Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Beginner's Introduction
Islam is the same religion that God revealed through His messengers
(peace be upon them) to all people. Islam is a complete way of life. It
impacts every part of life, from eating and sleeping to working and
playing. It is not only a personal religion, but also a social one.
Muslims are supposed to live in accordance with God's laws. By
doing so, they strive to obtain nearness to God and victory over
temporary trials and temptations in this world. All aspects of their
practice including prayer, fasting, charity, and pilgrimage are intended
to help meet this goal.
Muslims believe in Allah, the Supreme and Eternal, Infinite and
Mighty, Merciful and Compassionate, The Creator and The Provider,
He begets not, nor was He begotten, and there is none equal or
comparable unto Him.
Muslims believe in all Messengers of Allah without any discrimination
among them, as every known nation has a Warner or messenger
from Allah. They were chosen by God to teach humanity and deliver
His Divine message. The Qur'an mentions the name of some of them
including Jews including Adam, Noah, Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac,
Jacob, Joseph, Job, Moses, Aaron, David, Solomon, Elias, Jonah,
John the Baptist, and Jesus (peace be upon them).
Muslims also believe in another prophet named Muhammad who is a
direct descendant of Abraham through his first born son, Ishmael. His
prophethood is prophecied in the Bible in several places, including
Deut 18:18 and John 14:16. Mohammad stands as the last
messenger and the crowning glory of the foundation of prophethood.
Muslims believe in all original scriptures and revelations of Allah,
accepting them as the guiding light that the messengers received to
show their respective people the right path to Him. However, some of
these books and revelations had been lost or corrupted before the
revelation of the Qur'an. The only authentic and complete book of
Allah in existence today is the Qur'an, which has been preserved as it
was revealed to prophet Muhammad through Angel Gabriel in its
pristine, pure form.
The Qur'an contains many stories that are familiar to Christians and
Jews. It contains no scientific fallacies or internal contradictions. In
fact, it contains much scientific knowledge discovered by scientists
only in this century. The Qur'an is an unparalleled Arabic literary
masterpiece.
People living in the West and throughout the world should not allow
themselves to be ignorant about Islam and Muslims. For example,
there are ten million Muslims living in the United States out of 1.8
billion in the world. Only 18% of Muslims live in the Arab world.
Demographers say that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the
U.S. and the world. Islam is the second largest religion in America,
France, Great Britain and many more, surpassing Judaism,
Mormonism, Jehovah's Witness, and other religions.
Was the first born son of Abraham (Ishmael) and his descendants
included in God's covenant and promise? A few verses from the Bible
may help shed some light on this question:
After Jesus, the last Israelite messenger and prophet, it was time that
God's promise to bless Ishmael and his descendants be fulfilled. Less
than 600 years after Jesus, came the last messenger of God,
Muhammad (peace be upon him), from the progeny of Abraham
through Ishmael. God's blessing of both of the main branches of
Abraham's family tree was now fulfilled. But are there additional
corroborating evidence that the Bible did in fact foretell the advent of
prophet Muhammad (pbuh)?
Habakkuk 3:3 speaks of God (God's help) coming from Te'man (an
Oasis North of Medina according to J. Hasting's Dictionary of the
Bible), and the holy one (coming) from Paran. That holy one who
under persecution migrated from Paran (Mecca) to be received
enthusiastically in Medina was none but prophet Muhammad (pbuh).
Indeed the incident of the migration of the prophet and his persecuted
followers is vividly described in Isaiah 21:13-17 . That section foretold
as well about the battle of Badr in which the few ill-armed faithful
miraculously defeated the "mighty" men of Ke'dar, who sought to
destroy Islam and intimidate their own folks who turned to Islam.
For twenty-three years, God's words (the Qur'an) were truly put into
Muhammad's (pbuh) mouth. He was not the “11th author” of the
Qur'an, the Qur’an was dictated to Muhammad (pbuh) by Angel
Gabriel, who asked him to simply repeat the words of the Qur'an as
he heard them. These words were then committed to memory and to
writing by those who hear them during Muhammad's lifetime and
under his supervision.
Was it a coincidence that the prophet "like unto Moses" from the
"brethren" of the Israelites (i.e. from the Ishmaelites) was also
described as one in whose mouth God will put his words and that he
will speak in the name of God., ( Deuteronomy 18:18-20 ). Was it also
a coincidence the "Paraclete" that Jesus foretold to come after Him
was described as one who "shall not speak of himself, but
whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak (John 16:13).
THAT PROPHET-PARACLETE-MUHAMMAD
Up to the time of Jesus (peace be upon him), the Israelites were still
awaiting for that prophet like unto Moses prophesied in Deuteronomy
18:18 . When John the Baptist came, they asked him if he was Christ
and he said "no". They asked him if he was Elias and he said "no".
Then, in apparent reference to Deuteronomy 18:18 , they asked him
"Art thou that Prophet" and he answered, "no". ( John 1: 1 9-2 1).
One of the signs of the prophet to come from Paran (Mecca) is that
he will come with "ten thousands of saints" (Deuteronomy 33:2 KJV).
That was the number of faithful who accompanied Prophet
Muhammad to Paran (Mecca) in his victorious, bloodless return to his
birthplace to destroy the remaining symbols of idolatry in the Ka'bah.
A Christian who has studied the Bible would be proud to admit that
the prophecy made by prophet Moses for the coming of "a Prophet
like me" (Deut. 18:15), undoubtedly refers to the coming of Jesus
Christ, since Jesus himself had acknowledged before Jews; "Moses
wrote of me." (see John 5:46). These learned Christians have no
problem in admitting the fact that Jesus was "a prophet like his
predecessor Moses".
In his Epistle quoted below, apostle John records that Jesus was "a
Paraclete".
"My little children, I am writing these things to you that you may not
sin. And if anyone sins, we have a Paraclete with the Father, Jesus
Christ the righteous." 1 John. 2:1
John has also recorded in his Gospel 14:16, quoted below, that Jesus
(after his departure) will pray to the God, and the God will give us
"another Paraclete". This opens up a way for a future date male
Prophet to be "a Paraclete", as well. To say: only a "Spirit" can be a
Paraclete and not a male individual, would be to deny: "Jesus was a
Prophet and a Paraclete".
"And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Paraclete,
that he may abide with you into the age (to come)." John 14:16
Note: We often read the above verse ending as; "for ever". The fact
of the matter is; "into the age" is the literal translation of the original
Greek phrase; 'eis ton aiona'.
In the next verse, i.e. 14:17, John records, "another Paraclete" is the
"Spirit of Truth" (not the Holy Spirit). WHAT WILL "HE" DO?
Jesus Christ did indicate that the Paraclete will do certain things in his
time. Let us examine if "he", Prophet Muhammad, did those things.
1. "But when he, the Spirit of Truth, comes, he will guide you into all
the truth; for he will not speak on his own initiative, but whatever he
hears, he will speak..." Jn. 16:13
This verse clearly indicates that the coming of the Paraclete was
subject to the departure of Jesus. His departure from this world was a
*pre-condition* for the arrival of the Paraclete.
We know that the "Holy Spirit" was already present during and before
the ministry of Jesus. The Holy Spirit was in existence since the day
of the Creation and was hovering upon the surface of the earth (Gen.
