Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Apart from wantonly killing alleged drug users, pushers, and drug lords who have yet to be proven
guilty, disregarding their family and friends and human rights including their right to be trialed. Nothing.
People who have been victims of EJK's (extra judicial killings) are already dead, guilty or not, you can't
bring the dead back to life, and objectively reducing the amount of people thinking of doing drugs (out
of fear).
It's not really moral to do so but what's done is done and hopefully it never happens anymore to
anyone.
Positive:
There are a lot more police officers seen roaming the streets especially at night. This would hopefully
give off a sense of security for the tourists who come to the country.
Negative:
Tourists will be more cautious in coming into the country especially with how the media is covering a lot
of the news of late and since there is always the possibility that tourists may unknowingly get involved.
I’m not sure of how big the impact of this is though since I still see a lot of tourists coming int o the
country.
Drug trafficking is a global problem, an illicit trade that involves the manufacture, cultivation,
distribution and sale of prohibited substances. While every nation in the world works hard to fight
against drugs, drug trade is still a booming business. The dynamics of drug trafficking is simply incredible
in the sense that consumption and distribution continues to rise even with continuous efforts to curb
drug-related crimes and offenses.
While declaring war on drugs seems to be logical, opponents think it might be a waste of time and
resources. Some claim that criminal acts are a consequence of drugs being declared illegal. Because
people can’t acquire these substances through official channels, they will resort to illegal production,
distribution and consumption.
Perhaps everyone would turn out to be good citizens if they are provided with all the basic necessities to
help them achieve their dreams. Viewed this way, the war on drugs is nothing more than a nasty and
vindictive smoke screen.
5. Disparity on sentencing
Opponents complain that sentencing in drug-related crimes have major flaws. There is a huge problem
in the sentencing between possessions or trafficking of powder cocaine and crack. For example, those
convicted for possession of 5 grams of crack and those in possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine
basically have the same punishment – minimum mandatory sentence of being incarcerated in a federal
prison for 5 years. Judging from the differences of the drugs in question, sentencing is definitely unfair.
Moreover, the ruling is perceived as discriminatory against minorities, because blacks, Hispanics and
other races are likely to use crack than cocaine. Does this mean that white people go free for as long as
they are not in possession of 500 grams of coke?