Energy Security

Fundación Bariloche
“Energy Security and Energy Efficiency”
FINAL REPORT
(peer reviewed version November 2009)
Buenos Aires, October 2008

CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................ 1
I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1. Background of the study ........................................................................................................................................ 5
1.2. Objective of the study ............................................................................................................................................ 6
1.3. Scope and limitations ............................................................................................................................................ 6
1.4. Why energy security is a potential threat for Argentina? ...................................................................................... 7
1.5. Report structure ................................................................................................................................................... 10
II. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 12
2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 12
2.2. Description of the Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 12
III. Socio-Economic and Energy Profiles .............................................................................................. 14
3.1. Main socio-economic indicators .......................................................................................................................... 14
3.1.1. Population growth ..................................................................................................................................... 14
3.1.2. Global domestic Product........................................................................................................................... 15
3.1.3. Poverty and Inequity ................................................................................................................................. 16
3.2. Energy Situation .................................................................................................................................................. 19
3.3. Energy Scenario by 2030 .................................................................................................................................... 23
3.3.1. Energy Demand Scenario ......................................................................................................................... 23
3.4. Availability of resources ....................................................................................................................................... 24
3.4.1. Fossil Fuels Reserves............................................................................................................................... 24
3.4.2. Availability ................................................................................................................................................. 25
3.4.3. Renewable resources ............................................................................................................................... 25
3.5. Energy consumption patterns in the household sector (urban/rural and poor/non poor) ................................... 26
3.6. Consumption and Efficiency of Energy Use in the Household Sector................................................................ 30
IV. Threats to Energy Security and Measures to enhance them and their impacts at the National
Level ................................................................................................................................................... 32
i) Energy Import Dependency ............................................................................................................................. 32
ii) Diversification of Energy Sources ................................................................................................................... 33
iii) Energy Path: relation between Energy per Unit of GDP and GDP per capita .............................................. 33
iv) Depletion of Energy Reserves of different Fossil Fuels and their Rate of Depletion .................................... 35
v) Investment in New Power Plants .................................................................................................................... 35
vi) Investment in Oil and Natural Gas Exploration.............................................................................................. 36
vii) Investment in Renewables ............................................................................................................................ 36
viii) Economic implications of energy imports ..................................................................................................... 37
4.1. Context threats, general measures and main impacts ....................................................................................... 37
4.2. Measures and their impacts to enhance Energy Security .................................................................................. 42
4.2.1. Energy efficiency....................................................................................................................................... 43
4.2.1.1 Potential. Impacts on the energy mix .......................................................................................... 43
4.2.1.2 Main barriers to energy Efficiency improvement ......................................................................... 44
4.2.1.3 Measures to improve energy efficiency to enhance energy security .......................................... 45
4.2.1.4 Impacts of the measures/policies on cost of energy (both in financial and non-financial terms)
at the national level ....................................................................................................................... 48
4.2.1.5 Environmental impacts of the government measures/policies at the national level ................... 49
4.2.2. Renewable Energy.................................................................................................................................... 51
4.2.2.1 Renewable energy Potential. Impacts on the energy mix. Environmental Impacts .................... 51
4.2.2.2 Main barriers to promote renewable energy resources/Technologies ........................................ 53
4.2.2.3 Measures to promote renewable energy resources/Technologies to enhance energy security55
4.2.2.4 Impacts of the measures/policies on the mix and on the environmental at country level........... 57
4.2.3. Other Measures and their impacts ........................................................................................................... 58
V. Threats to Energy Security. Measures to enhance energy security and their impacts at the
Household Level................................................................................................................................ 60
i) Shares of Commercial Energy Consumption .................................................................................................. 60
ii) Household Energy Expenditure ...................................................................................................................... 64
iii) Access to Modern Fuels ................................................................................................................................. 66
5.1. Threats to energy security ................................................................................................................................... 67
5.1.1. Specific threats ......................................................................................................................................... 67
5.1.2. General and main threats ......................................................................................................................... 75
5.2. Measures and their impacts to enhance energy security ................................................................................... 77
5.2.1. Enhancing energy efficiency ..................................................................................................................... 77
5.2.1.1 Potential of energy savings and Impacts in the household sector in forecast scenario ............. 80
5.2.1.2 Other potential energy savings and Impacts in the household sector ........................................ 86
5.2.1.3 Cost of energy savings in household sector ................................................................................ 87
5.2.1.4 Enhancing Energy Security, Barriers to improving Efficiency ..................................................... 88
5.2.2. Promoting Renewable Energy .................................................................................................................. 91
5.2.2.1 Measures and their impacts to enhance renewable energy ....................................................... 91
5.2.2.2 Potential for renewable energy use in household sector ............................................................ 94
5.2.2.3 Enhancing Energy Security, Barriers to promote renewable energy use in household sector .. 95
5.2.3. Other Measures ........................................................................................................................................ 96
VI. Summary, Conclusions and follow up ............................................................................................ 99
6.1. Summary of threats, measures, impacts and stakeholders ................................................................................ 99
6.2. Follow up ........................................................................................................................................................... 103
ANNEX I. Questionnaire ....................................................................................................................... 104
ANNEX II. Estimates of Renewable Energy Use the final energy demand by usage ...................... 105
BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................... 107
List of Tables
Table III.1. Average annual rate of natural growth, births, mortality and net migration by five-year period
(%) .................................................................................................................................................. 14
Table III.2.Trends in population and number of dwellings (%) ................................................................. 14
Table III.3. GDP Future Trends (in billions of pesos of the year 2004) () .................................................. 16
Table III.4. Fuel consumption for conventional power generation ............................................................ 20
Usual units and % ................................................................................................................................... 20
Table III.5. General Indicators ................................................................................................................. 22
Table III.6. Energy demand Baseline scenario (in thousand tons of oil equivalents) ............................... 23
Table III.7. Projection of electricity generation in GWh ............................................................................ 24
Table III.8: Summary of prospective results for total final energy demand (kTOE) .................................. 24
Table III.9. Renewable resources ............................................................................................................ 25
Table III.10. Energy consumption structure and intensities by uses. Year 2004 ...................................... 29
Table III.11. Useful Energy consumption by fuel sources and uses [koe/household] Very Low Income
Urban Families without distributed Natural Gas, Nov 2007 ............................................................. 30
Table III.12. Structure of electricity consumption estimates for the household sector (%) ....................... 31
Table IV.1. Net Energy Import Ratio (NEIR) ............................................................................................ 32
Table IV.2. Shannon-Wienier and Herfindhal-Hirshman Index ................................................................ 33
Table IV.3. Energy per Unit of GDP and GDP per capita ........................................................................ 34
Table IV.4. Reserve to production ratio (R/P ratio) Oil and Natural Gas (%) ........................................... 35
Table IV.5. Installed capacity (MW) and Reserve capacity (%) ............................................................... 36
Table IV.6. Number of exploration wells per year .................................................................................... 36
Table IV.7. Energy Renewable as percentage of Primary Energy Supply ............................................... 37
Table IV.8. Different Economic indicators ................................................................................................ 37
Table IV.9. Household, and Commercial and Public Sector (%) .............................................................. 44
Table IV.10. Industrial, Agricultural and Petrochemical Sectors (%) ........................................................ 44
Table IV.11. Final demand savings between both scenarios as compared to reserves ........................... 48
Table IV.12. Impacts of socioeconomic or health-related ........................................................................ 50
Table IV.13. Renewable resources.......................................................................................................... 52
Table IV.14.Estimated renewable energies installed capacity. Alternative scenario (MW) ...................... 53
Table IV.15. Install hydro stations............................................................................................................ 57
Table IV.16. Implementation costs of renewable technologies ................................................................ 58
Table V.1. Net or Final Energy Consumption by Sources Argentine Household Sector. Year 2004 (kToe)
....................................................................................................................................................... 60
Table V.2. Energy Consumption structure and intensities by uses Year 2004 - Argentine Household
Sector ............................................................................................................................................. 61
Table V.3. Structure of Fuels used for Main Heating or Thermal Uses by Household quintile, years 2003
and 2006 (in %) Urban areas of Argentina ...................................................................................... 61
and 2006 (in %) Urban areas Formosa .......................................................................................... 62
Table V.5. Structure of Fuels for Cooking and Heating Merlo Case Study - Share of Total Homes -
February 2004 ................................................................................................................................ 63
Table V.6. Net or Final Energy consumption by fuel sources and uses [koe/household] Low Income
Urban Families without distributed Natural Gas, Villa Fiorito and Budge case study November 2007
()
...................................................................................................................................................... 63
Table V.7. Average energy expenditure in year 2004 (USD of 2004 1usd=3 Argentine $). Shares of
household expenditure and income. Total Country ......................................................................... 64
Table V.8. Energy prices and consumer energy-purchasing power for different household fuels Year
2005, Patagonian City of Bariloche ................................................................................................. 65
Table V.9. Average expenditure in Argentine pesos per month on all fuels. Merlo Case Study ............... 65
Table V.10. Estimation of annual expenditure on energy: Villa Fiorito and Budge case-study. November
2007 total survey (in AR$) .............................................................................................................. 66
Table V.11. Households’ structure and foreseen evolution ...................................................................... 67
Table V.12 a.Summary of threats Problem / Vulnerability on the household sector. High Oil dependence
....................................................................................................................................................... 75
Table V.12 b.Summary of threats Problem / Vulnerability on the household sector. High Natural Gas
dependence .................................................................................................................................... 76
Table V.12 c.Summary of threats Problem / Vulnerability on the household sector. Electricity Supply
Restrictions: Equipment and fuels ................................................................................................... 77
Table V.13.Estimation of the electricity consumption structure in the household Sector. (%) .................. 81
Table V.14 Estimation the energy savings (monetary and non monetary) in household sector ............... 84
Table V.15.Balance of saving potential and edge reduction for household appliances ............................ 86
Table V.16.Customer Analysis – R1(*) Category ...................................................................................... 87
Table V.17.Customer Analysis – R2 Category ........................................................................................ 87
Table V.20. Households’ solar photovoltaic ............................................................................................. 95
Table VI.1.Summary of threats, impacts and stakeholders .................................................................... 100
List of Figures
Figure III.1.GDP Trend in million of pesos (base year: 1993) .................................................................. 15
Figure III.2.Poverty and unemployment trends in GBA from 1988 ........................................................... 16
Figure III.3.Percentage of people below the poverty line ......................................................................... 17
Figure III.4.Gini index for income distribution (1993 – 2005).................................................................... 17
Figure III.5.a) Percentage of population with unmet basic needs ............................................................ 18
Figure III.5.b) Percentage of population with unmet basic needs. By Provinces ...................................... 18
Figure III.6.Oil and Natural Gas participation in primary energy supply. 1970 – 2004.............................. 19
Figure III.7.Total supply of primary energy (2004) ................................................................................... 19
Figure III.8. Structure of Final Energy Consumption (2004) ..................................................................... 21
Figure III.9. Population with access to electricity by grid (%) ................................................................... 21
Figure III.10. Percentage of population with access to grid-distributed gas ............................................. 22
Figure III.11. Per capita Evolution of household energy consumption and GDP. 1970 – 2004 (1970=100)
....................................................................................................................................................... 26
Figure III.12. Share of grid-distributed gas in household energy consumption. 1970 – 2004 ................... 27
Figure III.13. Household electricity consumption ..................................................................................... 27
Figure III.14. Structure of Net Consumption by Fuels Urban Households. Year 2004 ............................. 28
Figure III.15. Structure of Net Consumption by Fuels. Rural Households. Year 2004 ............................. 29
Figure IV.1. Energy Path, years 1990, 1997, 2000 and 2007 (PPP) ........................................................ 34
Figure IV.2. Energy Path years 1990, 1997, 2000 and 2007 (USD constant value of 2000) .................... 35
Figure IV.3. Comparison of Emissions by Scenarios ............................................................................... 51
Figure V.1.Household tariff by bi-month consumption ($ per KWh) ......................................................... 68
Figure V.2.Household electricity tariff by consumption. (Percentage of monthly expenditure) ................. 68
Figure V.3.Evolution of LPG consumption in the residential sector. Compared with exportations 1985-
2005................................................................................................................................................ 70
Figure V.4.Average energy expenditure in year 2004 ($ of 2004). Shares of household expenditure and
income ............................................................................................................................................ 71
Figure V.5.Structure of Fuels used for Heating or Thermal Uses by Household quintile years 2003 and
2006 (in %). Representative urban areas with NG availability ......................................................... 72
Figure V.6.Structure of Fuels used for Heating or Thermal Uses by Household quintile years 2003 and
2006 (in %). Representative Urban areas without or very restricted NG availability ........................ 73
Figure V.7.Cumulative energy savings in the household Level (%) of kTOE by energy source. .............. 82
Figure V.8.Cumulative energy savings structure in the household Level in kTOE by energy use. ........... 83
Figure V.9.Energy savings in the Household Sector (%) by energy use. ................................................. 83
Figure V.10.Emissions evolution in the residential sector by use (Millions of Tons CO2 equivalent) ....... 84
Figure V.11.Emissions evolution in the residential sector by source (Millions of Tons CO2 equivalent) .. 85
Figure V.12. Emissions evolution (tons CO2 equivalent /hab/año) .......................................................... 86
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADELCO League of Action(Share) of the Consumer
ADT Added Value Tax
ALURE Program of energetic cooperation between the European Union and Latin America
ARCO Attracting Resources to Cogeneration
ARGURELEC Program of promotion of the rational use of the electricity in the Argentine one
ASLP Argentina Street Lighting Programme
BEN National Energy Balance
BAU Business as Usual
BID Interamerican Development Bank
BTU British Thermal Unit
CAMMESA Administrator of the wholesale electricity market
CNG Compressed Natural Gas
CDM Clean Development Mechanism
CE / UE Comunidad Europea / European Union
CFL Compact Fluorescent Lamps
CIPURE Research Centre for Rational Use of Energy
CONURE National Commission for Rational Use of Energy
CRICYT Regional Centre of Scientific and Technical research – Mendoza Province
DSM Demand Side Management
EDENOR North Distribution Utility
EDESUR South Distribution Utility
ELI Efficient Lighting Initiative
ENRE Electricity Regulating Agency
ENARGAS Natural Gas Regulating Agency
ENARSA Argentine Energy SA, state managed company
EPEC Cordoba Province Energy Company
EPEN Neuquén Province Energy Company
EPRE Provincial Regulatory Body
ESCO Energy Service Companies
FADU Architecture, Design and Urbanization School
FONINVEMEN Investment fund on the electrical market
GBA Greater Buenos Aires
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GEF Global Environmental Facility
GHG Green House Gases
LPG Liquefied Petrol Gas
I&D or R&D Investigation(Research) and Development
IAPG Argentine Institute for Oil and Gas
ICAEN Catalán Energy Institute
1
IEA International Energy Agency
INDEC National Institute of Statistics and Census
INTI National Industrial Technology Institute
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change
IRAM Materials´ standardization Institute
JICA Japanese International Cooperation Agency
LFC Fluorescent compact lamps
MCE Machines of external combustion
MCI Machines of internal combustion
MDL Mechanism of clean development
MEM Wholesale electricity market
NGO Not governmental organization
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OPTIMELEC Program of optimization of electric power
PAEEP / PAyEEP Program of saving in public buildings
PIEEP Program of increase of the energetic and productive efficiency
PPP Purchasing Power Parity
PROCAHE Quality program of Electrical appliances of the home(fireplace)
PROCEL National program of Conservation of Electrical Energy
PRONUREE Plan for de Rational and Efficient Use of Energy
PURE Program of rational use of the energy
PUREE Program of rational use of the electric power
PyME Small and medium company
RES/T Renewable Energy Sources/Technologies
RSU Solid urban residues
SE Energy Secretariat
SECyT Secretariat of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation
SWH Solar Water Heaters
UBN Unfulfilled Basic Needs
UEE Efficient use of the energy
URE Rational Use of Energy
WEC Wind Energy Converters
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Most of the policies implemented in Argentina in the decade of the nineties, implied a structural
change of the argentine economic system, framed within a relatively low oil prices international
context and the consideration (national law) of crude oil as one more commodity, disregarding
its national strategic good feature. These polices did not include any long term vision, aimed at
incorporating the uncertainty – which now is easily observed worldwide - in the potential
scenarios.
The key issue of the Argentina case study is that the world oil market changes constitute
nowadays the principal threat for a safety energy supply at reasonable prices. Thus,
vulnerability did increase as result of the public policies implemented in the decade of the
nineties. Domestic decisions gave birth to a set of conditions, triggering increased energy
vulnerability of the country, framed by changes in the global context.
As result of what can be defined as short-term market-driven rationality, applied by the leading
actors of the sector, the Argentine energy system went from a situation regarding own reserves
- nearly 15 decades in case of the oil and more than 3 decades for natural gas, were
guaranteed by self-supply - in to a situation of increasing dependence on imports for the near
future. This picture is framed by a dependence of 90 % of fossil fuels, in terms of primary
energy, a global market with increasing oil prices and increasing conflicts in the major oil
regions.
Therefore, such structural changes of the energy policy implied both a growing internalization of
international oil prices, and the lack of a sort of reference company that generate witness
prices, reflecting the actual local production costs and not the crude oil international prices. This
role was performed in the past by the National Oil Company YPF. The policy of free availability
of energy exploitation earnings, implied an important export pace, together with a risky lack of
investment in exploration (that should be considered as the preferable employment of oil rents,
from the National point of view), which affected the reserve levels and poses serious doubts
upon the feasibility to keep self-supply in the medium and long term. An energy system that
depends on oil and natural gas importations in the medium term is the most probable scenario
for Argentina today. This implies higher energy prices at the local level, together with the need
of a delicate “energy diplomacy” guaranteeing long term agreements with neighboring and other
countries to guarantee future supply.
From the end of the convertibility economic plan; devaluation and subsequent economic
reactivation (and the consistent growth of the energy demand), the difficulties to generate
adequate strategies in the framework of the current policies became evident. Thus, different
threats to energy security were detected at the national level.
The current crisis has a structural character and demands core changes immediately just to
satisfy short, medium and long term energy needs. The actions should be taken from both, the
supply and the demand side, including energy matrix structure diversification, energy efficiency
actions and policy oriented to the most vulnerable actors.
Projections of future energy demand indicate the continuity of a high dependence on oil and
natural gas. This constitutes an alert for the safety of future supply, considering the limited
available reserves. A preliminary analysis of the uses and consumptions indicates that there
exist low and medium efficiencies not only in the appliances but also in the final energy
behavior patterns, which might be improved. The existence of available renewable resources
indicates the need of intensification in their use. Energy Efficiency and Renewable energy
1
encouragement, together with the continuity of the Nuclear Plan, could be considered as main
tools to guarantee the future energy supply.
It must also be remarked that although relatively high energy consumption is found in the
household sector, especially in urban areas, core geographical and social inequalities exist,
thus the impact on income distribution (in broad sense) of any measure must be carefully
considered before implementation.
Not only the current actions, but also the potential, and future ones indicate the feasibility of an
Alternative Scenario; where vulnerability could be significantly reduced though adequate
strategies. In the case of Oil, savings could be equivalent to 23% of the verified reserves; and
53% of the potential reserves. Furthermore, such accrued savings would be equivalent to
almost three times the consumption registered in oil refineries in 2004. In turn, it implies
extending the reserve/production ratio in 2 years. As regards Natural Gas, the potential energy
efficiency actions imply an amount to 11% of the verified reserves plus 50% of the potential
reserves. The accrued savings would imply extending the production/reserve relation in 1.3
years. Finally, the accrued savings in Electric Power demand would be equivalent to the
generation of a 2,530 MW power station for 21 years, the construction of which might be
avoided if the energy savings presented in a structural scenario are verified.
The main threats that the Residential sector faces, both in urban and rural areas, reflect the
very structure of the sector. The employed energy sources are essentially three: Electricity,
Natural Gas and LPG, while Kerosene and Biomass, play a minor role. Nevertheless, the
sources structure is very different for the urban and rural homes.
The above mentioned threats link themselves, essentially, to two variables: availability to the
source and the price of it. It is possible to affirm that while the vulnerability regarding availability
is independent from the level of revenue, the vulnerability considering purchase power is
suffered by those sectors of minor level of revenue.
The threats linked to the availability of energy sources, are triggered by the lack of investments
in the productive chains of the Natural Gas and the Electricity. While there is a risk of temporary
cuts, in order to employ the scarce energy to the productive activities of major priority. This sort
of trade off between final consumption sectors for the scarce energy, is due to delays in energy
infrastructure investments.
An increase in the prices might stimulate investments, but it should be followed by other
regulatory instruments, in order to guarantee that such investments will take place. Tariff
mechanisms should be orchestrated to avoid the impact on the poorest sectors.
Observations remain valid for Electricity and Natural Gas. In case of the LPG, the households
are facing more than a threat, but a current restriction, as it is already a fact that the prices of
this fuel have grown substantially striking on the distribution of the revenue or the level of
satisfaction of the needs. This is because LPG is employed mainly by poor households, not
connected to the cheaper Natural Gas service.
LPG situation – comparatively expensive and not always available – is aggravated by the
existence of unmet basic energy needs, thus the urgency for policy action becomes
unambiguous. Only a 10% of the first quintile of income would have access to natural gas,
another 40% would use LPG and pay six times the price of natural gas – half of the poorest
would consume no gas at all.
2
Provision of Kerosene and LPG reflects the market feature of oligopoly, and the lack of
monitoring and control by the regulatory entity. Additionally the charcoal price, and commercial
wood did increase constantly since 2002, drawing a delicate picture for the poor households’
energy access, as these sources are mainly used by poor families for home heating and
cooking in absence of LPG. Thus, the strategy for providing energy to poorest homes should
concentrate in better access and availability of LPG.
On the other hand a relevant space for energy efficiency actions and measures is found, as the
patterns of consumption were not encouraged towards energy savings.
Additionally, some niches can be proposed for empowering the household sector with
renewable energy, mainly in rural areas. Other measures would relay on modification of energy
consumption habits or behaviors – which could be included as energy efficiency in a broad
sense. The diversification of fuels depends on public policy (directly or by economic
instruments) but most interesting cases (solar water heaters; biogas; wind energy converters)
require important programs of public awareness and local diffusion.
Electricity infrastructure must be improved. While gas availability may relax the provision of
electricity (in the case of electric power caloric uses) but, again, with unsatisfied needs and, in
case of an income distribution improvement, there will be additional pressures on both
infrastructures.
Estimations indicate that 19% savings could be achieved in the household sector through
simple and coordinated energy efficiency measures. The economic convenience of many
efficiency programs, such as the substitution of incandescent lamps and the renewal of
household appliances, has been remarked.
As regards renewable energy contribution, while the urban sector is expected to almost
duplicate the demand of renewable energies, their participation in the rural sector will be
reduced in view of the penetration of LPG which, while not a renewable source, is of better
quality for the energy services required by this sector. Additionally, the participation of these
sources can be duplicated only by achieving the goals proposed by the new Legislation that
regulates them. Yet, the role of renewable energies does not seem to generate an important
tool as regards supply security, since they will only amount to 7% of the energy used by the
sector by the year 2025.
Among the existing barriers the lack of policy stability and effective enforcement measures
outstand. Long term political commitment and flexible incentives should be present for
renewable energies technologies to be feasible and sustained in time.
In particular a promissory link is found between caloric uses - mainly water heating but also
cooking, employing solar ovens – and the potential of renewable energy at the household level.
Remarkably, strong public policy and measures are required, as the barriers to be overcome
are multiple and would not be solved by current market trends.
From the energy security point of view, and considering both mentioned Natural Gas scarcity
problems, and the potential fuel savings that could be achieved in urban areas, the promotion of
measures for this source use should aimed at saving this fossil fuel for other sectors where it
would be more difficult to substitute (e.g. industry). Once again this will not happened if market
prices are leading the way. Strong government will, expressed in a long term solid program,
encouraging the change of energy consumption patterns is needed.
3
The perspective of cheap natural gas has somewhat changed after the 2001-2002
socioeconomic crisis, when energy utilities started to put pressure on government in order to
update fuels prices. Furthermore, in the particular case of natural gas the lack of adequate
development in the exploration and infrastructure areas triggered alarm signs during last
winters, forewarning about a growing scarcity problem contrasting with an increasing
residential, industrial and power utilities demand of this fuel.
4
I. Introduction
1.1. Background of the study
Energy Security is a key energy policy objective in a framework of sustainable energy

development. The dimensions of sustainability (economic, social and environmental, together
with governance) should be identified as a context for energy security, especially from the
macro point of view. Energy efficiency, Renewables, Energy Matrix diversification, among
others, as essential component to contribute to supply security, have grown in significance over
recent years and are now as important as the rest of the actions developed in relation to the
supply issue.
Sustainable Energy Development implies several issues; nearly all of them are in convergence
and synergy whit energy security, among them:
9 diversification of energy supply,

