Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/309489017
CITATIONS READS
0 619
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Taoufik Brahim on 20 November 2016.
HEAT EXCHANGERS
CHARACTERISTICS, TYPES
AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS
No part of this digital document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or
by any means. The publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this digital document, but makes no
expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No
liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information
contained herein. This digital document is sold with the clear understanding that the publisher is not engaged in
rendering legal, medical or any other professional services.
HEAT EXCHANGERS
CHARACTERISTICS, TYPES
AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS
JAMES K. COOPER
EDITOR
New York
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any
form or by any means: electronic, electrostatic, magnetic, tape, mechanical photocopying, recording or
otherwise without the written permission of the Publisher.
We have partnered with Copyright Clearance Center to make it easy for you to obtain permissions to reuse
content from this publication. Simply navigate to this publication’s page on Nova’s website and locate the
“Get Permission” button below the title description. This button is linked directly to the title’s permission
page on copyright.com. Alternatively, you can visit copyright.com and search by title, ISBN, or ISSN.
For further questions about using the service on copyright.com, please contact:
Copyright Clearance Center
Phone: +1-(978) 750-8400 Fax: +1-(978) 750-4470 E-mail: info@copyright.com.
Independent verification should be sought for any data, advice or recommendations contained in this book. In
addition, no responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property
arising from any methods, products, instructions, ideas or otherwise contained in this publication.
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard to the subject
matter covered herein. It is sold with the clear understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in rendering
legal or any other professional services. If legal or any other expert assistance is required, the services of a
competent person should be sought. FROM A DECLARATION OF PARTICIPANTS JOINTLY ADOPTED
BY A COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AND A COMMITTEE OF
PUBLISHERS.
Additional color graphics may be available in the e-book version of this book.
Preface vii
Chapter 1 Compact Heat Exchangers Development 1
Brahim Taoufik and Jemni Abdelmajid
Index 127
number of passes and tubes per pass, as well as, several mixture conditions of
both fluids. The computational procedures are developed, based on some
works from literature, to calculate the temperature effectiveness and the mean
logarithm temperature difference (MLTD) correction factor for crossflow and
parallel and counter-crossflow heat exchangers. New temperature
effectiveness and correction factor data for the treated complex flow
arrangements configurations are provided and showed in various tables and
plots. Tube fluid mixing conditions after each pass, characterized by three
types of configuration: tube fluid mixed; tube fluid unmixed keeping identical
order of the rows; and tube fluid unmixed with inverted order of the rows, are
analyzed. The influence of external fluid mixing between tube rows along the
heat exchanger configurations is also addressed. In addition, the results are
compared with other works and show the capability of the computational
algorithms developed.
Chapter 1
COMPACT HEAT
EXCHANGERS DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
In recent years, thermal control systems performance has improved in numerous
ways due to developments in control theory and information technology. Efforts
have been made to produce more efficient heat exchangers by employing various
methods of heat transfer enhancement. However, our understanding of
controllability and related questions remain rudimentary. Increase in heat
exchanger performance can lead to more economical design of heat exchanger
which can be help to make energy, material & cost savings related to a heat
exchange process. Compact heat exchangers (CHEs) technologies are expected to
be one of the solutions for new generation heat exchanger.
The main motivation of this chapter is to present a short review of advanced
heat exchangers thermal design and manufacturing perspective. In this context, a
review on performance of compact heat exchangers with different configurations
is presented. The enhanced heat transfer techniques for compact heat exchangers
in various applications. Finally, future development technologies and heat
exchangers emerging applications are discussed.
1. Introduction
The heat exchangers are found to have a wide range of applications such as
aerospace, automotive, power and process applications. Novel heat exchangers
solutions are needed to accommodate demand for increased performance with
minimum pressure loss, reduced size (volume, envelop dimensions, aspect ratio,
weight) and affordable, modular and/or scalable. In fact, the design procedure of
heat exchangers is quite complicated, as it needs exact analysis of heat transfer
rate, efficiency and pressure drop apart from issues such as long- term
performance and the economic aspect of the equipment. Whenever inserts
technologies are used for the heat transfer enhancement, along with the
improvement in the heat transfer rate, the pressure drop also increases, which
induces the higher pumping cost. Therefore any augmentation device or methods
utilized into the heat exchanger should be optimized between the benefits of heat
transfer coefficient and the higher pumping cost owing to the increased frictional
losses. So, if we provided fins rectangular or circular type on internal periphery of
the tube type heat exchanger than the heat transfer rate will going to be increased.
