You are on page 1of 6

Posthumanism

Posthumanism or post-humanism (meaning "after humanism" or "beyond humanism") is a term with at least
seven definitions according to philosopher Francesca Ferrando:[1]

1. Antihumanism: any theory that is critical of traditional humanism and traditional ideas about humanity
and the human condition.[2]
2. Cultural posthumanism: a branch of cultural theory critical of the foundational assumptions of
humanism and its legacy[3] that examines and questions the historical notions of "human" and "human
nature", often challenging typical notions of human subjectivity and embodiment[4] and strives to move
beyond archaic concepts of "human nature" to develop ones which constantly adapt to contemporary
technoscientific knowledge.[5]
3. Philosophical posthumanism: a philosophical direction which draws on cultural posthumanism, the
philosophical strand examines the ethical implications of expanding the circle of moral concern and
extending subjectivities beyond the human species[4]
4. Posthuman condition: the deconstruction of the human condition by critical theorists.[6]
5. Transhumanism: an ideology and movement which seeks to develop and make available technologies
that eliminate aging and greatly enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities, in
order to achieve a "posthuman future".[7]
6. AI takeover: A more pessimistic alternative to transhumanism in which humans will not be enhanced,
but rather eventually replaced by artificial intelligences. Some philosophers, including Nick Land,
promote the view that humans should embrace and accept their eventual demise.[8] This is related to the
view of "cosmism" which supports the building of strong artificial intelligence even if it may entail the
end of humanity as in their view it "would be a cosmic tragedy if humanity freezes evolution at the puny
human level".[9][10][11]
7. Voluntary Human Extinction, which seeks a "posthuman future" that in this case is a future without
humans.

Contents
1 Philosophical posthumanism
2 Emergence of philosophical posthumanism
3 Contemporary posthuman discourse
4 Relationship with transhumanism
5 Criticism
6 See also
7 References
7.1 Works cited

Philosophical posthumanism
Philosopher Ted Schatzki suggests there are two varieties of posthumanism of the philosophical kind:[12]

One, which he calls 'objectivism', tries to counter the overemphasis of the subjective or intersubjective that
pervades humanism, and emphasises the role of the nonhuman agents, whether they be animals and plants, or
computers or other things.[12]

A second prioritizes practices, especially social practices, over individuals (or individual subjects) which, they
say, constitute the individual.[12]
There may be a third kind of posthumanism, propounded by the philosopher Herman Dooyeweerd. Though he
did not label it as 'posthumanism', he made an extensive and penetrating immanent critique of Humanism, and
then constructed a philosophy that presupposed neither Humanist, nor Scholastic, nor Greek thought but started
with a different religious ground motive.[13] Dooyeweerd prioritized law and meaningfulness as that which
enables humanity and all else to exist, behave, live, occur, etc. "Meaning is the being of all that has been
created," Dooyeweerd wrote, "and the nature even of our selfhood."[14] Both human and nonhuman alike
function subject to a common 'law-side', which is diverse, composed of a number of distinct law-spheres or
aspects.[15] The temporal being of both human and non-human is multi-aspectual; for example, both plants and
humans are bodies, functioning in the biotic aspect, and both computers and humans function in the formative
and lingual aspect, but humans function in the aesthetic, juridical, ethical and faith aspects too. The
Dooyeweerdian version is able to incorporate and integrate both the objectivist version and the practices
version, because it allows nonhuman agents their own subject-functioning in various aspects and places
emphasis on aspectual functioning.[16]

Emergence of philosophical posthumanism


Ihab Hassan, theorist in the academic study of literature, once stated:

Humanism may be coming to an end as humanism transforms itself into something one must
helplessly call posthumanism.[17]

This view predates most currents of posthumanism which have developed over the late 20th century in
somewhat diverse, but complementary, domains of thought and practice. For example, Hassan is a known
scholar whose theoretical writings expressly address postmodernity in society. Beyond postmodernist studies,
posthumanism has been developed and deployed by various cultural theorists, often in reaction to problematic
inherent assumptions within humanistic and enlightenment thought.[4]