9 energy autarchy,
9 low degree of participation of energy import in energy supply,
9 energy rents capture,
9 low energy intensity,
9 efficient use of energy in productive uses,
9 efficient use of energy in the energy industry (low self consumption),
9 quality of energy supply,
9 adequate investment financing,
9 adequate costs of energy supply,
9 diversification of the energy matrix,
9 universal minimum level of access to modern energy,
9 basic energy needs satisfaction,
9 secure supply of social infrastructure (health, education, basic housing services e.g.
water, sanitation),
9 sustainable biomass management,
9 sustainable fossil fuels management,
9 renewable participation,
9 …
Nevertheless, as remarked the Concept Note (AIT, 2007), Energy Security nature and its
manifestation is specific to the country or region under analysis, although the threat could be
exogenous to the country. There are several approaches and a lot of material on energy
security, but developing countries reality is generally overlooked in the global approaches to
energy security.
The majority of South American countries are abundant in energy resources, including fossil
fuels. The security of supply is not only related with the dependence of imported energy or
scarcity of national resources but from the adequate use of national resources and the
implementation of adequate energy policies. With the exception of few countries (Chile,
Uruguay, the Guyana’s and Surinam) all the rest have sufficient energy resources to satisfy the
domestic energy needs of the socio-economic system with no major restrictions. The regional
integration process could contribute positively to a greater security in countries like Chile and
Uruguay. In consequence, in many cases, if there is an energy risk or insecurity of supply it is
closely related to the energy policies context and not only on the availability of energy sources,
specially the absence of long term planning and policies. In many countries, vulnerable
populations, or those with higher energy supply risk, face such situation as the result of the lack
of specific policies oriented to low-income sectors. Public policies of the nearly past, may be
5
considered as the main responsible for the supply risks that the countries are currently facing
and will face in the short and medium term.
Such is the case of Argentina, which is facing short and medium-term supply risks and even
long-term risks if adequate policies and strategies are not duly implemented. Therefore, it is a
proper case to be analyzed, noting that a considerable amount of energy resources does not
eliminate the supply risk if public policies fail to guarantee the adequate management thereof.
Like other areas of the socioeconomic systems, upon the energy shortage possibility, it is highly
probable that the lowest income level sectors will be the most affected due to several reasons:
impossibility to access to more expensive substitutes, low adaptation capacity to new conditions
created by energy shortage, dependence of specific sources without substitution possibilities,
etc.
Some of the aspects highlighted in the AIT-Concept Note,(AIT, 2007) particularly those referred
to the non-universal access to modern energy sources despite resource availability, and the
strong consumption growth, are highly relevant for Argentina. The significance of non-
commercial energy sources, as well as the substitution of Biomass for other sources, is less
significant for the country.
1.2. Objective of the study
General objectives:
Present the nature of energy security issue specific to Argentina and main impacts of energy
insecurity at national and household levels; analyze the responses of the main stakeholders to
mitigate the impacts.
Specific objectives:
a) At national level:
1) Analyze the threats (present and future) to energy security.
2) Analyze the different measures/strategies for energy security in the context of Argentina.
3) Study the impacts of the measures to improve energy security (past, existing, and
potential).
a) At the household level:

1) Analyze the threats (present and future) to energy security.
2) Analyze the measures (past, existing, and potential) to improve the energy security.
3) Analyze the impacts of the measures/strategies on energy security.
1.3. Scope and limitations
Information sources and expected results
It is worth noticing that the use of indicators as a methodology has limitations, especially on
1
Developing Countries ( ).
The following information will be obtained:
(1) Such limitations will be commented by the time the corresponding results are obtained.
6
• An assessment of implementation feasibility according to the in-country information.
• Estimation of indicators according to the results arising from the different components of
the Energy Security analysis.
• Evaluation of vulnerabilities and threats in view of the results obtained by the application
of the indicators and other qualitative analysis.
When the objectives are directed towards the measuring of impacts on certain sectors of the
population that constitute a homogeneous nucleus by virtue of specific characteristics –income
level, relevance as consumer sector, geographic localization, energy consumption
characteristics, etc. – there is less secondary information available, and we need to resort to
other approximate estimation mechanisms –if indicators are sought to be incorporated- or to
conclusions, recommendations or analysis taken from other studies of the same sectors.
Therefore, the methodological approach takes into account the different situations related to the
analysis at aggregate and disaggregate levels, and the possibilities to quantify key impacts.
The main information sources are:
9 Official statistics
9 The results of the existing investigation and technical assistance projects
9 The results of polls made to qualified informants.
Some of the data presented here – mainly the forecasts - relay on ongoing energy prospective
works, made with the participation and interaction of public secretariats’ staff (2). The energy
estimations are based on a socioeconomic scenario constructed on a sound basis, using
available most reliable sources.
Energy consumption is not available by income strata and uses. Thus if the average urban
consumption is compared with requirements, basic needs are obviously covered. But some
assessment of poor population gives an idea of unsatisfied needs.
Facing the lack of aggregate information reflecting household patterns of energy consumption -
especially poor vs. non poor – some individual studies with relevant details are presented.
Furthermore, the year 2004 is employed frequently as the most robust set of detailed and
desegregated information. It is the “base year” from where estimations are made, it can be
considered as well, as the “best picture of the current Argentine situation”.
1.4. Why energy security is a potential threat for Argentina?
During the nineties Argentina went trough a process of reform that left the coordination and
sector decision of short, medium and long term, nearly at all, in the hands of the market
following the objectives of efficiency improvement and attraction of new investments. The
transfer of property rights and decision-making power led to the abandonment of long-term
planning and prospective, and to a reduced use of instruments and control measures that could
highly influence the system to guarantee the long-term supply. There was total confidence in
(2) Technical Assistance Project for the preparation of the “Strategic Energy Plan of the Argentine Republic”
designed by IDEE/FB for the Energy Department, 2007.
7
the market wisdom and the signs generated by it, at the same time as the State capacity to
generate and implement corrective policies started to decrease.
As a result of such structural changes, the government capacity was reduced; they have a
limited information and control on primary energy resources, insufficient information of the
different segments of the energy chain and a strong dependence of the decentralized decision
making process of key actors in the energy industry. This situation implies a strong restriction
for the development of long-term sustainable proposals in convergence with national objectives
on the socioeconomic system, as a whole, and would require a significant change of approach,
as a short term approach and ad hoc measures dominate the actions.
As mentioned, Energy Security is related to three axes which are growing in relevance: the
relationship among energy and social (equity), environment and development issues, and the
need to deal with all of them in an integrated way. This general awareness is related to the
continuous rise of the fossil fuel prices (oil, natural gas, mineral coal); the debates as regards
the “peak oil” date, growing energy interdependence among countries, oil reserves in conflict
areas and the multiplication of extreme climate events.
For sure, all these elements will have an impact on the Argentine energy system, if not
immediately or in its current situation, in the medium and long term; therefore, they must be
considered when defining the methodological approach.
As regards the first and second aspect, the structural changes of the energy policy of the
nineties imply the growing internalization of international oil prices and the impossibility to have
companies that generate witness prices reflecting the actual local production costs instead of
the crude oil international prices. The energy resource free availability policy implied an
important export pace, together with a lack of investment in exploration, which affected the
reserve levels and poses serious doubts upon the feasibility to keep self-supply in the medium
and long term. An energy system that depends on oil and natural gas importations in the
medium term is the most probable scenario for Argentina, as well as higher energy prices at the
local level, together with the need of an “energy diplomacy” guaranteeing long term agreements
with neighboring and other countries. Additionally, Climate Change threatens the availability of
the major energy resource of Argentina (Hydropower) and has indirect effects, by virtue of a
growing energy demand due to temperature changes, rainfalls and productivity that will
generate an additional pressure on the energy infrastructure and the consequent investments
needed.
Within this context, supply security is threatened and energy vulnerability is increasing, which in
turn suggests the need to asses intervention actions through policies and strategies, as well as
institutional changes, among other aspects (3).
Demand growth and Energy Intensity
From 1970 to 2004, the energy consumption growth to an accumulative rate of 2,5% yearly,
higher than the population growth (1,4%) and the GDP (1,6%). At the same time that per capita
GDP growth 6%, the energy consumption per inhabitant growth 40%. This means an important
intensification of the energy use for the socioeconomic system. As a result E/GDP elasticity is
always higher than one and energy intensity is in a continuous increasing process. As was
mentioned, the consumption by sources reflects the dominant role of oil and natural gas.
(3) Further developed in sections 3 and 4.
8
Energy matrix
Nearly 92% of the total supply of primary energy is provided by fossil fuels (49% Natural Gas,
42% Oil and 1% Coal). Hydraulic energy, nuclear and biomass provide the rest. The high
concentration in Oil and NG is a structural characteristic of the Argentine Energy matrix.
While this supply structure was possible in the past, its future viability is uncertain, in view of the
fast growing demand and the pressure on the need to discover new reserves if self-supply is
sought to be maintained. Although energy security could be solved using adequate public
policies that guarantee the supply of main fuels (oil and natural gas) through imports, the
impacts would be important and would imply both direct and indirect socioeconomic impacts on
foreign currency requirements, price increases, international competitiveness reduction,
recessive income distribution impacts and/or inflationary effects, just to mention the most
important ones.
Among other actions, energy matrix diversification; energy efficiency measures or push the
development of renewable energy, are key issues in the energy agenda.
Regional Integration
Energy security could not be seen just within a national isolated context, regional coordinated
actions should be considered as part of a long term strategy. The globalization process and the
development of international trade have triggered the necessity to build regional blocks as a
valid instrument for complementing bilateral relations. In addition the energy challenges and
increased globally uncertainty push the energy interconnection with neighbor’s countries,
especially the electricity and natural gas chains. Argentina followed a continuous strengthening
of regional energy integration.
Unfortunately, the political framework and the decision making process placed the country as
an energy supplier to Brazil, Chile and Uruguay and the integration developed during the
nineties had a short term view, based in the identification of business opportunities from a
decentralized point of view. Such a process has a big responsibility in the current insecurity of
energy supply.
As mentioned, the diversity of energy resources in the region is remarkable. Venezuela,

Colombia, Argentina and Brazil have oil, Bolivia’s and Peru’s natural gas reserves are crucial
for supplying natural gas to the South Cone. Hydro energy is very important, Brazil based its
electricity supply 83% in hydro and Paraguay is a big exporter of hydroelectricity to Argentina
and Brazil. There are important natural gas and electricity integration networks and key bi-
national project in power generation. In South America the geopolitical relevance of the
economic and energy integration processes, is essential in order to guarantee energy security.
In summary, integration with a long term view should be considered as a potential measures to
guarantee energy security. The benefit of a regional market requires a political will, based in
cooperation and not in competition for energy resources. Naturally a legal and regulatory
framework is needed as well as strategic plans with regional scope and umbrella agreements
with neighbor’s countries.
The relevance of energy security in the household sector
The challenges faced in relation to household sector energy security have several implications.
The continuity of the energy supply is not guarantied, as a result of interruption of electricity
provision and risk of lack of natural gas. Neither LPG, nor Kerosene are always available for the
9
most vulnerable population: rural and poor urban households. On the other hand access to
energy is not even among the population, as some regions of the north east are not included in
the national gas network, while some rural population do not have electricity.
A remarkable issue is the higher price paid and worse service received by poor families, in
order to fulfill their energy needs. This situation is worse by the lack of programs to address the
problem.
Final comments
The selection of Argentina as case study is related to the threats and challenges to secure
energy supply in the short, medium and long term. The causes should be sought in the energy
policies of the past decade and the change of the current international context, particularly as
regards the price of oil and other related energy products.
They are reflected in:
9 Power capacity general shortage, due to lack of investments.

9 Shortage in electricity due to restrictions in fuels.
9 Lack of investment in natural gas production and transport.
9 Increasing vulnerability of poor population to have access to electricity and LPG.
9 Short term view in energy policy that reduces the capacity to guarantee long term energy
supply.
9 Shortage in diesel supply due to lack of investment in refineries.
Finally, a broader framework should be address: “lack of protection, uncertainty and insecurity
are the key features of the period at global level” (Bauman, Z, 2001). Is the global context
similar to a drifting ship? Who is the captain?
Naturally, the global context should be considered as well, and the identification of potential
World Agenda related with the issue of Energy Security as a “border condition” or any national
analysis.
1.5. Report structure
Next section describes the methodology used to develop the analysis, in agreement to the
asked detail.
In Section 3 the Socio-economic and Energy Profiles of Argentina are presented as well as the
expected scenario following existing trends (Business as Usual). This is the relevant scenario in
terms of threats to energy supply and energy security, showing clearly the vulnerabilities of the
Country.
In Section 4 a description of the threats to energy security, and the principal measures (past,
present, and future) to enhance energy security and their impacts at the national level are
presented. These actions are present within a desired scenario - featured by the general
implementation of energy efficiency measures and rational use of energy in all the sectors of
final consumption. If compared with the BAU scenario, it includes some slight differences
regarding hydrocarbons discoveries (and associated investments), energy prices and modern
energy sources penetration.
10
Section 5 presents a description of the threats to energy security and the principal measures
(past, present, and future) to enhance energy security and their impacts at the household level.
These actions - in the same way as those at the national level - are present in a desired
scenario, which involves basically increased measures of energy efficiency and rational use of
energy in household consumption.
Section 6 summarizes the main aspects of the document, presenting some conclusions and
suggestions for guidance purposes.
11
II. Methodology
2.1. Introduction
The Supply Security studies, analyzed at the global or macro level, are based on the analysis of
different indicators to provide a summary of the energy system vulnerabilities as regards its
capacity to guarantee the energy supply in due time and manner, in the short, medium and long
term. In general, the available information and databases of most of the countries allow for the
estimation of such indicators based on secondary information. Regarding potential measures to
increase energy security, like Energy Efficiency, Renewable or others, the use of indicators
depends on the statistical availability.
Likewise, taking into account the national circumstances and the system peculiarities, the
energy efficiency level for the most important sectors can be estimated based on additional or
sector indicators, according to the secondary information available. The role that New and
Renewable Sources can play as regards their contribution to increase supply security and
energy efficiency could be measured by using the information available in the official statistics.
2.2. Description of the Methodology
Analysis at National Level
The security of supply -and consequent vulnerability- of the Argentine Energy System is
analyzed in the framework of the global context and the current situation and the future potential
evolution, based on energy scenarios. Specific policy measures of the recent past and current
actions are going to be a key issue to assess.
The study relies mainly on secondary data, specific reports or studies, interviews with key
stakeholders, projects documents, as main sources. In addition, a survey among energy
experts and representative from different groups of interest was implemented following the
Delphi Methodology (4).
The chosen indicators are aimed at monitoring the implementation of policies, approaching
issues like:
9 Energy integration in socioeconomic programs

9 Combination of renewable energy availability, energy efficiency and technological
development to meet energy consumption.
9 Increasing the participation of options based on renewable sources.
9 Reducing the pressure on non-renewable sources.
9 Establishing efficient use of energy programs.
9 Facilitating the access to energy
9 Others
Therefore, the indicators considered describe these aspects and are presented along the study,
following the proposed outline and the available information.
(4) The questionnaire used for the survey is attached to this report as an exhibit.
12
It is worth noticing that the use of indicators as methodology has limitations, regarding their
5
application on Developing Countries ( ).
(5) Such limitations are commented when the corresponding results are presented.
13
III. Socio-Economic and Energy Profiles
A general overview of Argentine energy profile and main features is presented, as well as its
available resources and energy consumption patterns of the household sector.
3.1. Main socio-economic indicators
3.1.1. Population growth
The population growth rate has shown a persistently declining tendency, interrupted only by an
upturn recorded in the 1975-1980 period. For 2010-2015, the trend is 16.8 per thousand. This
trend is accompanied by other indicators such as births, mortality and net migration. This last
indicator, historically positive with the exception of the 1975-1980 period, reached very low –
but positive – levels during the 1980s. However, over the 1995-2000’ period reached slightly
negative levels, thus reflecting the incidence of the emigration process taking place at the time,
a tendency which is supposed to revert in future.
Table III.1. Average annual rate of natural growth, births, mortality and net migration by five-year period
(%)
Natural growth Births Mortality Net migration

Period
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1950-1955 16.2 25.4 9.2 3.4
1955-1960 15.6 24.3 8.7 1.4
1960-1965 14.4 23.2 8.8 1.2
1965-1970 13.4 22.6 9.1 1.1
1970-1975 14.4 23.4 9.0 2.3
1975-1980 16.7 25.7 8.9 -1.6
1980-1985 14.6 23.1 8.5 0.6
1985-1990 13.7 22.2 8.5 0.8
1990-1995 13.1 21.3 8.2 0.0
1995-2000 11.8 19.7 7.9 -0.6
(1) Quotient between the balance of births and deaths recorded in a place in a certain period and the average
population in that period.
(2) Average population increase per year, every 1,000 inhabitants.
(3) Average population decrease – dead – per year, every 1,000 inhabitants.
(4) Quotient between the annual net migration over a certain period and the average population in the same period.
Source: Estimated based on results of the 2001 National Population, Home and Dwelling Census.
A preliminary estimate of future trends related to population and number of dwellings, carried
out on the basis of data by the INDEC, shows that rates continue to decline in the direction of
the historical tendency of the last periods.
Table III.2.Trends in population and number of dwellings (%)
2004 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2004-2030
Population (millon) 37.4 40.1 42.1 44.1 46.3 48.7 11.3

Rate between cut-off years (%) 1.17 0.81 0.78 1.04 1.01 1.02
Homes (millon) 10.4 11.1 11.7 12.3 12.9 13.6 1.9
Source: Estimated based on results of the 2001 National Population, Home and Dwelling Census.
14
3.1.2. Global domestic Product
The past two and a half decades have shown significant structural changes in the socio-
economic system. Whereas the 1980s, despite the persistent crisis, were influenced by the
dynamics of energy-intensive industries, growth over the 1990s was mainly based on service
activities and less energy-intensive industry branches such as metal-mechanical activities.
Towards the end of that decade, after several years of rapid growth over the period of the
privatization process, Argentine economy showed it was extremely fragile in the face of foreign
financial clashes; it kept a strong dependence regarding short-term funds and its foreign debt
increased significantly.
In this context, the country reached a deep crisis in the year 2001/2. As from then on, and due
to currency devaluation and the advantageous international situation, the national economy
took a different turn, which enabled a reactivation of the industrial activity. This led to a higher
final energy consumption level per inhabitant and larger GDP energy intensity.
Figure III.1.GDP Trend in million of pesos (base year: 1993)
Source: www.mecon.gov.ar/secpro/dir_cn/default1.html
It should be remarked that the results of the country’s economic activity in the year 2006
brought about an increase in GDP by 8.5%. This came about in the context of a considerable
rise in consumption levels, strong investments in durable production equipment, a noticeable
larger productive capacity, especially in the manufacturing sector, and a reduction in the
unemployment rate. A significant increase in export value was also recorded.
The world economy has been projected to grow by 3.2% p.a. approximately in the 2002-2030
period (IEA, 2004). It is estimated that, in such context, Argentina will increase its trade
relations with China, India, and the rest of the world, and will stabilize it with the USA, the EU
and other OECD countries. Also, it will grow at a more dynamic pace than the rest of the region
until 2015, and then it will go on at the same pace as the region, which, in turn, will
progressively converge on the world rate towards 2030.
15
Table III.3. GDP Future Trends (in billions of pesos of the year 2004) (6)
(Billion $ 04) 2004 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2004-2030

GDP 417.9 617.8 735.8 845.1 953.2 1067.8 427
Rate between cutoff years 6.73 2.96 2.34 2.44 2.3 3.7
Source: own estimation from INDEC data.
3.1.3. Poverty and Inequity
The evolution of poverty levels (7) has been determined by the economic processes described
above. The following figure illustrates the evolution of population below the poverty line and the
unemployment rate in Greater Buenos Aires. The highest levels of this indicator were recorded
between May 2002 and the first three-term period of 2003.Finally, in the first six-term period of
2006, 31.4% of people had incomes below the poverty line (8).
Figure III.2.Poverty and unemployment trends in GBA from 1988
People below the poverty line

