Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Weismann’s 1891 hypothesis: aging evolved to the advantage of the species (group selection)
Weismann’s later formulation: aging occurs in organisms that segregate soma and germ because
additional resources need to be used to maintain the soma – renunciation of soma = aging.
Kirkwood’s reformulation of Weismann’s theory – the disposable soma theory: balance of resources
between reproduction and soma maintenance- aging is due to accumulation of damage during life.
Peter Medawar: force of selection declines with age = hazardous late-acting genes can exist.
George Williams Antagonistic pleiotropy model- maybe some genes are beneficial @ early ages but
harmful later – genes that increase survival to reproductive age will be favoured by NS even if it
increases likelihood of dying later. E.g. Peacock tail: Zahavi’s handicap theory.
- Life history = study of the changes of organisms from birth to death, focusing on schedule of
reproduction and survival.
- r/K selection proposed by MacArthur and Wilson- organisms in hazardous environments
maximize reproduction = r selected, non-hazardous = K selected.
o R selected organsms: small size, rapid development, short lifespan
o K selected organisms: large size, delayed development, longer lifespan’
- Extreme life history strategies:
o Semelparous species- unstable environment
o Where juveniles live longer than adults – Mayfly
o Aging evolved for a purpose (group selection)
1. Let Drosophila reproduce when older- find delay in aging: natural selection can operate on
older flies (+)
2. Steven Austad observed that opossums, a North American marsupial, living in a predator-
free island reproduced later (K-selected) than animals of the same species on the more
hazardous mainland (R-selected) – intraspecies variation in r/k selection. (+)
3. Modern theory of aging proposes that aging is multifactorial but: single gene knock outs in C.
elegans + delay aging without affecting reproduction + mating increases longevity in ant
queens + in guppies, where higher extrinsic mortality = mature earlier and invest more in
reproduction but DO NOT have earlier onset of reproductive aging + does not explain why
aging is similar among mammals.
4. Exceptions: animals that do not age (calassical evolutionary models of aging predict that all
species eventually age because all species must reproduce)
o Blanding turtles: increase reproductive output with age!
5. Some germ cells in mammals could originate in somatic cell precursors= soma and germ
discrimination too simplistic?
Aging in mammals:
- Mammals evolved from reptiles, reptiles don’t age, but mammals age. Why?
Mammals age because of r-selection during dinosaur’s rule. Mammals were small
nocturnal animals then = high mortalities = short generation cycles = select for early
reproduction instead of survival: effects last till today.
- What is the process?
o Drift due to decrased evolutionary pressure at later stages?
o Mutation aaccumulation?
o Antagonistic pleiotropY
1. Human cells
- Problem: measurement usually based on rate of cell proliferation, and rate of proliferation
doesn’t necessarily record vitality – cancer = excessive proliferation. Also, stress resistance is
used.. but is it really relevant to aging
Counterarguments:
- Aging is the corruption of life, so understand how life works is useful: many genes that
modulate aging have been identified in model organisms- useful starting point?
2. S. cerevisiae
3. C. elegans
4. D. melanogaster
5. Mice and rats (rodents)
Cellular senescence:
Hayflick and Moorhead’s 3 phases of cell culture: Primary culture- division in culture- slow division ->
hayflick limit (replicative senescence)