Theorists who both complement and contrast Hassan include Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, cyberneticists
such as Gregory Bateson, Warren McCullouch, Norbert Wiener, Bruno Latour, Cary Wolfe, Elaine Graham, N.
Katherine Hayles, Donna Haraway, Peter Sloterdijk, Stefan Lorenz Sorgner, Evan Thompson, Francisco Varela,
Humberto Maturana and Douglas Kellner. Among the theorists are philosophers, such as Robert Pepperell, who
have written about a "posthuman condition", which is often substituted for the term "posthumanism".[5][6]

Posthumanism differs from classical humanism by relegating humanity back to one of many natural species,
thereby rejecting any claims founded on anthropocentric dominance.[18] According to this claim, humans have
no inherent rights to destroy nature or set themselves above it in ethical considerations a priori. Human
knowledge is also reduced to a less controlling position, previously seen as the defining aspect of the world.
Human rights exist on a spectrum with animal rights and posthuman rights.[19] The limitations and fallibility of
human intelligence are confessed, even though it does not imply abandoning the rational tradition of humanism.

Proponents of a posthuman discourse, suggest that innovative advancements and emerging technologies have
transcended the traditional model of the human, as proposed by Descartes among others associated with
philosophy of the Enlightenment period.[20] In contrast to humanism, the discourse of posthumanism seeks to
redefine the boundaries surrounding modern philosophical understanding of the human. Posthumanism
represents an evolution of thought beyond that of the contemporary social boundaries and is predicated on the
seeking of truth within a postmodern context. In so doing, it rejects previous attempts to establish
'anthropological universals' that are imbued with anthropocentric assumptions.[18]

The philosopher Michel Foucault placed posthumanism within a context that differentiated humanism from
enlightenment thought. According to Foucault, the two existed in a state of tension: as humanism sought to
establish norms while Enlightenment thought attempted to transcend all that is material, including the
boundaries that are constructed by humanistic thought.[18] Drawing on the Enlightenment’s challenges to the
boundaries of humanism, posthumanism rejects the various assumptions of human dogmas (anthropological,
political, scientific) and takes the next step by attempting to change the nature of thought about what it means
to be human. This requires not only decentering the human in multiple discourses (evolutionary, ecological,
technological) but also examining those discourses to uncover inherent humanistic, anthropocentric, normative
notions of humanness and the concept of the human.[4]

Contemporary posthuman discourse


Posthumanistic discourse aims to open up spaces to examine what it means to be human and critically question
the concept of "the human" in light of current cultural and historical contexts[4] In her book How We Became
Posthuman, N. Katherine Hayles, writes about the struggle between different versions of the posthuman as it
continually co-evolves alongside intelligent machines.[21] Such coevolution, according to some strands of the
posthuman discourse, allows one to extend their subjective understandings of real experiences beyond the
boundaries of embodied existence. According to Hayles's view of posthuman, often referred to as technological
posthumanism, visual perception and digital representations thus paradoxically become ever more salient. Even
as one seeks to extend knowledge by deconstructing perceived boundaries, it is these same boundaries that
make knowledge acquisition possible. The use of technology in a contemporary society is thought to
complicate this relationship.

Hayles discusses the translation of human bodies into information (as suggested by Hans Moravec) in order to
illuminate how the boundaries of our embodied reality have been compromised in the current age and how
narrow definitions of humanness no longer apply. Because of this, according to Hayles, posthumanism is
characterized by a loss of subjectivity based on bodily boundaries.[4] This strand of posthumanism, including
the changing notion of subjectivity and the disruption of ideas concerning what it means to be human, is often
associated with Donna Haraway’s concept of the cyborg.[4] However, Haraway has distanced herself from
posthumanistic discourse due to other theorists’ use of the term to promote utopian views of technological
innovation to extend the human biological capacity[22] (even though these notions would more correctly fall
into the realm of transhumanism[4]).

While posthumanism is a broad and complex ideology, it has relevant implications today and for the future. It
attempts to redefine social structures without inherently humanly or even biological origins, but rather in terms
of social and psychological systems where consciousness and communication could potentially exist as unique
disembodied entities. Questions subsequently emerge with respect to the current use and the future of
technology in shaping human existence,[18] as do new concerns with regards to language, symbolism,
subjectivity, phenomenology, ethics, justice and creativity.[23]

Relationship with transhumanism


Posthumanism is sometimes used as a synonym for a cultural and philosophical movement known as
"transhumanism" because it proposes a transition to a "posthuman future", achieved through the application of
technology to expand human capacities.