Unemployment rate
60
50
40
% 30
20
10
date of the survey
Source: INDEC.
(6) The rate of exchange of argentine’s pesos to dollars can be stated slightly above 3 $ per US$.
(7) The poverty line indicates the proportion of people living in households whose incomes are not enough to fulfill a
number of basic food and service needs, determined as from a family basket of goods and services.
(8) The most recent values are not included in the figure.
16
Figure III.3.Percentage of people below the poverty line
60
50
13.8
40
13.3
12.2 11.2
4.6
30 4.1 9.9
Percentage
3.3 8.9
3.1
2.5
18.3 2.4
20
16.9 15.3 15.1
13.3
12.7
10
11.3 9.9 9.3 9 8.5 7.4
0
2nd six-month 1st six-month 2nd six-month 1st six-month 2nd six-month 1st six-month
term 2003 term 2004 term 2004 term 2005 term 2005 term 2006
Period
Less than 10 years old Pensioners Unemployed Employed
Source: INDEC, Permanent Home Survey.
These data show the high incidence of poverty on unemployed population and children.
Likewise, employed people have a strong share in this group, which indicates that, in many
cases, income levels of those who have a job are not enough to fulfill basic needs.
The Gini Index, in turn, reveals that the income gap was reduced, on average, over the last four
years.
Figure III.4.Gini index for income distribution (1993 – 2005)
0.56
0.54 0.54
0.52 0.52
0.52
0.5 0.515
0.49 0.51
0.50 0.49
0.495
0.5
0.48 0.48
0.47
0.46
0.45
0.44
0.42
0.40
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
Source: Subsecretaría de Programación Técnica y Estudios Laborales. Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad
Social (Undersecretariat of Technical Programming and Labor Studies, Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social
Security), based on data from the Permanent Home Survey by INDEC.
The rate of Unfulfilled Basic Needs showed a slight decrease between 1980-2001.
17
Figure III.5.a) Percentage of population with unmet basic needs
30
25
20
Percentage
15
24,4
10 19,3 17,7
5
0
1980 1991 2001
years
Source: INDEC National Population Census
As next figure shows, in spite of the general improvement in Unmet Basic Needs index,
additional inequities in the regional dimension exist, which have not been adjusted in the last
years.
Figure III.5.b) Percentage of population with unmet basic needs. By Provinces
Source: INDEC National Population Census
18
3.2. Energy Situation
The situation of the energy sector by the year 2004 is outlined in this section. Comments on
more recent years are included in as much as updated data are available. On the other hand,
and considering the availability of a Net Energy Balance (NEB), the year 2004 has been taken
as the base year for the year 2030 projections.
As mentioned, nearly 90% of the total supply of primary energy comes from fossil fuels. The
remaining is provided by hydraulic energy, nuclear power, firewood and Bagasse and other
primary resources. However, within the hydrocarbon set of fuels, significant changes were
recorded over the years, linked to the progressive substitution of oil by natural gas.
Figure III.6.Oil and Natural Gas participation in primary energy supply. 1970 – 2004
100.0%
95.0%
90.0%
85.0%
80.0%
75.0%
70.0%
65.0%
60.0%
55.0%
50.0%
1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
Source: Energy Secretariat, Series BEN National Energy Balance.
Figure III.7.Total supply of primary energy (2004)
1% 1% 5% 3%
38%
50%
Hydraulic Energy Nuclear Natural Gas Oil
Coal Firewood Bagasse Other primary resources
19
Regarding the electricity system, the installed power of the public interconnected service
reached in 2004 more than 24.800 MW. Mainly thermal plants (56 %) (almost a half not
prepared to burn an alternative fuel than gas); 4 % is nuclear power, while 40 % is covered by
hydraulic capacity. The new and renewable sources participate with a marginal place,
outstanding the wind power with almost 28 MW of installed power. Finally, within the isolated
systems thermal generation prevails. Further on, 26 % of the installed capacity corresponds to
combined cycles, generally units of last generation built during the last ten years.
The steam plants, that represent 19 % of the total power – are old machines whose useful life
has almost expired. Moreover, they have already suffered a rebumping process. Nevertheless,
they are in working conditions and their availability indexes have been raised, especially before
the crisis of gas availability, due to their feature of multiple fuels burning.
Natural gas explains almost 60% of the whole energy sources for electricity production and
among 85-95% of the total fuel burned in conventional thermal generation. This dependence
constitutes a critical variable for the sector.
Table III.4. Fuel consumption for conventional power generation

Usual units and %
2002 2003 2004 2005 ∆ 05/02

Natural Gas (GCM) 6.15 8.17 9.61 10.04 63%
Fuel Oil (Mill Ton) 39.4 85.4 828.4 1130.8 2770%
Diesel (Mill Ton) 14.9 14.2 91.9 51.8 248%
Coal (Ton) 61.5 91.4 351.6 626.7 919%
Natural Gas 98,4% 97,9% 88,4% 85,3%
Fuel Oil 0,7% 1,1% 8,5% 10,7%
Diesel 0,3% 0,2% 1,0% 0,5%
Coal 0,7% 0,7% 2,2% 3,6%
In the structure of final energy consumption (which includes sector consumption + own-use
energy) the main shares comprise: oil products (37%), gas (43%) and electricity (16%).
On the other hand if it is analyzed the structure of electrical generation, almost 31% of this is
generated from renewable resources (more than 95% big hydro plants).
20
Figure III.8. Structure of Final Energy Consumption (2004)
23%
41%
1%
4%
7%
8% 16%
Grid distributed gas Electricity Others Total gasoline

Liquefied gas Refinery gas Diesel Oil + Diesel
Whereas natural gas production remained unchanged, crude oil extraction decreased for the
fifth consecutive year. Given the sustained increase in the demand of gas, its provision was
guaranteed through larger imports from Bolivia and the restriction of Chilean exports. Oil
product imports also grew substantially so as to substitute gas in thermal generation and for the
transport of agricultural products. Thus, supply and investment trends regarding hydrocarbons
and energy kept attracting public attention. By mid 2007, gas and electricity supply underwent
restrictions, especially to large industrial consumers, and outages were also recorded in several
residential areas of the southern Greater Buenos Aires and in some provinces, such as Santa
Fe and Cordoba.
On the other hand, the regional situation regarding access to modern fuels – electricity and
natural gas – shows important differences.
Figure III.9. Population with access to electricity by grid (%)
98%
96%
94%
92%
90%
88%
86%
84%
82%
Cuyo Noroeste Pampeana Country
Metro Noreste Patagonia
Source: Energy Secretariat
21
Inequity is even more noticeable in the case of natural gas, which implies additional pressures
on supply and potential threats to its security.
Figure III.10. Percentage of population with access to grid-distributed gas
Country 61
Patagonia 89.9
Pampa region 58.9
Northeast 42.3
Northwest 0.24
M etropolitan 83.1
Cuyo 65.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Source: Energy Secretariat
Some key indicator could be summarized for an historical period or the base year.
Table III.5. General Indicators

Indicator 2004
Share of residential energy
24%
consumption/total energy use
Total imported energy 3687 KOE
Total Exported energy 23 815 KOE
Autarchy (Energy imports-Energy
-0,28 (Net Exports)
exports)/primary energy supply
Intensity 150 KOE/1000 US$ (yr. 2000)
Total Average 1220 KOE/inhabitant
Power Average 2273 Kwh/inhabitant
Efficiency Energy Use Indicators
Indicator 2004
Energy efficiency in Supply 64%
Fossil Fuel Electricity 58% of total generation
Electricity demand 14400 MW
Renewable Indicators
Indicator 2004
Renewable energies use 7,6%
Per capita renewability index 144 KOE/inhabitant
Hydro energy dependency 61%
Firewood dependency index 14%
Share of Renewable in power generation 31%
Environmental Indicators
Indicator 2004
GHG emissions 45% of total emissions (2000)
GHG intensity 975 Kg CO2 equiv./1000 USD
GHG per capita 3900 Kg CO2 equiv./inhab.
Cleanliness 3193 Kg CO2 equiv./TOE
Polluting electricity 1050 Kg CO2 equiv/Mwh
Source: Energy Secretariat, Series BEN National Energy Balance and other.
22
3.3. Energy Scenario by 2030
As mentioned a BAU scenario has been considered. It includes technological innovations as

part of the development process, as well as improvements in productive efficiencies or
substitution processes, which would take place even in the absence of explicit additional
policies.
The projections comprise fuel penetrations, proposals for the rational use of energy and relative
structures of energy product prices which will enable substitution goals and rational use,
considering in all cases the different socio-economic consumption sectors. A relative price and
tariff structure by sectors has been taken into account, which will reinforce the historical trend in
the shares of the different energy products (9).
3.3.1. Energy Demand Scenario
The Final Energy Demand prospective for the 2004-2030 period maintains the historical trend,
with an important penetration of renewable fuels, according to public policy goals.
The results of the final energy demand prospective by sectors, including own-use and non-
energy products, is as follows:
Table III.6. Energy demand Baseline scenario (in thousand tons of oil equivalents)
2004-2030
Sectors 2004 2008 2013 2018 2025 2030 Rate of growth
Household 9.890 13.503 15.746 17.879 20.854 23.365 2,9%
Commercial and Public 3.391 4.689 5.831 6.893 8.198 9.185 3,5%
Industry 11.033 15.367 19.796 24.435 29.938 33.542 3,9%
Transport 12.727 14.804 17.170 19.620 22.921 25.681 2,3%
Agricultural 4.663 6.477 7.864 9.157 10.342 11.588 3,1%
Non Energy 3.698 5.239 6.633 8.130 9.823 11.005 3,8%
Own-use 6.000 6.500 7.000 7.500 8.000 8.963 1,1%
Total 51.402 66.579 80.041 93.614 110.075 123.329 3,0%
Source: own elaboration.
The table shows that a considerable growth is expected, especially in the industrial and
commercial and public sectors. The largest consumption levels are related to natural gas, diesel
oil and electricity. In order to meet the projected electricity demand, possible energy exchanges
with neighboring countries have been estimated.
As a result of those estimates, the thermal generation still has a major share, though with an
important increase in nuclear generation, according to National Government plans.
(9) Relative price and tariff structures were estimated on the basis of oil price trends. The largest growth has been
considered at U$ 80 per barrel of the year 2006, which is within the values estimated by the International Energy
Agency.
23
Table III.7. Projection of electricity generation in GWh and %
2004-2030
GWh 2004 2010 2015 2020
2025 2030 rate p.a. (%)
Hydroelectric Power Plants 30,555 36,867 44,799 59,867 64,167 72,599 3.4
Conventional Thermal
61,779 100,355 120,844 132,995 152,742 172,814 4.0
Power Plants
Wind 72 2,092 5,052 7,812 9,018 10,203 21.0
PV 0 23 54 78 91 103 86.1
Geothermal 0 75 219 237 273 309 94.1
Nuclear 7,870 10,212 17,346 26,164 38,045 43,044 6.8
Total 100,276 149,624 188,314 227,153 264,336 299,072 4.3
Hydroelectric Power
17,7% 14,9% 9,7% 11,0% 10,2% 10,2%
Plants
Conventional Thermal
35,9% 40,5% 26,2% 24,5% 24,3% 24,3%
Power Plants
Wind 41,8% 0,8% 1,1% 1,4% 1,4% 1,4%
PV 0,0% 9,3% 11,7% 14,4% 14,5% 14,5%
Geothermal 0,0% 30,3% 47,5% 43,7% 43,5% 43,5%
Nuclear 4,6% 4,1% 3,8% 4,8% 6,1% 6,1%
The following table includes the evolution of the total final energy demand, taking into account
final sector consumption (Final), intermediate energy consumption and own-use (OU) for the
main fuels.
Table III.8: Summary of prospective results for total final energy demand (kTOE and %)
2004 2030
Oil NG Electr. DO Total Oil NG Electr. DO Total
Final + OU 8 19856 7593 10941 38398 13 53543 24176 24201 101933
Intermediate
27183 16452 1328 147 45110 54995 38331 3044 2972 99342
Consumption
Total Final 27191 36308 8921 11088 83508 55008 91875 27220 27173 201276
Final + OU 0,0% 51,7% 19,8% 28,5% 100% 0,0% 52,5% 23,7% 23,7% 100%
Intermediate
60,3% 36,5% 2,9% 0,3% 100% 55,4% 38,6% 3,1% 3,0% 100%
Consumption
Total Final 32,6% 43,5% 10,7% 13,3% 100% 27,3% 45,6% 13,5% 13,5% 100%
Final energy demand prospective rate between 2025 and 2030 is 2.85%. The structure of
consumption in 2030 is similar to 2025. The strong dependence on liquid and gas hydrocarbons
is foreseen to prevail.
3.4. Availability of resources
3.4.1. Fossil Fuels Reserves
24
Total Proven Reserves of Oil in the country evolved from 392 billion m3 in 1980 to 349 Billion m3 in
2005, having reached a top of 488 Bm3 in 1999 (10). The deterioration of the Reserves/Production
ratio has been permanent, falling from 13.4 years in 1980 to 9 years in 2005 (11).
Total Proven Reserves of Natural Gas in the country evolved from 641 thousand billion cubic
meters in 1980 dropped to 439 in 2005, having reached a top of 777 in 1988 (12). The deterioration
of the Reserves/Production ratio has been permanent, falling from 48 years in 1980 to 8.5 years in
2005.
Measured Reserves of Coal reached 477.9 million tones in 2005 (13).The Rio Turbio present
production, the only reservoir, reached 295,333 tones in the year 2006. Top production was
reached in 1979, with 1,326,254 tons, and since then, the fall has been constant. The Measured
Reserves/Production ratio was 1620 years in 2006.
3.4.2. Availability
For Oil and Natural Gas, the hypotheses have been that, as from the year 2007, apart from
Proven Reserves, 50% of Potential Reserves could be available, and the other 50%, as from
2010 or 2012, according to the Scenarios. It was also estimated that Possible Reserves could
be available as from 2013, and Speculative Reserves, as from 2016. In the case of Coal,
production requirements could be met by the Measured Reserves, taking into account the
warnings that will be presented below.
A preliminary analysis of the preceding aspects reveals that there are strong restrictions on
hydrocarbon self-sufficiency, which represents a future threat to the system due to the
additional costs that importing crude oil could imply. If demand estimates are confirmed, it
would be very difficult to meet the required levels with national, and even imported, Oil and
Natural Gas until the year 2010.
In the short term, there could also be restrictions on electric equipment, and it does not seem
feasible to substitute it with electricity imported from Brazil.
These are the main threats that the energy sector will have to face at national level. Coal seems
to be the only fuel with enough availability in the country.
3.4.3. Renewable resources
Main renewable resources are presented in next table; the proposed scenario reflects an
important use of them, as new promotion laws have already been enacted.
Table III.9. Renewable resources
Solar 417,494 Million TOE

Geothermal 25 Peta Joule
Biomass 19,000,000 TOE
(10) Proven, Probable, Potential and Speculative Reserves totaled 1128 Bm3 in 2005, only 30% of which were
Proven.
(11) Recent discoveries might increase this relation, according to journalistic versions, in 3 years more.
(12) Proven, Probable, Potential and Speculative Reserves reached 1954 thousand billion cubic meters in 2005, of
which only 22% were Proven.
(13) Which added to the 206,5 Possible Reserves and 67,8 inferred reserves, totaled 752,3 million tones.
25
Firewood 27,094,377 Tons
Bagasse 3,460,000 TOE
Hydro 170,000 GWh-year
Wind 6,087 TWh-year
Other Primary 9,352,279 TOE

3.5. Energy consumption patterns in the household sector (urban/rural and
poor/non poor)
Whereas energy consumption per capita (CRh in Figure III.11) grew to an average rate of 1.2%
in the 1970-2004 period, GDP per capita (PBIh in Figure III.11), after revealing a very marked
cyclical behavior, reached, in 2004, levels similar to those of 1970. Household energy
consumption had a more dynamic behavior as a consequence of population growth and the
urbanization process, and not only of the average income (GDP per capita).
Figure III.11. Per capita Evolution of household energy consumption and GDP. 1970 – 2004 (1970=100)
Source: own estimation based on data from the Energy Secretariat and INDEC.
Argentina has undergone a virtual stagnation of average incomes and an increase in social
inequity over the last 30 years. However, the progressive penetration of grid-distributed gas and
the country’s high electricity coverage would make a contribution to reduce “energy inequity”
facilitating the access to high quality fuels (14) to the household energy basket. Nevertheless,
this penetration was reduced in the last decade and some regional inequalities remain across
the country.
(14) In 2004, grid-distributed gas and electricity accounted for 81.4% of the total; if LPG is also taken into account,
that percentage reaches 94.7%.
26
Figure III.12. Share of grid-distributed gas in household energy consumption. 1970 – 2004
Source: own estimation using data from the Energy Balance
Electricity consumption in the household sector recorded a strong increase during the 1970s
and 1990s, and a much slower dynamic in the 1980s.
The interconnection level of its electricity system contributed significantly to the improvement of
the systems’ coverage throughout the national territory.
Figure III.13. Household electricity consumption
Source: self estimate using data from the National Energy Balance
The households’ tariff freeze for both gas and electricity, made the impact of the deep crisis less
severe. But that was not the case for poor families not covered by grid-distributed gas that,
therefore, had to resort to LPG – whose price did increase significantly – in order to cover such
27
basic uses as cooking. It is necessary to consider that income distribution inequity grew even
more in the year 2002, as has already been pointed out.
According to the 2001 National Population Census, 95% of the dwellings were electrified. Out of
the total of non-electrified ones, 60.2% are rural; of these, the largest percentage corresponds
to disperse rural population (56.6% of the total of non-electrified dwellings).
However, the percentages of electrified dwellings vary greatly from region to region. The lowest
percentages are recorded in north-eastern provinces (Formosa, Chaco, Corrientes and
Misiones) and north-western provinces (Santiago del Estero, Salta) (15).
If the whole Household consumption is addressed, in 2004, total figure reached 9,890 kToe,
which accounted for 21.8% of the total final energy consumption in the country (not including
Own Use). The Distribution of this figure over mentioned sub-sectors indicates a 92% of total
energy use by urban Households; a further 6% consumed by rural Households with electricity
and finally a 2% used by non electrified rural Households.
Natural gas covered 61.9 % of the sector consumption, followed by Electricity (19.6%) and then
LPG (13.3%). The rest of the fuels contributed relatively low levels. This means that only three
sources (Natural Gas, Electricity and LPG) represent 95% of the Household Consumption.
In 2004, 92.2% of the total Household consumption was recorded in urban households, and the
remaining 7.8%, in rural ones.
Figure III.14. Structure of Net Consumption by Fuels Urban Households. Year 2004
Charcoal Firewood
2.2% 0.2%
Electricity Kerosene
20.1% 0.7%
LP Gas Natural Gas

9.8%
67.0%
Source: Energy Balance, Argentine Energy Secretariat
(15) These percentages are as follows: Formosa 74,3%, Chaco 86,4, Corrientes 88,4, Misiones 88,4, Santiago del
Estero 74,3 and Salta 87,6%. Further regional data distinguishing main urban areas will be presented in Chapter V.
28
Figure III.15. Structure of Net Consumption by Fuels. Rural Households. Year 2004
Charcoal
Electricity 1.8% Firewood Kerosene
12.9% 11.5% 8.8%
Wind Natural Gas
8.2%
1.0%
LP Gas
55.8%
Source: Energy Balance, Argentine Energy Secretariat
Differences in Intensity across sub-sectors are more marked if they are measured in useful
energy. This is so because of the larger consumption of less efficient fuels in rural areas
(firewood, kerosene, wind), and the fact that those rural households with no access to
distribution grids do not use Electricity. Next table shows an estimate of energy intensities and
structure by uses.
Table III.10. Energy consumption structure and intensities by uses. Year 2004
NET ENERGY USEFUL ENERGY

RURAL RURAL
Uses
URBAN Non- URBAN Non-
Electrified Electrified
electrified electrified
1. Lighting 6.0% 9.3% 7.5% 0.8% 1.0% 0.8%
2. Cooking 24.1% 39.9% 40.7% 21.3% 39.8% 59.5%
3. Water heating 29.4% 21.6% 6.1% 28.9% 23.8% 9.9%
4. Heating 26.9% 12.6% 2.5% 26.5% 11.2% 1.3%
5. Cooling & Ventilation 1.2% 1.3% 0.0% 1.9% 2.5% 0.0%
6. Food conservation 7.9% 9.3% 7.0% 12.6% 9.2% 2.8%
7 Water pumping 0.1% 0.8% 35.6% 0.2% 1.0% 24.7%
8. Engines 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%
9. Other uses 4.4% 5.0% 0.5% 7.7% 10.9% 0.9%
TOTAL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
koe/household 964.7 844.2 711.9 486.3 343.9 143.6
Source: own estimation
Additional conclusions -from an electricity tariff study- (16) argues about the convenience of
subsiding low income households’ gas or kerosene consumption - instead of electricity tariff
(due to caloric - heating and cooking - uses encouragement originated on a low electricity
price). Then it will be possible to give an additional reduction on electricity tariff for small
consumptions - around 150 kWh/ month. Interestingly a consumption pattern is developed for
electricity uses, it is found that a low income family might use 469 kWh instead of 240 kWh
every two months, if electricity is employed for caloric uses (cooking and home heating) this
(16) Bertero, R. 2004.
29
figure becomes even larger that the average consumption of total households (between 452
kWh and 365 kWh, in the Buenos Aires area).
Another recent survey (Fundación Bariloche, 2008, 106 homes surveyed) aimed at very poor
villages of southern Buenos Aires, analyzes the consumption by sources, in (almost) absence
of distributed gas, which is the feature of poor households.
Table III.11. Useful Energy consumption by fuel sources and uses [koe/household] Very Low Income
Urban Families without distributed Natural Gas, Nov 2007.
Natural Biomass
USES / FUELS LPG Kerosene Charcoal Electricity TOTAL
Gas Residues
Lighting 1.1 1.0 0.5%
Cooking 61.3 2.2 0.8 2.0 0.1 0.4 66.8 34.4%
Water Heating 12.3 4.1 1.6 0.8 21.1 40.0 20.6%
House Heating 1.9 1.1 1.0 6.7 0.03 12.6 23.4 12.0%
Food
41.7 41.7 21.5%
Conservation
House Cooling 2.2 2.2 1.2%
Other
19.0 19.0 9.8%
appliances
75.4 7.4 3.5 9.6 0.2 98.0 194.1 100%
TOTAL
38.9% 3.8% 1.8% 4.9% 0.1% 50.5% 100.0%
Source: Self elaboration.
Main use in terms of energy consumption is Cooking, accounting for the 34.4% of home
consumption, the next are Food Conservation and Water heating (21.5% and 20.6%
respectively)
This energy consumption profile reflects the priority of fulfilled needs given by cultural and
economical reasons, showing where the main unsatisfied needs in poor households lie.
If prices and budget issue are addressed, what is remarked is the disadvantage of most poor
families, which pay as much as 6 argentine pesos (around 2 dollars) for covering – very poorly
and in a relatively dirty way - basic caloric or heating uses with charcoal. If LPG is employed the
expenditure is reduced down to 2$ while if natural gas is employed for same energy activities,
the cost is around 0.5 cents.
Nevertheless these observations must beard in mind the impossibility of substitution between
basic needs (uses) and the fact that the figures presented reflect average values, some homes
have substantive energy lacks, hidden behind the average.
3.6. Consumption and Efficiency of Energy Use in the Household Sector
Some data of household appliances’ efficiency is presented in here; this will be further
developed in section 5. The objective is to present a description of household situation in order
to identify the main feature relevant for energy security.
30
i) Caloric Uses of Firewood and Charcoal
In most cases, Firewood and Charcoal fuel devices which are used by rural Households, for
Cooking, Water Heating and Heating indistinctly.
The type of equipment differs according to whether it is a Low, or Middle or High Income Sector.
For Low Incomes, the present average efficiency may be estimated at 10%
For Middle and High Incomes, the present average efficiency may be estimated at about 20%
In high and middle income rural sectors, which account for 1.05% of the total population, caloric
uses also account for 100% of the household consumption of Firewood and Charcoal by these
families. The average efficiency for caloric uses of these fuels was approximately 20% in 2004.
ii) Caloric Uses of Natural Gas and Liquefied Petrol Gas – estimated in 2004
- Food cooking: average efficiencies reach 45%.