1:2). It was also present with the prophets of the Old Testament. No
Bible believing Christian can deny that the "Holy Spirit" was present
at River Jordan when Christ was Baptized by John the Baptist. Since
there is no more than ONE "Holy Spirit", Jesus would not have made
his own departure a *pre-condition* for its arrival.
"When the Paraclete comes, whom I will send to you from the Father,
that is the Spirit of Truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear
witness of me." John 15:26
This verse further clears the confusion, if there is any. Here the
Paraclete is called the "Spirit of Truth" and not the "Holy Spirit".
These are two separate terms and two independent entities. The first
entity takes the pronoun "he" being a male figure. Whereas, the
second one takes the pronoun "it". The Greek word 'pneu'ma' (spirit)
is of neutral gender and takes the pronoun "it". Whereas, in almost all
the verses referring to Paraclete quoted below, the pronoun used is
"he".
"But the Paraclete, the Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name,
he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I
said to you." John 14:26
Notes:
1. In the older MSS, Codex Syriacus discovered in 1812 on Mount
Sinai by Mrs. Agnes S. Lewis (and Mrs. Bensley), the text of John
14:26 reads; "Paraclete, the Spirit"; and not "Paraclete, the Holy
Spirit". "The Spirit" is a reference to "the Spirit of Truth" as in 15:26.
2. In 1 John 4:6, the terms "the spirit of truth" and "the spirit of error"
are used for the human beings.
3. History records that prophet Muhammad was known for his Truth
and Honesty, long before he received the Divine Revelations.
A PROPHET IN THE LAND OF KEDAR
Prophet Isaiah is considered to be one of the major prophets of the
Old Testament. In the Book of Isaiah there are several prophecies
about the coming of the Messiah. In chapter 42, Isaiah begins with a
prophecy for the coming of prophet Jesus. After verse number nine,
God declares through Isaiah, the "new things" that are to "spring
forth" in the
Land of Kedar.
In the Bible there is only one personality called Kedar. He was the
grandson of prophet Abraham, through his son Ishmael (see Gen.
25:13). Kedar's descendants had settled in Paran (Syno-Arabian
dessert). In the Rabbinic literature Arabia is called the "Land of
Kedar". Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was a descendant of Kedar.
Prophet Muhammad did go forth as "a mighty man of war" against the
Pagan Arabs, the enemies of The Lord. He did stir up jealousy
among the most influential and dominating Pagan tribe in Arabia.
With a war cry and roar of "Allahu Akbar" ("The God is the Greatest"),
the Prophet of Islam did prevail upon the enemies of Lord - the
idolaters. No doubt, the Islam was spread with a "war cry", but that
was not a cry of a man seeking the personal power. It was a cry of
the Lord, who no longer wanted to hold HIS PEACE against HIS
ENEMIES. After the victory, Allah bestowed HIS FAVOR upon
mankind and gave the Message of "TRUE PEACE" - The Islam.
Once a person whole heartedly submit himself or herself to Allah
(become a Muslim), the "True Peace" from Allah is bound to enter his
or her body, mind and soul. The relationship of that individual with
Allah is now direct, having no Church or Papal Authority acting as a
vicar or an intermediary.
"I have long time holden my peace; I have been still, and refrained
myself, now will I cry like a travailing woman; I will destroy and devour
at once." Verse 14.
The prophets that came before Muhammad had all tried with peaceful
missions. But, the concept of sharing God's Glory continued to
surface again and again, in one way or other. It was with the war cry,
through the descendants of Kedar (Arabs), these sinful practices
were destroyed and devoured, inside and outside of Arabia. The
spread of Islam was swift, wide spread and at once.
"And I will bring the blind by a way they knew not; I will lead them in
paths that they have not known; I will make darkness light before
them, and crooked things straight. These things I will do unto them,
and not forsake them." Isaiah Chapter 42, Verse 16.
It is an undeniable fact that before the advent of Islam, the pagan
Arabs were like the blinds. Their religious and social concepts were
crooked. The revelation of this "new song" brought them out of that
darkness. Earlier, God had not sent any prophet to these people. By
sending Muhammad, God fulfilled His above promise and also the
following promise to Abraham;
"And *also* of the son of the bondwoman I will make a nation,
because he is thy seed." Genesis 21:13.
"They shall be turned back, they shall be greatly ashamed, that trust
in graven images; they say to the molten images, 'Ye are our gods.'"
Isaiah 42 Verse 17.
History records that Prophet Muhammad did put the pagan idolaters
to great shame when he demolished before them, their 365 idols that
were installed in Ka'bah (Mecca), the most respected place of
pilgrimage in the whole of Arabia. Today, Ka'bah is the Grand
Mosque of Islam. Muslims from all over the world face towards
Ka'bah while reciting their daily ritual prayers.
3-In the 'sacred' book of Hindus the father's name of 'Kalki Autar'
is mentioned as 'Vishnu Bhagat' and his mother's name as
'Somanib.' In sanskrit Vishnu' stands for Allah and the literal
meaning of 'Bhagat' is slave. 'Vishnu Bhagat' therefore in the
Arabic language will mean Allah's Slave (Abdullah). 'Somanib' in
Sanskrit means peace and tranquillity which in Arabic is denoted
by the word 'Amina.' Whereas the last Messenger Muhammad's
father and mother's names were Abdullah and Amina
respectively.
4-In the big books of Hindus, it is mentioned that 'Kalki Autar' will
live on olive and dates and he will be true to his words and
honest. In this regard Pundit Parkash writes, "This is true and
established only in the case of Muhammad
8-It is also written in the Hindus' books that 'Kalik Autar' will be
strengthened and heavily helped by Bhagwan. And we know this
fact that Muhammad was aided and reinforced by Allah through
His angel in the battle of Badr.
Baca Is Makkah
The Holy Ka'bah, which was built by Abraham and his son
Ishmael, is in Makkah. This name Makkah has been mentioned
once in the Qur'an in Surah 48:24. Another name for Makkah is
Bakkah, depending on the dialect of the tribe. This also has been
mentioned once, in Surah 3:96: "Verily, the first House [of
worship] appointed for mankind was that in Bakkah [Makkah], full
of blessing, and guidance for all people." Amazing enough, this
word Bakkah was mentioned by Prophet David in his Psalm 84:6:
"Who passing through the valley of Baca make it a well, the rain
also filleth the pools." The well here is the well known well of
Zamzam, which is still present today and is located close to the
Ka'bah.
The first revelation (surah 96: 1-5) of Allah through the angel
Gabriel to Muhammad was the word iqra', which means "read."As
he was illiterate, he replied: "I cannot read." This first revelation
was prophesied in Isaiah 29:12: "And the book is delivered to him
that is not learned, saying: 'Read this, I pray thee,' and he saith: 'I
am not learned. "'
The Qurtanic verses were not revealed in the order in which they
appear in the Qur'an. In other words, the first part that was
revealed is not the first page and the last part that was revealed
is not the last page. That these revelations came in installments
and were inserted in a certain order in the Qurtan as ordained by
Allah was also mentioned in Isaiah 28:10-11: "For precept must
be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon
line; here a little, and there a little. For with stammering lips and
another tongue will he speak to his people." Another tongue
means here another language, not Hebrew or Aramaic, but
Arabic.
