Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of California Press and Society for the Study of Social Problems are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Problems.
http://www.jstor.org
JOSEPH R. GUSFIELD
ofIllinois
University
The fact of public affirmation of a norm throughlaw and governmentaction
expressesthe public worthof one sub-culturevis-a-visothers.Because differentforms
of deviance affectthat normativestatus in different ways, they incur different
re-
sponses fromthe designators.Three formsof deviance are disinguished:repentant,
sick, and enemy.One formthreatensthe public affirmation of the norm more than
another.The public definitionof deviance undergoes changes from one form to
another,as illustratedin issues of drinkingcontrol.Where consensuson the norm
is lacking and deviantsbecome enemies,movementsfor legal restrictionsare most
likely. It is not the frequencyof deviant acts but the symbolicimportof deviance
for the statusof the normwhich is determinative of thesereactions.