- Water heating: especially using tank less and storage water heaters, with an
average efficiency of about 50%.
- Heating: the average efficiency of heaters is 55% (17). Heating uses are estimated to
account for 34% of caloric uses.
- Efficiency of all Uses for NG and LPG: 50%.
iii) Electricity Uses
The structure of electricity consumption by type of use has been extracted from the “Energy
Needs” Study by Fundación Bariloche (2000), and is only an approximation, since these types
of data are not available in Argentina.
Table III.12. Structure of electricity consumption estimates for the household sector (%)
STRUCTURE
USE
(%)
Food Conservation 40.3
Lighting 30.6
Stand-By Devices 15.1
Air Conditioning 5.6
Washing Machines 3.6
Other types of Space Conditioning 0.6
Other Devices 4.2
TOTAL 100
Source: own estimation.
There is an important potential (36.8% of household final consumption) for implement measures
for electricity savings in: Food Conservation, Lighting, Stand-by Devices, Air Conditioning and
Washing machines.
(17) OLADE, Energética 21. Magazine p.36
31
IV. Threats to Energy Security and Measures to enhance them and their impacts
at the National Level
This section presents briefly the main threats that the country faces (present and future)
regarding energy security, together with some links to their origin and impacts.
Supply security threats are due to factors external to the system, as for example the
international oil prices and internal elements of the system, as for example political decisions
made in the past such as the transfer of the energy natural resources control. The system’s
vulnerability is the result of two factors: the magnitude of the threat and the system’s response
capacity (weakness or strength to adjust to the threat or to overcome it definitively). The actions
and measures to adjust or mitigate the threats depend on the nature thereof: internal or external
to the system and on the design and implementation of policies and strategies.
Before developing the above statement, some selected Indicators summarizing the National
Level situation are exposed. By this, we intend to provide a brief description based on current
(year 2007) and past pictures (years 1990 and 2000).
The assessment includes the following indicators - in all the cases calculated for years 1990,
2000 and 2007:
i. Energy Import Dependency;

ii. Diversification of energy sources;
iii. Energy Path - energy per unit of GDP and GDP per capita;
iv. Depletion of energy reserves of different fossil fuels and their rate of depletion;
v. Investment in new power plants;
vi. Investment in Oil and Natural Gas exploration;
vii. Investment in Renewable; and
viii. Economic implications of energy imports.
i) Energy Import Dependency
It is measured by Net Energy Import Ratio (NEIR):
NEIR = NEI / NDS
Where:
NEI is the net energy import for the considered years

NDS is the Net Domestic Supply of energy = Net Domestic supply of Primary Energy + Net
Domestic Supply of Secondary Energy – Secondary Energy Domestic Production.
Table IV.1. Net Energy Import Ratio (NEIR)
1990 2000 2007

NEIR -5.03% -36.3% -9.54%
The indicator has negative values for Argentina, as the country was, and still is, a next exporter
of energy. Up to the nineties exports were marginal. During the nineties the liberalization
policies pushed and promoted the energy exports (especially Oil and Natural Gas); this is the
reason of the remarkable increase in the indicator. As this Private stakeholder behavior was not
accompanied by investment in exploration (as others indicators will show), reserves began to
32
decrease and hence energy exports should be reduced (especially Natural Gas). So, the
evolution of the indicator clearly reflects the absence of a long term policy and the erroneous
policy implemented during the nineties, from the National Energy System point of view.
ii) Diversification of Energy Sources
There are two proposals to measure diversification:
9 Shannon-Wienier Index (SWI)
SWI = −∑ S i × Ln(S i )
i
Where, Si is the share of fuel i in total primary energy supply (TPES).
A higher value of SWI implies a more diversified energy resource mix. Grubb (Grubb, M. et al,
2006) indicated that “a value above 2 shows a system with numerous sources, none of which
play a dominant role; such a system can reasonably be considered to be quite secure in the
face of interruption of any individual supply component.”
9 Herfindhal-Hirshman Index (HHI)

HHI = −∑ S i2
i
Where, Si = Si is the share of fuel i in TPES.
A lower value of HHI means higher level of diversification in energy supply mix. Michael Grubb,
(Grubb, M. et al, 2006) indicated that “The US Department of Justice suggests that a result less
than 1000 indicates a competitive market place and that a result greater than 1800 indicates a
highly concentrated market place”.
Next table shows the evolution of the proposed indicators.
Table IV.2. Shannon-Wienier and Herfindhal-Hirshman Index
Indicator 1990 2000 2007

SWI 1.22 1.17 1.12
HHI 3786 3920 4111
Both indicators are in convergence and show a high degree of concentration in Primary Energy
Supply. Together Oil and Natural Gas, evolved from 86% of total supply in 1990, to nearly 90%
in 2007, showing a path of growing concentration.
iii) Energy Path: relation between Energy per Unit of GDP and GDP per capita
The energy Path is the relation between energy per unit of GDP and GDP per capita.
The results of the calculations made for Argentina depends on the information used (18).
(18) The information on Energy was taken from the Energy Balances, published by the Energy Secretary (official
Information). The information on National Accounts could have two sources: INDEC (National Institute for Statistics)
or World Bank, using PPP. In the first case the information is presented in local currency at constant values from
1993. In the second case the information is in USD at constant value of 2000. The results are very different and also
33
Table IV.3. Energy per Unit of GDP and GDP per capita
World Bank Figures Argentine Official Figures

Energy Intensity
GDP PPP Energy Intensity GDP INDEC (19)
INDEC
(USD/Inhabit.) (TOE/GDP PPP) (USD/Inhabit)
(TOE/GDP)
1990 7310 0.121 6101 0.144
2000 12130 0.090 7897 0.138
2007 15000 0.080 6898 0.173
Considering World Bank figures the Argentine Energy Path is very similar to the one of a
Developed Country. Using Official information on National Accounts, the results show a
different path, at least recently.
Figure IV.1. Energy Path, years 1990, 1997, 2000 and 2007 (PPP)
TOE/GDP PPP
0.130
0.120
0.110
0.100
0.090
0.080
0.070
7000 9000 11000 13000 15000
GDP per capita PPP
Source: WB
the behavior of the path, depending whether the calculus base employed is Official Information, or World Bank
figures.
(19) INDEC- Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censo (National Institute for Statistics and Census)
34
Figure IV.2. Energy Path, years 1990, 1997, 2000 and 2007 (USD constant value of 2000)
TOE/GDP INDEC
0.240
0.120
6000 6500 7000 7500 8000

GDP per Capita - INDEC
Source: INDEC
As a conclusion, it should be remarked the limits of this kind of indicators to make comparison
among countries.
iv) Depletion of Energy Reserves of different Fossil Fuels and their Rate of
Depletion
It is measured through:
Reserve to production ratio (R/P ratio) = Estimated reserves / Current annual extraction.
The evolution of such ratio was calculated for Oil and Natural Gas Reserves.
Table IV.4. Reserve to production ratio (R/P ratio) Oil and Natural Gas
R/P Ratio 1990 2000 2007

Oil (years) 12 11 9
Natural Gas (years) 25 18 10
As can be seen, in both cases the fuels that represent near 90% or Argentine Energy Matrix,
the depletion of reserves is dramatic, especially in the case of Natural Gas.
v) Investment in New Power Plants
The information on Investment is not easy available. As is made by private stakeholders, it is

not public information. Some private or public institutions publish some information but it is not a
set of information covering the whole period.
As proxy variable, power installed capacity is used. Power reserve capacity evolution is defined
as the difference between the installed capacity and the maximum yearly demand. Both
variables are for Wholesale Electricity Market (MEM).
35
Table IV.5. Installed capacity (MW) and Reserve capacity (%)
Power 1992 2000 2007

Installed capacity (MW) 13267 20719 24407
Reserve capacity (%) 47 50 33
But, in the same period that installed capacity growth at an annual rate of 4,2%, power
consumption growth at an annual rate of 4,9%. As a consequence, reserve margin decreases
between extremes as much as 14%. Current threat on electricity security of supply is related
with this decoupling between installed capacity and consumption evolution.
vi) Investment in Oil and Natural Gas Exploration
As in the case of electricity, the information on Investment is not available. As it is made by

private stakeholders, it is not public information.
As proxy variable, number of exploration wells per year is used.
Table IV.6. Number of exploration wells per year

Source 1990 2000 2007
Natural Gas 6 11 9
Oil 22 30 27
In the case of exploration or exploratory wells drilling, figures for one year are not very
representative of the tendencies. During the former period, when the National Oil Company was
under Public Ownership (Oil Public company YPF), the number exploratory wells drilled,
averaged 100/120 per year. During the nineties private stakeholders produced or extracted the
oil (the cheapest activity of the oil industry) but they did not look for Oil, (the most expensive
activity of the Oil Industry). A similar situation is happening for Natural Gas. As the period of
analysis considered, does not cover the situation before Argentine energy industry structural
reform took place, this kind of change in behavior can not be caught by the indicators (20).
vii) Investment in Renewables
Due to the problem on availability of information, the role of Renewable as percentage of

Primary Energy Supply is presented as a proxy variable.
(20) The real reserves’ level is not known precisely by the Government. As the oil fields have been privatized, the
government depend on the information provide by oil companies.
36
Table IV.7. Renewable Energy as percentage of Primary Energy Supply
1990 2000 2007

Source
(%) (%) (%)
Hydro Energy 4.0 4.7 4.3
Charcoal 1.1 1.0 1.4
Bagasse 0.9 1.3 1.3
Others 1.5 1.1 0.7
Total 7.5 8.2 7.7
A marginal change in structure depends on short term circumstances, lake water availability. As
could be seen the participation of Renewable has been practically frozen since the last 17
years.
viii) Economic implications of energy imports
It can be assessed through the use of the following indicators:
9 Energy Import as percentage of GDP

9 Energy Import as percentage of total exports.
9 Net Energy Import as percentage of GDP.
9 Energy export as percentage of total exports.
Table IV.8. Selected Economic indicators
Indicator 1990 2000 2007

(%) (%) (%)
1- Energy Imports/GDP 0.2 0.4 4,3
2- Energy Imports/Total Exports 2.6 3.9 5.1
3- Net Energy Imports/GDP -0.3 -1.4 -1.5
4- Energy exports/Total exports 8.0 18.6 12.4
As already mentioned, Argentina is, still, a net energy exporter (21). Indicators are showing a
clear change in tendency, with a dramatic increase in imports reflected by the relation with GDP
and total Exports and a decline in the participation of Energy in Total Exports.
Now that the National situation has been illustrated by indicators, the main discussion on
Energy Security is developed
4.1. Context threats, general measures and main impacts
The analysis made, detected the existence of a supply security threat, with potential impacts on
costs, competitiveness, social equity, availability of domestic fossil fuels as well as on the
regional integration process. This threat is mainly related to the characteristics and
consequences of the structural reforms applied during the last decade and to the national
situation generated after the end of convertibility. It is to say of essentially internal character, in
(21) This is the reason why, indicator number 3 of the table is negative.
37
the frame of an international context of increasing prices of the oil and of conflicts in strategic
zones.
Effectively, as the result of the structural policies of the nineties– most of them currently still in
force – the energy system faces several risks related to supply security:
I.On the one hand, the effective control of nearly all the energy offer and natural energy
resources was privatized. Substantive short term rationality defines the trend, within a weak
regulation context and nearly absence of intervention through public policies.
II.The tariff structure and price levels (gas and electric power) favor higher consumption,
eliminating signals for efficient use and social equity.
III.The real investment process is oriented towards the maximization of the net present value,
and energy stakeholders strategy prioritize the remission of utilities, the distribution of
dividends and the simultaneous foreign indebtedness. This rationality of the companies
responsible for supply conditions the long term supply, as it endangers the necessary link
between the resource revenue and the financing of the required investments.
IV.On the other hand, some of the characteristics of the strategies of private investors were:
9 The increasing use of natural gas for power generation and the orientation of increasing
amount of natural gas to the foreign market, both actions explain nearly 60% of the
increment in production during the nineties and imply that future security of supply could
not be guaranteed.
9 The increment of hydrocarbon production for the internal market, and especially for the
external one, as well as the minimization of investment risks (more compression
capacity in the transportation of natural gas instead of new gas pipelines, low risk
exploration investments concentrated in already discovered fields; foreign indebtedness
policies and simultaneous distribution of dividends; production oriented to the external
market independently of reserve replacement; expansion of distribution networks pre-
financed by third parties and returned at a lower value, and protection from the risks of a
virtual pesification by means of legal actions which, if succeeding, would allow for
expropriation indemnifications and would imply leaving a portion of the acquired debt in
the hands of the National Government).
V.The reduction of investments since 1999, discouraged by the recession, while the present
value maximization strategy is framed within a short and medium term policy, disconnected
from the license and concession terms or the long term supply optimization criteria.
VI.Despite the gas and electric power regulatory frameworks limit vertical integration, such
limitation is overcome by corporate strategies. In view of a weak regulation, the companies
manage to achieve a high integration level, both vertically and horizontally. This situation not
only allows for dominant positions in each chain, but also through the integration of the
different links of the chains (e.g.: natural gas production and distribution; gas production;
electric power generation and distribution, large consumers, etc.)
VII.Consequently, many of the main actors participate simultaneously in different energy sector
activities, creating integrated, oligopoly markets, highly concentrated in the major deregulated
links and integrated with the sectors that constitute regulated natural monopolies.
VIII.The unclear legal framework let them have a dominant market position as well as a strong
power correlation with the authorities.
IX.Finally the provincialization of hydrocarbon resources property (from former National
ownership to Provincial jurisdictions control) leaves a weakened actor in charge of
negotiations with private oil firms.
At a Macroeconomic level, the convertibility policy collapsed by the end of 2001, generating
significant currency devaluation. The new macroeconomic scheme led to an important industrial
reactivation vis-à-vis the 1999-2002 recessive period. The first sectors to show that reactivation
were the ones that managed to articulate or re-articulate themselves into the international
38
market. The large foreign companies did it first, followed by some lower-sized local companies.
The sectors that managed to participate in the new import substitution process also increased
their activity.
That reactivation is framed within a context of limited gas offer and with a transportation
capacity that has grown very little since 1999. This new vulnerability of the industrial sector as
regards resources and infrastructure may be first identified in the dependency on fuel as a
production input which could not be guaranteed on the long term, and then, in its immediate
response. For example, many industries started to buy their own electric power generation
equipment. This distorts the generation park and imposes higher pressure on the demand of
liquid fuels (especially for the farming and transportation sectors), so being a hardly rational and
unsustainable measure as regards the use of resources.
On the one hand, such complex situation is framed within a regulatory scheme (still in force)
which followed the reformation process and facilitated, in some way, the sector vulnerability
situation. On the other hand, and in order to embrace the most critical elements of this situation,
several short term measures of partial scope have been adopted
Some examples are mentioned below:
9 The partial “dollarization” of the deregulated segment of the hydrocarbon sector, especially
for the integrated companies with strong upstream participation; the new situation is
particularly favorable since prices have been gradually growing in the international market.
9 Resolution 208/2004 and other regulations have been enacted, improving the price
perceived by the natural gas producers in exchange for an offer guarantee only for the firm
contracted capacities. In turn, those users who have not acquired firm capacity, can directly
contract it from the producers, carriers and distributors at free prices.
9 Although, the gas and electric power transportation and distribution services remained
“pesified” in an important part of the market, which led to a hard negotiation process. While
some of the companies have already been authorized to apply price increments to the
commercial and industrial sectors, the analysis of the residential sector is still pending. This
has generated additional uncertainties and more distortions like regressive structures and
the lack of incorporation of social tariff (for low incomes).
9 In turn, the electric power generators were offset by the higher cost of gas and use of
alternative fuels by a fund (FONINVEMEN) which, when depleted, turned into a debt that
can be capitalized through investments in two thermal generation stations. The debt with
this fund was increasing. The growing liquid fuel importation through public funds was also
an important distortion in the functioning of the system, as it broke the link between the
electric power generation costs and its remuneration. This generated, on the one hand, a
cost increase for certain productive sectors and, on the other hand, a lack of supply
guarantees.
9 Due to the gas shortage, supply to interruptible users was restricted. Argentine exportation
had also been limited, mainly to Chile, a country that depends almost 100% on the
Argentine gas supply. This situation prevailed during the 2007 winter season, even
generating an extraordinary situation. The authorities permanently informed of the electric
power system critical situation, and directly asked large consumers, companies and
industries to disconnect themselves from the network to avoid the general interruption of the
service.
Finally, within a complex regulatory, institutional, physical and political framework, it may be
noted that the main threats from a supply guarantee standpoint are related to the increased
dependence on oil, derivates, and natural gas, coupled with restrictions in the electric power
offer due to problems related to the lack of equipment and fuel availability.
39
These threats affect the energy system as a whole at the national level, and particularly those
sectors with less resources of their own, as for example the low income residential sector.
Furthermore, several actions, including the ones mentioned below (without any specific order),
have been started:
9 Agreement to import Fuel Oil from Venezuela (closed), which generates strong commercial
deficits (around U$S 4000 millons);
9 Agreement to import gas from Bolivia (closed at a value of U$D 5/ million of BTU, but now
this price increased to U$D 7/ million of BTU);
9 Importation of electric power from Brazil (partially closed) ;
9 Two programs for Rational Use of Energy (PURE for electric power and gas) (22);
9 Electric power transportation works (partially closed);
9 Generation works: Atucha II Nuclear station (not closed) and increment of Yaciretá´s quota;
9 Natural gas transportation extension for the 2006/2007 period (not closed meaning it has
not started yet);
9 Bio-fuel boosting Act;
9 Referential prices and more economical outlets were established for the oil liquefied gas
(GLP), whit a strong social impact;
9 Launching of the Nuclear Plan;
9 Incentive plan for the exploitation of the so-abundant mineral coal.
9 Launching of the Plan called “Energía Plus” to foster industrial self-production,
9 Substantives taxes on both, oil crude and derivates exportations (called retentions), once
the local refineries are supplied.
All these examples, while indicating a proactive attitude towards the complex situation, also
generate strong ambiguities and inconsistencies. The energy supply situation is a clear
example of it. On the one hand, no clear, defined and systematic official policy exists. The
operators themselves are following different strategies. In some cases, these strategies do not
converge (neither are expected to) into the initiatives established by the different areas of the
government, while in other cases, they are protected by the rules and/or contracts from the
past, such as in the oil upstream area.
An additional threatening element is that the impact of the price and rate readjustment, despite
it had little average relevance for the sector as regards the total costs of the industry (23), is
already another element for the internal price increment. Both the new inflationary pressures
and the supply risk can aggravate the uncertainty climate that tends to paralyze productive
investments. These are undoubtedly, two of the major threats that have become concrete risks
for energy security.
(22) For example, the Energy Efficient Use Program (Programa de uso eficiente de la energía – PURE) for gas
consumption, with estimated net savings of 400 ktep/year and the Electric Power Efficient Use Program (Programa
de uso eficiente de la energía eléctrica – PUREE), with estimated net savings of approximately 200 ktep/year (yearly
average).
(23) According to the Product-Output Matrix, INDEC, 1997 and Study on Energy consumption by the Industrial
Sector. Service Agreement Nº 28.03 Agencia Alemana de Cooperación Técnica SRL / Fundación Bariloche, March
2004.
40
Energy Security and Global Macro-Economic Impacts
The most relevant macro-economic impacts as regards energy security are those related with
the external sector and fiscal revenues (24). Besides, the analysis must be focused on gas, oil
and their oil products, which are highly influential on the trade balance and the fiscal revenues.
The impacts on competitiveness can be identified in the productive sectors through the weight
of energy as regards the total costs, a higher weight implying more vulnerability to shortage (25).
In the future scenario, oil-related activities lose weight, because Natural Gas should be
substituted in power generation. Those activities that meet the internal demand have a growth
rate similar to that of the product, while the dynamism and participation of the hydrocarbon
sector decrease. The main fiscal impact involves loss of revenues due to export retentions.
Impacts on the trade balance of oil, gas and oil products
The results of the future scenario imply the interruption of oil exportations between 2008 and
2009, and a slight recovery of them between 2010 and 2012, to then have null values.
Thus, it is expected that the positive balance existing up to 2006 will give way to an increasingly
negative balance until the year 2011. Such negative balance would be, by that time, of between
500 and 600 million dollars, but it would exceed 3 billion dollars in 2025.
As regards the foreign trade scenarios concerning oil products (26), it is expected the
introduction of a new higher-conversion refinery by the year 2010, which will enable the supply
the demand by domestic diesel.
Fiscal Impacts
The taxes revenues coming from the hydrocarbon sector represented near the 97% of the
national fiscal revenues of the energy sector, excluding the AVT of the regulated activities. In
turn, it is worth mentioning that the set of the main fiscal revenues corresponding to the energy
sector, including royalties, has represented nearly 3.5% of the GDP between 2004 and 2006, a
fact that hides important modifications of the different components which, in turn, have been the
result of quantity and price variations. A fiscal revenue reduction up to the year 2013 is
expected vis-à-vis the year 2006. The proportion of integrated fiscal revenues as a percentage
of the GDP would go from 3.4% in 2006 to 1.9% between 2014 and 2018, reaching only 2.3% in
2020.
Impacts on economic growth and competitiveness
(24) To assure domestic supply oil exports should be cut in the near future with the consequent losses on revenues
coming from export taxes.
(25) Please note that, besides the relative weight of energy on the total costs, the impossibility to replace it by
another input makes the vulnerability caused by the energy shortage affect all productive activities. Moreover,
despite the relative weight of energy on total costs, the impossibility to replace it by another input makes the
vulnerability in the case of lack of energy reach all the productive activities.
Furthermore, the delicate current energy situation was worsened by ongoing increases in oil prices, which in turn
enlarged the price of the fuel that Argentina has to import. Additionally, the official decision to prevent electric power
and gas increases for residential customers in the Capital and Greater Buenos Aires areas resulted in four times
more energy subsidies vis-à-vis 2007, reaching the amount of almost US$2700 Million.
(26) The analysis only considers motor oils, diesel, fuel oil and LPG.
41
A lower value added level produced by the energy sector would affect, at least, the economic
growth proportionally to the activity reduction. However, we can affirm that it may also affect
growth by reducing the fiscal revenues, weakening the income of foreign exchange, and due to
its multiplying impacts through the related productive structures.
It is not possible to quantify the indirect impacts that might be generated by the demand and
supply scenarios at the global level of the economic activity, these impacts will surely affect the
economy and should be considered when dealing with energy security policies. The oil price
susceptibility to the crude oil price values of the international markets is an important issue to be
considered, while the internal pricing mechanism through the effect of retentions would no
longer be applied.
Even though it is hard to estimate the quantification of energy shortage impacts on the growth
goals, it is very feasible that the economy may fail to grow at the rates expected until 2008,
while the short term energy offer seems to present restrictions and rigidity.
Apart from the cross-incidences within the energy sector, the sectors that are more susceptible
to the increment of energy costs are the transportation and farming service sectors. In turn,
some industrial sectors also show important values, namely: basic chemistry, mineral
extraction, and the sectors related to construction assets.
The cargo transportation sector is highly influential on the production costs of general assets.
Besides, it must be considered that the value of diesel, which is the main fuel of the sector, is
currently subsidized and, therefore, its price variation would inevitably imply the increment of
the subsidy value, according to the considered future prices. Should the existing subsidy not be
adjusted, it will affect the expenditure of both the intermediate demand and final consumption
sectors, distorting the home income-expenditure ratio.
4.2. Measures and their impacts to enhance Energy Security
To reduce the risks of future shortage of supply, structural policies and strategies are
necessary, not only Institutional changes but also Regulatory and Legislative (understand as
the modification of the rules of the game).
A brief overview has been introduced on the main conditions and prevailing threats to
guarantee the energy supply for a tendency or business as usual scenario. The actions/policies
that have been implemented so far to mitigate the complex situation in the medium and long
term have also been discussed.
Thus, an alternative scenario is introduced as a result of potential measurements that would