Muslims all over the world use one language "Arabic" in calling
their God, in their prayers, pilgrimage, and in their greetings to
each other. This unity of language was also prophesied in
Zephaniah 3:9: "For then will I turn to the people a pure language,
that they may all call upon the name of the Lord, to serve him
with one consent." Alas the truth has come in Arabic, but some
still expect Prophet Jesus, who might teach mankind to worship
Allah in one unique language in his second coming. We Muslims
are sure that Prophet Jesus, in his second coming, will join the
Muslims in their mosques, as he is like any other Muslim: he is
circumcised, abstains from pork, and performs prayers with
ablution, and that he stands, bows, and prostrates during his
prayers.
Can you believe that John the Baptist is greater than Adan., NG".,
Abraham, Moses, David, and many other prophets? How many
pagans did John the Baptist convert, and how many followers did
he have? But this is not the main point here. The question is: who
was the least in the kingdom of heaven, greater than John the
Baptist? For sure not Jesus, as at that time the kingdom of
heaven was not yet formed and he never claimed to be the least,
i.e., the youngest one. The kingdom of heaven consists of God as
the Supreme Being and all of the prophets. The least or youngest
one is here Prophet Muhammad.
The Jews sent priests and Levites to John the Baptist to ask who
he really was. John 1:20-21: "And he [John the Baptist] confessed
and denied not; but confessed, 'I am not the Christ.' And they
asked him: 'What then? Art thou Elias? 'And he saith: 'I am not.'
'Art thou that prophet?' And he answered: 'No."'
The crucial question here is: Art thou that prophet? Who was the
long awaited prophet who was to come after the advent of Jesus
and John the Baptist? Was he not the one like unto Moses
(Deuteronomy 18:18) who is Muhammad?
The vision of Isaiah of the two riders in Isaiah 21:7: "And he saw
a chariot with a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, and a
chariot of camels ..."
Who was the rider upon an ass? Every Sunday School student
knows that this person was Jesus: John 12:14: "And Jesus, when
he had found a young ass, sat thereon, as it is written."
Isaiah 21:15: "For they fled from the swords, from the drawn
sword and from the bent bow, and from the grievousness of war."
This was when Prophet Muhammad and his Companions were
persecuted and left Makkah for Madinah.
Isaiah 21:16: "For thus hath the Lord said unto me: 'Within a year,
according to the years of an hireling, and all the glory of Kedar
shall fail."' Exactly in the second year of Hijrah (immigration), the
pagans were defeated in the battle of Badr
Finally Isaiah 21:17 concludes with "... the mighty men of the
children of Kedar shall be diminished, for the Lord God of Israel
hath spoken it." Kedar is the second son of Ishmael (Genesis
25:13), from whom ultimately Prophet Muhammad arose. In the
beginning, the children of Kedar were attacking Muhammad and
his Companions. But as many of them accepted Islam, the
number of children of Kedar who resisted began to diminish. In
some Bible verses, "Kedar" is synonymous with "Arab" in
general, as in Ezekiel 27:21: "Arabia, and all the Princes of
Kedar ..."
1. "Arise shine, for thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is
risen upon thee." Compare the with Surah 74:1-3: 0, you
[Muhammad] wrapped up in garments! Arise and warn! And your
Lord magnify!
2. "For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth, and gross
darkness the people, but the Lord shall arise upon thee, and his
glory shall be seen upon thee." The advent of Prophet Muhammad
was at a time of darkness when the world had forgotten the
oneness of God as taught by Abraham and all of the other
prophets, including Jesus.
3. "And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the
brightness of thy rising."
4. "Lift up shine eyes round about, and see: all they gather
themselves together, they come to thee: ...." Within less than
twenty three years the whole of Arabia was united.
Jesus, at the end of his mission, made it clear that God is not only his
father, but also the father of all, and God of all, and even his own God
whom he worshipped throughout his earthly career.
“We cry, Abba, Father.” (Romans 8:15 KJV 1611) Here the writer is
Paul and he made it clear that anyone can address God as "Father."
Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples: ". . . Do not call anyone
on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.
(Matthew 23:1,9 NIV 1984)
"Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone." (Mark
10:18)
A man had ran up and knelt before Jesus and called him "Good
Teacher." Jesus used the opportunity to make it clear to people that
they must not praise him more than a human being deserves to be
praised.
Jesus depends on God for Authority: God depends on no one :
God has full authority, and full knowledge. He cannot be taught, but
He teaches.
People forget this and they say that Jesus is equal to the Father.
Whom should we believe--Jesus or the people?
Jesus did not have power to raise himself up. God had to raise him
up, as the author of Acts says.
"Abba, Father, all things are possible to thee; remove this cup from
me; yet not what I will, but what thou wilt." (Mark 14:32)
Jesus fell on his face and prayed to God, begging God to save him
from crucifixion. This also shows that Jesus had a will different from
God's will. The writers of Matthew, Mark, and Luke tell us that it was
Jesus’ wish to be saved from crucifixion, but it was God's will to let
the crucifixion take place. "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken
me?" (Matthew 27:46)
“He [Jesus] was hungry. And on seeing in the distance a fig tree in
leaf, he went to see if he could find anything on it. When he came to
it, he found nothing but leaves, for it was not the season for figs.”
(Mark 11 12-13)
When he saw that the tree had leaves, he thought that he might find
fruit on it. But when he came up close to the tree he realised there
were no fruits. After all, it was not even fig season.
The God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob, the God of our
fathers, glorified his servant Jesus. (Acts 3:13)
For truly in this city there were gathered together against thy holy
servant Jesus. . . (Acts 4:27)
Everyone, except for God, are God's servants. Jesus, too, is God's
servant.
Who was the real Worker of Miracles?
People say that since Jesus worked many miracles, he must be God.
But here we see that God did the miracles; Jesus was the instrument
God used to accomplish His work. Jesus was a man whom God
approved of. This means he was a righteous man.
"To sit at my right hand and at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for
those for whom it has been prepared by my Father" (Matthew 20:23)
Therefore if we want to secure our position with God in the life
hereafter we must turn to God and ask Him.
A Misunderstood saying
This shows that what was meant was one in purpose, not one in
substance as people think. The disciples could not become one
human, but they can pursue the same goal. That is to say, they can
be one in purpose, just as Jesus and the Father are one in purpose.
Christian scholars tell us that if Jesus had made all these fantastic
claims about himself, the first three gospels would surely have
recorded them. Mark was written around 70 C.E., followed by
Matthew and Luke somewhere between 80-90 C.E. John, written
around 100 C.E., was the last of the four canonized gospels. The
Christian scholar James Dunn writes in his book The Evidence for
Jesus:
"If they were part of the original words of Jesus himself, how could it
be that only John picked them up and none of the others? Call it
scholarly scepticism if you like, but I find it almost incredible that such
sayings should have been neglected had they been known as a
feature of Jesus' teaching. If the 'I ams' had been part of the original
tradition, it is very hard indeed to explain why none of the other three
evangelists made use of them." (The Evidence for Jesus, p. 36)
The New American Bible says that most scholars "have come to the
conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably produced by
subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added to a
shorter original." (The New American Bible, Revised New Testament,
p. 143)
12 Proofs Of Prophethood
All praise and gratitude is to Allah – our Creator, Provider and the
Maintainer of all the worlds.
7. Nor has there been a man on earth whom is still followed in all
his doings by those who believe in him. Those who believe in
Muhammad sleep in the manner he slept; purify themselves
(through ablution and ritual washing) in the manner he purified
himself; and adhere to his practice in the way they eat, drink, and
clothe themselves.
