You are on page 1of 44

Flow

Over an Airfoil
Alisa Mizukami

Experimental Fluid Mechanics and Aerodynamics Laboratory


Introduction
Case introduction to air flow over an airfoil

Computational fluid dynamics simulation

Simulation results
A structure with curved surfaces
Airfoil: designed to give the most favorable
ratio of lift to drag in flight
Drag & Lift

Can be
modeled as
2
Want high lift, low drag airfoil
The Situation: • Air flow from
airfoil nose (left)
to tail (right)

• With attack angle,


air flows at specified
angle with respect to
6° the direction of motion
ANSYS
Fluent (v18.2)
• Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) Software

• Simulates fluid flow


1 Start! 2 Geometry 3 Mesh

4 Setup 5 Solution 6 Results


Boundary Conditions
Velocity Inlet: Velocity Inlet
Wall Pressure
(Airfoil) Outlet
Defines flow velocity

Pressure Outlet:
Specifies static pressure
(for supersonic flow, pressure
value is taken from upstream
values)
Incompressible Flow
Over an Airfoil Tutorial
1. Incompressible Flow
• 1 m/s, 6° angle of attack
2. Supersonic Flow, Denser Mesh
• 450 m/s, no angle
• 450 m/s, 6° angle of attack
• 450 m/s, no angle, pressure outlet boundary condition
• 450 m/s, no angle, symmetry boundary condition
• 1000 m/s, no angle
3. Supersonic Flow, Larger Domain
• 450 m/s, no angle
• 450 m/s, 6° angle of attack
Cases
Pressure Outlet
Incompressible Wall
Flow Over an
Airfoil

12.5 m
12.5 m
Incompressible 12.5 m
Flow Mesh
• 15,300 Nodes
• 15,000 Elements

element
node

12.5 m
Incompressible
Flow Setup
• Density-Based Solver

• Inviscid

• Constant Density: 1 kg/m3

• Velocity: 1 m/s at 6° attack angle


1 m/s
• Mach Number: 0.00292
• Courant Number: (default)
• Iterations: 3,000
• Limit of Residuals: 10-6
(limit set by user)
• Convergence: Yes
1 m/s, 6˚ Angle, Pressure Contour

Effects are closely centered around airfoil


1 m/s, 6˚ Angle, Mesh Quality
Mesh Drag Lift Lift Error of
Coefficient Coefficient Experimental (%)
Coarser 0.01750 0.596 11.2

Original 0.00774 0.647 2.47 Most


accurate
Denser 0.00366 0.681 2.64

Experimental 0.00900 0.663 ---


Supersonic

Pressure Outlet
Flow Over an Wall
Airfoil 450 m/s
1000 m/s

(Denser Mesh)
12.5 m
12.5 m
Why denser mesh? Cons
Solver takes longer
to process detailed
To capture the thin results in a region
shockwave effect where gas
properties can be
approximated as
the same
Supersonic 12.5 m

Flow Mesh
Denser Mesh:
• 160,800 Nodes
• 160,000 Elements

Original: 15,300 Nodes


15,000 Elements
12.5 m
Supersonic
Flow Setup
• Density-Based Solver
• Inviscid
• Ideal Gas
• Energy Equation
450 m/s
• Mach Number: 1.32
• Courant Number: 5 (default)
• Iterations: 5000
• Limit of residuals: 10-5
• Convergence: No
Shockwaves
Small regions in the gas where
gas properties (density,
pressure, temperature) change θ
almost instantaneously.
3 types:
• Normal 𝑐
• Oblique 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃 =
𝑣
• Bow
Expansion Waves
• Gradual decrease in
pressure and density

• Isentropic

• Built of infinitesimal
Mach waves
450 m/s, Density Contour

Shockwave has distance


to the airfoil nose
Reflections at pressure outlet (“detached”)
Expansion Waves

Shockwaves

Bow Shockwave
Changing Boundary Conditions
Symmetry
• Geometry is assumed to be
symmetrical across the boundary
• No flux across boundary
Pressure Outlet
• Specifies pressure at this boundary
450 m/s, Symmetry Boundary Condition
Symmetry

Pressure Outlet
Reflections

Symmetry
450 m/s, Velocity Inlet vs Symmetry
Image Transparency
Velocity Inlet 0%
Symmetry 50%

Approximately
same angle
450 m/s, Pressure Outlet Boundary Condition
Pressure Outlet
The location of
abnormality is
random

Pressure Outlet
Initially flow
develops similar to
original boundary
Pressure Outlet conditions
450 m/s, Pressure Outlet Boundary Condition

Divergence
1000 m/s
• Mach Number: 2.94
• Courant Number: 0.1
• Iterations: 10,000
• Limit of Residuals: 10-3
• Convergence: No
1000 m/s, Density Contour

Shockwave closer to the


No reflections at pressure outlet airfoil nose than 450 m/s
1000 m/s, Density vs Pressure

Density Contour Pressure Contour


1000 m/s, Density vs Pressure

Density Contour Pressure Contour


1000 m/s, Velocity Streamline

Velocity Streamline
1000 m/s Animation
Supersonic

Pressure Outlet
Flow Over an Wall
Airfoil 450 m/s

(Larger Domain) 35.0 m

12.5 m
37
Why larger domain? Cons

To get the shockwaves Solver also has to


to hit the pressure calculate additional
values for enlarged
outlet before the area that is
velocity inlet unnecessary
Supersonic Flow 35.0 m

Mesh (Enlarged)
Larger Mesh:
• 201,100 Nodes
• 200,000 Elements

Denser: 160,800 Nodes


160,000 Elements

12.5 m
450 m/s, Density Contour

No reflections at
pressure outlet
450 m/s, 6˚ Angle, Density

Stronger shock
(larger turn angle)
450 m/s, 6° Angle Animation
Summary
The arc of the C-Mesh domain must be a velocity inlet

The shock must hit the pressure outlet before it hits the
velocity inlet

Future topics: Unsteady flow, varying airfoil shapes


References
1. NASA, NASA, www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-
12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/ldrat.html.
2. Elert, Glenn. “Shock Waves.” Shock Waves – The Physics Hypertextbook,
physics.info/shock/.
3. http://slideplayer.com/slide/4239872/
4. http://www.iaa.ncku.edu.tw/~aeromems/Mach/Ch3.pdf
5. “Compressible Flow.” THERMOPEDIA™, www.thermopedia.com/content/646/.
6. “Supersonic Flow.” The Free Dictionary, Farlex,
encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Supersonic+Flow.
7. Supersonic Expansion by Turning,
farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/336L/Fluid/node209.html.