allow for the enhancement of the complex supply security conditions discussed above in the
future. That scenario would include:
i) Changes in the energy usage guidelines (Energy Efficiency, EE). These guidelines imply
technological improvements and improvements in the operation of equipment and devices that
lead to a lower net energy consumption.
ii) Changes in the substitution guidelines for energy sources in each energy sector, with special
focus in renewable energy sources (RE).
42
The results described next relate to the combination of the factors stated above (EE and RE).
However, they will be analyzed separately for better identification indicating for each of them
potential, impacts, measurements, etc.
4.2.1. Energy efficiency
4.2.1.1 Potential. Impacts on the energy mix
A preliminary estimate of the potential energy savings as of the year 2030 has been made for
each consumption sector.
In the case of electric power, savings in Lighting are particularly considered; Food Preservation
and Ambient Conditioning, applicable to the Residential, Business and Public sectors.
In the Industrial Sector, energy saving measures will focus on steam generation systems, duct
insulation systems, general maintenance systems and valve systems. In terms of Electric
Power use, the highest savings are expected in Engines (labeling measures), since if well it is
true that potential measures may also be applied in lighting and environment conditioning, their
involvement in the electric consumption is relatively low. For each industrial branch, the URE
measurements related to technological improvements in the production processes are
considered in each industry. These brief considerations may be summarized quantitatively
expecting savings in energy consumption for the industrial sector of 22% in caloric usage;
11.6% in electric power-related usages for the year 2030. The total energy savings in the
industry for the year 2030 would be of 17%. As regards accrued energy savings, they exceed
80000 KTep for the whole period under consideration.
In the generation of heat or during its use in driving force by means of the use of fuel is where
the more possibilities of energy savings rely (boilers, stoves, heaters, Otto cycle engines and
Diesel cycle engines)
One of the sectors with the highest savings possibilities is Transportation, where the
technological changes in engines could cause a substantial decrease in fuel consumption per
ran Kilometer, thus estimating potential savings of up to 4% as regards a scenario in which only
tendency changes are involved. The insertion of Biodiesel and Bioethanol is further expected.
This measure would allow, together with other ones, that by the year 2020, approximately 94%
of the final demand for such sector shall derive from fossil resources, almost 5.2% from
bioenergy, 0.6% from Electric Power and 0.2% from Hydrogen (especially in automobiles, taxis
and hauls of less than 4 Ton.)
In the case of the Agricultural Sector, the main source of consumed energy has been Diesel.
The sector’s consumption is distributed between the Agricultural and Livestock sectors. In the
year 2004, the former represented 92% of the consumption, while 8% of the remaining
consumption derived from Livestock. It is expected that in an efficiency scenario the energy
intensity would be reduced, generating energy savings of 21% as regards the consumption of
the year 2005 for a business as usual scenario. On the other hand, the accrued savings would
reach approximately 35,000 ktep during the period under analysis (2004 – 2030).
In the non-energy sector, savings could also be expected if efficiency measures are taken in the
specific consumption during industrial processes. As a consequence, the achieved energy
savings would be of approximately 15%, while the accrued savings vis-à-vis a BaU scenario
would be of approximately 14,157 Ktep.
43
The following tables present an accurate estimate of the percentages of potential energy
savings for each sector and fuel, as well as the resulting energy saving for sector totals that
could be obtained towards the end of the projected period.
Table IV.9. Household, and Commercial and Public Sector (%)
Grid- Liquefied
% Firewood Electricity Distributed Petrol Charcoal Total
Gas Gas
Household 8.6 36.8 14.1 14.1 8.6 18.8
Commercial
and
Services 14.1 36.5 14.7 14.7 25.3
Table IV.10. Industrial, Agricultural and Petrochemical Sectors (%)
Grid- Liquefied
Fuel Non
Bagasse Electricity Distributed Petrol Gaso- Diesel Bio- Total
% Oil Energy
Gas Gas line Diesel
Industrial 22 11,6 22 22 22 16.90
Agricultural 11.6 10 23.3 21.76

23.3
Petro-chemical 15 15 15
15 15
As a result of the assumption discussed above, accrued energy savings of 253000 kTep could
be generated between the years 2005 and 2030. As regards energy savings, in absolute terms
the highest savings would derive from the Industrial Sector (achieving 32% of the savings by
the year 2030 between both scenarios), followed by the Residential Sector with 28% of the
savings, the Business and Public Sectors with 13% of the savings, and the Agricultural Sector
with 9% of the Non-Energy Consumption and 5% of the savings deriving from the
Transportation Sector.
Thus, the dependency on fossil fuels would be reduced even more and would represent 73.5%
of the final demand.
4.2.1.2 Main barriers to energy Efficiency improvement
There are a number of barriers to increased investment in energy efficiency in Argentina. Some
of these barriers are similar to those in other countries, while others are specific to the financial
situation and regulatory framework in Argentina.
Lack of regulatory incentives to promote energy efficiency. The regulatory framework for
electricity and natural gas provides inadequate incentives for utilities and many classes of
consumers to undertake energy efficiency investments, even where the marginal cost of energy
supply is significantly above the marginal cost of investing in energy efficiency. Consumers
associations still have to focus on EE as an instrument to improve consumer well being.
Lack of adequate price signals to energy consumers, especially among residential consumers.
Partly as a result of the financial crisis, energy prices for some consumers have been frozen
and not allowed to reflect increases in the costs of energy supply. Some residential tariffs
44
specifically discourage energy efficiency, for example, by effectively providing lower tariffs for
increased usage.
Inadequate information among industrial consumers about EE technologies and experiences.
Very recently, there were programs towards providing industrial consumers with information on
EE potential and specific measures. However with limited in scale as well as in scope -
geographically and sector-wise. Dissemination of best practices is not sufficiently used as a
replication tool for EE investments. At provincial level there is also insufficient knowledge and
informative actions about EE.
High transaction costs for enterprises to implement energy efficiency investments. The high
cost of the initial design and implementation of EE projects is added to the lack of access to
financing for introducing EE measures.
Perceived high risk among banks to finance energy efficiency projects. Access to financing has
been difficult due to the 2002 crisis, and energy efficiency projects are still perceived as high-
risk initiatives, while there are doubts related to their actual profitability.
Infant ESCO industry. There are only a few energy services consulting companies that yet do
not function as real ESCOs. However, with adequate support and information, these companies
are expected to pursue cost-effective energy efficiency investments.
Multiplicity of stakeholders and fragmented institutional framework. The multiplicity of
stakeholders involved or concerned with EE increases the information barrier and makes
difficult the coordination of EE actions. At government level, EE overlaps the mandates of
several entities which also makes coordination difficult and can lead to duplication of efforts in
that field.
In summary, the system confronts regulatory, legal, economics, institutional, information and
financial barriers, to mention the most relevant.
4.2.1.3 Measures to improve energy efficiency to enhance energy security
There are important references on the actions and measures that would have a positive impact
on the efficient use of energy, thus increasing energy security. All of them may be found in a
wide number of studies that have allowed for the identification of potential energy savings in
different sectors.
45
Box 1. Initiatives in energy efficiency
A large number of projects developed by the Government have generated enough information for the
design of specific measures. Among them the following may be identified:
I. URE Program: Agreement subscribed between the Secretariat of Energy and the European
Union, in the period 1992-2000.
II. Cooperation agreement subscribed between Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Industrial (INTI)
(National Institute of Industrial Technology) and the Japanese International Cooperation Agency -
JICA 1996-2000.
III. Agreement subscribed between the Secretariat of Energy and the Inter-American Development
Bank (IDB), 1998-1999.
IV. Cooperation Agreement subscribed between the Secretariat of Energy and the German Agency
for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) 1999-2005.
V. Efficient Lighting Program (PNUMA-GEF): Argentine Street Lighting Program (ASLP). 1999-2001
VI. Efficient Lighting Program (PNUMA-GEF): Efficient Lighting Initiative (ELI). 1999-2003
VII. ARGURELEC Projects (Secretariat of Energy – European Union). 1998 – 1999
VIII. The ARCO Project (Secretariat of Energy – European Union).
IX. In 2003, the Secretariat of Energy, designed the Energy Savings and Efficiency Program (PAEE),
in line with the Secretary of Energy’s policy objective of promoting energy efficiency and the use
of renewable energy sources. An ‘Energy Efficiency Bill’ was proposed and approved by the
upper chamber of Congress in October 2003. The law establishes the SE’s mandate and
responsibilities for promoting EE.
X. In 2004 the PURE (Program for the Rational Use of Energy) was launched, an incentive-based
program similar to the initiative developed by Brazil in 2001 during its energy crisis. The program
was extended in 2005 and incentives were stiffened.
XI. Since 2005, the Secretariat of Energy has been promoting the Energy Efficiency Program in
Argentina before the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The objectives are to aid i) in the
reduction of the energy infrastructure expansion investments; ii) to reduce the users’ electric
power bills; iii) to increase the competitiveness of the productive sectors; iv) to install a cultural
change in society in relation to an energy sustainable consumption. The main activities of the
Project are: (i) to promote penetration in the market of energy-efficient practices and technologies,
even through mechanisms for the financing of energy efficiency investments by energy services
enterprises (ESEs); (ii) to ease the execution of Demand Side Management (DSM) Projects by
electric power distributors: Edenor, Edesur and EPEC; and (iii) to provide technical assistance to
support the promotion and management of the Project. Preliminary estimates indicate that after
ten years of implementation (by 2015), the Project would allow a 2,400 MW reduction in the
electric energy demand; a 16.5 TWh reduction in the annual generation of electric energy; and
savings of 1.7 million tons of oil equivalent (tep) per year – as well as a reduction of about 28
million tons of CO2.
XII. At the end of 2007, the new national government has launched a series of isolated measures of
short and medium term destined to the saving electric power (with impact in the gas
consumptions and derived due to) and saving 0.4 tons of CO2 emissions. The main measures
named “Plan of rational and efficient use of the energy” (PRONUREE) are: 1. daylight saving
time; 2. massive replacement of 5 million inefficient lamps. Latter on as a second stage, the
substitution of 20 million lamps is foreseen jointly with promotional sale prices; 3. Regulation of all
air conditioners within the public sector; 4. Substitution of inefficient lights of the thoroughfare; and
5. high efficiency domestic appliances purchases financing.
Source: Own elaboration.
Besides, global measures are being taken in order to mitigate the absence of long-term policies
aimed at preventing or reducing daily power outages as a result of the system’s incapacity to
meet the electric power demand.
According to the identified potential and the references on the actions in specific sectors, there
are plenty of measures to actually transform the energy efficiency potential.
46
Even though it is not possible to fully exhaust all the possible strategies, it is necessary to
identify a number of options that have proved successful in other regions and countries and that
would be possible to apply in the Argentine case.
The identified barriers constitute the objectives to overcome and, consequently, allow for the
identification of the main measures and instruments that could be applied.
The savings potential discussed above may be reached through a number of measures. One
partial proposal of the measures that would be required could be the following:
9 A proper level of internal rates of return and prices reflecting the true energy costs for
society, especially as regards the Residential Sector consumption and the electric power
and natural gas sources. The impact on income distribution should also be considered,
designing a price and rate structure that may decrease or eliminate any negative impact on
the low income sectors.
9 The implementation of an investment fund that may generate financing resources linked to
energy efficiency options in consumption sectors, especially in the Residential, Services and
Industry sectors. The credits granted through this mechanism should only be applied to the
purchase of equipment of proved energy efficiency, both for final and intermediary use. The
strategy could be complemented with that of the Labeling which, aside from providing the
decision-maker with information, could constitute the source of the equipment that qualified
to have access to financing.
9 Labeling program and definition of the minimum standards for equipment destined to the
Residential, Services and Industrial sectors in order to provide information in the decision-
making process.
9 Encouragement of efficient energy self-production and co-generation through regulatory
mechanisms and, enabling its integration to the Public Service.
9 Distributive and financing program through efficient electric power equipment distributors:
lamps and other electro-domestic appliances.
Certain sectors, such as Transportation, of great efficiency potential would require more
complex actions that could even be combined. The growth of private transportation has become
an increasing problem without apparent limit.
It is possible to imagine that there are alternatives aimed at having a positive contribution to the
Economy of Transportation, Energy and the Environment, including:
9 Substitution of means/options aimed at enhancing the train, metro and bus public
transportation infrastructure. A higher and better offer through the availability and
combination of low cost means would contribute to the discouragement of the use of cars in
urban areas.
9 Different measures aimed at the restriction of car traffic in urban areas: day restriction,
restricted areas, tolls, etc.
9 Regulation of taxi circulation, preventing the circulation without passengers in restricted
areas.
9 Reduction of parking areas in restricted zones.
9 Fuel substitution, Diesel by NCG in buses and taxis.
9 Restrictions to the sale of diesel cars for private usage.
47
4.2.1.4 Impacts of the measures/policies on cost of energy (both in financial and non-financial
terms) at the national level
As a result of the implementation of the different efficiency measures applied to all sectors
nationwide, and with the purpose of contextualizing the savings that might be generated, the
accrued savings corresponding to Oil products are compared to the verified and potential Oil
reserves up to the year 2005 (according to the SE), and the same process was applied to
Natural Gas. As regards Electric Power, it was calculated the equivalent of the electric power
consumption savings, in terms of capacity-installation construction that might be avoided. These
estimates have been done in consideration of the exercise developed only up to 2025, as there
is more accuracy as regards the hypothesis of possible discoveries.
Table IV.11. Final demand savings between both scenarios as compared to reserves
2005 Reserves Verified or Proven Potential Proven+ 50% pot.

3
Oil 349.096 153.324 thousand m 425.758
Natural Gas 438.950 248.856 million m3 563.378
Accrued Savings Tendency vs. Structural Monetary Savings

Oil 80.511 thousand m3 U$S 30000 millions (US$ 60/barrel)
Natural Gas 62.248 million m3 U$S 11000 millions (US$ 5/ million BTU)
Savings Percentage on reserves

Verified or Proven Potential Proven+ 50% pot.
Oil 23% 53% 19%
Natural Gas 14% 25% 11%
Savings on installed electric capacity Monetary Savings

326 Twh accrued savings, U$S 2000 millions (in install capacity)
Electric
equivalent to 2,530 MW for 21 U$S 7000 millions (US$ 5/ mill BTU, 50%
Power
years of operation thermal generation with natural gas)
Source: FB estimations.
In the case of Oil, savings on oil products would be equivalent to 23% of the verified reserves,
53% of the potential reserves, or 19% of the verified reserves plus 50% of the potential
reserves. Furthermore, such accrued savings would be equivalent to almost three times the
consumption registered in oil refineries in 2004. In turn, it implies extending the
reserve/production ratio in 2 years.
As regards Natural Gas, the percentages amount to 11% of the verified reserves plus 50% of
the potential reserves. The accrued savings would imply extending the production/reserve
relation in 1.3 years.
Finally, the accrued savings in Electric Power demand would be equivalent to the generation of
a station of 2,530 MW installed capacity for 21 years, the construction of which might be
avoided if the energy savings presented in the policy scenario are verified.
One scenario in which such significant monetary amounts could be saved would allow for the
alleviation of the energy shortage risks, and it would further ease the access to higher quality
energy at a lower price, such as natural gas, thus enhancing the conditions of the poorest
48
sectors of the population. Needless to say, it would allow for the possibility to destine such
amounts to other more urgent needs of this population.
4.2.1.5 Environmental impacts of the government measures/policies at the national level
The environmental impacts of the efficient use measures would be significant and cover both
local and global aspects.
Identification of Local Environmental Impacts.
The main environmental impacts avoided at local level are verified in the supply chain of the
different sources, the consumption of which would be reduced as the result of the efficient use
measures.
That is to say: Hydrocarbons (Oil, Natural Gas), Mineral Coal, Nuclear Sector (Mining and Fuel
Cycle), Hydro Stations, conventional thermo-electric Stations and Electric Power transportation.
The potential effects referred to natural environment resources, of socioeconomic or health-

related scope include: Water, Air and Climate, Soil and Soil Use, Natural and Cultural Heritage,
Resources, Wastes, Socioeconomic, Population’s Health and Welfare, Production, Handling or
Transportation of Toxic or Hazardous Substances, Territory and Public Opinion.
Depending on the sectors or production chains, the reference to each element is either total or
partial.
49
Table IV.12. Impacts of socioeconomic or health-related
Impacts
Thermal Electric Power
Hydro Stations
Item Hydrocarbons Coal Nuclear Stations Transportation
+ use + use + less conflict + use
Water + use reduction
reduction reduction with other uses reduction
+ prevents
Air and + prevents + prevents
contaminating
Climate pollution pollution
emissions
+ prevents
+ prevents + prevents + liberates soil
Soil pollution in
pollution pollution for other uses
mining activity
+ prevents + prevents + prevents + prevents + prevents
Natural and
potential potential potential potential potential
Cultural
destruction or destruction destruction or destruction or destruction or
Heritage
damage or damage damage damage damage
+ extends
+ extends + extends
Resources uranium
availability availability
availability
+ prevents + prevents + prevents + prevents
Wastes
pollution pollution pollution pollution
-/+ reduces
Socio- - reduces activity - reduces - reduces activity level but - reduces - reduces activity
economic level activity level activity level prevents activity level level
resettlement
+ reduces health + reduces + reduces + reduces + reduces
Health
risks health risks accident risks accident risks risks
+ reduces
Dangerous + reduces + reduces + reduces + reduces
manipulatio
Substances manipulation manipulation manipulation manipulation
n
+ prevents
+ prevents + prevents + prevents + prevents
Territory environmental
pollution pollution pollution pollution
effects
+/- depends
+/- depends on
on the + fearful of this + fearful of this
Public Opinion the affected
affected technology technology
population
population
Positive effect quantification would require specific estimates that exceed the scope of this
report.
Global Impacts
The three main GEI whose emissions are directly related to the Energy Sector are: Carbon
Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O).
An alternative scenario implying efficient use measures and penetration of energy renewable
sources substituting emitting sources would have an approximate impact exceeding 470 million
Tons of CO2 eq., of which near 90% would correspond to Fuel Burning and the remaining 10%
to Fugitive Emissions. Next graph shows the comparative picture that both scenarios might
take.
50
Figure IV.3. Comparison of Emissions by Scenarios (Million Tons CO2 Equiv.)
Tendency Structural
200 200
Agropecuario Agropecuary
180 180 Savings:
Transporte Transport 20%
160 Industria Industry
160
Comercial y Publico Commercial & Public Sectors
e n M illo n e s T o n C O 2 E q u iv a le n te
140 Residencial 140 Household
120 120
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
4.2.2. Renewable Energy
4.2.2.1 Renewable energy Potential. Impacts on the energy mix. Environmental Impacts
Renewable energies are quite low, reaching only about 7% of the national primary energy
supply (3, 8% of final consumption). Within this figure, the participation of hydro energy (3,5%)
and of non-woody biomass (sugar cane products and other biomass, 3,5%) is significant; the
role of renewable firewood and charcoal is not significant (0,6%); the contribution of the new
renewable energies is almost null (wind, photovoltaic and geothermal energy).
Renewable energies present a huge theoretical potential in Argentina but, for the purposes of
this study, only the portion of such potential that may be used after considering a number of
restrictions (technology, operation cost, available area, etc), which originate the concepts of
technical and economic potential, is of practical interest here.
Supplementing the information shown in Table III.9 (3.4.3: Renewable Resources), an estimate
of the short and medium-term penetration potential of renewable energies for the generation of
Electric Power is introduced below. The following penetration potentials were identified:
51
Table IV.13. Renewable resources
Technology Penetration Potential
100MW by the year 2015, maximum 1000MW by the year