Indeed in all aspects of their lives, the believers in Muhammad
adhere to the teachings he spread among them and the path that
he traveled upon during his life.
During every generation, from his day till our time, the believers
in this Noble prophet have fully adhered to his teachings.
Let alone all that, all those who believe in Muhammad repeat
those praises of Allah, special prayers, and invocations that he
would say during each of his actions, supplicating to Allah during
day and night, like: what he would say when he greeted people,
upon entering and leaving the house, entering and leaving the
mosque, entering and leaving the bathroom, going to sleep and
awaking from sleep, observing the new crescent, observing the
new fruit on trees, eating, drinking, dressing, riding, traveling and
returning from travel, etc.
All those who believe in Muhammad fully perform-even to the
minute detail-every act of worship-like prayer, fasting, charity,
and pilgrimage-as this Noble Messenger (may Allah's blessings
and peace be upon him) taught and as he himself performed. All
of this allows those who believe in him, to live their lives in all
aspects with this Noble Messenger as their example, as if he was
standing before them, for them to follow in all their doings.
8. There has never been, nor will there ever be a man anywhere
upon this earth who has received such love, respect, honor, and
obedience in all matters-small and large alike-as has this Noble
Prophet.
9. Since his day, in every region of the earth and during every
period, this Noble Prophet has been followed by individuals from
all races, colors and peoples. Many of those who followed him
were previously Christians, Jews, pagans, idolaters, or without
any religion. Among those who chose to follow him, were those
who were known for their sound judgment, wisdom, reflection,
and foresight. They chose to follow this Noble Prophet after they
witnessed the signs of his truthfulness and the evidences of his
miracles. They did not choose to follow Muhammad out of
compulsion or coercion or because they had adopted the ways of
their fathers and mothers. Indeed many of the followers of this
Prophet (may Allah's blessings peace be upon him), chose to
follow him during the time when Islam was weak, when there
were few Muslims, and when there was severe persecution of his
followers on earth. Most people who have followed this Prophet
(may Allah's blessings and peace be upon him) have done so not
to acquire some material benefits. Indeed many of his followers
have suffered the greatest forms of harm and persecution as a
result of following this Prophet.
Despite all this harm and persecution, this did not turn them back
from his religion. All of this clearly indicates, that this Prophet
was truly and really Allah's messenger and that he was not just a
man who claimed prophet hood or spoke about Allah without
knowledge.
10. With all this, Muhammad came with a great religion in its
creedal and legal make-up. Muhammad described Allah with
qualities of complete perfection, and at the same time in a
manner that is free of ascribing to Him any imperfection. Neither
the philosophers nor the wise could ever describe Allah like
such. Indeed it is impossible to imagine that any human mind
could conceive of an existing being that possesses such
complete ability, knowledge, and greatness; who has subdued
the creation and has encompassed everything in the universe,
small or large; and possesses such perfect mercy. Nor is it in the
ability of any human being to place a perfect law based upon
justice, equality, mercy and objectivity for all human activity on
earth like the laws that Muhammad brought for all spheres of
human activity - like buying and selling, marriage and divorce,
renting, testimony, custody, and all other contracts that are
necessary to uphold life and civilization on earth.
12. The legal and creedal make-up of the religion that the
Messenger, Muhammad, (may Allah’s blessings and peace be
upon him) brought resembles the engineering of the heavens and
the earth. All of that indicates that He who created the heavens
and the earth is the One Who sent down this great law and
upright religion. The degree of inimitability of the Divine law that
was sent down upon Muhammad is to the same degree of
inimitability of the Divine creation of the heavens and earth. For
just as humanity cannot create this universe, in the same manner
humanity cannot bring forth a law like Allah's law that He sent
down upon His servant and messenger Muhammad (may Allah's
blessings and peace be upon him).
You Should Know This Man !
The world has had its share of great personalities. But these were
one-sided figures, who distinguished themselves in but one or two
fields, such as religious thought or military leadership. The lives and
teachings of these great personalities of the world are shrouded in
the mist of time. There is so much speculation about the time and
place of their birth, the mode and style of their life, the nature and
detail of their teachings and the degree and measure of their success
or failure that it is impossible for humanity to reconstruct accurately
the lives and teachings of these men.
Some Qur'aanic Verses about Geology & The Origin Of The Earth
Professor Alfred Kroner: and that many of the statements made at the time could be
proven, but that modern scientific methods are now in a position to prove what
Muhammad said 1400 years ago.
We present to you Professor Alfred Kroner who is one of the worlds most famous
geologists. He is a Professor of Geology and the Chairman of the Department of
Geology at the Institute of Geosciences, Johannes Gutenburg University, Mainz,
Germany. We met him and presented several Qur'aanic verses and Ahadeeth of the
Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). He studied and commented on them. Then
we had a discussion with him.
Professor Kroner said: "Thinking about many of these questions and thinking where
Muhammad came from, he was after all a Bedouin. I think it is almost impossible that
he could have known about things like the common origin of the universe, because
scientists have only found out within the last few years with very complicated and
advanced technological methods that this is the case."
Professor Kroner chose an example from the Qur'aan which proved to him why the
Qur'aan could not have come from Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself. The
example which Professor Kroner chose is a description in the Qur'aan of the fact that
this universe had its beginnings in one single entity. Allah, may He be Exalted and
Glorified said: Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined
together [ratqan], before we clove them asunder? We made from water every living
thing [Qur'aan 21:30]
The meaning of ratqan in this verse, as Ibn Abbas, Mujaahid, and others (may Allah be
pleased with him) said, may Allah be pleased with all of them, is that the heavens and the
earth were stuck together or blended together, and that they were later separated from
each other. Professor Kroner used this as an example to prove that no human being
during the time of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), could have known this.
Professor Kroner: "Somebody who did not know something about nuclear physics
1400 years ago could not, I think, be in a position to find out from his own mind for
instance that the earth and the heavens had the same origin, or many others of the
questions that we have discussed here."
Professor Kroner, so it seemed to us, has a special talent of being evasive. For example,
we asked him to describe the geological conditions of Arabia. Was Arabia full of
orchards and rivers? He said: "During the Snow Age." And it is further known that the
North Polar icebergs are slowly moving southwards. When those polar icebergs become
relatively close to the Arabian Peninsula, the weather will change and Arabia will
become one of the greenest and wettest parts of the world. We asked him: Will Arabia
become the land of orchards and rivers? He said: "Yes, it is a scientific fact."
This astonished us, and we wondered how he could state this as a scientific fact while it
was related to the future and we asked: Why? He said: "Because the new Snow Age has
actually started. And we can see the snow crawling once again from the North Pole
southwards. In fact, the polar snow is now on the way to get closer to the Arabian
Peninsula. We can see the signs of this in the snow blizzards striking the northern parts
of Europe and America every winter. Scientists have other signs and information proving
the actual beginning of another Snow Age. It is a scientific fact."
--So we said to him: What you have just mentioned has only been known to scientists
after a long series of discoveries and with the help of specialized instruments. But we
have already found this mentioned by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)
1400 years ago. He said in a hadeeth transmitted in Saheeh Muslim:
The Last Hour will not come upon us until the lands of the Arabs are once again pasture
lands and filled with rivers.