James Hughes comments that there is considerable confusion between the two terms.[24][25]

Criticism
Some critics have argued that all forms of posthumanism, including transhumanism, have more in common
than their respective proponents realize.[26] Linking these different approaches, Paul James suggests that 'the
key political problem is that, in effect, the position allows the human as a category of being to flow down the
plughole of history':

“ This is ontologically critical. Unlike the naming of ‘postmodernism’ where the



‘post’ does not infer the end of what it previously meant to be human (just the
passing of the dominance of the modern) the posthumanists are playing a serious
game where the human, in all its ontological variability, disappears in the name of
saving something unspecified about us as merely a motley co-location of
individuals and communities.[27]

However, some posthumanists in the humanities and the arts are critical of transhumanism (the brunt of Paul
James's criticism), in part, because they argue that it incorporates and extends many of the values of
Enlightenment humanism and classical liberalism, namely scientism, according to performance philosopher
Shannon Bell:[28]

“ Altruism, mutualism, humanism are the soft and slimy virtues that underpin liberal
capitalism. Humanism has always been integrated into discourses of exploitation:
colonialism, imperialism, neoimperialism, democracy, and of course, American
democratization. One of the serious flaws in transhumanism is the importation of
liberal-human values to the biotechno enhancement of the human. Posthumanism
has a much stronger critical edge attempting to develop through enactment new
understandings of the self and others, essence, consciousness, intelligence, reason,
agency, intimacy, life, embodiment, identity and the body.[28]

While many modern leaders of thought are accepting of nature of ideologies described by posthumanism, some
are more skeptical of the term. Donna Haraway, the author of A Cyborg Manifesto, has outspokenly rejected the
term, though acknowledges a philosophical alignment with posthumanism. Haraway opts instead for the term
of companion species, referring to nonhuman entities with which humans coexist.[22]

Questions of race, some argue, are suspiciously elided within the "turn" to posthumanism. Noting that the terms
"post" and "human" are already loaded with racial meaning, critical theorist Zakiyyah Iman Jackson argues that
the impulse to move "beyond" the human within posthumanism too often ignores “praxes of humanity and
critiques produced by black people,”[29] including Frantz Fanon and Aime Cesaire to Hortense Spillers and
Fred Moten.[29] Interrogating the conceptual grounds in which such a mode of “beyond” is rendered legible and
viable, Jackson argues that it is important to observe that “blackness conditions and constitutes the very
nonhuman disruption and/or disruption" which posthumanists invite.[29] In other words, given that race in
general and blackness in particular constitutes the very terms through which human/nonhuman distinctions are
made, for example in enduring legacies of scientific racism, a gesture toward a “beyond” actually “returns us to
a Eurocentric transcendentalism long challenged”.[30]