Solar thermo electrical
2025 (structural)
48MW by 2015 for residential use, maximum 1400MW by
Solar photovoltaic
2025
Wind 2100MW by 2015
Biomass 68MW by 2015
Milling plants 800MW
Hydro <30MW 430MW
Geothermal 30MW by 2010
Source: Final Report of the Technical Assistance Project for the preparation of the “Strategic Energy Plan of the
Argentine Republic” designed by IDEE/FB for the Energy Department, 2007.
In the alternative Scenario, according to the experts’ opinion concerning the use of these
technologies in the final energy consumption, the use of renewable energies is expected to go
up from 3.8% to 7.2% of the final consumption in the horizon year, mainly due to the penetration
of biofuels (biodiesel, bioethanol, biogas), which increases from 0% of the final energy
consumption in the base year to 3.7% in the horizon year, and of solar energy, going from 0%
to 0.97% in the same period.
As regards the use of renewable sources by sectors, in the base year the Rural Residential,
Livestock and Industrial sectors show higher usage, with 21.5%, 16.7%, and 9.1% of final
consumption of each sector respectively.
In the livestock sector, the use of renewable energies grows 42.7% in the horizon year thanks
to the penetration of biodiesel and, to a lesser extent, to wind pumping. Furthermore, it grows
significantly in the agricultural sector due to the penetration of biodiesel and, to a lesser extent,
to solar energy for drying purposes, reaching to 15.6% of the final consumption in the horizon
year. On the other hand, in the industrial sector, the regression of traditional biomasses reduces
the general participation level in the horizon year. The penetration in the transportation sector is
quite significant due to the introduction of biodiesel and, to a lesser extent, to the introduction of
bioethanol, reaching 9.4% in the horizon year.
The table contained in Annex II summarizes the results of the substitution measures adopted at
final consumption level in each sector.
As regards the energy offer, the use of renewable energies in the electric power generation
sectors was estimated. Such decisions or proposals were based in the goals set by the
applicable regulation (27).
Act Nº 26.190 imposes quite an important requirement as regards terms to develop renewable
energies and implies the implementation of almost all the wind projects included in the portfolio,
besides an important amount of generation produced by the sugar cane milling refineries and all
the hydro projects under 30MW, which seems hard to achieve as regards the terms and
capacities thereof, without the urgent implementation of additional measures for the promotion
of renewable energies.
(27) Hydro Power Plants over 30Mw were not considered.
52
Table IV.14.Estimated renewable energies installed capacity. Alternative scenario (MW)
Installed capacity
(MW) 2004 2008 2013 2018 2025 2030(*)
Wind 28 288 1,142 2,007 2,322 2600
Solar (*) 0 9 34 56 65 80
Mini-Hydro 372 411 703 866 1,012 1250
Geothermic 1 1 31 34 42 50
Biomass 55 42 42 62 72 80
Milling Plants 220 265 500 861 996 1000
Total 675 1,017 2,451 3,886 4,508 5060
Source: Final Report of the Technical Assistance Project for the preparation of the “Strategic Energy Plan of the
Argentine Republic” designed by IDEE/FB for the Energy Department, 2007
(*) Although there is no official report, the top value of the load curve is estimated in 6.5 MW.
4.2.2.2 Main barriers to promote renewable energy resources/Technologies
There are significant renewable energy resources in Argentina that could be used for electric
power generation. Previous surveys have performed a preliminary quantification of the
generation potential and identified the existence of the technological capacity for the execution
of projects. However, a number of different barriers conspire against the execution thereof in
the short and medium term.
The main barrier in relation to the dissemination of renewable energies for electricity generation
in Argentina seems to be the lack of incentives and an adequate framework (institutional, legal
and regulatory). In this sense, the passing of the law Nº 26190, and its regulation, has
represented a necessary - although not sufficient - step in the correct direction
R&D: Argentina registers a moderate R&D activity with respect to renewable energies, involving
technologies such as photovoltaic, wind, solar thermal, mini hydro, biomass, and hydrogen.
More R&D is needed for uses such as food refrigeration, and water pumping based on biogas,
and biomass combustion and gasification. In general terms, there is very good potential of
human resources available in the country for R&D. There is an overlapping of efforts in certain
areas and lack of coordination, resulting in deficient organization and information availability on
the part of renewable energies stakeholders. Many public institutions still present huge legal
and bureaucratic obstacles for transferring technological developments with commercial aims,
which make it even more difficult to associate with private stakeholders and to develop patents.
Manufacturers and industrial capacity: Within the industrial area, there is good potential
capacity to fine tune and manufacture most of the renewable energy technologies that have
reached the commercial stage within the industrialized world. As regards less complex
technologies with an associated market niche, this capacity is shown or has been shown in the
past through the existence of small companies that manufacture equipments in the fields of
hydro energy, small wind chargers, wind pumping, solar water heaters, biodiesel, geothermal
energy, ethanol, gasifiers, biomass boilers, and different photovoltaic system components.
However, the quality of these equipments is highly variable, and it would be necessary for the
manufacturers to be aware of and apply adequate quality standards. Some of the simpler
technologies could be very easily developed at industrial level, as there is more than sufficient
capacity for it, although the lack of an attractive market explains the nearly zero level of
application and installed capacity in these areas, even when there is abundant R&D.
53
O&M infrastructure: Renewable energies projects characterized by low population densities
and the intervention of multiple stakeholders which need to be coordinated, some of which are
not physically present in the area where the project is implemented, will require the existence of
an adequate network for O&M, for developing capacity of users and to provide financial
support,. Some infrastructure already exists in the rural areas and should be used, supported
and expanded in order to overcome this barrier. The O&M structure in general shows
substantial deficiencies with respect to geographic coverage throughout the country and the
time periods involved in the repair of equipments. This calls for more efforts so that those
designing a project may plan this aspect in depth, and so that equipment manufacturers and
dealers expand their O&M networks and the scope of their guarantees to reduce the rejection of
the technology due to lack of or inadequate maintenance. Technicians should be aware of the
quality standards and regulations to comply with during the installation and maintenance of the
equipments.
Policy and Institutional issues: It is necessary to strengthen the areas related to energy
planning and the use of the resources, the coherent design of energy and development policies,
and the establishment of adequate regulatory, legal, and incentive frameworks for renewable
energies. There is insufficient capacity to gather, organize, and promote information.
Finally, there are legal voids, lack of regulatory coherence and deficiencies in the
implementation of incentives in general. The few existing legal mechanisms towards the
promotion of certain renewable energies are still hard to implement, and in some cases
somewhat deficient as to their scope, or even not viable on account of the lack of adaptation to
the nation’s socioeconomic reality and the weakness of the organizations in charge of their
application.
Financial: Renewable energy faces higher transaction costs than conventional projects,
requiring specific financing schemes, particularly in the case of poor population sectors where
payment capacity is very low. There are no specific credit schemes to finance this type of
projects, and many projects involving renewable energies in Argentina have been partially
financed with provincial funds, electricity development funds, and funds from the Ministry of
Education with the support of international bodies.
Consumers: Training is essential, as it is linked to the adequate operation of the systems and
their higher acceptance; both are critical aspects to ensure sustainability. In particular, in low
power projects, the consumer must be aware of limitations and implications regarding adequate
management of the energy demand. Cultural aspects are also significant, when introducing a
new technology its degree of compatibility and potential acceptance must be estimated.
Private Stakeholders in Argentina: The private investment sector demands a coordinated

national policy that articulates stakeholders and activities at national and provincial levels. They
claim stronger incentives than those included in renewable energies promotion laws, which in
practice have proven insufficient to initiate a process of massive dissemination.
Energy Resources: The information available on resources sometimes lacks spatial detail and
stems from extrapolation of a few scattered measurements. Furthermore, long temporal series
of data are sometimes lacking, except for specific locations associated with weather data
stations.
Technical and infrastructure: Large renewable energies resources are located in areas with
low population density and which lack adequate energy transmission infrastructure, a further
barrier for tapping these resources in large scale, as occurs in Patagonia with the wind
resource. Thus, the development of power transmission infrastructure is a prerequisite.
54
4.2.2.3 Measures to promote renewable energy resources/Technologies to enhance energy
security
The actions carried out by consecutive governments towards the study and implementation of
renewable energies projects were of a different nature, effectiveness, and duration. An
historical survey of these actions indicates that they were initiated several decades ago as an
energy self-supply and diversification strategy. In this frame a considerable number of RES/T
projects have been implemented, but its impact has been low in the national primary energy
supply.
Among the measures/actions/efforts aimed at promoting Renewable Energies, the following

may be highlighted: the diversity of enacted legal regulations; the large number of entities that
either directly or indirectly discusses the issue; and the programs and/or projects that have
been initiated, especially from the governmental area. It should be noted that some of them
have finally been transformed, as shown in true barriers to the RES/T promotion.
As regards the standards currently in effect at the national level related to the New and
Renewable Energy Sources (RES/T), they include the following: Act Nº 25019/1998, “National
Regulations for Wind and Solar Energy”, Decree 1396/2001, “Competitiveness Plan for
Biodiesel Fuel”, and Resolution Nº 129/2001 of the Secretariat of Energy and Mining, “Biodiesel
Definition and Specifications”. There are no other regulations in support of the rest of the
renewable energies.
In some provinces, laws for the promotion and/or support of the RES/T were enacted, among
which the legal framework of the Province of Chubut should be highlighted, by means of which
wind energy generation is compensated, requiring an increasing percentage for the integration
of local manufacturing components to receive such bonus. In the province of Buenos Aires, the
development of renewable energies is supported by means of an incentive to generation and it
the exemption, for the term of 10 years, from the payment of the property tax. It further binds
electric energy distributors to the purchase of the electric energy injected to the market at
market prices.
As regards the institutional framework, there are many public entities on which plans and
activities related to Renewable Energies depend, even though they do not always act in
coordination with each other.
Thus, the entities, plans and programs with activities related to Renewable energies include:
9 Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services of the Nation: “National
Strategic Plan for Wind Energy”
9 Secretariat of Energy: “Renewable Energies Project in Rural Markets” - PERMER.
9 Secretariat of Mining: Geothermal Energy Program.
9 Secretariat of Agriculture: Biofuel Program.
9 Secretariat of the Environment: Sustainable Energy Development Unit.
9 Secretariat of Science and Technology: Special Program for Renewable and Non-
Renewable Resources.
In numerous National Universities there are groups that are specifically devoted to the issue of
Renewable Energies with a significant dedication to the development of human resources.
55
Experiences and current usage status
Among the main experiences in the use of renewable energies in electric power generation
promoted by the Government, by local authorities and private entities, it should be highlighted
that the Argentine Electricity Market has more than 2800 agents, which generated 96646 GWh
in 2005. The amount of electricity supplied by renewable sources was less than 1600 GWh in
the same period.
Solar Photovoltaic: The PERMER is a Project destined to finance the purchase and
installation of systems to supply electric power to users who, due to their location, lack such
service and do not have access to it in the short or medium term. The photovoltaic installations
performed within the framework of this project and in and in the process of tender or actually
awarded total approximately 1MWp (residential and public services). At present, in 15 of the 24
Argentine provinces the PERMER program shows different levels of progress, Jujuy being the
province with the highest degree of progress.
Other photovoltaic energy installations: Among the projects outside the scope of the
PERMER that contribute to this installed capacity there are: the electrification of the rural
schools in the Province of Buenos Aires; the provision of the residential Electric Energy and for
public services in the province of Neuquén and water pumping in Catamarca.
High capacity wind energy: At the end of the 1990s, some electric power cooperatives and
private investors installed small wind farms and generators, mainly in the South of Buenos Aires
and Chubut provinces. As a result of this favorable context, plans for the installation of up to
3000 MW of wind power in Buenos Aires and Patagonia were mentioned. Investments were
made for capacity building, resource measurement and buying wind converters. But due to
economic crises the context suddenly changed. Currently there are approximately 29MW of
high wind capacity installed in Argentina (0.11% of the total installed capacity in 2005) and a
portfolio of projects that add up to approximately 2,000MW, some of which form part of the
National Wind Plan.
Low wind capacity: According to the National Agricultural Census of 2002, during that year
there were 112 wind turbine generators installed in agricultural facilities (EAP) for the production
of electric power, assuming an average value of 500MW per equipment, an installed capacity of
581kW and 184,7 kW installed in rural schools and in distributed population may be obtained.
Biomass: A significant use of biomass nowadays is the use of sugar cane bagasse as fuel for
boilers in sugar mills. There are certain isolated cases of electric power generation with
biomass residues (bagasse, tung husk, sawmill residues) and firewood (6 projects).
High Enthalpy Geothermal: For the use of high enthalpy geothermal energy, the only
demonstrative project developed in the country is the 0.67 MW binary-cycle Pilot Electric Power
Station installed in 1988 in the geothermal field of Copahue, Neuquén, which has been
inoperative for several years now.
Small Hydro Projects: The following table shows a summary of the existing hydro stations
under 30 MW (Source: SE, National Prospective Direction).
56
Table IV.15. Install hydro stations
Capacity Energy Operating Average Load

(MW) (GWh) Hours Factor
Existing installations 347
Operating installations 372 1,152 3,470 0.40
Source: Authors’ elaboration.
This mini-hydro capacity represents near 1.3% of the total capacity installed in Argentina in the
year 2005, and 3.7% of the total hydroelectric capacity. In terms of energy, it represents 1.2%
and 3.4% of the total energy produced in Argentina and hydroelectric energy respectively.
Hydrogen: There are no operating programs for the use of hydrogen, except for the small
experimental Pico Truncado station of water electrolysis from wind-generated electricity. There
is numerous research teams involved in the subject, particularly for the use of fuel cells.
4.2.2.4 Impacts of the measures/policies on the mix and on the environmental at country level
Due to the wide variety of applications and the small relative weight, in many cases, there is no
energy “accountancy” and, therefore, it is impossible to quantify the avoided emissions by
comparison with other conventional supply sources. For such reason, all estimations have been
based, in some cases, on simple hypotheses.
Only in the case of wind generation connected to networks, and of some small hydro projects,
are there accurate data about the total generated energy where it is possible to calculate the
avoided emissions.
This is not the same for solar installations, where it is necessary to make some generation
hypotheses.
Photovoltaic solar energy: The total installed capacity is approximately of 6.5 MWp; if we
assume that, at national level, there is an average of 5 hours-day of peak solar radiation (1000
W/m2) the total annual energy amounts to 11,860 MWh/year. The emissions avoided per year,
assuming diesel substitution, would be 10,674 t of CO2 equiv.
Wind energy for electric power supply: The estimation of the emissions avoided by the
generation of electric power through wind turbine generators has been of 90,000 Ton/CO2 per
year.
Small hydro projects: The total installed capacity now operative is 372 MW. Considering a
typical use factor value of 0.25, the annual energy generation would be equivalent to 821 GWh,
and the avoided emissions would amount to 739.000 t CO2 equiv.
Geothermal energy: The total installed capacity is approximately of 150 MWt, 83.6 MWt of
which are intended for balneology. Taking only the capacity intended for direct thermal uses,
which totals 66.4 MWt, and adopting a 0.4 use factor, it is possible to estimate the avoided GEI
emissions assuming that, for example, all the heat is produced by substituting liquid fuel (gas-oil
or fuel-oil) used with a 60% efficiency, that is to say, with a CO2 equivalent emission factor of
0.45 t CO2/MWh. Then, the avoided emissions would amount to 107,000 t CO2 equiv/year.
57
Costs
The following table shows unitary investment prices enabling to dimension the measure
implementation costs. In turn, these costs are offset by fuel savings and investments in
substituted conventional energies.
Table IV.16. Implementation costs of renewable technologies
Technology Cost
Big-scale wind turbine generator 1000 USD/Kw.
Small-scale wind turbine generator 3000-6000 USD/Kw.
Wind mill 500 USD/Kw.
Small hydro stations 600-3000 USD/Kw. (w/civil works)
Solar Photovoltaic 4000-10000 USD/Kw.
Solar oven 200-2000 USD/unit (ch/gr)
Solar collector 200-600 USD/unit (ch/gr)
Turbo steam with biomass 1500-2500 USD/Kw.
Biodigestor 1000 USD/m3
Biodiesel 450-500 USD/Tn
Electric Power Generation with Geothermic 600/1500 USD/Kw.
Source: Torcuato Di Tella Foundation and Institute. National Communication: National Adaptation Program and
Regional Adaptation Plans. November 2006. Chapter: Energy Sector vulnerability and adaptation.
4.2.3. Other Measures and their impacts
The actions related to efficient use and penetration of renewable energies may be
complemented by other possible measures.
In the case of the involved study, there are specific options that, while may not be quantified
and assessed in the framework of this study, could be listed as options to be analyzed in more
thorough studies.
Strengthening oil and gas exploration and extraction
Argentina has many geological beds to be studied yet and, up to date, only the known beds
have been analyzed without evaluating the possibility of investing in the exploration and
development of new ones. An international call to attract investments in this activity may help
improve the reserve/production relation and reduce vulnerability in face of the potential
depletion of domestic resources and the growing international prices. In addition, high oil prices
give the opportunity to make new efforts to discover resources, also offshore.
Increasing refining capacity
As Argentina is having problems in the supply of oil products, especially Diesel, to improve
security of supply means to increase the capacity of refineries to meet the demand for lighter
products such as transportation fuels.
Strengthening regional energy integration
South America has an important energy integration history, especially in the Southern Cone.
The strengthening of the gas and electric interconnections will make mutual securities grow.
58
Umbrella bilateral and multilateral agreements, together with specific long-term contracts, would
give security to a region that, in fact, not only has plenty of energy resources but also presents
an outstanding level of complementation among them.
Diversification of the energy matrix
It is necessary to recover policies to foster the development of the most abundant sources and
substitute the use of the least abundant ones. In such sense, the development of a more
diversified primary energy matrix, giving a major role to hydro and nuclear energy, mineral coal
and renewable energies, would generate benefits both for the energy sector and the economy
as a whole, enabling to develop new activities related to such sources and causing important
effects on the rest of the economy.
Electricity Generation Portfolio
As a complement to the previous measure, the diversification of the electricity generation

matrix, the reduction of pressure on non-renewable resources, specifically natural gas and oil
products, could be achieved through long-term agreements guaranteeing prices and quantities
to those who undertake investment projects related to sources alternative to those mentioned
above.
Finally, the resources generated as the consequence of the Crude and Oil products export
taxes (withholdings or retentions) may constitute a fund to finance projects which, through
different measures, will tend to increase supply security.
59
V. Threats to Energy Security. Measures to enhance energy security and their
impacts at the Household Level
Following the same pattern that the previous section (National Level), we introduce first some
key figures describing the situation of the Household Sector, in order to identify latter main
threats regarding Energy Security. Unfortunately, at the Household Sector the intended analysis
is more difficult, as the lack of information is larger. Moreover, available data in many cases
allowed presenting only a brief picture of the sector’s situation, without the dynamic view that
data for – at least – a couple of years would provide. Next, the main threats linked with the
particular situation of both rural and urban Households - as well as high and low incomes - are
presented.
i) Shares of Commercial Energy Consumption
Country wide
From available sources, a general picture of energy consumption by sources in rural versus
urban sector, was found only for year 2004. Nevertheless it is clear that this dilemma is not an
issue in Argentina as total country. Table below reflects that urban sector only consumes a
2.4% of traditional energy (28). The rural electrified sector consumes 9.0% of traditional energy,
while non electrified rural sector consumes 26% of wood, as energy source. Nevertheless this
last group accounts only for a 2.4% of total homes in Argentina.
Table V.1. Net or Final Energy Consumption by Sources Argentine Household Sector. Year 2004 (kToe)
RURAL
Energy Sources URBAN TOTAL
Electrified Non-electrified
Number of households:
9456.9 % 699.5 % 248.3 % 10404.8 %
(in thousands)
Wood 14.8 0.2% 42.3 7.2% 45.9 26.0% 103.1 1.0%
Charcoal 204.3 2.2% 13.6 2.3% 0.0 0.0% 217.9 2.2%
Kerosene 67.3 0.7% 63.7 10.8% 3.8 2.1% 134.8 1.4%
Wind Energy 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 63.0 35.6% 63.0 0.6%
LPG 890.3 9.8% 363.9 61.6% 64.1 36.3% 1318.3 13.3%
Natural Gas 6110.3 67.0% 8.0 1.4% 0.0 0.0% 6118.3 61.9%
Electricity 1835.8 20.1% 99.0 16.8% 0.0 0.0% 1934.8 19.6%
Total 9122.8 100% 590.5 100% 176.8 100% 9890.1 100%
A more detailed picture of energy uses or services is also available, only for year 2004. It is
remarked the core relevance of Cooking, among Rural non electrified energy use.
(28) Nevertheless, charcoal is difficult to include or should be only partially included, due to the importance of asado
the traditional way of meat cooking in Argentina.
60
Table V.2. Energy Consumption structure and intensities by uses Year 2004 - Argentine Household
Sector
NET ENERGY USEFUL ENERGY

RURAL RURAL
Uses
URBAN Non- URBAN Non-
Electrified Electrified
electrified electrified
1. Lighting 6.0% 9.3% 7.5% 0.8% 1.0% 0.8%
2. Cooking 24.1% 39.9% 40.7% 21.3% 39.8% 59.5%
3. Water heating 29.4% 21.6% 6.1% 28.9% 23.8% 9.9%
4. Heating 26.9% 12.6% 2.5% 26.5% 11.2% 1.3%
5. Cooling &Ventilation 1.2% 1.3% 0.0% 1.9% 2.5% 0.0%
6. Food conservation 7.9% 9.3% 7.0% 12.6% 9.2% 2.8%
7 Water pumping 0.1% 0.8% 35.6% 0.2% 1.0% 24.7%
8. Engines 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%
9. Other uses 4.4% 5.0% 0.5% 7.7% 10.9% 0.9%
TOTAL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
koe/household 964.7 844.2 711.9 486.3 343.9 143.6
Using available information of INDEC’s permanent household survey on 10 urban centers –

including the three biggest ones – figures are presented regarding the fuels employed for
caloric or thermal purposes (cooking, home and water heating) by income strata.
and 2006 (in %) Urban areas of Argentina
Kerosen/
Income Natural Gas LPG Firewood/ Other
Quintile Charcoal
and Year
2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006
Quintile 1 57.0% 58.5% 39.4% 38.4% 1.9% 1.4% 1.7% 1.8%
Quintile 2 57.7% 58.5% 39.2% 39.9% 1.3% 0.7% 1.8% 1.0%
Quintile 3 65.9% 65.3% 32.8% 34.0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.9% 0.5%
Quintile 4 73.7% 76.9% 25.6% 22.9% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1%
Quintile 5 89.0% 89.3% 10.7% 10.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
Source: Elaborated from INDEC permanent households’ survey.
For comparison purpose the urban area of Formosa – almost without Natural Gas availability -
is presented below. Thus, it is possible to distinguish the situation of households in those urban
areas endowed with Natural Gas network, from the unfavorable situation of those Provinces not
reached by the Natural Gas network (29).
(29) The detail by representative provinces is presented in next section.
61
and 2006 (in %) Urban areas Formosa
Kerosen/
Income Natural Gas LPG Firewood/ Other
Quintile Charcoal
and Year
2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006
Quintile 1 0.0% 0.4% 74.4% 86.5% 25.6% 12.7% 0.0% 0.5%
Quintile 2 0.0% 0.9% 89.6% 94.8% 10.4% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0%
Quintile 3 1.7% 1.6% 91.7% 95.8% 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Quintile 4 1.5% 0.0% 96.2% 98.2% 2.3% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0%
Quintile 5 0.0% 0.3% 100.0% 99.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
It is very clear the progressive substitution of GLP, Firewood, Charcoal and Kerosene (30) by
Natural Gas as income grows, as well as the substitution of Firewood, Charcoal and Kerosene
by GLP in absence of the NG option.
Tables above reflect not only the better energy availability in terms of modern fuel, as income
grows (from quintile number 1 to 5), but also the evolution from year 2003 to year 2006.
Unfortunately data of absolute consumptions were not survey nor estimated, as well as the
Merlo Case Study (described below) only the employment or existence of specific energy
source was surveyed, but not the quantity consumed.
As available information allows, some additional detail is presented from specific studies,
related with energy use in poor households.
Specific Local Studies
The prepayment meters pilot project in Merlo, EDENOR utility concession area was
implemented during years 2002-2003 for addressing the needs of 4,300 households, many of
whom could be defined as ‘newly poor’. The relevant feature is the lack of natural gas
connection in an urban area. (102 interviews, June 2004, Annecke et al, 2004). Energy
consumption for Cooking and Heating is shown in Table below (31).
(30) In Argentina Kerosene can be considered as a relatively poor energy source, although it is not as dirty as
firewood or charcoal, heating appliances are closer to biomass’ appliances than to LPG’s.
(31) If the situation before the prepayment meter is considered, LPG was the most important fuel for cooking, while
electricity was the most used source for water- and space-heating. This holds even if all biomass sources are
consolidated (23 % for electricity versus 7%+14%=21 % for wood plus charcoal). Following the installation of the
prepayment devices, the satisfaction of space-heating needs actually got slightly worse – increase from 31% to 34%
of unattended energy use. Also, considering that these households use relative more expensive water-heating
options (electricity and LPG), there is an access issue with respect to the lower-cost option: natural gas.
62
Table V.5. Structure of Fuels for Cooking and Heating Merlo Case Study - Share of Total Homes -
February 2004
Space heating
Water
Sources / Uses Cooking Before After
heating
prepayment meter
Wood 2% 3% 7% 14%
Charcoal - - 14% 17%
Kerosene 1% 1% 10% 11%
Electricity - 49% 23% 15%
LPG 97% 45% 14% 10%
Un-addressed use - 2% 31% 34%
100% 100% 100% 100%
Source: Annecke et al, 2004.
In the next table another study findings - dealing with poor households - are presented. As
energy units of consumption were survey (which was not done in the Merlo study), it is possible
to estimate the share of traditional energy, even by energy service, adding Charcoal and
Biomass Residues. Thus, these urban poor households use 16.5% of traditional energy.
Table V.6. Net or Final Energy consumption by fuel sources and uses [koe/household] Low Income
Urban Families without distributed Natural Gas (FB, 2008). November 2007
Natural Biomass
USES / FUELS LPG Kerosene Charcoal Electricity TOTAL
Gas Residues
Lighting 18.5 18.5 4.5%
Cooking 136.1 4.3 2.3 31.1 1.3 0.5 175.7 42.8%
Water Heating 27.4 8.2 4.7 8.4 26.4 75.2 18.3%
House Heating 4.1 2.3 2.6 26.9 0.1 15.7 51.8 12.6%
Food Conservation 64.2 64.2 15.7%
House Cooling 2.5 2.5 0.6%
Other appliances 22.5 22.5 5.5%
167.7 14.8 9.6 66.5 1.4 150.3 410.3 100.0%
TOTAL
40.9% 3.6% 2.3% 16.2% 0.3% 36.6% 100.0%
Source: Self elaboration.
63
ii) Household Energy Expenditure
Country wide
Table V.7. Average energy expenditure in year 2004 (USD of 2004 1usd=3 Argentine $). Shares of
household expenditure and income. Total Country
d01 d02 d03 d04 d05 d06 d07 d08 d09 d10
Monthly energy
expenditure in US$- 19.01 28.59 31.94 36.22 40.25 47.25 52.84 58.83 62.29 76.14
estimated
% of average
14.5 12.8 11.7 11.6 10.6 10.1 9.0 8.1 6.9 4.9
monthly Expenditure
% of average
18.3 13.6 11.4 10.7 9.4 8.5 7.5 6.6 5.3 3.1
monthly Income
Source: FB estimates based on INDEC data.