At this point we asked Professor Kroner: Who told the Prophet Muhammad (peace be
upon him), that the lands of the Arabs were once filled with orchards and rivers? He
immediately replied: "The Romans." This reminded me of Professor Kroners evasive
ability. We asked him another question, we said to him: But who informed the Prophet
Muhammad (peace be upon him), that the lands of the Arabs would once again become
pasturelands and be filled with rivers?. Professor Kroner becomes evasive if
embarrassed. But whenever he was faced with the truth, he is courageous enough to state
his opinion frankly and thus he replied: "This could have been known to him only
through revelation from above."
Finally, after our discussions with him, he made the following comments: "If you
combine all these and you combine all those statements that are being made in the
Qur'aan in terms that relate to the earth and the formation of the earth and science in
general, you can basically say that statements made there in many ways are true. They
can now be confirmed by scientific methods, and in a way you can say that the Qur'aan
is a simple science text book for the simple man, and that many of the statements made
in there at that time could not be proven but that modern scientific methods are now in a
position to prove what Muhammad said 1400 years ago."
Allah confirms in His Book that:
This is no less than reminder to (all), the worlds. And you shall certainly know the
truth of it all after a while. (Qur'aan 38:87-88).
The Qur'aan On The Cerebrum
Allah said in the Qur'aan about one of the evil unbelievers who forbade the Prophet
Muhammad (peace be upon him) from praying at the Ka'abah: Let him beware! If he
does not stop, We will take him by the naasiyah (front of the head), a lying, sinful
naasiyah! [Qur'aan 96 :15-16]
Why did the Qur'aan describe the front of the head as being lying and sinful? Why
didn't the Qur'aan say that the person was lying and sinful? Is there a relationship
between the front of the head and lying and sinfulness?
If we look into the skull at the front of the head, we will find the prefrontal area of the
cerebrum. What does physiology tell us about the function of this area? A book entitled,
Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology, says about this area: "The motivation and the
foresight to plan and initiate movements occur in the anterior portion of the frontal
lobes, the prefrontal area . This is a region of the association cortex... The book also says:
In relation to its involvement in motivation, the prefrontal area is also thought to be the
functional center for aggression..."
So, this area of the cerebrum is responsible for planning, motivating, and initiating
good and sinful behavior, and is responsible for telling lies and speaking the truth.
Thus, it is proper to describe the front of the head as lying and sinful when someone lies
or commits a sin, as the Qur'aan said: "...a lying, sinful naasiyyah (front of the head)!"
Scientists have only discovered these functions of the prefrontal area in the last sixty
years, according to Professor Keith Moore
Introduction
During the last two decades in particular, the concept of "Islamic terror"
has been often discussed. In the wake of the September 11 terrorist
attacks on targets in New York and Washington which caused the death
of tens of thousands of innocent civilians, this concept has once again
returned to the top of the international agenda.
One point that should be stressed at the outset is that the identities of
the perpetrators of the acts of terrorism which targeted the United States
are not yet determined. There is a chance that these horrible attackers
are linked to quite different centres. It may well be a communist
organization harboring rage and hatred against American values, a
fascist organization opposing federal administration or a secret faction in
another state. Even though the hijackers have Muslim identities, the
questions regarding by whom and for what purposes these people were
used will probably remain to be a mystery.
The fact remains however, that even if the terrorists have Muslim
identities, the terror they perpetrated cannot be labelled "Islamic terror",
just as it would not be called "Jewish terror" if the perpetrators were
Jews or "Christian terror" if they were Christians.
Thus, a religious person who has fear of God can never commit such an
act.
In fact, the aggressors can commit such violence only with the intention
of attacking religion itself. It may well be that they carried out this
violence to present religion as evil in the eyes of people, to divorce
people from religion and to generate hatred and reaction against pious
people. Consequently, every attack having a "religious" facade on
American citizens or other innocent people is actually an attack made
against religion.
All the three Theistic religions command love, mercy and peace. Terror,
on the other hand, is the opposite of religion; it is cruel, merciless and it
demands bloodshed and misery. This being the case, while looking for
the perpetrators of a terrorist act, its origins should be sought in disbelief
rather than in religion. People with a fascist, communist, racist or
materialist outlook on life should be suspected as potential perpetrators.
The name or the identity of the triggerman is not important. If he can kill
innocent people without blinking an eye, whatever his label is, then he is
a disbeliever, not a believer. He is a murderer with no fear of God,
whose main ambition is to shed blood and to give harm.
The Qur'an is a Book revealed to people as a guide to the true path and
in this Book, God commands man to adopt good morals. This morality is
based upon concepts such as love, compassion, tolerance and mercy.
God calls all people to Islamic morals through which compassion,
mercy, peace and tolerance can be experienced all over the world:
You who believe! Enter absolutely into peace (Islam). Do not follow in
the footsteps of Satan. He is an outright enemy to you. (Surat al-Baqara
:208)
The values of the Qur'an hold a Muslim responsible for treating all
people, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, kindly and justly, protecting the
needy and the innocent and preventing the "dissemination of mischief".
Mischief comprises all forms of anarchy and terror that remove security,
comfort and peace. As God says in a verse, "God does not love
mischief makers". (Surat al-Qasas: 77)
As the verse suggests, a person who kills even a single man, "unless it
is in retaliation for someone else or for causing corruption in the earth",
commits a crime as if he had murdered all mankind on earth.
This being the case, it is obvious what great sins are the murders,
massacres and, attacks, popularly known as "suicide attacks",
committed by terrorists are. God informs us how this cruel face of
terrorism will be punished in the hereafter in the following verse:
There are only grounds against those who wrong people and act as
tyrants in the earth without any right to do so. Such people will have a
painful punishment. (Surat ash-Shura: 42)
All these reveal that organizing acts of terror against innocent people is
utterly against Islam and it is unlikely that any Muslim could ever commit
such crime. On the contrary, Muslims are responsible for stopping these
people, removing "mischief on earth" and bringing peace and security to
all people all over the world. Being a Muslim cannot be reconciled with
terror. Just the contrary, it is the solution and prevention of terror.
This being the case, how did the popular term "Islamic terror" emerge?
What has been examined so far reveals that it is not possible to talk
about an "Islamic" terror. Indeed, a closer look at the characteristics of
the perpetrators explicitly reveals that this terror is not a religious but a
social phenomenon.
Despite the fact that Christianity is a religion of love and pacifism, the
Crusaders slaughtered innocent people in the name of Christ. They
misunderstood their religion.
In the period of our Prophet, there existed two basic social structures in
Arabia. City-dwellers and Bedouins (Desert Arabs). A sophisticated
culture prevailed in Arab towns. Commercial relations linked the towns
to the outer world, which contributed to the formation of "civilized life"
among Arabs dwelling in cities. They had refined aesthetic values,
enjoyed literature and, especially poetry. Desert Arabs, on the other
hand, were the nomad tribes living in the desert who had a very crude
culture. Utterly unaware of arts and literature, they developed an
unrefined, harsh character.
