Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(for the use of the Training and Development Section, Human Resource Management Division, v. 2018)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Preliminary matters ……………….. 1
II. Jurisdiction, defined ……………….. 3
III. Aspects of jurisdiction ……………….. 3
IV. Venue ……………….. 5
V. Jurisdictions of the different courts ……………….. 6
VI. Agencies with quasi-judicial power ……………….. 14
VII. The government counsels ……………….. 14
VIII. Appeal ……………….. 15
I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS
The matter of jurisdiction is best discussed within the context of the powers of
the three branches of the Philippine government:
1. The legislative power, the power to make, alter, and repeal laws, is vested
in Congress – a bicameral body comprised of the Senate and the House of
Representatives;1
2. The executive power, which essentially is the power to enforce the laws
of the land, is vested in the President;2
3. The judicial power, which includes the power to interpret the law, is vested
in one Supreme Court and in such other courts as may be created by law.3
Ex.: X owes Y P500,000. The loan fell due on 5 June 2018, but X failed
to pay the same on even date. Later on, Y sent X a formal demand
for the payment of the loan, but to no avail.
Ex.: Falcis v. Civil Registrar General,4 now pending before the Supreme
Court, is the most recent case, news cycle-wise, in which the final
arbiter is called upon to exercise its power of judicial review. In
Falcis, the issue is whether certain provisions of the Family Code
(such as those defining marriage as a special contract of permanent
union between a man and a woman) are unconstitutional.
1
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
Ex.: The Rules of Court – which lays out the procedure for ordinary and
special civil actions, special proceedings, and criminal cases, sets
the rules on evidence, and prescribes the guidelines for admission
to the practice of law – were created by virtue of the Supreme
Court’s rule-making power.
Corollary to these vast powers are the principles of separation of powers and
checks and balances. These two principles serve as safeguards against
totalitarianism, that is, that the great powers of government are never at the beck and
call of a single branch, but distributed among all three in such a way that no one branch
is more powerful than the others, thus ensuring parity among them.
In general terms, separation of powers ensures that (1) Congress can make
laws but not enforce them, or resolve controversies on their interpretation; (2) the
executive department can enforce laws but not make or interpret them, at least not in
the way either Congress or the courts could; and (3) the courts can neither create nor
enforce laws, but can interpret them for the guidance of all.
The principle of checks and balances, for its part, makes it so that a power
wielded by one branch is “checked” by a power possessed by another branch, thereby
preventing unbridled exercise of the former. Checks and balances at work can be seen
in some of these scenarios:
The Supreme Court can exercise its power of judicial review on the
sufficiency of the President's factual basis for his proclamation, upon the
filing of a proper petition by any Filipino citizen – as was done in Lagman
v. Medialdea5 regarding the declaration of martial law over Mindanao.
2
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
3
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
4
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
IV. VENUE
Whenever jurisdiction is brought up, venue will never be too far behind. Venue
is the place where an action is to be filed and tried – for example, if a collection case
is pending before the Quezon City RTC, “RTC” connotes the court with jurisdiction
over the case; “Quezon City,” on the other hand, refers to the venue.
JURISDICTION VENUE
Conferred by law For parties’ convenience
Substantial, thus: Procedural, thus:
1. Cannot be waived 1. Waivable
2. Cannot be stipulated upon 2. Can be subject of agreement
The court can take cognizance of
such an agreement if made:
(a) In writing
(b) Before institution of action
The court can motu proprio dismiss a There can be no motu proprio dismissal
case on the ground of lack of jurisdiction on the ground of improper venue; the
court cannot take the cudgels for the
parties and must wait for a Motion to
Dismiss (MTD) on that ground.
Exception: Cases falling under the
Rules on Summary Procedure;*
the court can motu proprio dismiss
under any of the grounds for MTD
(which includes improper venue)
* Cases governed by the Rules on
Summary Procedure will be tackled in the
latter pages of this handout.
In real actions, venue is where the property or any part thereof is located.
A can file an action for unlawful detainer with the MTC of Quezon City.
Being an ejectment case, the MTC has jurisdiction; the venue would be
Quezon City because that is where A’s apartment is.
Venue in personal actions may either be (1) the residence of the plaintiff or the
defendant; or (2) where a non-resident defendant may be found, at the option of the
plaintiff.
Ex.: (1) X, a resident of Taguig, owes Y, who lives in Manila, P500,000. X’s
debt fell due, but remained unpaid despite subsequent formal
demand from Y. Should Y decide to file a case, the court with
jurisdiction is the RTC – but which RTC? Y can choose to file the
case with the RTC of Manila, being where she lives, or with the RTC
of Taguig, where X resides.