Note: lower income strata are spending more money on energy than their salaries allow them to (social plans, debts,
others) that is why the fraction or percentage related to EXPENDITURE is lower than the one based on INCOME.
Considering 1 US$ = 3 Argentine pesos of 2004.
Figure above shows an estimate of household energy expenditure including all significant
sources: natural gas, LPG, kerosene and electricity consumed within the home (transport
energy is excluded). Monthly energy consumption is presented by income decile (d01 or the
first decile comprises the poorest 10 % of households, while d10 or the tenth decile shows the
energy consumption of the richest 10 %). As expected, poorer households spend a greater part
of their income on energy.
Specific Local Studies
Some additional information was found comparing the cost of energy sources for a Patagonian
city (Bariloche), although these figures do not reflect exactly the national picture – e.g. electricity
is much cheaper in Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area – relative costs can be considered a good
estimation. It must be remarked that this city has bigger needs of caloric or thermal energy
services (house and water heating) than the country average, as it is located near the Andes
Mountains in the south-west.
64
Table V.8. Energy prices and consumer energy-purchasing power for different household fuels Year
2005, Patagonian City of Bariloche
Energy obtained with

Energy per unit a medium salary
Common Energy prices
Resource (lower heat value) (official national
Trade unit US$/Unit
(MJ) [a] average) (GJ/salary)
[b]
Subsidized natural gas m3 35.4 1.1 213
Unsubsidized natural gas m3 35.4 2.3 102
Subsidized LPG Kg 46.1 11.4 21
Unsubsidized LPG Kg 46.1 16.0 15
Electricity kWh 3.6 1.6 144
Firewood Kg 15 4.4 54
Kerosene Liter 35.2 14.12 17
Diesel Liter 36.6 13.3 18
Trade unit means the common unit for trade for residential consumers.
a) The energy per unit corresponds to the low heat value for every fuel, since the combustion produces water in
vapour form (see IEA, 2005). Prices include all taxes and fixed charges paid even with minimal consumption.
b) The energy per salary is calculated with a medium salary. The medium salary was obtained from the government’s
official statistics centre INDEC. The medium monthly salary for the first part of 2005 in Bariloche was taken to be
equal to the medium salary in the whole country, namely $ 720 per month (USD 240) (INDEC, 2005). This value
applies to the registered workers, and is somewhat higher than that considering also unregistered salaries.
(32)
Source: Gonzalez et.al, 2007
Additionally tables from mentioned Merlo prepayment project addresses the needs of 4,300
people; could be defined as ‘newly poor’. This population does not have access to distributed
gas. Next table shows a picture of the expenditure in fuels; higher relevance for LPG is found,
while standard deviation of surveyed data is not too large.
Table V.9. Average expenditure in Argentine pesos per month on all fuels. Merlo Case Study
Kerosene Gas Coal Wood Candles Batteries Electricity All fuels

Mean 3 29 2 0 1 1 23 57
Standard
14 15 8 3 3 3 11 26
deviation
Source: Annecke, Wendy, 2004
A detailed picture (see Table below), using average tariff for electricity – without considering
whether it is paid or not – and natural gas, and real field study prices for other fuels bought by
these particular households (33), contains a warning about the share of income necessary to buy
existing levels of energy at current prices. The poor profile of surveyed families is illustrated by
the 54 % of total energy expenditure spent on cooking.
(32) Residential energy use in one-family households with natural gas provision in a city of the Patagonian Andean
region Gonzalez A.D. et.al., Energy Policy 35 (2007) 2141–2150.
(33) UPEA Theme case study: poor neighborhoods of Villa Fiorito and Budge, southern Greatest Buenos Aires.
65
Table V.10. Estimation of annual expenditure on energy: Villa Fiorito and Budge case-study. November
2007 total survey (in AR$)
USES \ SOURCES LPG NG KE CH BR EE TOTAL

Lighting 20.3 20.3 2.8%
Cooking 310.8 1.3 5.3 71.9 0.53.0 392.8 53.8%
Water Heating 62.6 2.5 10.8 19.428.9 124.2 17.0%
Space Heating 9.4 0.7 5.9 62.1
0.3 17.2 95.7 13.1%
Food Conservation 70.3 70.3 9.6%
Ventilation 2.7 2.7 0.4%
Other Devices 24.6 24.6 3.4%
382.8 4.5 22.0 153.4 3.3 164.6 730.5 100%
TOTAL
52.4% 0.6% 3.0% 21.0% 0.4% 22.5% 100%
Source: Authors’ estimates from http://www.montamat.com.ar/ and field study prices, December 2007
Notes: Lower heating value of fuels was used for comparisons. For biomass residues the same price per energy unit
as charcoal was used, for simplicity. Relative prices in terms of AR$ per
GJ are: LPG 54.45 (AR$ 25 per 10 kg cylinder); NG 7.40 (0.27 per m3); EE 29.08 (104.7 per MWh); CH and BR
55.17 (6 per bag of 4 kg); and KE 54.45 (1.9 per l).
Argentine $730 - total energy expenditure - represented, in December 2007:
9 14 % of the cost of the indigence-level basic basket of food (AR$ 442) mentioned
earlier;
9 6 % of the officially defined poverty income (AR$ 955);
9 41 % of the most important (in terms of number of beneficiaries) social welfare plan
for households in Argentina (AR$ 150), or finally
9 27 % of the unemployment subsidy (AR$ 225).
iii) Access to Modern Fuels
Electricity
1990 2000 2007

% of homes 89.9 % 94.0 % 95 / 97.6 % (34)
According to the 2001 National Population Census, 95% of the dwellings were electrified. Out of
the total of non-electrified ones, 60.2% are rural; of these, the largest percentage corresponds
to disperse rural population (56.6% of the total of non-electrified dwellings).
However, the percentages of electrified dwellings vary greatly from region to region. The lowest
percentages are recorded in north-eastern provinces - Formosa, Chaco, Corrientes and
Misiones - and north-western provinces -Santiago del Estero, Salta.
Gas
It is possible to get an accurate idea of access to Natural Gas and LPG, by the section 1.1
Shares of Commercial Energy Consumption/ Country wide above.
(34) Some sources shows this very high level of electrified houses by 2007, other sources (OLADE, official Energy
Secretary) express a 95% reached in 2001 without further increase.
66
5.1. Threats to energy security
The main threats linked with the particular situation of both rural and urban Households - as well
as high and low incomes - are presented below. After that, some tables are exposed
summarizing the threats/problem/vulnerability related with Oil and Natural Gas dependence,
and Electricity supply restrictions, that have an impact on the household sector. The threats on
the Household level triggered by institutional, regulatory and macroeconomic situation are not
repeated – at least not as extensively - as previous chapter already indicated household sector
impact as well. Nevertheless the linkages between current policy and households threats are
summarized on mentioned tables.
5.1.1. Specific threats
While analyzing the threats to energy security within the Household sector, it is important to
distinguish grid or network provided sources (natural gas and electricity) from the other energy
sources (mainly LPG and charcoal, complemented by wind, firewood and kerosene in rural
areas).
Thus, on one hand the grids do not reach all the country population – already mentioned feature
of regional inequality – and on the other hand the extension of the service remains a pending
task of the utilities – lack of investments showing the need of regulation improvements. As grid
extension and related infrastructure investments have long pay back periods.
Argentina has an unambiguous urban profile of its population, which is expected to get even
deeper.
Table V.11. Households’ structure and foreseen evolution
in million Households 2004 2010 2015 2020 2025

Total Homes 10,405 11,147 11,691 12,264 12.859
% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Urban Homes 9,457 10,167 10,694 11,251 11.830
% 90,9% 91,2% 91,5% 91,7% 92.0%
Rural with Electricity 0,700 0,797 0,873 0,950 1.029
% 6,7% 7,1% 7,5% 7,7% 8.0%
Rural Without Electricity 0,248 0,183 0,124 0,063
% 2,4% 1,6% 1,1% 0,5%
Source: Own elaboration, form INDEC data.
This urban profile encompasses additional pressure on grid provided services. Furthermore as
both average consumption and electrification level grow - pushing the capacity to the limit of
technical failure (with increased service interruptions) the household provision becomes more
vulnerable (35).
In addition it must be expressed that some of the provinces outside Buenos Aires urban area
made tariff actualization – including a social tariff scheme or at least some considerations -
leaving its users in a different situation regarding the Buenos Aires metropolitan area - regional
(35) For this report purposes 100% of urban population is consider electrified (99.6% of 10 surveyed urban areas had
electricity by year 2001), see footnote # 15 and linked paragraphs for further detail.
67
inequality issue. As reflected in next graphs a need of fixing the regressive nature of the tariff
structure in most of the jurisdictions is also identified.
Figure V.1.Household tariff by bi-month consumption ($ per KWh)
0.6
Jan 2001
Basic Jan 2007

0.5 Consumptions
0.4
$ per KWh
0.3
Implicit Inequity in the Higher income
tariff design consumptions
0.2
0.1
0
70
100
130
160
190
220
250
280
310
340
370
400
430
460
490
520
550
580
10
40
Source: Own estimates using data from current GBA tariff.
Figure V.2.Household electricity tariff by consumption. (Percentage of monthly expenditure)
4 .00
3 .50
3 .00
1997 data
2.50
Poore r
1997 % E lect. expenditure
2 .00 Strata
2004 estim ated 2004 % E lect expenditure
1.50
1.00
0.50
R icher
Strat a
0.00
d01 d0 2 d03 d04 d05 d06 d07 d08 d09 d10
Source: Own estimates using data from INDEC.
68
As mentioned, after the 2002 crisis, gas and electricity household tariffs were not adjusted.
Industrial users’ tariffs, on the other hand, were increased according to the impact of
devaluation and their status in the market. However, the household tariff structure is still
absolutely regressive and does not foster the rational use of energy (Figure V.1.). Although the
relative incidence of the electricity bill was reduced, its impact on the energy basket is much
higher for poor users with regular incomes than for the rest of the social strata (Figure V.2).
Anyway the worsened service provision is not reflected, neither the worsened situation
regarding monetary income by lower strata households.
Additionally, addressing the most poor-related energy source, it is estimated that by the end of
year 2004 LPG represented between 50% and 60% of the total basic services expenditure by
low income household (36). These results ask for urgent attention as the total figure of LPG sold
in the market, reflects the existence of unmet basic energy needs.
The following figure shows the impact of devaluation and crisis in the year 2002 on
consumption due to the significant increase in LPG price, explained because the market of the
energy source lacks price regulation and it is strongly concentrated (37). The figure compares the
performance of residential sales - that do not grow as demand does - against the explosive
increase in exports. Obvious commercial reasons lie behind this differential conduct. Despite
the many factors behind the lack of smooth behavior in both lines, the relation between
increased production and external market is unambiguous, while unsatisfied domestic market is
not addressed.
It is also possible to identify that even after the mentioned households’ gas and electricity “price
frozen” the negative impact is higher for low income homes compared to richer ones. Currently
a cross subsidy between productive users and households is prevailing, as the former pay
higher actualized tariff. But a deeper analysis must review these rents transfers towards non
poor households, to avoid affecting the energy sustainability and thus, energy security.
Since it is assumed that almost all homes consuming LPG at present are rural families or poor
homes (about 4.5 to 5 million households in the whole country), analysis should focus in to what
extent policies for this fuel help mitigate the energy insecurity of the poorest.
(36) De Dicco, R., December 2004, http://www.lafogata.org/04arg/arg12/ar_notas.html.

(37) If the structure of Argentine LPG market is assessed - following National Energy Secretary data – a high degree
of concentration is found in the upstream stage: only six firms represent the 85% of the production (Repsol YPF Gas
- 35% - up to 55% once its controlled firm Pluspetrol is included - Total Gaz - 21%; and Shell Gas - 8%, among
them). Regarding the downstream, even though the gas spliters/ separators and distributors are integrated for 49
and 280 entities, respectively, both Repsol YPF (Spain) and Petrobras (Brazil) operate indirectly in most of the firms
within both stages. Furthermore there is no official signal toward a harder regulation of this market, for example fixing
final prices. That is why this situation is considered structural and requires not only a rigid commitment by the
governmental authorities, but also a proper implementation tool in order to allow a fairer price to the poor
households. Following some experts analysis, the production cost of the LPG lies around 2 $ for a 10 kg cylinder,
while the social price proposed is 16$. Thus the earnings of the mentioned operators reached more than U$S 5.300
millions in the period 1997- 2004 (De Dicco, R. 2004).
69
Figure V.3.Evolution of LPG consumption in the residential sector. Compared with exportations 1985-
2005.
4000
3500 Production
Exportations
Residencial Consumption
3000
thousands of TOEs
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1985 1986 1987 1988 19891990 19911992 1993199419951996 1997 19981999 2000 20012002 2003 2004
Source: Estimate on the basis of Energy Balances by the Secretary of Energy.
The figure below shows an estimate based on an update of the energy consumption (38) basket
by decile of population income, in terms of current prices in the local currency, and its relation to
the average expenditure and income of the households (see average income level on table
below). It should be stated, however, that these estimates refer to average households by
decile and may not reflect the real situation of most poor population. Anyway, it is revealing to
notice the negative saving of the groups in the first two deciles concerning expenditure by
household, and also the high share of energy expenditure in their average income.
Other sources of information do not show such a big share of energy expenditure, probably due
to the underestimation of GLP and Kerosene, but the regressive feature of energy prices
(weighed by its quantities) is also present.
(38) Including only Household energy, mainly electricity and gas (distributed and LPG) but excluding fuels for
transport.
70
Figure V.4.Average energy expenditure in year 2004 ($ of 2004). Shares of household expenditure and
income
250.00 20.0
18.3 M onthly energy e xpenditure - estim ated
% on average m onthly E xpenditure 18.0
% on average m onthly Incom e

200.00 13.6 16.0
monthly Argentine $ of 2004
14.0
% of monthly expenditure
14.5 11.7 11.6
150.00 10.6 10.1 12.0
12.8
11.4 10.0
10.7
9.0
100.00 9.4 8.1 6.9 8.0
8.5
7.5 4.9 6.0

6.6
50.00 5.3 4.0
3.1 2.0
0.00 0.0
d01 d02 d03 d04 d05 d06 d07 d08 d09 d10
Source: FB estimates based on INDEC data.

(a) considering 1 US$ = 3 Argentine pesos of 2004
Finally, only a 10% of the first quintile of income would have access to natural gas, another 40%
would use LPG and pay six times the price of distributed gas (50% would consume no gas at
all) (39). An almost equal proportion is found in the RETs’ II report, (Fundación Bariloche 2007)
(40)
.
Using available information of INDEC’s permanent household survey on 10 urban centers –

including the three biggest ones-, the following information is presented regarding the fuels
employed for heating purposes (cooking, home and water heating) by income strata. Thus it is
possible to distinguish the situation of households in those urban areas endowed with NG
network, from the unfavorable situation of those Provinces not reached by the NG network.
(39) Social Interest tariff – ENARGAS. Commissions’ plenary session, Argentine National Senate, June 5th 2003.
(40) The average price estimated for year 2006 for LPG is 61.2 USD/10^6 kcal, while that of natural gas reaches
11.3 USD/106 kcal and finally electricity worth 41.8 USD/10^6 kcal, considering household tariffs.
71
Figure V.5.Structure of Fuels used for Heating or Thermal Uses by Household quintile years 2003 and 2006 (in %). Representative urban areas with
NG availability
a) Fuels for cooking Gran Córdoba b) Fuels for cooking Gran Buenos Aires
100% 100%
90% other 90%
KE/F
80% 80%
W/CH
70% KE/F 70%
60% 60% LPG
W/CH
50% 50%
LPG
40% 40%
30%
NG
30% NG
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
q1 q1 q2 q2 q3 q3 q4 q4 q5 q5 q1 q1 q2 q2 q3 q3 q4 q4 q5 q5
2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006
c) Fuels for cooking Santa Fe d) Fuels for cooking in Urban Areas of ARGENTINA
100% 100%
90% 90%
80%
KE/F KE/F
80%
70%
W/CH W/CH
70%
60% 60%
LPG LPG
50% 50%
40% 40%
30%
NG 30%
NG
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
q1 q1 q2 q2 q3 q3 q4 q4 q5 q5
q1 q1 q2 q2 q3 q3 q4 q4 q5 q5
2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006
2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006

Note: Gran Buenos Aires excludes the Capital City of Buenos Aires.
72
Figure V.6.Structure of Fuels used for Heating or Thermal Uses by Household quintile years 2003 and 2006 (in %). Representative Urban areas without
or very restricted NG availability
a) Fuels for cooking Formosa b) Fuels for cooking Jujuy

100% 100%
90% 90%
KE/F KE/F
80% 80%
W/CH W/CH
70% 70%
60% 60%
LPG LPG
50% 50%
40% 40%
30% NG 30%
NG
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
q1 q1 q2 q2 q3 q3 q4 q4 q5 q5 q1 q1 q2 q2 q3 q3 q4 q4 q5 q5
2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006
c) Fuels for cooking Resistencia, Chaco

100%
90%
80%
KE/F
70%
W/CH
60%
LPG
50%
40%
30%
NG
20%
10%
0%
q1 q1 q2 q2 q3 q3 q4 q4 q5 q5
2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006 2003 2006
73
The progressive substitution of LPG by Natural Gas, while other sources (mainly Charcoal in
the case of very poor families) are abandon is very clear, when the households are ordered by
income quintile (q1 comprehends 20% of poorest households, while quintile q5 presents fuel
structure of the 20% richest).
LPG is replaced by NG when available or in turn LPG displaces Firewood, Charcoal and
Kerosene in those cities where NG is not available. The exceptions are Jujuy City and Santa Fe
city, where the poorest strata’s (deciles 1 and 2) energy consumption is showing the opposite
trend during the 2003/2006 period: Firewood, Charcoal and Kerosene share was increased in
Jujuy while GLP consumption, relative to NG also increased in Santa Fe. Remarkably higher
deciles of income (4 and 5) do not suffered the same disadvantage. Although many factors can
provide explanations for this – e.g. localizations of new homes, increased poverty, impossibility
to afford upfront costs of NG in Santa FE or the LPG appliances as well as LPG prices in Jujuy),
it seams that the consumption patterns is regressive, in terms of poor people paying more
expensive fuels, and the better off benefiting from cheaper and cleaner fuels.
Nevertheless it is very clear the progressive substitution of GLP, Firewood, Charcoal and
Kerosene by NG as income grows, as well as the substitution of Firewood, Charcoal and
Kerosene by GLP in absence of the NG option. Finally it is noticeable how other sources - with
the exception of GLP - become almost negligible when NG is available for thermal uses in
cities.
Regarding Kerosene a lack of availability was also reported (main sales point are the gasoline
stations).The situation of the provision of both fuels (Kerosene and LPG) reflects once again the
“oligopoly” situation and the lack of monitoring and control by the regulatory entity. Similarly the
charcoal price did increase constantly since 2002, drawing a delicate picture for the poor
households’ energy access, as these sources are mainly used by most poor families for home
heating and cooking in absence of LPG or when energy is bought on a daily basis.
It is possible to identify both the convenience of using natural gas, even unsubsidized (see
Table V above), and the somehow low electricity comparative price. Once again poor users,
relying on LPG, Kerosene or Firewood (which would be Charcoal in Buenos Aires metropolitan
area) as clear more expensive fuels as they can not pay the electricity and distributed gas
upfront cost connection.
The strategy to provide energy to the poorest homes in the short turn should focus on improving
the availability of, and access to the LPG. But, in view of the unsatisfied basic needs, it is
possible that such additional energy will only partially substitute less clean and more expensive
sources (charcoal, firewood). In a second instance –medium term-, it is desirable to include the
poorest homes into the natural gas network. Nevertheless the large differences of energy price
in Argentina, due to existing subsidies, give very unequal opportunities to households,
depending on where they are located and whether or not they are connected to the gas grid (41).
Additionally, the electric power distribution networks must be improved to cover the additional
demand of these families. While gas availability may partially alleviate the provision of electricity
(in the case of electricity employed for thermal or caloric uses) but, again, with unsatisfied
needs and, in case of an income distribution improvement, there will be additional pressures on
the electric power infrastructure.
(41) Please see footnote # 15 and considerations regarding gas network on section 3.2 regional issues on Energy
Situation description.
74
5.1.2. General and main threats
As initially remarked, most important threats are associated with Crude Oil and Oil Derivates
dependence; Natural Gas dependence and Electricity supply restrictions. Household sector is
affected directly and indirectly by them in terms of the regulatory (R); institutional (I); physical
(P); or political (PL) dimensions, meaning the different natures of the threat.
Next, these threats are summarized, emphasizing (bold) those that are more closely related to
the Household sector and situations regarding poverty alleviation. Furthermore the direction of
the expected tendency is remarked by a signal (▲,▼, =) indicating respectively whether the
weaknesses is expected to get worse, better off or equal; and then the time dimension,
expressing the short term (ST), medium term (2-4 years) (MT) or long term (LT).
These tables will be further developed at the end of the report, completing direct & indirect
impacts and stakeholders involved, providing as well the national level description.
Table V.12 a.Summary of threats Problem / Vulnerability on the household sector. High Oil dependence
Time Tendency Threat / Problem / Vulnerability
REGULATORY: Lack of compliance of Hydrocarbons Law (concession contracts signed).

9 Non-complied contracts are being renewed.
9 Low royalties level (national oil exportations).
9 Oil companies are allowed to send a 70% of exportation proceedings to matrix house at
home countries - disbursed earnings, dividends.
9 Prices partially linked to international ones.
9 Provinces (instead of the whole country) have the property of reserves; they have
weaker capacity of negotiation than counterpart oil companies. Difficulties for
contracts enforcement, reserves audit, among others.
9 The inflation impact of the fuel price increase modifies the poverty line figure and
has an impact on the displacement of the available income expenditure.
9 Increase of electricity generation cost and hence, electricity tariff.
9 Transport sector (both passengers and cargo) critical situation due to lack of fuel.
Increase in the public subsidy, increase in transport costs for final goods,
inflation pressures –
9 Low income households more affected as they spent higher income share on final
consumption goods.
ST ▲
MT ▲ INSTITUTIONAL: There is a single Energy Secretariat department, concentrating the whole
LT ▲ issue, isolated.
9 Strong supply concentration (oligopoly under lax regulation).
9 Stakeholders’ pressures with high relative power (compared to regulator)
9 Newly created energy company ENARSA is not endowed with enough budget,
resources, staff, in order to play a stronger role in the sector.
9 Stakeholders not interested in national market (investments in new exploration,
production, refining take place in other countries).
PHYSICAL: Substantive reduction of reserves
POLITICAL: Regulatory signals given in opposition to Rational Use of Energy.