Islam was born and developed among the inhabitants of Mecca, the
most important city of the peninsula. However, as Islam spread to the
peninsula, all tribes in Arabia embraced it. Among these tribes were also
Desert Arabs, who were somehow problematic: their poor intellectual
and cultural background prevented them from grasping the profundity
and noble spirit of Islam. Of this God states the following in a verse:
The Desert Arabs are more obdurate in disbelief and hypocrisy and
more likely not to know the limits which God has sent down to His
Messenger. God is All-Knowing, All-Wise. (Surat at-Tawba: 97)
The Desert Arabs, that is, social groups who were "obdurate in disbelief
and hypocrisy" and prone to disobey God's commands, became a part
of the Islamic world in the Prophet's lifetime. In latter periods, they
became a source of trouble for the Islamic world. The sect called
"Kharijis" that emerged among Bedouins was an example. The most
distinctive trait of this perverse sect (which was called "Kharijis" the
rebels because they greatly deviated from Sunni practises), was their
extremely vulgar, wild and fanatical nature. The "Kharijis", who had no
comprehension whatsoever of the essence of Islam or of the virtues and
the values of the Qur'an, waged war against all other Muslims and
based this war on a few Qur'anic verses about which they made
distorted interpretations. Furthermore, they carried out "acts of
terrorism". Caliph Ali, who was one of the closest companions of the
Prophet and was described by him as the "gate of the city of
knowledge", was assassinated by a Kharijite.
It is a fact that, for the last few centuries, Muslims in all corners of the
Islamic world, are being subjected to violence by Western forces and
their affiliates. The colonialist European states, local oppressive regimes
or colonialists backed by the West (Israel, for instance) caused great
suffering for Muslims at large. However, for Muslims, this is a situation
that has to be approached and responded to from a purely Qur'anic
stance.
A good action and a bad action are not the same. Repel the bad with
something better and, if there is enmity between you and someone else,
he will be like a bosom friend. (Surat al-Fussilat: 34)
Another point that deserves a special mention here is that all the
Western world cannot be held responsible for the aforementioned
colonialist (or "neo-colonialist) violence and oppression against
Muslims. Actually, the materialist, irreligious philosophies and ideologies
that prevailed in the 19th century are responsible for these dismal acts.
European colonialism did not originate from Christianity. On the
contrary, anti-religious movements opposing the values of Christianity
led the way to colonialism. At the roots of the greatest brutalities of the
19th century lies the Social Darwinist ideology.
In the Western world today, there are still cruel, mischievous and
opposing elements as well as a culture dominated by peaceful and just
elements that have its roots in Judeo-Christian faith. As a matter of fact,
the main disagreement is not between the West and Islam. Contrary to
the general opinion, it is between the religious people of the West and of
the Muslim world on the one hand, and the people opposing religion
(like materialists and atheists.) on the other.
Today, the Western world is concerned about the organizations that use
terror under the guise of Islam and this concern is not misplaced. It is
obvious that those carrying out terror and their supporters should be
punished according to international judicial criteria. However, a more
important point to consider is the long-term strategies that have to be
pursued for viable solutions to these problems.
The assessments above reveal that terror has no place in Islam. They
further show the inherently contradictory nature of the concept of
"Islamic terror". This provides us with an important vantage point:
1) The Western world, especially the United States, will surely take the
most dissuasive measures to cope with terror and it has the right to do
that. However, it has to state explicitly that this is not a war waged
against Islam and Muslims but, on the contrary, a measure serving the
best interests of Islam. The "Clash of civilizations", the dangerous
scenario envisioned in the 90's should be at all costs prevented.
2) Support should be provided for the spread of "True Islam", which is a
religion of love, friendship, peace and brotherhood, and for its true
understanding by Islamic societies. The solution for radical factions in
Islamic countries should not be "forced secularization". On the contrary,
such a policy will incite more reaction from the masses and feed
radicalism. The solution is the dissemination of true Islam and the
appearance of a Muslim role-model who embraces Qur'anic values such
as human rights, democracy, freedom, good morals, science and
aesthetics, and who offers happiness and bliss to humanity.
Our hope is that these measures will help to the world get rid of
terrorism and all other bigoted, brutal, barbarous structures. With its
Christian-dominated culture and population, the United States, which
defines itself as "a nation under God", is in fact a real friend of the
Muslims. In the Qur'an, God draws attention to this fact and informs us
that Christians are those who are "most affectionate to those who
believe". (Surat al-Ma'ida: 82)
Who Is Allah ?
It is interesting to note that the Aramaic word "El", which is the word
for God in the language that Jesus spoke, is certainly more similar in
sound to the word "Allah" than the English word "God". This also
holds true for the various Hebrew words for God, which are "El”,
"Elah", and the plural form "Elohim". The reason for these similarities
is that Aramaic, Hebrew and Arabic are all Semitic languages with
common origins. It should also be noted that in translating the Bible
into English, the Hebrew word "El" is translated variously as "God",
"god" and "angel"! This imprecise language allows different
translators, based on their preconceived notions, to translate the
word to fit their own views. The Arabic word "Allah" presents no such
difficulty or ambiguity, since it is only used for Almighty God alone.
Additionally, in English, the only difference between "god", meaning a
false god, and "God", meaning the One True God, is the capital "G".
In the Arabic alphabet, since it does not have capital letters, the word
for God (i.e. Allah) is formed by adding the equivalent to the English
word "the" (Al-) to the Arabic word for "god/God" (ilah). So the Arabic
word "Allah" literally means "The God”: the "Al-" in Arabic basically
serving the same function as the capital "G" in English. Due to the
above mentioned facts, a more accurate translation of the word
"Allah" into English might be "The One -and-Only God" or "The One
True God".
More importantly, it should also be noted that the Arabic word "Allah"
contains a deep religious message due to its root meaning and origin.
This is because it stems from the Arabic verb ta'allaha (or alaha),
which means "to be worshipped". Thus in Arabic, the word "Allah"
means "The One who deserves all worship". This, in a nutshell, is the
Pure Monotheistic message of Islam. According to Islam,
"monotheism" is much more than simply believing in the existence of
"only One God" - as seemingly opposed to two, three or more. If one
understands the root meaning of the word "Allah", this point should
become clear. One should understand that Islam's criticism of the
other religions that claim to be "monotheistic" is not because they are
"polytheistic" in the classic sense, but because they direct various
forms of worship to other than Almighty God. We will discuss the
meaning of worship in Islam below, however, before moving on it
should be noted that many non-Muslims are unaware of the
distinction between simply believing in the existence of only One God
and reserving all worship for Him alone. Many Christians are painfully
unaware of this point, and thus you often find them asking how
Muslims can accuse the followers of Jesus, peace be upon him, of
being "polytheists" when they were all "monotheistic Jews". First of
all, it should be clarified that the word "polytheist" doesn't really sound
right in this context, since to many it implies simply believing in the
existence of more than one God. So in an Islamic context,
"associators", "man-worshippers" or "creature worshippers" might be
more accurate and appropriate terms, especially since Christians
believe Jesus to be both "100% God and 100% man", while still
paying lip-service to God's "Oneness". However, as we're previously
touched upon, what is really at the root of this problem is the fact that
Christians as well as the members of other religions don't really know
what "monotheism" means especially in the Islamic sense. All of the
books, articles, and papers that I've read which were written by
Christians invariably limit "monotheism" to believing in the existence
of "One Sovereign and Creator God". Islam, however, teaches much
more than this.
Everyone should be aware of the fact that throughout the long history
of the "Abrahamic Faiths", there have people who, while believing in
"One God", have adopted beliefs and practices that completely nullify
their claim to "monotheism". This is the Muslim view of Christians.
