AN STUDY ON WAGERING CONTRACT

ABSTRACT:
This paper deals with wagering contract and also described the contract are the lawfully
enforceable agreements that bind the parties into acting it and there should be a thought among
the parties related to it. Here the thought means one party renders any specific services or will
something of one’s feeling in expectation of any monetary, non-financial or maybe service
reciprocally. Another necessary side of the contract is, there ought to lawfulness of the article
meaning, it must be something that's prohibited by law. For example- associate degree agreement
to buy and sell medication might ne'er be legal because it could be a crime within the eyes of
law.which can be annulled due to lack of consideration, mistake or inadequacy of capacity. There are
many agreements that cannot be enforced by law. One of them is wagering agreement.

1
INTRODUCTION:

Contracts are the lawfully enforceable agreements that bind the parties into acting it and there
should be a thought among the parties related to it. Here the thought means one party renders any
specific services or will something of one’s feeling in expectation of any monetary, non-financial
or perhaps service reciprocally. Another vital fact of the contract is, there ought to the lawfulness
of the item which means, it mustn't be something that's prohibited by law. For example- an
agreement to buy and sell medication may never be legal because it could be a crime within the
eyes of the law. As we are discussing the legal philosophy in details, we are moving towards the
void agreements, which might be annulled owing to lack of thought, mistake or inadequacy of
capability. There are several agreements that can't be implemented by law. one amongst them is
wagering agreement. Literally, the word ‘wager’ suggests that ‘a bet’ one thing explicit to be lost
or won on the results of an uncertain issue, and, therefore, wagering agreements are nothing
however normal indulgent agreements. Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act talks concerning
wagering agreements that reads as “agreements by the method of wager are void”. The section
doesn't outline ‘wager.’ Section 30 states that, “Agreements by a method of wager are void, and
no suit shall be brought for ill something purported to be won on any wager, or entrusted to
someone to abide the results of any game or alternative unsure event on that any wager is
created.” All contracts or agreements, whether or not by parole or in writing, by means of
diversion or wagering, shall be null and void; and no suit shall be brought or maintained in any
court of law or equity for sick any sum of money or valuable issue speculated to be won upon
any wager”. The impact of these words is that wagering contract is ‘hold with contract at the
mindset of parties, i.e. before the parties implementation by the wager has occurred’ as in case of
[Hill v. William Hill (park lane) Ltd. its void and it became illegitimate. It consists has no rights
upon either party. If the loser fails to pay, recovery cannot be implemented by action. Another as
in case of carlill vs. carbolic smoke ball co. said that “It is crucial to a wagering contract that
every party could there under either win or loses, whether or not he can win or lose being
captivated with the problem of the event and so remaining unsure till that issue is understood. If
either of the parties could win however cannot lose, or could lose however cannot win, it's not a
wagering contract”. In this case the defendants secure to pay one hundred pounds to anyone who
caught respiratory disorder when mistreatment the smoke ball factory-made by them. It

2
absolutely was command to not be a wager as a result of the user couldn't lose something if he
did not catch respiratory disorder. The details to be noted here is that there ought to be equal
probabilities of gain or loss to the parties associate degreed it ought to be relating to an unsure
event. The foremost hanging feature of wager is that every party has the possibility of winning or
losing.

3
 THE EFFECT OF WAGERING CONTRACT:

The section is as follows:

Wagering contract or agreement by way of wager is void because of lose of a person who want
to recovery they lose in wager agreement as in the contract clearly stated that any person to
contract by result of any game or uncertain event held on which any wager is made. Section
294-A of the Indian contract act says that—Nothing under this section shall be deemed to fits
countenance any dealings connected with racing, to that the provisions of section 294-A of the
Indian contract act apply. Section 30 solely says that “agreements by a method of wager square
measure void”. The section doesn't outline ‘wager’. Subba Rao J in Gherulal v. Mahadeo said:
Sir William Anson’s definition of ‘wager’ as a promise to present cash or money’s value upon
the determination or ascertainment of an unsure event, brings out the idea of wager declared void
by section 30 of the contract act.
ESSENTIALS OF WAGERING AGREEMENT:
Firstly, an uncertain event will happen when the mind of the parties to make the determination
on the event in one way or other is necessary, generally, the wager is a future course of an action
event. But it should relate the event which is already happened in past. But the parties do not
know the result or the time of its happening.
Secondly, there have equal chances of gaining or losing to the parties. There is no wager where
the chances of gain or loss, each party should stand for their winning or losing. If the party wins
there no long losing the contract and then in the case there is no long wager. If the winning or
losing complete the skills of event will no longer be wager and it should be dependent on
chances.
Thirdly, the party should control the event; the parties should control the happening of the event
on one way and others. Birdwood J in (Dayabhai Tribhovandas v. Lakshmichand) if the party
has the power of event in his own hands, then the lack of essentials transaction of wager.
Lastly, no other interest in the event, if the party don’t have interest in the happening of the event
other than the sum or stake may win or loss.