5
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
Art. VIII of the 1987 Constitution defines the powers of the Supreme Court,
each of which are either judicial or administrative in nature. The latter category
pertains to (1) supervision and control over the Philippine judiciary and its
personnel, as well as the members of the Bar; and (2) rule-making power.
CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL
1. Exclusive: petitions for writs of certiorari, prohibition, & mandamus vs. –
(a) CA
(b) CTA
(c) COMELEC en banc
(d) COA
(e) Sandiganbayan
2. Concurrent:
(a) W/ CA:
- Petitions for writs of certiorari, prohibition, & mandamus vs. –
i. NLRC, under the Labor Code
Hierarchy of courts: must file w/ CA first, otw. SC shall dismiss14
ii. Civil Service Commission (CSC)
iii. Quasi-judicial agencies
iv. RTCs & other lower courts (must also file w/ CA first)
- Petitions for issuance of writ of kalikasan (A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC)
(b) W/ CA & RTC: petitions for –
- Habeas corpus & quo warranto
- Certiorari, prohibition, & mandamus vs. lower courts/other bodies
(c) W/ CA, Sandiganbayan, & RTC: petitions for –
- Amparo
- Habeas data, where the action involves public data or gov’t office
(d) W/ RTC: actions affecting ambassadors/other public ministers & consuls
APPELLATE
1. Petitions for review on certiorari vs. –
6
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
(a) CA
(b) CTA en banc
(c) Sandiganbayan
(d) RTC in cases –
- Where no question of fact is involved & the case is one involving the:
i. Constitutionality/validity of a treaty, int’l/executive agreement, law,
PD, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation
ii. Legality of taxes/imposts/assessments/tolls; penalties rel. thereto
iii. Jurisdiction of the lower court (i.e. being put at issue)
- Where only errors or questions of law are involved
2. Special civil action of certiorari filed w/in 30 days vs. COMELEC/COA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL
1. Exclusive: petitions for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against the CA
and the Sandiganbayan
2. Concurrent:
(a) W/ CA: petitions for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against RTCs
(b) W/ CA & RTC: certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against lower courts
(c) W/ Sandiganbayan: petitions for mandamus, prohibition, certiorari,
habeas corpus, injunctions, and ancillary writs in aid of its appellate
jurisdiction & over petitions of similar nature, including quo warranto
arising or that may arise in cases filed/under EOs 1, 2, 14, & 14-A, s. 1986
EXCLUSIVE APPELLATE
1. By appeal:
(a) From the RTCs in all criminal cases involving offenses for which the
penalty is reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, and those involving
other offenses which, although not so punished, arose out of the same
occurrence of which may have been committed by the accused on the
same occasion
(b) Automatic review in criminal cases where the death penalty is imposed
2. By petition for review on certiorari:
(a) From the CA
(b) From the Sandiganbayan
(c) From the RTCs where only an error or question of law is involved
B. COURT OF APPEALS
The CA was established by virtue of Batas Pambansa (B.P.) Blg. 129, the
Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980; as such, it is the first among Art. VIII, Sec.
1’s “such other courts as may be created by law.”
The CA sits in Division, with 3 members each, and only sits en banc for
exercising administrative, ceremonial, or other non-adjudicatory functions. The 23
Divisions of the CA are apportioned throughout the country as follows:
CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL
1. Exclusive: actions for annulment of judgment of RTC based on –
(a) Extrinsic fraud
7
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
C. SANDIGANBAYAN
ORIGINAL
1. Exclusive: cases involving violations of –
(a) R.A. 3019, as amended (Anti-Graft & Corrupt Practices Act), R.A. 1379
(re: recovery of property illegally acquired by public officers), and
Chapter II, Section 2, Title VII, Book II (Arts. 210-212), RPC (i.e. direct
and indirect bribery; corruption of public officers), where one or more of
the accused are officials occupying the following positions in
8
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
9
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
YES NO
Does the information (a) allege any
damage to the government or any
bribery, or (b) allege damage to the Is the accused (or at least one of the
government or bribery arising from accused) classified as SG 27 and
the same or closely related up?
transactions or acts in an amount
not exceeding P1,000,000?
YES NO YES NO
Is the offense
punishable by
Sandigan- Sandigan-
RTC imprisonment
bayan bayan
exceeding six
(6) years?
As expanded by law, the CTA’s jurisdiction now includes (1) criminal and
tax collection cases under the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) and the
Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (CMTA), and (2) cases involving local and
real property taxes previously within the ambit of the RTC and the CA.
TAX JURISDICTION
EXCLUSIVE APPELLATE
NOTE: Any dispute or controversy involving national internal revenue taxes or customs
duties not part of the following list (e.g. taxpayer’s suit impugning the constitutionality of
a tax law) falls within the jurisdiction of the regular courts.