We're well aware of the fact that they claim belief in "One God" with
their lips, but this doesn't mean that they don't nullify their claim in
other ways. This is because many people simply haven't been taught
everything that Pure Monotheism entails. From an Islamic point of
view, "monotheism" can be nullified in many ways. For example,
simply believing that it is permissible to rule by Western "liberal" and
"democratic" laws in lieu of the Divinely Revealed Law of Almighty
God makes one a "polytheist". Certainly, a person who does such a
thing, whether Jewish, Christian or Muslim, doesn't ever believe that
there is another Almighty Creator and Sovereign Lord. However, for
all practical purposes, such a person has taken another "god",
whether they choose to admit it or not. In this way they are
associating partners with Almighty God (Arabic: shirk), and thus
become a "polytheist" in a practical sense, regardless of their lip-
service to "monotheism". This holds true even if the person doesn't
believe what they are doing is "worship". For example, Roman
Catholics who pray to the Virgin Mary will staunchly deny that they
are "worshipping" her. They instead call it "adoration" or some other
watered-down term. However, from an Islamic point of view, what is
worship if not this? Islam teaches that prayer and supplication are the
marrow of worship, so if one directs their prayers to an intermediary
(even if the pray is "ultimately" meant for God), then what is left of
worship? Additionally, how can someone who believes in Almighty
God follow man-made laws instead of God's Law, without admitting
that they've begun worshipping other than God? Do they know better
than God?
u can visit
www.sultan.org this
site in all
languages!!!and audio
either!!
Hosea 13:4 "...thou shalt know no G-d but me; for there is no Savior
besides me." So much for Jesus....
"Christianity is a Greek-Pagan heresy of Judaism" - Maimonides
Nothing on this page is original, and it is not an effort to extol
one religion over another. It is compiled and provided here as a
resource for people working to heal destructive, voodoo
fundamentalism.
(The purpose of this page is to show the futility of dogma; it is
not to denigrate the Bible, an amazing compendium of revelation and
literature, and one of our only connections to the ancient world. The
Bible is a monument of human thought - but alas, the defenders of
the New Testament systematically eradicated the competition, to
create an illusion that the Theirs was The Great Text.)
The purpose of pointing out contradictions is not to 'disprove the
Bible,' it is to defuse the small minded literalists who make Bible-
based religions look stupid.
The author of this page also freely acknowledges that many
derive true healing and spiritual fulfillment from the Bible
and even from Christianity; it's all in the intention. This page
targets those who use any religion as a weapon.
This page does not claim to explain anything in Torah or the New
Testament or provide a definitive, final answer. Usually the people
who claim to have "the True, Accurate and Final Answer" are the
ones who are suspect.
The 'Bible,' to the Jews, does not include the New Testament, which
is seen to some as an opportunistic add-on. The Christian experience
of religion is radically different than the Jewish, so inconsistencies
seem inevitable when the two are bound together in one book. To
begin to understand the Bible, learn Hebrew. To understand the New
Testament, learn Greek.
Christianity exists in translation - and so much gets lost in translation.
The Jewish religious experience is joyously human, celebrating and
sanctifying all acts of life, including eating, excreting, and mating,
while contemplating God and Torah in its original language. The
Christian experience, because it is a translation, and because of
Paulist and other Hellenistic add-ons, is more theoretical, with
conditional joy, and strained, convoluted guilt and denial. It attempts
to destroy the human part of us, most obviously in its suppression of
sex, and notion of "Original Sin." By splitting God into three, and
having a mutilated corpse as its central icon, Christianity becomes
Anti-Messiah. (Messiah brings peace...not gore) By inventing a
"Devil," God's power is subverted and challenged - inconceivable in a
non-pagan, one God system.
Paul's notion of "Original Sin" taints the well of spirituality.
Nachmanides said: "We gave you Christians the idea of sin and you
didn't know what to do with it. You'd be better off to just go on being
Pagans." Jewish thinking says "sin" is "missing the mark" - with the
constant gentle guidance of Torah to get you closer to that mark - the
"mark" being the will of the Creator. Sin and Satan were both given
capital letters by the Christians. They are generic concepts in
Judaism, where in Christianity they become entities in their own right.
This allows a more human-centered focus, providing a distinct target
to resist. Real Life is not always so distinct. In the Garden of Eden,
the "Tree of Knowing Good and Evil" introduces ambiguity, because it
is confusing. Confusing because of both good and evil growing on the
same tree. In the Torah, it does not say knowing good from evil - it
says "good and evil." [tov v'ra]. Since this is disturbing, Christians
[and many Jews] avoid or censor out this little nuance in translation.
If the evil had been made obvious by isolating it on one tree, there
would have been no test for Adam and Eve. It would just be God
winding up a toy and watching it run. By confusing the issue (snake
symbolising confusion), Adam and Eve were given the opportunity to
exercise their own will, and to perhaps grow spiritually. They missed
the mark, and here we are today, confronted daily with the same Tree
of Knowing Good and Evil. Christianity, being man-centered, focuses
on the sin, while Judaism, the God-centered mother religion, focuses
on the Creator's Oneness. Torah says "Choose Life" - which means
we are to focus on this life, not on what we cannot know beyond that.
["Choose Life" has nothing to do with pregnancy, and its use as a
slogan by anti-choicers is a grotesque and blasphemous mis-
interpretation.] Anyway...
The Jewish Bible was passed on and carefully preserved for more
than a millennium when it was finally canonized by the scribe Ezra, in
444 B.C.E. This was the first 'religion of the book,' written and kept by
people who had been in and out of exile, and with whom 'God had
formed a special bond.' The early Jewish editors were rigorously
conservative, and kept the book to the basics. It was written mostly in
Hebrew, with some Aramaic and Chaldean.
Before the Bible was canonized (from the Hebrew kaneh, meaning
'cane,' or'upright'), there were prophets everywhere. Jews were
literate early on, and many considered themselves authors,
commentators, or prophets. Prophecy dwindled after canonization, as
the older (and official) texts gained authority.
There were also the numerous claimants to being "Messiah" that
annoyed Jewish authorities off and on through the centuries.
Some of the Jewish innovations were the concept of 'ethical
monotheism,' and a system of covenants with an immediate, personal
deity. The one-on-one relationship with the creator was
democratizing; for a homeless, captive people, it provided a way
around 'the system.' The Jewish idea of being 'The Chosen People'
has been causing friction for nearly 4,000 years - but the Jewish
conception of "chosen" less like being "better than," and more like
being "singled out."
Rabbi Jesus adhered to the ancient Jewish system of laws, and was
a devout Jew (the "Last Supper" was a Passover Seder), but rejected
legalistic corruption in the Jewish establishment. For this,
conservative Jewish authorities (Sadducees) rejected Jesus, and
made it easy for the Romans to crucify him.
Paul of Tarsus Hellenized the story of Jesus, removed its
Jewishness, grafted on Pagan Greek ideas, and opened the gates to
hordes of converts. The multitude of Christian cults canonized their
literature, and added it onto the Torah, calling the combined material
the "Old" and "New" Testaments. But Christianity is not the "next
phase" of Judaism. It is a religion unto itself, with Judaism as its initial
inspiration, but sharply different than Judaism in its teaching. The
things in Christianity that sound Jewish are Jewish. Christianity is not
founded so much upon Jesus the man as upon Jesus the concept,
and the resulting theology that was invented to support it.
The New Testament is not the logical completion of the Old
Testament. "Judeo-Christian" is a misnomer, an erroneous concept -
Christians and Jews have both said so. Judaism is unrelated to any
religion that claims that it is the one and only true religion and the
sole ticket to heaven, and that if you don't join, you're damned.