4
EFFECT OF WAGERING TRANSACTION:
According to the section 30 of contract Act, “agreements by means of wager are void; and no
suit shall be brought for convalescent something imagined being won on any wager, or entrusted
to someone to abide the results of any game or alternative unsure events on that any wager is
made”. Exceptions are created in supporting the prizes of racing though racing isn't this
clarification of the section came by default since the country abides by the common legal
philosophy, “this section shall not be deemed to render unlawful a subscription or any
contribution, or agreement to subscribe or contribute, created or entered into for or toward any
plate, prize or total of cash, of the worth of quantity of five hundred Bangladeshi monetary unit
or upwards, to be awarded to the winner or winners of any race.”
But this doesn't eliminate the actual fact that a wagering agreement is void at the start and also
the section 65 of the contract act cannot be applied against it. Money that is paid by a third party
to a winner of a bet can’t be recovered from the one that loses it. although that very same loser
makes a brand new promise to buy his losses in the thought of not being posted; however if he
provides a cheque in discharge of his liability, the cheque might not be tainted with lawfulness as
a result of the winner’s promise to not have the name denote. The cheques won't be enforceable
by a third party holder of the cheque, although he knew of the facts leading up to giving the
cheque.
Wagering agreement can be void but it cannot enforceable by court of law. The Calcutta high
court in “Badridas Kothari v. Meghraj Kothari” held that though a debt instrument was dead
for the payment of the debt caused through wagering dealings, the note was control to not be
enforceable. Similarly, cash deposited with someone to alter him to pay to the party winning
upon a wager can't be recovered. The winner cannot recover the cash; however before it's paid to
him the investor might get over the stakeholder. But once the money paid already it cannot
recovered back. (Bridger v. Savage).
WAGERING AGREEMENT NOT UNLAWFUL:
It was held by the court in the case of Gherulal Parekh v.Mahadeo Das states that the wager is
void but it not unenforceable by law and it is forbidden by law. Therefore the wagering
agreement is not unlawful in nature under section 23 of contract Act, and hence the transaction
collateral to the main transaction is enforceable.

5
WHAT ARE NOT WAGERS? – EXCEPTION:
CONTRACT OF INSURANCE ARE NOT WAGER:
Insurance contract are contract of indemnity, they are entered into the contract because of
safeguards the interest of one party through the contract. In this contract the insurable of the
property life. Hence, it is not wager.
DISTINCTION BETWEEN WAGERING AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT OF
INSURANCE:
1. In the wagering agreement there is no insurable contract, but in case of contract of
insurance has insurable contract.
2. In wagering agreement is a void agreement, and the other one in contract of insurance are
valid one.
3. In a wagering agreement both the parties are interested in happening and non- happening
of event whereas in contract of insurance both the parties are interested in the subject
matter.
4. Wagering agreement are conditional contract, whereas in contract of insurance are
contract of indemnity expect the life insurance.
5. A wagering agreement is gamble but as in the case of contract of insurance is based on
scientific and risks.

6
 THE LEGAL PROPOSITIONS FOR A WAGERING AGREEMENT

Contracts are the lawfully enforceable agreements that bind the parties into acting it and there
should be a thought among the parties related to it. Here the thought means one party renders any
specific services or will something of one’s feeling in expectation of any monetary, non-financial
or perhaps service reciprocally. Another vital fact of the contract is, there ought to the lawfulness
of the item which means, it mustn't be something that's prohibited by law. For example- an
agreement to buy and sell medication may never be legal because it could be a crime within the
eyes of the law. As we are discussing the legal philosophy in details, we are moving towards the
void agreements, which might be annulled owing to lack of thought, mistake or inadequacy of
capability. There are several agreements that can't be implemented by law. One amongst them is
wagering agreement.
FUNDAMENTALS OF WAGERING AGREEMENTS:
According to the sir William Anson, there was bringing the concept of fundamentals of wagering
agreement.
1. Mutual chances of gain or loss: there should be two parties and there should have equal
chances of gain or loss. That means one party should win and other one is loss upon
resolve the event. But it is not called wager, one party definitely win, but can’t loss or if
he loss, can’t win.
2. Parties- There must be two parties of sound mind who are capable of winning or losing.
3. Uncertain event: uncertainly in the mind of the party that the determination of one event
and other is not necessary the wager is generally a future event, but most of the wager
relate to the event which is already happened in the past. But the party does not aware of
its result and it’s the time for them that the happening of event. So the essential part of
the event is wager which is depending upon the determination of uncertain event.
4. No control over the event: if the party does not control over the happening event then the
parties should make sure to control. If it not then the lacks of quality will make more
ingredients of wager.

7
CONCLUSION:
The contract act reads solely agreements by an approach of wager are void; however, it doesn't
outline what constitutes a wager or wagering agreement. It solely mentions that such agreements
are void and unenforceable and no action will hoodwink either recover something that's due
underneath a wager or for performance of a contract that's within the nature of a wager. A wager
is within the nature of a contingent contract however prevented from being enforced by Section
30. so the contract act ought to offer an a specific definition that may clarify on what represents a
wager, so removing any ambiguity with respect to the lawfulness of spinoff contracts that are
within the nature of wagering agreements. Conjointly the exhaustive of the study of assorted
cases, books and views of the learned students within the project it will be same that section 30
of the contract act must be reviewed critically. Thus it ought to be amended. Since plenty of
inconvenience are visage by the judiciary whereas addressing the problem of wagers, specifically
on what all represent wagers and what all comes underneath the range of wagers. As completely
different completely different} judgments and different jurists the range of wagers is outlined in
several ways that. In different words the scope of section 30 must be widened. Another vital fact
of the contract is, there ought to the lawfulness of the item which means, it mustn't be something
that's prohibited by law. For example- an agreement to buy and sell medication may never be
legal because it could be a crime within the eyes of the law. As we are discussing the legal
philosophy in details, we are moving towards the void agreements, which might be annulled
owing to lack of thought, mistake or inadequacy of capability. There are several agreements that
can't be implemented by law. One amongst them is wagering agreement.

8
9