Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cite this article: Yin X, Tao Z, Huang M, Zou Y. Increasing wall thickness is more effective than increasing diameter for
improving breaking resistance of rice internode. J Plant Biol Crop Res. 2018; 1: 1001.
1
MedDocs Publishers
traits (diameter and wall thickness) of rice internode. We analyzed the obtained data set by using scatter plot and
found that the data could be categorized into three groups on
A literature search was performed in China National Knowl- the basis of the relationship between internode breaking resis-
edge Infrastructure database (cnki.net) using the keywords tance and dry matter per unit length of internode (Figure 3).
‘lodging’ and ‘rice’. Each identified article was examined to de- Internode breaking resistance slowly, moderately and rapidly
termine if it contained the data (or data which could be derived increased with increasing dry matter per unit length of inter-
from the available data) of breaking resistance, dry matter per node in group I, II and III, respectively. Linear regression analy-
unit length, diameter and wall thickness of the basal internode. sis (Statistix 8.0, Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA) in-
A total of 6 published articles with 72 observations were se- dicated that, for each 10 mg cm–1 increase in dry matter per
lected through this process (Figure 1; Table 1). All the selected unit length of internode, there was an increase of about 210,
articles were published in the top agricultural journals in China, 551 and 1,254 g cm in internode breaking resistance in group I,
including Scientia Agricultura Sinica, Acta Agronomica Sinica II and III, respectively. These results are not entirely consistent
and Chinese Journal of Rice Science. In the selected articles, with the results of single studies with only one type of cultivar
large variations were observed in both internode breaking resis- (japonica or indica) [4,5], usually showing a simple positive lin-
tance (ranging from 944 to 6,313 g cm with an average of 2,999 ear relationship between internode breaking resistance and dry
g cm) (Figure 2A) and dry matter per unit length of internode matter per unit length of internode. In this study, both japonica
(ranging from 12.0 to 66.0 mg cm–1 with an average of 37.2 mg and indica cultivars were included (Table 1), and the response
cm–1) (Figure 2B). of internode breaking resistance to increasing dry matter per
unit length of internode was generally more dramatic in japoni-
ca than in indica cultivars (Figure 4).
Figure 1: Literature search and selection flowchart. Figure 3: Relationship between breaking resistance and dry
matter per unit length of the basal internode in rice. Data were col-
lected from the selected articles listed in Table 1.
Figure 2: Breaking resistance (A) and dry matter per unit length Figure 4: Breaking resistance and dry matter per unit
(B) of the basal internode in rice. Data were collected from the select- length of the basal internode in japonica and indica rice. Data were
ed articles listed in Table 1. Box-whisker diagrams include the range of collected from the selected articles listed in Table 1. The data are
25–75% of the observations (rectangular box), the mean (circle within shown as the mean (circle) and the minimum and maximum val-
the box) and the minimum and maximum values (vertical lines). ues (horizontal and vertical lines).
Huaidao 9 (japonica) 6
Li, et al. [9] 2008–2009 Establishment method
III-you 98 (japonica) 6
Establishment method
Lei, et al. [10] 2012 F-you 498 (indica) 6
and seedling age
Establishment method
Lei, et al. [12] 2013 F-you 498 (indica) 6
and seedling age
Nanjing 44 (japonica) 10
Establishment method
Guo, et al. [13] 2010–2011 and seedling number
Wuyunjing 24 (japonica) per hill 10
a
The cultivar type is indicated in parentheses.
Acknowledgements
9. Li J, Zhang H, Gong J, et al. Effects of different planting methods
This work was supported by the National Natural Science on the culm lodging resistance of super rice. Scientia Agricultura
Foundation of China (31771722) and the Earmarked Fund for Sinica. 2011; 44: 2234-2243.
China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01). 10. Lei X, Liu L, Gou W, et al. Effects of planting methods on culm
lodging resistance of indica hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Ag-
References
ronomica Sinica. 2013; 39: 1814-1825.
1. TL, Laureles EV, Mazaredo AM. Lodging reduces yield of rice
11. Li G, Zhong X, Tian K, et al. Effect of nitrogen application on stem
by self-shading and reduction in canopy photosynthesis. Field
lodging resistance of rice and its morphological and mechanical
Crops Research. 1997; 49: 95-106.
mechanisms. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2013; 46: 1323-1334.
2. Berry PM, Sterling M, Spink JH, et al. Understanding and reduc-
12. Lei X, Liu L, Liu B, et al. Physical and chemical characteristics and
ing lodging in cereals. Advance in Agronomy. 2004; 84: Setter
lodging resistance of culm of indica hybrid rice F-you 498 under
217-271.
mechanical planting. Chinese Journal of Rice Science. 2014; 28:
3. Kashiwagi T, Togawa E, Hirotsu N, et al. Improvement of lodging 612-620.
resistance with QTLs for stem diameter in rice (Oryza sativa L.).
13. Guo B, Zhu D, Xu K, et al. Effect of ordered transplanting and
Theoritical and Applied Genetics. 2008; 117: 749-757.
optimized broadcasting on the culm lodging resistance of super
4. Islam MS, Peng S, Visperas RM, et al. Lodging-related morpho- rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science. 2015; 29: 45-55.
logical traits of hybrid rice in a tropical irrigated ecosystem. Field
14. Takai T, Matsuura S, Nishio T, et al. Rice yield potential is closely
Crops Research. 2007; 101: 240-248.
related to crop growth rate during late reproductive period.
5. Duy PQ, Abe A, Hirano M, et al. Analysis of lodging-resistant Field Crops Research. 2006; 96: 328-335.
characteristics of different rice genotypes grown under the stan-
15. Peng S, Khush GS, Virk P, et al. Progress in ideotype breeding to
dard and nitrogen-free basal dressing accompanied with sparse
increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research. 2008; 108:
planting density practices. Plant Production Science. 2004; 7:
32-38.
243-251.
16. Evans LT, Fischer RA. Yield potential: its definition, measure-
6. Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Berry S. Ideotype design for lodg-
ment, and significance. Crop Science. 1999; 39: 1544-1551.
ing-resistant wheat. Euphytica. 2007; 154: 165-179.
17. Peng S, Cassman KG, Virmani SS, et al. Yield potential trends of
7. Ookawa T, Hobo T, Yano M, et al. New approach for rice im-
tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increas-
provement using a pleiotropic QTL gene for lodging resistance
ing rice yield potential. Crop Science. 1999; 39: 1552-1559.
and yield. Nature Communications. 2010; 1: 132.
18. Zhang Y, Tang Q, Zou Y, et al. Yield potential and radiation use
8. Yang S, Xie L, Zheng S, et al. Effects of nitrogen rate and trans-
efficiency of “super” hybrid rice grown under subtropical condi-
planting density on physical and chemical characteristics and
tions. Field Crops Research. 2009; 114: 91-98.
lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice. Acta Agronomica Si-
nica. 2009; 35: w93-103