at the
upside and downside of the trailing edge as T and
5
0 on SH except for fin surface (17) T respectively. Substituting this into Equation (22),
n
5 U U
n 5 m 5 n 5 n 3 on fin surface j ( x, yT , zT ) ( jT jT ) e ik ( x xT ) (25)
n i e i e
(18)
In the case of the steady problem, k in Equation (25)
is equal to zero.
Where n means the unit normal vector which is
transformed into the coordinate system whose origin
is put at the rotating axis of the fin. And then, the 3.2 Numerical methods
hydrodynamic forces and moments produced by the Boundary conditions (5)-(7) and (8)–(10) are solved
pitch motion of the fin around its axis are calculated by using the boundary element method. In the case
as follows. of unsteady problem, the integral equation is derived
as follows:
Fi U 5
e2 S 5 n i dS , (i 1, 3, 5)
5 H
i e x j ( P) G( P, Q)
S j (Q)dS
(19) 2 H n
j (Q)
S j (Q) G ( P, Q)dS
Accordingly, the fin-generated lift force is calculated F
n n
as follows. G ( P, Q) (26)
S j (Q)dS
W n
1 F F1 l0 j (Q)
Lf F3 5 S
2 xf
H n
G( P, Q)dS
(20)
1 F F1 l0
La F3 5
2 Where
xa
4
X HSMV - Naples, October 2014
P ( x, y, z ), Q ( x, y, z) (27) Where *j ( k ) indicates the value of the velocity
G ( P, Q )
1
, r PQ potential j of k-th panel and
(28)
4 r
G( Pk , Q)
Next expression is obtained from Equation (25). G * (k , l )
* S (l ) G( Pk , Q) dS (35)
Gn (k , l )
n
j (Q) ( jT jT ) eik ( x xT ) (29)
Here Pk denotes the representative position of the k-
The velocity potentials j (Q) on the free-surface, the th panel and S (l ) the area of the l-th panel. Also,
hull- surface and the fin-surface are unknowns in the has only of the value in the case that l lies on the
integral equation (26). In this study, the spline finite panel next to the trailing edge, and then l is equal to
element method14) developed by Sclavounos and +1 on the top surface panel, -1 on the under surface
Nakos is adopted to solve the free-surface problem. panel. In the result, Equation (33) is reduced to the
That is, the velocity potential j on the free-surface simultaneous equation in which *j and m are
z=0 is described as follows. regarded as unknowns.
5
150 Exp Fore fin
Cal Fore fin
4 100
5
150 Exp Aft fin
Cal Aft fin
4 100
3
0
2
-50
5
150 Exp Fore fin
Cal Fore fin
4 100
Phase lag of CL5 (deg)
50
|CL5| (1/rad)
3
0
2
-50
5
150 Exp Aft fin
Cal Aft fin
4 100
Phase lag of CL5 (deg)
50
|CL5| (1/rad)
3
0
2
-50
6
X HSMV - Naples, October 2014
7
X HSMV - Naples, October 2014