[Catholics also reportedly accept that theirs is not the only way to
Heaven - if that's the case, it's certainly difficult to understand their
role in the torture and killing of tens of thousands of innocents, for
purportedly religious reasons. And yes, the Jews killed the Amorites,
the Hittites, the Jebusites, and the Girgashites, etc., a fact that is
repeated daily, and which has a constant humbling effect. Jewish
guilt about its occasional oppressions of others doesn't make it any
easier to contemplate the cruelty of non-Jews.]
Christianity did not begin with Jesus, but after Jesus.
Jesus was an Essene Jew - the Dead Sea Scrolls reveal that the
ideas he taught had been part of the Essene tradition for 200 years
when Jesus was alive. [Jews today do ritual immersions in water
(John the Baptist was a Jew also), and believe in the Final
Redemption when the Messiah comes, with the revival of the dead.]
Jesus was not an innovator. Fifty years after his crucifixion by the
Romans, Paul of Tarsus grafted on Pagan Mithraic ideas and began
the Christianity we know today, which is so radically different than its
mother religion, Judaism.
The absolutist, Heaven or Hell Christian and Islamic world views
differ sharply from Torah ("Old" Testament) religion. They read the
Bible (and later writings, Koran, New Testament) and see only black
and white. The original Bible religion, Judaism, understands the
relationship with the Creator differently, seeing it as a contractual
relationship, a dialog, or a dialectic. Jews do not believe that theirs is
only way to paradise. Christianity and Islam, later interpretations of
Torah, are both much more prone to laying down absolute dictums
about the fate of your soul. "God, however, does not play dice."
(Albert Einstein, Jewish Physicist)
A literal approach to the Bible embalms it. The Bible's function
(providing us with a diagnostic tool, a "litmus test" for life) is
enhanced by its contradictions and ambiguities. It forces our minds to
reach beyond the obvious and find new meanings and hidden
teachings. The Jewish oral tradition fills in a lot of the blanks. The
Zohar (Mystical Biblical commentary from Spain in the 1200's) says:
"The stories in the Torah couldn't possibly be about what they seem
to be about, otherwise we could write better stories!" (III 152a).
Anyone who is really interested in the Bible should take the time to
learn Hebrew and study it in its original language. Experience has
shown this writer that it's worth the effort. All of the hair pulling over
the "King James Version" or whatever other translation someone's
using is really a moot point.
The Burning Hell, the "Lake of Fire," the Pointy Tailed Devil, these
fictions are all medieval-Christian scare tactics, and have nothing at
all to do with the Judaism of Jesus. God created humans, and said "It
is Good." The God of the Bible (Jesus' God) has faith in humanity,
and waits for our gratitude and praise. On the other hand, the New
Testament God has condemned humanity, robbed his followers of the
Joy of Life, and resorted to bullying and sham to corral the faithful.
The Bible is fractal- filled with thickets and labyrinths, and that is why
people love it. It has as many contradictions as any other thought
system; and is seen by some as a form of poetry.
Each of these contradictions could provide a seed for great mystical
analysis. Use them as a way to raise spiritual sparks, instead of as a
cudgel against other people (see Spanish Inquisition).
There are strains of the Christian church who refer to the Bible as a
'Sword'. The metaphor becomes real when they attack the freedoms
of others. These contradictions are pointed out for their sake. Many
good people believe the Bible is literally God's Word ('sWord?!?), and
reverence it and its teachings appropriately. But Jesus said: "Put up
again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall
perish with the sword."(Matt.26:52.)
The Buddhist concept of Sword is called 'Prajna'- 'cutting-through'
wisdom. This can be related to a line from a letter of Paul's to the
Hebrews where he says: "For the word of God is quick, and powerful,
and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing
asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a
discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." (Hebrews: 4.12.)
The Bible is perhaps a potent device for meditation or prayer, or a
comfort in times of loneliness, grief or adversity, but when used as a
weapon, it loses its validity. The Bible's commandments are
comparable to Hindu, Buddhist, or many other rule-systems, and
serve societies well. Any way that people can feel peace, or improve
their lives, shouldn't be disrespected. Unfortunately for peaceful
believers, the fanatics twist something sacred into an ugly parody of
itself.
THE OCCULT
"Occult" means "hidden," and refers to ancient knowledge and
tradition forced into hiding by meddlesome Christians. Anything not in
the Bible is considered Evil, must be repressed, and becomes
"occult." 2,000 years of Christian censorship have tried, but failed to
repress older beliefs and the roots of Christianity itself.
The Christian Satan is vastly different than the original Hebrew
"satan," an "obstructing angel," that is short-lived and generic.
Babylonian influences solidified this entity into a specific, evil being,
and now, Christianity has elevated the Devil to an equal footing with
God. Bible belt teenagers becoming 'Satanists' and going on killing
sprees are the obvious products of a fundamentalist environment;
borne of parents who see evil everywhere, from Harry Potter books to
Tinky Winky, these kids rebel in the easiest way: becoming what their
parents most fear and obsess over. They do it by claiming belief in a
"religion" that owes its very existence to Christianity. (And yes, Anton
Lavey).
The Christian obsession with the Devil and witchcraft actually fosters
and propagates what they try so hard to repress.
Fundamentalist abhorrence of evil is really a lack of faith, because
God created Evil:
[Isa 45:7 KJV] I form the light, and create darkness: I make
peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
Trying to avoid the issue, newer translations change "evil" to "woe,"
or "calamity," but the Hebrew word in the original is "Ra," which
translates into "Evil."
As Christianity took over Europe, attempts to suppress Pagan holy
day celebrations met fierce resistance. Their solution was to absorb
these holidays, purloin them, and make them into Christian holidays.
Christians object to Halloween, because it is of Pagan origin
(Samhain). To be consistent, then, they should also reject Christmas
(Yule), Easter (Ostara), and Pentecost (Lugnasaً), also Pagan
holidays co-opted by Christians in an attempt to erase the true
origins. They should also reject the Resurrection (Pagan) and the
transubstantiation of bread and wine into blood and flesh (Pagan).
Christian demons and devils are no different than Buddhist, or even
Hindu ones (Not as colorful though...) Christian God-forms (Father,
Son, & Holy Ghost, the Devil) are just as "true" or "false" as any other
religions'.
Christians believe that Pagans worship the Earth, and say it is sin to
worship the created, instead of worshiping the Creator. This confused
notion of separating creator and created is particularly vain, and is
used by Christians to justify trashing the land.
Thousands of people were crucified in Judea during Roman times. By
concentrating on the suffering of Jesus, the Gospels convey the
impression that he was a rare victim of this brutal form of Roman
execution.
Leviticus has dire warnings against even touching the skin of pigs-
doesn't this imperil the souls of Christian football players?
If one can see through to the underlying metaphor (or parable), and
glean the good from scripture, fine. But justifying intolerance with
dogmatic fixation on the literal inerrancy of every line in the book
leads to simplistic conclusions, and often contradictory ones.
Fundamentalists are obsessed with making the world clear cut and
orderly. Subtlety or complexity upsets and confuses them. Alternate
points of view, or attitudes of flexibility or openness drive them crazy.
Possessed by their own fear of destabilization, they are driven to
impose their will on others. They even view their inflexibility as a
virtue. Their fear and mistrust feeds on itself, and grows
exponentially.