1. CTA En Banc:
(a) Decisions/resolutions on MRs/MNTs21 of the CTA in Division in the
exercise of its exclusive appellate jurisdiction over:
- Cases arising from administrative agencies (BIR/BOC/DTI/DOF/DA)
- Local tax cases decided by the RTC in exercise of original
jurisdiction
- Tax collection cases decided by the RTC in exercise of original
jurisdiction involving final and executory assessments for taxes,
fees, charges, and penalties, where the principal amount of taxes
and penalties claimed is less than P1,000,000
- Cases involving criminal offenses arising from violations of the NIRC
or the CMTA and other laws administered by the BIR or BOC
(b) Decisions/resolutions/orders on MRs/MNTs of the CTA in Division in the
exercise of its exclusive original jurisdiction over:
- Tax collection cases
- Cases involving criminal offenses arising from violations of the NIRC
or the CMTA and other laws administered by the BIR or BOC
(c) Decisions, etc. of the RTC in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction re:
- Local tax cases
- Tax collection cases
10
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
Previously called the “Courts of First Instance,” the Regional Trial Courts
(RTCs) are courts of general jurisdiction scattered throughout the thirteen judicial
regions of the Philippines.
CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL
1. Exclusive:
(a) Subject of litigation = incapable of pecuniary estimation (this includes
expropriation [regardless of the value of the subject property],22
reformation of instrument, and consolidation of ownership23)
(b) Sum-of-money cases: > P300K (P400K in MMLA) 24
22 Brgy. San Roque v. Heirs of Pastor, 334 SCRA 127 (2000); the power of the State to expropriate property for
public use cannot be quantified. As said in San Roque, “In the main, the subject of an expropriation suit is the
governments exercise of eminent domain, a matter that is incapable of pecuniary estimation.”
23 Actions for consolidation of ownership are incapable of pecuniary estimation as their purpose is registration.
24 Metro Manila.
11
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
12
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
The SC shall designate special courts from among the existing RTCs in each
judicial region to exclusively try & hear cases involving violations of R.A. 916527
Every municipality in the Philippines has its own Municipal Trial Court
(MTC) – where such a court covers two or more municipalities, it is called a
Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC). If an MTC is within the Metropolitan Manila
area, it is referred to as a Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC). In cities outside
Metropolitan Manila, an MTC is called a Municipal Trial Court in Cities (MTCC).
CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL
1. Sum-of-money (DIALeC, admiralty, probate): ≤ P300K (P400K in MMLA)
2. Real actions: assessed value ≤ P20K (P50K in MMLA)
3. Summary procedure:
(a) Forcible entry/unlawful detainer (irrespective of damages/unpaid rent)
(b) Other cases where total amt. of the claim ≤ P100K (P200K in MMLA)
4. Inclusion/exclusion of voters
DELEGATED
Cadastral & land registration cases, provided –
1. No controversy/opposition; &
2. Contested lots valued > P100K
SPECIAL
Petitions for habeas corpus (in the absence of all RTC judges)
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL
1. All violations of city or municipal ordinances committed within their respective
territorial jurisdictions
2. All offenses punishable with imprisonment of not more than 6 years
irrespective of the amount of fine, and in all cases of damage to property
through criminal negligence, regardless of other penalties and the civil
liabilities arising therefrom
3. All offenses (except violations of R.A. 3018, R.A. 1379, and Arts. 210 to 212,
RPC) committed by public officers and employees in relation to their office,
including those employed in government-owned or controlled corporations,
and by private individuals charged as co-principals, accomplices or
accessories, punishable with imprisonment of not more than 6 years or where
none of the accused holds a position of SG 27 and higher
SUMMARY PROCEDURE
1. Traffic violations
2. Violations of the rental law
3. Violations of city or municipal ordinances
4. All other offenses where the penalty does not exceed 6 months imprisonment
and/or P1,000 fine, irrespective of other penalties or civil liabilities arising
therefrom, & in offenses involving damage to property through criminal
negligence where the imposable fine ≤ P10,000
G. SHARI’A COURTS
Philippine Shari’a law, as laid out in the Code of Muslim Personal Laws of
the Philippines, provides for two Islamic courts: the Shari’a District Courts and
the Shari’a Circuit Courts. There are 5 Shari’a District Courts and 51 Shari’a
Circuit Courts in existence.
13
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
The decisions of the Shari’a District Courts, whether on appeal from the
Shari’a Circuit Courts or not, shall be final – but without prejudice to the jurisdiction
of the SC over certain issues as provided by the Constitution.