The survey and researches had been carried out in a large manner to improve the
heat transfer enhancements. In general, heat transfer augmentation methods are
classified into three broad categories:
Active techniques involves some external power input for the enhancement of
heat transfer using mechanical aids, surface vibration, fluid vibration, electrostatic
fields, injection, suction and jet impingement. Examples of active techniques
induced pulsation by cams and reciprocating plungers, the use of a magnetic field
to disturb the seeded light particles in a flowing stream, etc.
Passive techniques generally used in surface or geometrical modifications to
the flow channel by incorporating inserts or additional devices, for example,
treated surfaces, use of rough surfaces or extended surfaces, displaced
enhancement devices, swirl flow devices /surfaces, coiled tubes, surface tension
devices, liquid gas additives. The Effectiveness of each particular method depends
on mode of heat transfer and flow regime (i.e single or two phase flow, free or
forced convection, laminar or turbulent flow) and also of type of application.
In general, enhanced heat transfer surfaces can be used for three purposes: (1)
to make heat exchangers more compact in order to reduce their overall volume,
and possibly their cost, (2) to reduce the pumping power required for a given heat
transfer process, or (3) to increase the overall UA value of the heat exchanger. A
higher UA value can be exploited in either of two ways: (1) to obtain an increased
heat exchange rate for fixed fluid inlet temperatures, or (2) to reduce the mean
temperature difference for the heat exchange; this increases the thermodynamic
process efficiency, which can result in a saving of operating costs.
A large number of plate fin geometries have been used in compact CHEs and
more are still being developed (Figure 1). It consists of a series of corrugated
The advantages of PHEs are: high efficiency, compact design, can operate at
high temperatures and pressure and easily cleaned. The surface area required for a
PHE is 30–50% that of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger for a given heat duty, thus
in turn reducing the cost. For the same effective heat transfer area, the weight and
volume of PHEs are approximately only 30% and 20%, respectively, of those of
shell-and-tube heat exchangers. They can have 50% less volume than a fined tube
heat exchanger [17].
parts: offset fins, wavy fins and non-uniformity of inlet fluid flow. This review
helps the researchers to carry out their further research in this field and also gives
awareness for the designers to select the accurate design data for the optimum
design. Most PFHEs still use brazing to assemble the core.
Strip fins (or offset fins): the short sections of fins are
Offset Strip Fins aligned entirely with the flow direction. Due to the short
flow-length fins, the boundary layer never becomes
thick. Thus there is a high heat transfer coefficient
[28,29].
Louvered Fins
Louvered fins: fins are cut and bent out into the flow
stream at frequent intervals, to break the boundary
layers and achieve high thermal performance [30].
Vortex generators do not significantly change the
effective heat transfer surface area of the plate, but they
increase the heat transfer coefficient by creating
Vortex Generators longitudinally spiraling vortices which promote mixing
between the wall and core regions of the flow [29, 30].
Vortex generators are a relatively new type of
enhancement device, and an optimum geometry has not
yet been arrived at. There are any numbers of
possibilities for different vortex generator surfaces,
since one can vary the size, angle of attack, aspect ratio,
and/or arrangement of the vortex generators.
Figure 4. Different types of PCHE, (a)-Conventional zigzag, (b)-S shaped, (c)-Airfoil shape.
giving precise passage shapes from a form very similar to that of a PFHE; to one
similar to a PCHE surface [38]. And the type can be used for a wide variety of
duties involving single phase or two phase streams, as well as for reactions. The
Marbond heat exchangers are considered as high-integrity, high compact units
able to operate over a range of pressures and temperatures not met in more
conventional gasketed or welded CHEs. The Marbond unit is capable of being
used at temperatures within the range −200◦C to 900◦C. Pressure differentials in
excess of 400 bars can be accommodated [39].
Figure 5. Marbond heat exchanger, (a) – Exploded view, (b)-layers of slotted plates
forming flow paths
Most of SHEs are not compact (some recent developments are compact).
