Professional Documents
Culture Documents
People from all walks of life often have difficult choices to make—but for some
the range of options is more restricted than for others. In remote villages and urban
communities, many women, men, and children have limited choices available to them,
resulting in a daily struggle to simply survive. The socio-economically underprivileged
people in particular have limited employment opportunities, little voice in decision
making over locally available resources, often lack basic services, have limited recourse
to state-sponsored systems of justice, and are rarely able to exercise the right to hold
their representatives accountable. These people suffer from inequality in terms of the
power they have to change their lives and escape poverty.
To assess the failure and the success of the Philippine government’s efforts to
advance people's empowerment and participation comparing it to those implemented in
other country, case studies of poverty reduction strategies of both the Philippines and
Malaysia will be used.
People participation in the Philippines began after the “People Power” uprising in
the year 1986. With the enactment of the Local Government Code, through the
devolution of power, people’s participation in all levels of decision-making was effected.
Powers, resources, authority, and responsibilities were transferred from the national to
local government—thus transferring matters of fiscal management and governance to
local governments.
Included in the stipulations of the Local Government Code, was the significance it
attributed to local development planning. The local development planning body was
composed of local development council members, non-government organization
members, and people’s organization. Participatory approaches in local development
planning ushered in innovative approaches by local NGOs-POs in engaging LGUs to
prioritize people-identified development projects (Villarin, 1999).
1
and referendum. Said system allowed local electorate to amend, revoke, and enact
ordinances and resolutions. People’s participation was further enhanced with the
mandated representation of NGOs-POs in local special bodies. This body was entitled
to draft, discuss and recommend policies to LGUs. Public consultations were also called
to secure consent from people whether or not a particular project shall be allowed to
push through.
2
2010).
3
Among these plans however, the core policies were considered to be the most
important. These core policies included the New Economic Policy (1970-1990), and the
National Development Policy (1991-2000). These two abovementioned national policies
were based on a philosophy of growth with equitable distribution. The policies saw
national unity as the goal of development and the two-pronged strategy to achieve it (1)
the eradication of poverty and (2) the restructuring of society.
Similar to the KALAHI project of the Arroyo administration, the NEP and the NDP
incorporated in its main objectives the significance of the participation of the community
in achieving the goals of the project. Its institutional framework was broad-based,
capturing within its ambit, public sector organizations (ministries, departments and
statutory authorities) as well as private sector institutions, academia, NGO’s and others.
The public sector component of the framework was also multi-tiered, incorporating
federal, state and local-level organizations. These features has resulted to a
participative and interactive process that allowed a broad range of viewpoints to be
expressed and considered which was believed to have created a broader acceptance of
plans that were formulated thereby facilitating their implementation.
In the implementation stage, all ministries and their respective departments and
statutory authorities, were involved in implementing national development policies and
plan. State and local governments, NGOs and foundations receiving Government funds
also complemented federal policies and plans in implementing their programs, and the
private sector also contributed through their business activities in the achievement of a
major component of development policy.
4
In the Philippines however, despite the significance the government has
attributed to community participation in governance and in poverty reduction, according
to the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) in its 2006 statistics,
approximately 24 out of 100 Pinoy families did not earn enough in 2003 to satisfy their
basic food and non-food requirements. In terms of population on the other hand, 30 out
of 100 Filipinos in 2003 had income short of minimum cost of satisfying the basic
requirements which is a slight improvement from 2000 which 33 out of 100 Filipinos had
income below poverty threshold.
It is a fact that the Philippines like Malaysia, prioritized poverty reduction in its
policies for development, however, despite the Philippine government granting its
people complete participation after Martial Law, said principle was only observed in
black and white. What only transpired during said decades only provided Filipinos with
the feeling of “your decision matters” instead of “letting them do something for
themselves”. Community participation and empowerment in the context of poverty
reduction in the Philippines was only put to life during the Arroyo administration in its
KALAHI project. Unlike the Philippines, community participation and empowerment in
the context of poverty reduction in Malaysia has been embedded in its programs for
poverty reduction when it first introduced the NEP way back in the 1970s.
The fact that community participation in the context of poverty reduction efforts in
the country appeared insignificant and objectives, strategies, and methods employed in
these programs produced unfavourable results; problems encountered by these
programs can be resolved through eliminating these constraints. These programs for
poverty reduction are in fact embedded with principles which if applied would make
these programs a success. However, these principles are all in paper—what has been
written is different from what is practised. In this context, real community participation is
necessary. People, who are recipients of poverty reduction projects, should agree and
accept the contents of the projects and help in its drafting, approval, implementation and
monitoring stage. It is true that the government, in its efforts to reduce poverty in the
country, depends on the support of international organizations for funding, however, the
5
fact that people in the government are driven by their selfish interests, being granted
with the authority to disburse funds for public use, they have been disbursing funds for
their personal use. The sole solution to this age-old problem lies on the electorate. It is
our responsibility to choose the people who will decide in our behalf and live up to a
standard of a good government, as Abraham Lincoln puts it, the government of the
people, by the people, and for the people.