Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are lots of topic to be discussed in Physics. There are always new
discoveries all the time. The world, and everything in it, moves. Even
seemingly stationary things, such as a roadway, move with Earth’s rotation,
Earth’s orbit around the Sun, the Sun’s orbit around the center of the Milky
Way galaxy, and that galaxy’s migration relative to other galaxies. Dynamics
is the study of the relationships between motion and forces.
In this experiment, the motion of the object moves along a straight line
and it is called one-dimensional motion. The line used for this motion is often
the familiar x-axis, or x number line. The object may move forward or
backward along this line. Forward is usually considered positive movement,
and this movement is usually considered to be to the right. On the other hand,
backward is usually considered negative movement to the left. It can be
described in terms of space and time. The moving object in kinematics is
represented as particle. The objective of this experiment is to study motion by
determining the velocity and acceleration and to determine experimentally the
acceleration due to gravity. The instruction is to not misuse the components of
the set-up, like the car being used as a roller skate, and to be sure that 220V-
AC source is used to power the smart timer.
∆𝑥 𝑑𝑥 𝑥2 −𝑥1
𝑣𝑥 = lim = = (1)
∆𝑡→0 ∆𝑡 𝑑𝑡 𝑡2 −𝑡1
𝑣 = 𝑣0 + 𝑎𝑡 (3)
1
𝑥 = 𝑥0 + 𝑣0 𝑡 + 𝑎𝑡 2 (4)
2
𝑣 2 = 𝑣0 2 + 2𝑎(𝑥 − 𝑥0 ) (5)
𝑎 = 𝑔 + 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃
where:
a = acceleration
g = 9.8 𝑚⁄ 2 = 980 𝑐𝑚⁄ 2
𝑠 𝑠
g
ϴ = inclination
when ϴ = 90° or a free-fall:
a=g
Shown are the materials used in this experiment. We used a dynamic cart, a
dynamics track with angle indicator and end stop, two photo gates, a smart timer,
two photo gate mounting brackets, a picket fence, a meter stick and a stand. Dynamic
carts in physics provide sample tools to experiment with and demonstrate the laws
of dynamics. The photo gate together with the smart timer is used to determine the
average velocity of a passing object, especially the dynamic cart, between two photo
gates. The picket fence is the object being detected by the photo gates.
The first part of the experiment is all about the
“Determination of the Average Velocity of a Dynamics
Cart”. First, the materials were set up as shown. After
finishing the set-up, we placed the first and second photo-
gate in their respective places based on what is given in
the laboratory manual. After that, we inputted the right
mode of the smart timer to measure time with two gates.
The table shows the average velocity and time of the cart within a given
displacement. The displacement of each trial was adjusted with an increment
of 10cm. With these results we could say that travel time (𝒕) is directly
̅) is
proportional to the distance traveled (∆𝑿) while the average velocity (𝒗
inversely proportional to time because the faster it goes, the less time it needs
to get to the end point.
Determination of the Average Velocity of a Dynamic Cart
𝑿𝒐 = 𝟐𝟓𝒄𝒎
Trial 𝑿𝒇 ∆𝑿 = 𝑿𝒇 − 𝑿𝒐 𝒕 𝑿
̅=
𝒗
𝒕
1 65 cm 40 cm 0.57 s 70.35 cm/s
2 75 cm 50 cm 0.73 s 68.50 cm/s
3 85 cm 60 cm 0.90 s 66.86 cm/s
4 95 cm 70 cm 1.08 s 64.59 cm/s
5 105 cm 80 cm 1.28 s 62.41 cm/s
Based from the data obtained from the experiment, we could say that the
time (t) and position of the cart are directly proportional to each other.
In the table below, the starting point of the cart on track is now elevated.
The height of the track (𝑯) is increased by 5cm for each trial. For each trial,
there is a constant distance for the cart to travel. With these results, we could
see that as the height of the track (𝑯) increases, the acceleration (𝒂) increases
as well. Also, the time for the cart to reach the 80cm mark decreases. We could
say that the height of track is directly proportional to the acceleration of the
cart while time for cart to reach the endpoint is inversely proportional to the
height of the track. For this table, we have reached a percent error of 4.71%.
This could be caused by various factors such as the set-up of the track or the
limited precision of the smart timer or photo-gates.
Determination of Acceleration
Due to Gravity Using Cart’s Acceleration
𝑋𝑜 = 18 𝑐𝑚 𝐿 = 120 𝑐𝑚
𝑋𝑓 = 80 𝑐𝑚 ∆𝑋 = 𝑋 = 62 𝑐𝑚
Trial 𝑯 𝒂 𝑯 𝒂
𝐬𝐢𝐧 𝜽 = 𝒈= 𝟐𝑿
𝑳 𝐬𝐢𝐧 𝜽 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆 = √
𝒂
Based from the data obtained from the experiment, we could say that the
acceleration keeps increasing while the sinθ is unstable.
In table below, we will no longer acquire the results with the usage of
the cart but with just the picket fence instead. The 𝒂 represents the acceleration
of picket fence’s drop. Although we didn’t get the exact 980 value, we still
managed to get values that are close enough to 980. The reason why we
couldn’t get the exact amount might be caused by the smart timer’s limited
precision or its reaction time.
Table 3: Determination of Acceleration Due to Gravity Using Picket
Fence and Smart Timer
Trial 𝑎
1 997.2 cm/s2
2 989.4 cm/s2
3 979.8 cm/s2
4 981.2 cm/s2
5 993.4 cm/s2
AVE 988.2 cm/s2
CONCLUSION
We were able to prove the relationship between the height of the track and its
acceleration that it is also directly proportional based on the results. This explains
that when an object is at higher altitude, its acceleration is faster or the greater the
slope of the inclination, the larger the acceleration of an object down the incline.
Presentation
Answers to Question
Interpretation of Results
Conclusion
Total Score