They are often used in the heating of high viscosity and dirty fluids. A SHE refers
to a helical tube configuration; more generally, the term refers to a circular heat
exchanger with two long metal strips of plate rolled together to form a pair of
concentric spiral channels of rectangular cross-section, one for each fluid (Figure
6). The passages can be either smooth or corrugated, in some cases studs are
welded onto one side of each strip to fix the spacing between the plates, provide
mechanical strength and induce turbulence that increases heat transfer. Alternate
passage edges are sealed either by welding at each side of the channel [38] or by
providing a gasket at each end cover to obtain the following arrangements of the
two fluids: (1) both in spiral counter-flow; (2) one in spiral flow, the other in
cross-flow across the spiral; or (3) one in spiral flow, the other in a combination of
cross-flow and spiral flow. The internal void volume is lower (less than 60%) than
in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger [40], and this yields a compact and space-
saving construction that can be readily integrated in any plant and reduces
installation costs. Recently the newly designed Swiss-roll recuperator based on a
spiral concept is proposed as a heat exchanger to recover the exhaust heat for
future higher efficiency micro-turbines. The strategies to have a Swiss-roll
recuperator of higher efficiency, low pressure loss and compact size were
discussed and the feasibility studies were performed by Shih et al. [41, 42].
Types Features
Max- Multistram
Compactness Stream Temperature Cleaning Corrosion
Materiel2 pressure /multipass
(m2/m3) types1 range (°C) methods resistance
( bar) capacity
Liquid-
s/s, Ti,
liquid,
Plate-and- Incoloy,
gas-
frame <=200 Hastelloy, -35 to +200 25 Mechanical4 Good5 Yes6/Yes
liquid,
(gaskets) graphite,
two-
polymer
phase
Liquid-
liquid,
Partially s/s, Ti,
gas- Mechanical4,7
Welded <=200 Incoloy, -35 to +200 25 Good5 No/Yes
liquid, Chimical8
Plate Hastelloy
two-
phase
Liquid-
liquid,
Fully welded
gas- s/s,Ti, Ni
plate <=200 -50 to 350 40 Chemical Good No/Yes
liquid, alloys
(Alfa Rex)
two-
phase
Liquid-
liquid,
Brazed plate <=200 s/s -195 to +220 30 Chimical9 Good No/No11
two-
phase
Gases,
s/s, Ni, Cu,
liquids, Mechanical4,9 In.principe/
Bavex plate 200 up to 300 Ti, special -200 to +900 60 Good10
two – Chemical Yes
steels
phase
Types Features
Max- Multistram
Compactness Stream Temperature Cleaning Corrosion
Materiel2 pressure /multipass
(m2/m3) types1 range (°C) methods resistance
( bar) capacity
Gas-
s/s,
Platular liquid,
200 hostelloy, up to 700 40 Mechanical4,13 Good Yes14/Yes
plate two-
Ni alloys
phase
Compabloc s/s,Ti, Not.usually/
<=300 Liquids up to 300 32 Mechanical4 Good
Plate Incoloy Yes
Gases,
s/s, Ti,
Packinox liquids,
<=300 Hastelloy, -200 up to +700 300 Mechanical4.15 Good Yes6/Yes
plate two –
Inconel
phase
Liquid-
c/s, s/s, Ti,
liquid,
Spiral <=200 Incoloy, up to 400 25 Mechanical4 Good No/No
two-
Hastelloy
phase
Gases,
Brazed liquids, Al, s/s, Ni Cryogenic to
800 up to 1500 90 Chemical Good Yes/Yes
plate-fin two – alloy +650
phase
Gases,
Diffusion-
liquids,
bonded plate- 700 up to 800 Ti, s/s up to 500 >200 Chemical Excellent Yes/Yes
two –
fin
phase
Types Features
Max- Multistram
Compactness Stream Temperature Cleaning Corrosion
Materiel2 pressure /multipass
(m2/m3) types1 range (°C) methods resistance
( bar) capacity
Gases,
Diffusion-
700 up to 800 liquids, two Ti, s/s up to 500 >200 Chemical Excellent Yes/Yes
bonded plate-fin
–phase
Gases,
200 up to s/s, Ni, Ni
Printed- Circuit liquids, two -200 up to +900 >400 Chemical Excellent Yes/Yes
5000 alloy, Ti
–phase
Polymer (e.g. PVDF17, No/Not
450 Gas-liquid16 up to 150 6 Water wash Excellent
channel plate) PP18 usually
s/s, Ti,
Mechanical4,15,
Plate-and-shell -- liquids (shell also up to 350 70 Good No/Yes
Chemical21
in c/s)20
Gases,
s/s, Ni, Ni
Marbond <= 10000 liquids, two -200 up to +900 >900 Chemical Excellent Yes/Yes
alloy, Ti
–phase
The ratio of the friction factor of the enhanced design over that of the
reference one (f0) and the ratio of the related heat transfer enhancement at the
same Reynolds number (Nu0) are plotted. Four region are considered
corresponding to the different effectiveness of saving energy: Region (1) is
characterized by enhanced heat transfer without energy-saving, where heat
transfer enhancement is obtained with larger pressure drop penalty such that per
identical pumping power the heat transfer is deteriorated; in Region (2) heat
transfer is enhanced per identical pumping power but deteriorated per identical
pressured drop, in Region (3) heat transfer is enhanced per identical pressure drop,
and in Region (4) the heat transfer enhancement ratio is larger than the friction
factor increase ratio under identical flow rate, which is the most favorable but also
the most difficult region to reach for heat transfer enhancement study.
