Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engl 218
Professor Tucker
6 February 2017
The poem “Brother Keeper” by Emily Ho uses specific imagery to express the
relationship between siblings. The title connotes the passage from the Bible, which
carries the semantic baggage of betrayal and rivalry. The title is not a cliché, but an
allusion and it works because it introduces a sibling relationship and suggests that
these relationships have existed since the beginning of time. The feelings
accompanying sibling stewardship and love begin to flow before the first line of the
poem is read.
The poem begins with a specific image: the brother “[puts] a flashlight in his
mouth and lit up like E.T.” (2-3). The imagery is unique. The relation of the brother
lighting up like E.T. gives the sense that the brother is foreign, perhaps he is the only
brother of the home. The narrator continues by putting the “flashlight to my chest
and it threw my rib cage on the wall around my brother” (4-6). Here, the image of
the rib cage capturing her brother is seen clearly through the shadow. The narrator
becomes her brother’s keeper in a literal, and authoritative sense. The poem takes a
The parallel of the actions of the brother and narrator shows their
similarities and inherent sibling-ness. But the author plays between the shadows
and the light that these characters create, evoking the relationship of these two
siblings. They are connected through their actions and contrasted through their
descriptions.
The poem continues to illustrate this idea, “he wears me like a hat like a
streetlight wears a night” (7-8). The brother is the streetlight, and the narrator the
nighttime. The idea that the siblings are contrasts of one another is further
The final stanza of the poem seems to carry purpose but that purpose is
incoherent, “My mother tells him wash the dishes put the cat out leave your sisters
alone” (11-14). It seems that the brother is a shadow of the narrator – although they
are contrasts, the little brother tries to follow his sibling. The everyday-ness of this
last stanza is apparent – all parents say these things to their children – but the
The compact language of this poem adds to the complexity in the expression
of this idea. The imagery is unique and full of connotations that add to the intention.
However, the intention seems unclear at times because the images focus on just
being unique over being entirely concrete. The connotation of the various words,
and especially the title are good because they allow the author to shape
preconceived feelings and use those emotions to form the new insight the author
intends. But because the story of this poem is vague, there is no image in the
reader’s mind that allows for the production of an idea. The reader is left grasping at