B. OMBUDSMAN
The Ombudsman and her deputies, as protectors of the people, shall act
promptly on complaints filed in any form or manner against officers or employees
of the government, or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including
government-owned and -controlled corporations, and enforce their administrative,
civil, and criminal liability in every case where the evidence so warrants to promote
efficient service by the government to the people.28
B. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 Sec. 13, R.A. 6770; see also Art. XI, Sec. 12, 1987 CONST.
29 Sec. 15, R.A. 6770.
14
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
For a person to qualify for PAO’s legal assistance, he must pass two tests:
the merit test and the indigency test. Under PAO Memorandum Circular (MC)
No. 18, s. 2002, a case is “meritorious” if an assessment of the law and evidence
discloses that PAO’s legal services will assist or be in aid of or in the furtherance
of justice, taking into consideration the interests of the party and those of society.
On the other hand, per PAO MC No. 02, s. 2010, a prospective client is “indigent”
if his net monthly income does not exceed P14,000 if he resides in Metro Manila,
P13,000 if in any other city, or P12,000 elsewhere. For purposes of determining
whether a client is indigent, ownership of real property is not taken into account.30
The PCGG is mandated to (a) prosecute and litigate ill-gotten wealth cases,
(b) investigate cases of graft and corruption related thereto, and (c) issue
sequestration, hold and/or freeze orders, or lift the same as may be warranted.
Assets recovered by the PCGG are deposited to the Bureau of Treasury, to be
used for the government’s Comprehensive Agrarian Program (CARP).
VIII. APPEAL
A. NATURE OF APPEAL; ITS PLACE IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM
B. MODES OF APPEAL
15
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
16
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
RESIDUAL JURISDICTION (cf. Rules 40-42): where appeal has been filed (i.e.
trial court has lost jurisdiction over the subject matter) but prior to transmittal of
original record/record on appeal, the court below may – [Mnemonic: WAPXC!]
(a) Allow withdrawal of the appeal
(b) Permit appeals of indigent litigants
(c) Issue orders for the protection & preservation of the rights of the parties
w/c do not involve any matter litigated by the appeal (e.g. appointment of
receiver, preliminary attachment/injunction)
(d) Order execution pending appeal (cf. Rule 39, Sec. 2)
(e) Approve compromises
PETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI (Rule 45)
Ayy
As can be gleaned above, the requisites for a petition for certiorari are:
37 R.A. 9282, Sec. 11; see also Rule 16, Sec. 1, Revised Rules of the Court of Tax Appeals.
38 Sec. 19 of both Rules for the Writs of Amparo and Habeas Data and Sec. 16 of the Rules of Procedure for
Environmental Cases provide that a Rule 45 petition on the issuance of the writ may also raise questions.
39 This is by no means an admission that the writer of this handout followed the Kalye-Serye in its heyday.
40 Safeguard Security v. Tangco, 511 SCRA 67 (2006).
41 Rule 65, Sec. 1, Rules of Court; see Agranzamendez, Questions and Answers in Remedial Law, 1st ed., p. 212.
17
JURISDICTION AND MODES OF APPEAL (Training and Development Section, HRMD, v. 2018)
An original action for certiorari may not be filed later than 60 DAYS from
notice of the judgment, order, or resolution sought to be assailed (except when the
judgment, etc. to be assailed is that of COMELEC or COA [Rule 64],43 in which
case the prescriptive period is, generally, 30 DAYS).
1. Verified; and
2. Accompanied by:
(a) A certified true copy of the judgment, etc. subject thereof;
(b) Copies of all pleadings/documents relevant & pertinent thereto; and
(c) A sworn certification of non-forum shopping.
R45 R65
Petition for review on certiorari Petition for certiorari
Findings of fact by CA = conclusive Not so in R65 actions
Involves questions of law Involves questions of jurisdiction
Either (a) vs. interlocutory orders; or
Review of judgments/FOs/resolutions
(b) when these is no appeal or any
of CA/CTA/SB/RTC/other courts
other plain/speedy/adequate remedy
15-day period 60-day period (see exception above)
The appellant & the appellee remain Judge, court, etc. shall be public
the original parties to the action respondents impleaded in the action
MR/NT = not condition sine qua non MR/NT = condition sine qua non
(see exceptions above)
SC/RTC/SB/COMELEC/etc. exercises
SC exercises appellate jurisdiction
original jurisdiction
ejdc-jurisdiction
42 Siok Ping Tang v. Subic Bay Distribution, Inc., 638 SCRA 457 (2010).
43 The mode by which a judgment or final order or resolution of COMELEC and COA may be revised is via special
civil action of certiorari under Rule 65 to be filed with the SC (see Rule 64, Secs. 1 and 2, Rules of Court).
18