See also
Posthuman
Metahuman

References

1. Ferrando, Francesca (2013). "Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New


Materialisms: Differences and Relations" (http://www.existenz.us/volumes/Vol.8-2Ferrando.pdf) (PDF).
ISSN 1932-1066 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/1932-1066). Retrieved 2014-03-14.
2. J. Childers/G. Hentzi eds., The Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism (1995) p.
140-1
3. Esposito, Roberto (2011). "Politics and human nature" (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/096
9725X.2011.621222) (PDF). doi:10.1080/0969725X.2011.621222 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F0969725
X.2011.621222). Retrieved 2013-06-06.
4. Miah, A. (2008) A Critical History of Posthumanism. In Gordijn, B. & Chadwick R. (2008) Medical
Enhancement and Posthumanity. Springer, pp.71-94.
5. Badmington, Neil (2000). Posthumanism (Readers in Cultural Criticism). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-
333-76538-9.
6. Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and
Informatics. University Of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-32146-0.
7. Bostrom, Nick (2005). "A history of transhumanist thought" (http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/histor
y.pdf) (PDF). Retrieved 2006-02-21.
8. "The Darkness Before the Right" (http://www.theawl.com/2015/09/good-luck-to-human-kind).
9. Hugo de Garis (2002). "First shot in Artilect war fired" (https://web.archive.org/web/20071017165724/ht
tp://iss.whu.edu.cn/degaris/news/zurich.html). Archived from the original (http://www.iss.whu.edu.cn/de
garis/news/zurich.html) on 17 October 2007.
10. "Machines Like Us interviews: Hugo de Garis" (http://www.machineslikeus.com/cms/interview-hugo-de-
garis.html). 3 September 2007. "gigadeath – the characteristic number of people that would be killed in
any major late 21st century war, if one extrapolates up the graph of the number of people killed in major
wars over the past 2 centuries"
11. Garis, Hugo de. "The Artilect War - Cosmists vs. Terrans" (http://agi-conf.org/2008/artilectwar.pdf)
(PDF). agi-conf.org. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
12. Schatzki, T.R. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory, in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory eds.
Theodore R.Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina & Eike Von Savigny.
13. http://www.dooy.info/ground.motives.html
14. Dooyeweerd, H. (1955/1984). A new critique of theoretical thought (Vol. 1). Jordan Station, Ontario,
Canada: Paideia Press. P. 4
15. 'law-side' (http://www.dooy.info/2sides.html)
16. his radical notion of subject-object relations (http://www.dooy.info/subject.object.html)
17. Hassan, Ihab (1977). "Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Postmodern Culture?". In Michel Benamou,
Charles Caramello. Performance in Postmodern Culture. Performance in Postmodern Culture. Madison,
Wisconsin: Coda Press. ISBN 0-930956-00-1.
18. Wolfe, C. (2009). 'What is Posthumanism?' (https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/what-is-
posthumanism) University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
19. Evans, Woody (2015). "Posthuman Rights: Dimensions of Transhuman Worlds" (http://revistas.ucm.es/in
dex.php/TEKN/article/view/49072/46310). Madrid: Teknokultura.
20. Badmington, Neil. "Posthumanism" (http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g978140518
3123_chunk_g978140518312363_ss1-3). Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
21. Cecchetto, David (2013). Humanesis: Sound and Technological Posthumanism. Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
22. Gane, Nicholas (2006). "When We Have Never Been Human, What Is to Be Done?: Interview with
Donna Haraway". Theory, Culture & Society. 23 (7-8): 135–158.
23. Roudavski, Stanislav; McCormack, Jon (2016). "Post-Anthropocentric Creativity" (https://www.academi
a.edu/25795263/Post-Anthropocentric_Creativity). Digital Creativity. 27 (1): 3–6.
doi:10.1080/14626268.2016.1151442 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F14626268.2016.1151442).
24. Ranisch, Robert (January 2014). "Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction" (https://www.researchgat
e.net/publication/269405350_Post-_and_Transhumanism_An_Introduction). Retrieved 25 August 2016.
25. MacFarlane, James. "Boundary Work: Post- and Transhumanism, Part I, James Michael MacFarlane" (htt
ps://social-epistemology.com/2014/12/23/boundary-work-post-and-transhumanism-part-i-james-michael-
macfarlane/). Retrieved 25 August 2016.
26. Winner, Langdon. "Resistance is Futile: The Posthuman Condition and Its Advocates". In Harold Bailie,
Timothy Casey. Is Human Nature Obsolete?. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, October 2004:
M.I.T. Press. pp. 385–411. ISBN 0262524287.
27. James, Paul (2017). "Alternative Paradigms for Sustainability: Decentring the Human without Becoming
Posthuman". In Karen Malone, Son Truong, and Tonia Gray. Reimagining Sustainability in Precarious
Times (https://www.academia.edu/32388929/Alternative_Paradigms_for_Sustainability_Decentring_the_
Human_Without_Becoming_Posthuman). Ashgate. p. 21.
28. Zaretsky, Adam (2005). "Bioart in Question. Interview." (http://magazine.ciac.ca/archives/no_23/en/entre
vue.htm). Retrieved 2007-01-28.
29. Jackson 2015, p. 216.
30. Jackson 2015, p. 217.

Works cited
Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman (June 2015). "Outer Worlds: The Persistence of Race in Movement ‘Beyond the
Human' ". Gay and Lesbian Quarterly (GLQ).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Posthumanism&oldid=803977509"

This page was last edited on 5 October 2017, at 21:53.


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may
apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered
trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

You might also like