Conclusion
Compact heat exchangers can be used in most industrial applications
depending on working temperature and pressure. Compared to conventional shell
and tube heat exchangers, CHE offer significant benefits such as improved
efficiency and security, smaller volume and weight, tighter temperature control
and energy saving. For a special surface geometry based on CHE process and
application, many options have to choose, as their varieties. How can one
compare the performance improvement given by various enhanced surfaces?
Certainly, one can judge the relative heat transfer enhancement for selected
geometries by comparing the heat transfer coefficients or dimensionless heat
transfer parameters (i.e. Nusselt number, Stanton number, etc.) yielded by each
enhanced surface. But this will only give a partial indication of performance.
Enhanced surfaces do provide a greater heat transfer coefficient, but they also lead
to increased fluid flow friction and pressure drop. Sometimes the benefits of
setting heat transfer value are not sufficient to offset the losses by increasing
friction. Clearly then, the performance objective is to get the maximum heat
transfer enhancement with minimum penalty on the pump power. However, this
balance is difficult to quantify in a way that allows direct comparisons between
improved surface geometries. Many methods have been proposed to accurately
assess the performance improvement provided by the technical improvement. The
thermal performance and the pressure loss are also two important factors in heat
exchanger design and must be evaluated. Moreover, the coefficient of
performance (COP), power density (PD), compactness factor (CF), and energy
saving efficiency can be estimated to evaluate the overall performance
enhancement of CHE’s.
The main focus of this chapter is placed on the introduction structures of certain
types of CHE commonly used in the industry or designed in the laboratory. Their
development is summarized, and their advantages and major limitations. This
overview of different types of CHE will help manufacturers to design and analyze
their specific needs. Although considerable database already exists for the transfer
of single phase heat in various types of CHE, certain data are not sufficient,
incomplete and cannot be used primarily because of the difference in operating
temperature conditions. Further experimental work is needed on the visualization
and measurement of the pressure drop, the local velocity profiles and heat transfer
coefficients for more data, in order to validate the results of CFD and for the
prediction of thermo-hydrodynamic behavior of CHE.
References
[1] R. K. Shah. Classification of Heat Exchangers, Low Reynolds Number Flow
Heat Exchangers. S. Kakac, R. K. Shah, and A. E. Bergles ed. pp. 9-14
(Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, 1983).
[2] Mehendale SS, Jacobi AM, Shah RK. Fluid flow and heat transfer at micro
and meso-scales with application to heat exchanger design. Appl Mech Rev
1999; 53(7):175–93.
[3] Shah RK, Sekuli´c DP. Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. New York:
John Wiley & Sons; 2003. pp. 9–39.
[4] Dostal V, Hejzlar P, Driscoll MJ. High-performance supercritical carbon
dioxide cycle for next-generation nuclear reactor. Nucl Technol 2006;
154:265–82.
[5] Shah RK. Compact heat exchanger technology and applications. In:
Foumeny EA, Heggs PJ, editors. Heat exchanger engineering, vol. 2,
compact heat exchangers: techniques for size reduction. London: Ellis
Horwood; 1991. p. 1–29.
[6] Qi Li, Gilles F, Xigang Y, Pierre N, Lingai L. Compact heat exchangers: A
review and future applications for a new generation of high temperature
solar receivers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011)
4855– 4875.
[7] Focke WW, Knibbe PG. Flow visualization in parallel-plate ducts with
corrugated walls. J Fluid Mech 1986; 165:73–7.
[8] Kanaris AG, Mouza AA, Paras SV. Designing novel compact heat
exchangers for improved efficiency using a CFD code. In: 1st Intern.
Conference from scientific computing to computational engineering Athens,
Greece; 2004.
[9] Sang I, Hyung N. Experimental study on flow and local heat/mass transfer
characteristics inside corrugated duct. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2006; 27:21–
32.
[10] Li XW, Meng JA, Li ZX. An experimental study of the flow and heat
transfer between enhanced heat transfer plates for PHEs. Exp Therm Fluid
Sci 2010; 34(8):1194–204.
[11] Rao BP, Das SK. An experimental study on the influence of flow
maldistribution on the pressure drop across a plate exchanger. J Fluids Eng,
ASME Trans 2004; 126:680–91.
