Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On April 7th, 2005 the Mehlis investigation began at the decision of the
United Nations Security Council due to the assassination of Rafik Hariri on February 14th,
2005. During the course of the investigation a memorandum of understanding was signed
by the government of Lebanon with the commission, and the Syrian Arab Republic
of Rafik Hariri was carried out by “a group with an extensive organization and
considerable resources and capabilities.” (Mehlis 2005) The commission also said,
“There is converging evidence pointing at both Lebanese and Syrian involvement in this
terrorist act.” (Mehlis 2005) It became apparent to all sources involved that this act of
terrorism and political manipulation in Lebanon could plausibly be the result of a meeting
between Prime Minister Hariri and the President of Syria Bashar Al-Asaad when the two
individuals disagreed on the extension of terms for Lebanese President Emile Lahoud.
Several witnesses overheard Prime Minister Hariri threatened by President Al-Assad and
according to Saad Hariri the following was said by Al-Asaad, “This is what I want. If you
think that President Chirac and you are going to run Lebanon, you are mistaken. It is not
going to happen. President Lahoud is me. Whatever I tell him, he follows suit. This
extension is to happen or else I will break Lebanon over your head and Walid
Jumblat’s.” (Mehlis 2005) Throughout the course of the investigation the commission
noted that the Syrian Arab Republic cooperated with the ongoing matter in “form, not
substance.” (Mehlis 2005) The commission did not directly indicate the parties
responsible for the assassination of Mr. Hariri but throughout the report the proverbial
Emerging from this report and the consequences of the activities of those involved
government (Lebanese and Syrian) attempt to act with impunity and international
institutions are able to make examples of these situations, and restore the rule of
processes and internal policies of one another through subversive means. Political
meddling and assassinations that transcend borders in the past have resulted in nations
waging war against one another. It is important that international institutions investigate
those involved in order that history is not doomed to repeat itself. It is important that the
Security Council Resolution 1595 investigate this incident without bias. This could be a
major factor in acquiring the cooperation of all parties involved due to the implied
Lebanon it is important to recognize the historical incidents which propelled the current
situation. Syria has long exerted influence over Lebanon and Arab nationalist consider it
nation of its own accord. The countries became independent of one another after World
War I, and since that time have never had formal diplomatic relations, which has resulted
Franjieh Syrian, troops were invited to protect the future of the country during a civil war
which lasted 13 years. The security provided by Syrian troops outlasted the civil war and
extended to 29 years due to joint agreements between the leaders of both Lebanon and
Syria. It wasn’t until May 2005 that Syria was forced to remove troops in accordance
4|Page Mehlis Investigation and Issues of Sovereignty
with Security Council Resolution 1559. Resolution 1559 was created due to Mehlis
government in Lebanon for the benefit of Syria. Syria was beginning to hold the belief
and implement the idea that Lebanon was an extension of the Republic. Leaders in
Lebanon were faced with swearing allegiance to Syria or facing the possibility of
which rarely result in success. Syria and Lebanon both complied with Security Council
resolutions which are a significant part of the process, but more often than not there is a
blatant disregard to these actions. Thankfully both nations understood the risk involved
and honored the resolutions. Syria could have faced sanctions and the Middle East’s
regional stability would have been jeopardized by the rise of civil unrest in Lebanon. If
not for these actions alone the results could have been catastrophic to implementing a
solution. Objectively, individuals must realize that it took a terroristic assassination for
the Security Council to comprehend and take action regarding the sovereignty of
Lebanon before it became perilous beyond repair. This is an unfortunate model for future
Bibliography