[12] Durmus A, Benli H, Kurtbas I, Gul H. Investigation of heat transfer and
pressure drop in plate heat exchangers having different surface profiles. Int
J Heat Mass Trans 2009; 52(5–6):1451–7.
[13] Jeong JY, Hong HK, Kim SK, Kang YT. Impact of plate design on the
performance of welded type plate heat exchangers for sorption cycles. Int J
Refrigerat 2009; 32(4):705–11.
[14] Fernandes CS, Dias RP, Nóbrega JM, Maia JM. Laminar flow in chevron-
type plate heat exchangers: CFD analysis of tortuosity, shape factor and
friction factor. Chem Eng Proc 2007; 46:825–33.
[15] Kanaris AG, Mouza AA, Paras SV. Flow and heat transfer in narrow
channels with corrugated walls: a CFD code application. Chem Eng Res Des
2005; 83(5):460–8.
[16] Focke WW, Zachariades J, Oliver I. The effect of the corrugation
inclination angle on the thermo hydraulic performance of plate heat
exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Trans 1985; 28(8):1469–79.
[17] Lozano A, Barreras F, Fueyo N, Santodomingo S. The flow in an oil/water
plate heat exchanger for the automotive industry. Appl Therm Eng 2008;
28(10):1109–17.
[18] Sheik Ismail L, Velraj R, Ranganayakulu C. Studies on pumping power in
terms of pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics of compact plate-fin
heat exchangers—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010; 14(1):
478–85.
[19] Adderley Colin I, Fowler John O, Wignall Michael F, inventors; Rolls-
Royce And Associates Limited, Rolls-Royce plc., assignee. Heat
exchanger, November 12. US Patent 5573060; 1996.
[20] Dudfield CD, Chen R, Adcock PL. A carbon monoxide PROX reactor for
PEM fuel cell automotive application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2001; 26(7):
763–75.
[21] The standards of the brazed aluminium plate-fin heat exchanger
manufacturers’ association, 2nd edition, ALPEMA; 2000.
[22] Reay D. Learning from experiences with compact heat exchangers, Center
for the Analysis and Dissemination of Demonstrated Energy Technologies
(CADDET), Series No. 25, Netherlands; 1999.
[23] R. K. Shah and R. L. Webb. Compact and Enhanced Heat Exchangers, Heat
Exchangers: Theory and Practice. J. Taborek G. F. Hewitt, and N. Afgan
ed. pp. 425-468(Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, 1983).
[24] J. G. Soland, J. W. M. Mack and W. M. Rohsenow, Performance Ranking
of Plate-Fin Heat Exchanger Surfaces, Transactions of the ASME Journal of
Heat Transfer, Vol. 100, pp. 514-519, 1978.
[25] J. E. O'Brien and E. M. Sparrow, Corrugated-Duct Heat Transfer, Pressure
Drop, and Flow Visualization, Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Heat
Transfer, Vol. 104, pp. 410-416, 1982.
[39] Reay D. Learning from experiences with compact heat exchangers, Center
for the Analysis and Dissemination of Demonstrated Energy Technologies
(CADDET), Series No. 25, Netherlands; 1999.
[40] Shah RK, Sekuli´c DP. Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. New York:
John Wiley & Sons; 2003. pp. 9–39.
[41] Shih HY, Huang YC. Thermal design and model analysis of the Swissroll
recuperator for an innovative micro gas turbine. Appl Therm Eng 2009; 29
(8–9):1493–9.
[42] Shih HY, Wang D, Kuo CR. Feasibility study of an innovative micro gas
turbine with a Swiss-roll recuperator. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
v5 part A; 2006. p. 459–66.
[43] ASTM Standard C242-01, 2007, Standard Terminology of Ceramic
Whitewares and Related Products,” ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA. Doi: 10.1520/C0242-01R07, www.astm.org; 2007.
[44] Sommers A, Wang Q, Han X, T’Joen C, Park Y, Jacobi A. Ceramics and
ceramic matrix composites for heat exchangers in advanced thermal
systems—a review. ApplThermEng2010; 30(11–12):1277–91.
[45] McDonald CF. Recuperator considerations for future higher efficiency
microturbines. ApplThermEng2003; 23(January (12)):1463–87.
[46] Fan JF, Ding WK, Zhang JF, He YL, Tao WQ. A performance evaluation
plot of enhanced heat transfer techniques oriented for energy-saving. Int J
Heat Mass Trans 2009; 52(1–2):33–4.