9 Lack of long term planning.
9 Absence of coherence between actions.
9 Higher share of poor households’ income (even larger in terms of expenditure) is

absorbed by energy sources and services.
9 LPG price increments are also having impact on poor wellbeing, reducing their
quality of life. Substitution for wood and other dirtier sources in the short run.
75
Table V.12 b.Summary of threats Problem / Vulnerability on the household sector. High Natural Gas
dependence

R: The legal framework of the reform remains almost unmodified.
9 Non-complied contracts are being renewed.
9 Lack of control and monitoring of concessionaries activity.
9 Increasing production prices paid, while privates actors express that they are not
attractive enough (for developing further investments)
9 increasing Bolivian gas prices (imported alternative supply)
9 Importations from Bolivia are not warranted.
9 Compromising exportations to Chile are not warranted.
9 Tariff structure does not encourage rational use (encouragement of extracting as
much as possible) and are uneven among final users. Triggering negative impacts on
lower income households users.
9 Regulation and Control are weak.
9 Renegotiation of contracts (post devaluation) and international Court legal claims (sues)
from private actors are pending.
9 The network does not expand towards poor households, very high costs of
connection.
9 Further difficulties by lack of LPG, and low cost of electricity induces electrical
appliances acquisition and use for caloric uses. Non rational use of energy, pressures on
electricity demand.
ST ▲
MT▲ I: There is a single Energy Secretariat department, concentrating the whole issue, isolated.
LT ► 9 Strong supply concentration (oligopoly under lax regulation).
9 Stakeholders’ pressures with high relative power (compared to regulator)
Newly created energy company ENARSA is not endowed with enough budget,
resources, staff, in order to play a stronger role in the sector.
9 Increasingly open questions regarding public binding contracts for gas pipes and
infrastructure building. Interrupted Works due to sound corruption cases.
P: Substantive reduction of reserves, but real dimension is not known by government.
9 Lack of pipes’ capacity during winter, due to residential heating use in cities.
9 Reduction in quality of service provision.
9 Problems in electricity supply to all sectors.
9 It should be noted that the urban poor sectors use electric power for heating or
caloric purposes during winter time in substitution of the expensive LPG. This
increases its vulnerability even more.
9 Strong dependence on gas for Electricity Power Generation
PL: Regulatory signals given in opposition to Rational Use of Energy.
9 Absence of coherence between actions.
9 Limited public awareness efforts towards a more efficient final use of gas
9 Impacts on poor wellbeing, reducing their quality of life, as prices of final consumption
goods - increases, triggering inflation.
76
Table V.12 c.Summary of threats Problem / Vulnerability on the household sector. Electricity Supply
Restrictions: Equipment and fuels

Remains almost unmodified.
9 Un clear incentives for investment in generation.
9 Full costs are not fully transferred to all users, distortions in electricity tariff,
regressive structure.
9 Tariff structure opposite to rational use of energy, as the more consumption, the
lower the price paid per kWh.
9 Weak control and regulation.
9 Renegotiation of contracts (post devaluation) and international Court legal claims
(sues) from private actors are pending.
9 Reduction in quality of service provision.
I: Stakeholders acting also in hydrocarbons production put pressures on regulator, higher

relative power (compared to regulator)
P: in the short run the supply would not mach demand

ST ▲ 9 Strong dependence on gas for Electricity Power Generation.
MT▲ 9 Reduced dual thermal supply (gas & fuel oil).
LT ► 9 Limitation in liquid fuels’ logistic provision.
9 Problems in electricity supply to all sectors.
9 Electricity grids do not expand towards poor households, high costs of
connection and provision to poor households.
9 Impacts on poor wellbeing, reducing their quality of life, as prices of final
consumption goods increases, triggering inflation.
9 Further difficulties by lack of LPG, and low cost of electricity induces electrical
appliances bought for caloric uses. Non rational use of energy, pressures on
electricity demand.
Pl: Regulatory signals given in opposition to Rational Use of Energy.

9 Absence of coherence between actions among different chains (sources) of energy
9 Reduced public awareness efforts towards a more efficient final use of electricity.
9 Signals in opposition to Rational use of energy.
Source: authors’ elaboration.
5.2. Measures and their impacts to enhance energy security
This section presents and emphasizes a vision based on real potential for increase energy
security through renewable and energy efficiency measures. Most probable actions and
technologies will be briefly described and quantification over the whole country is presented as
far as information was available.
5.2.1. Enhancing energy efficiency
Past, recent and current Government Strategy for EE
Chapter 4 made reference to the most important measures and programs.
The most relevant references include:
a. URE Program: Agreement subscribed by the Secretariat of Energy and the European
77
Union developed between 1992 and 2000 (42).
b. Efficient Lighting Initiative (PNUMA-GEF): Efficient Lighting Initiative (ELI). 1999-2003
(43)
.
c. ARGURELEC Projects (Secretariat of Energy – European Union) 1998 – 1999 (44).
d. In 2003, the Secretariat of Energy, designed the Energy Saving and Efficiency Program
(PAEE). The Program for Energy Equipment Quality (PROCAE) to develop energy
equipment standards and labeling.
e. Additionally, in 2004 was launched the PURE (Program for the Rational Use of
Electricity an gas).
f. From 2005, the Secretariat of Energy is boosting the Energy Efficiency Project in
Argentina financed by GEF. This year was approved its implementation.
g. Nowadays, the National Government has launched the “plan for the rational and
efficient use of energy” (PRONUREE), proposing for the household sector the
replacement of 5 million low consumption lamps which will be delivered for free through
the electric power distributors. In a second stage, such amount would be extended to 20
million lamps sold at promotional prices. The enforcement and extension of the
PROCAE, with Loans from Banco Nación, will offer soft loans to users who purchase
more efficient household appliances.
h. Both the national government and many other provincial governments have done initial
efforts towards raising awareness as regards the rational use of energy by the
residential sector. Most of them are massive radio and TV campaigns, including certain
ads.
i. Many electric power companies have also launched public awareness campaigns that
focus on the need to save energy and the changes in the energy consumption patterns.
They are mostly massive radio and television campaigns, including ads in the utilities
bills. In some cases there is guidance on the main measures aimed at optimizing the
energy consumption of different home appliances.
Indirect Measures triggered by current energy policies.
The government has taken various measures (somehow contradictory with the Efficient Use of
Energy) aimed at guaranteeing the energy supply both in the short term and during peak
demand days. Supply was cut to business customers (textile, iron and steel, automobile and
food sectors, among others, which have complained about it) (45) and to thermal generators of
the metropolitan area and the interior cities with ongoing contracts.
On the other hand, partial electric power supply cuts have been registered in residential
neighborhoods of the South area of the Greater Buenos Aires. Scheduled cuts have also been
taking place in the industry, which allowed for the reduction of 1200 MW daily of the electric
power demand. In warmer days, with certain industry previsions, estimates indicate “savings”
between 650 and 800 megawatts.
(42) The proposal was: “Inclining towards the development of energy efficient use behaviours in the different
socioeconomic actors of the supply and consumption market”. It was the basis for the PROCAEH and PROCAE
projects (Energy quality system for electrical devices and energy devices respectively) recently reactivated in the
Secretariat of Energy.
(43) Destined to promote efficient illumination in the household sector; up to 2005, the buildings with efficient
illumination were rewarded.
(44) The project was developed in the framework of the ALURE EU Program. ICAEN, the Catalonian energy institute
is the coordinator of this project. The Argentine participant, apart from the SE is the company EDENOR.
(45) Many of them have made diverse investments in order to ensure the supply of diesel tanks or diesel electric
generation equipment, to name a couple of examples, or established time changes in production to avoid
consumption during peak hours.
78
Even though these measures do not aim at the rational use of energy, as it has already been
stated, they aim at saving energy and guaranteeing the supply, especially in residential areas,
which are mostly charged subsidized rates (large and medium consumption). This situation
triggered an increasing level of inequity, especially with those users that do not have access to
gas or to subsidized rates in relation to their income levels. On the other hand, a significant
level of inconsistency has been generated by the rest of the users as regards savings needs or
the rational use of energy and the risk of shortage.
When briefly analyzing the effects of these measures in relation to the supply guarantee notion,
and its relation to the sustainable energy development, results contrary to those expected or
desired ones are be identified. This is because these outcomes are not allowing the normal
functioning of all the social and productive activities we are used to, including the preservation
of elementary aspects such as security and public health.
9 Secure, timely and good quality of supply at reasonable costs: implies transfers from
energy as an input (higher prices pay by industry) towards relative high power purchase
households.
9 Equity in energy access and afford: the poorest suffer direct and indirect inequities, due
to reduction in working hours and, in some cases, fire staff.
9 Environmental sustainability: environmental impacts are higher due to the increasing
consumption of oil products.
9 Energy dependence: autarchy is decreasing considering the growing tendence of
imported energy.
9 Participation of informed citizenship and democracy: the civil society is not having any
voice n the definition of priorities.
Impacts of measures described, and households’ strategies to respond to energy

insecurity
The impacts of the measures aimed at the efficient energy use have been diffused and
impossible to quantify. Even presently their impact is weak, largely due to the barriers stated
below. In fact, it could be said that in general there has been no changes in the residential
sector consumption habits as a result of the implementation of such measures. Directly related
to those results, it may be assumed that there are no environmental impacts related to the
stated measures and policies.
On the contrary, such poor results have determined that the poorest sector has had to give
improvised answers to the energy supply shortage. Below there is a description of some of
them:
9 Financing request to access the natural gas connection (which, in general, has been
difficult). Connection costs by themselves represent approximately three minimum
wages.
9 Purchase of low consumption lamps. Cost of replacement approximately US$3 per
lamp.
9 For the poorest sectors, an alternative is to connect to the electric grid furtively, which
generates risks of criminal penalties due to manipulation of the electric voltage cables,
aside from the physical risks.
9 Another alternative is related to delays in the payment of electric power invoices, which
also generates supply cuts risks (even though for the time being such risks have been
restricted in the Federal Capital City, Greater Buenos Aires and other provinces).
79
9 Related to the last two, a large part of the caloric usage has been covered based on the
electric power supply, which generates risks of cuts due to capacity increases in
facilities, as well as risks of minor fires, even though in some cases they have resulted in
the total loss of precarious dwellings.
9 In order to substitute the LPG in caloric usages, the poorest sectors are using firewood
again, together with other available biomass of lower quality. This option involves risks
of fire, monoxide inhaling intoxication and lung and eye problems.
9 Another strategy that has been adopted has been the acceptance of the installation of
approximately 5000 prepaid meters offered by EDENOR in its concession area. With
them, the poorest homes may have access to electric power at the same price per kWh
than that billed on a monthly basis, but self-interrupting the supply in accordance with
each home’s needs. This method allows for the fractioning and management of the
consumption in accordance with each home’s income distribution. It also allows users to
prevent delays in payments to the electric power company, and to receive the proof that
may allow them to have access to some kind of credit for minor purchases. The higher
risk is related to the refrigerator power cut because the cold chain is cut, which may be
decisive for their proper preservation of certain food.
5.2.1.1 Potential of energy savings and Impacts in the household sector in forecast scenario
This subject has been broadly discussed in item 3.6. The available information, broken down by
source, is shown below. When possible, the low income situation has been remarked.
Furthermore, the current efficiency and the expected efficiency evolution are also indicated with
the purpose of identifying energy savings and impacts on the consumption patterns.
Firewood and Charcoal
For low income, Firewood and Charcoal are used in Cooking, Water Heating and Room Heating
devices. For the Low Income Sectors, the current average efficiency would be of 10% (2004).
The average efficiency in 2025 for the families that continue using Firewood and Charcoal for
such caloric uses is expected to go up to 20% in 2050. It is assumed that 50% of the families
will change their cooking stoves, then, the efficiency in cooking with firewood or charcoal by the
year 2025 would be 15%.
For Medium-High Income, this energy sources are used by rural sectors which represent the
10% of the 10.5% of the total population, for whom caloric uses represent 100% of the
Firewood and Charcoal consumption. The affected families will be the 1.05% of the total
population. The average efficiency in the year 2025 of the families that continue using these
fuels for such caloric uses will go up from 20% in 2004 to 75% in 2050.
Then, the Average Efficiency for the total families using Firewood or Charcoal will be 20%, in
the year 2025 (46) Therefore savings between the years 2004 and 2025 would be around 9%.
(46) 15% for the 90% (poor households) of such energy sources, plus 61.25% for the 10% (medium high incomes),
that is to say 19.62%. Initial efficiency values for year 2004 are: 10% for the 90% of the rural population, plus 20% for
the 10% of the rural population, which is to say: 11%.
80
Natural Gas and LPG
For cooking purposes – caloric uses, the average efficiencies in the year 2004 amount to
45%.For the year 2050, estimations indicate that average efficiencies would increase to 55%,
basically due to a more adequate use of the devices, for example: cooking with covered
utensils, avoiding excessive flames, reducing the flame to the minimum when the liquids are
boiling, etc.
For water heating purposes, the efficiency in the year 2004 amounts to 50% and would go up to
60% in the year 2050, with better insulation and regulation systems.
For heating purposes, in 2004, the average efficiency of heaters was 55%. Estimations indicate
that heating uses represent 34% of the caloric uses. It is assumed that 75% of the population
will have access to this type of device by the year 2025. Then, the efficiency for the year 2025
would be 77.5%.
Efficiency of All Uses for NG and LPG, in 2004: 50.1%; in 2050: 64.2%. Energy savings
between 2025 and 2004 would amount to 14.1%.
Electricity
Based on different documents, the energy saving coefficients between the years 2004 and 2025
was estimated. The electric power consumption structure by energy use is only an
approximation, since such detail is not available.
Table V.13.Estimation of the electricity consumption structure in the household Sector (%)
USE STRUCTURE
Food conservation 40.3
Illumination 30.6
Standby devices 15.1
Air conditioning 5.6
Washing machines 3.6
Other room conditioning devices 0.5
Other appliances 4.3
TOTAL 100
Food conservation: measures will be aimed at increasing thermal insulation. Based on the EU
energy efficient labeling, the A level, would imply 53% savings as regards the 2004 values and,
for the 80% of the 2025 stock, savings would amount to 44%.
Lighting provides a very interesting saving potential, more efficient lighting devices – compared
to broadly employed incandescent ones - have been available in the market for many
years..Measures would involve the substitution of existing incandescent lamps (60 W and 75
W), for compact fluorescent lamps (15 W and 19 W), with a 75% saving, as well as the
incorporation of higher quality incandescent lamps, triggering a further 3% saving. On the whole
a final 35% saving is estimated by 2025.
Very little has been done to save energy through improved Standby Devices. Therefore,
estimations indicate that, by the year 2025 savings would amount only to 6.6%.
81
Air Conditioning, there is great uncertainty as to when the saturation level would be reached.
Preliminary estimations indicate a 7% annual growth of this type of devices which, in the year
2005 would have reached a sales volume of 1.5 million units. Saving measures should be
focused not only on labeling, but also including tax benefits for higher-efficiency equipment.
Estimated savings for the year 2025 would amount to 18%.
Washing Machines, saturation level, according to INDEC’s data, would reach 85%. The most
effective measure would be labeling and providing tax benefits for the manufacturing
encouraging most efficient equipment sales, apart from the education on use modalities.
Estimations indicate 15% savings by the year 2025.
Total Electricity Savings in Household Sector, considering those arising from each type of
electricity use, would amount to 37% for 2025.
The potential savings that could be obtained between 2004 y 2030, after the implementation of
an energy efficiency strategy, according to household sector’s estimations, could reach around
73000 kTOE. Next figure shows the structure of main sources.
Figure V.7.Cumulative energy savings in the household Level (%) of kTOE by energy source.
Charcoal
Electricity
5%
13%
Liquefide Natural Gas

Petrol Gas 61%
21%
The figures below depict the evolution of the potential consumption savings in the residential
sector and the structure of accrued usage. The achievements obtained in water warming,
heating, and food cooking are highlighted. Such results are in line with the savings attained with
Natural Gas, Coal and LPG.
82
Figure V.8.Cumulative energy savings structure in the household Level in kTOE by energy use.
7000
6000 Pump of Water

w arming Heating
5000
Boiling Water
4000
Cooking
3000 Food conservation
2000 Lighting
Motive
1000
Other Uses
0
Refrigeration and Ventilation
04
07
10
13
16
19
22
25
28
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Source: authors’ elaboration
Figure V.9.Energy savings in the Household Sector (%) by energy use.
Refrigeration
and Lighting
warming Ventilation 10%
Heating 2% Food
26% conservation
15%
Cooking
Boiling Water 20%
27%
The main social benefit is directly related to the monetary savings achieved with energy
savings. As it may be noted in the following table, the total saved amount between 2003 and
2004 reaches an amount equivalent to the yearly minimum income of four million people (at
US$350/month) or almost 13% of the GDP of 2004.
A scenario in which such significant monetary amounts could be saved would allow for a more
reachable access to higher quality energy at a lower price, such as natural gas, thus enhancing
the conditions of the poorest areas of the population, without mentioning the possibilities of
destining such amounts to other more urgent needs of this population.
A scenario in which such significant amounts could be saved would allow for the alleviation of
the energy shortage risks, and it would ease the access to higher quality energy at a lower price
such as natural gas, thus enhancing the conditions of the poorest sectors of the population.
83
Table V.14 Estimation the energy savings (monetary and non monetary) in household sector
Energy U$S/unit Million

Energy Saved
Source May 2008-08-20 U$S
Natural Gas 61256.0 million m3 0.0833 5104
GLP 16438.9 million ton 0.3333 5479
Electricity 130777.5 GWh 0.0400 5231
Charcoal 7600.3 million ton 0.2667 2026
Total saved 17842
As regards the environmental impacts, an analysis of CO2 emissions directly equivalent for
both scenarios of the residential sector indicates that in the tendency scenario, emissions would
grow approximately 122% compared to 54% of the scenario with the described energy savings
measures. Between both scenarios, accrued emission savings of 167 million Tons have been
estimated.
The following Figure depicts the evolution of emissions for each scenario discriminated by
energy usage. It may also be noted that the highest emissions savings were achieved in water
warming (47%) and heating (32%).
Figure V.10.Emissions evolution in the residential sector by use (Millions of Tons CO2 equivalent)
a) Tendency Scenario b) Energy Efficiency Scenario (Structural)
45 45
40 40
35 35
30 30
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
04
06
08
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
8
0
4
6
0
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
1
1
2
3
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
other uses Lighting Food conservation other uses Lighting Food conservation
Cooking Water warming Heating
Cooking Water warming Heating
c) Emissions saved by usage
14
12
10 Heating
M illo n T o n n s
8 Water w arming
6 Cooking
4 Food conservation
2 Lighting
0 other uses
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
84
The following graphic depicts the emissions evolution for each scenario discriminated by energy
source. It may also be noted that the highest emissions savings were achieved in natural gas
consumption (71%) and LPG (32%).
Figure V.11.Emissions evolution in the residential sector by source (Millions of Tons CO2 equivalent)
a) Tendency Scenario b) Energy Efficiency Scenario (Structural)
45 45
40 40
35 35
30 30
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
04
06
08
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
04
06
08
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Firewood Kerosene Natural Gas Liquefide Petrol Gas Charcoal Firewood Kerosene Natural Gas Liquefide Petrol Gas Charcoal
c) Emissions saved by source
14
12
10 Charcoal
Millon Tonns
8 Liquefide Petrol
Gas
6
Natural Gas
4
Kerosene
2
Firew ood
0
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
The following graphic depicts the emissions evolution by inhabitant for the years of supply cut in
the tendency scenario and in the energy efficiency scenario. Increasing benefits may be noted,
which reaches a 30% of emissions per inhabitant, by year 2030.
85
Figure V.12. Emissions evolution (tons CO2 equivalent /hab/año)
0.900
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500 Tend
0.400 Effici
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
2004 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
5.2.1.2 Other potential energy savings and Impacts in the household sector
In addition there are other actions implemented by private utilities, like EDESUR, with following
potential results (47).
Table V.15.Balance of saving potential and edge reduction for household appliances
Top Load
Top Load
Consumption Curve
Number Consumption Curve
Savings per Reduction
Item of Savings Reduction
unit for all
devices MWh/year per unit
kWh/year devices
kW
kW
Refrigerator 11,000 162.5 1,800 0.020 224
Air Conditioner 11,000 112.1 1,200 0.327 3,597
Washing Machine 11,000 61.3 700 0.017 185
Total 3,700 4,006
Source: Econeler elaboration.
Forecasts indicate that approximately 923,000 refrigerators will be purchased in 2008 in

Argentina. The 11,000 refrigerators included in the project, divided into 6 years, represent
approximately 0.2% of the market – 1.0% of the market granted to EDESUR under concession.
The 11,000 air conditioners represent 1.8% of the 600,000 units sold during the year 2006 in
Argentina. Finally, the 11,000 washing machines represent 1.0% of the 1,130,000 units sold
during the year 2006 in Argentina. The program will allow for savings of 3,700 MWh/year and
for the reduction of the 4MW edge demand.
(47) “Support to the energy efficiency program design in electric power distribution companies”, November 2007,
ECONOLER INTERNACIONAL.
86
5.2.1.3 Cost of energy savings in household sector
Two examples of costs related to investments in the household sector efficiency are shown
below. These examples provide an idea of the values involved in the proposed measures. It is
worthwhile noticing that most times these are profitable measures, even from the mere financial
point of view. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the existing barriers, since in many
cases, only an effort in the design, implementation, coordination and sustaining of long-term
programs is needed more than funds to finance the measures.
Substitution of incandescent lamps for compact fluorescent lamps (efficient CFL)
The example of a methodological analysis has been taken. In such analysis, it has been
simulated the operation of both types of lamps for R1 customers (bimonthly consumption equal
or inferior to 300 kWh), which represent near 46% of the household customers, and for R2
customers (consumption superior to 300 kWh). Both the user and distributor financing have
been considered in the analysis.
Tables V.16. and V.17 describes the results respectively obtained for each customer. It is
observed that, under the current rates, the substitution of incandescent lamps for compact
fluorescent lamps is economically convenient.
Table V.16.Customer Analysis – R1(*) Category
Item Unit Current Customer Benefit Current Distributor Benefit

situation buys CFL Situation finances CFL
Consumption kWh/year 491 123 369 491 123 369
Purchase of U$S 13,4 28,7 -15,3 13,4 21,4 -8,0
lamps
Energy cost U$S 76,9 19,2 57,7 76,9 19,2 57,7
PUREE Bonus U$S 0,0 -6,7 6,7 0,0 -6,7 6,7
NPV U$S 90,3 41,2 49,1 90,3 33,9 56,4
(*) Lowest consumption level.
Table V.17.Customer Analysis – R2 Category

situation buys CFL Situation finances CFL
Consumption kWh/year 491 123 369 491 123 369
Purchase of U$S 13,4 28,7 -15,3 13,4 21,4 -8,0
lamps
Energy cost U$S 39,0 9,7 29,2 39,0 9,7 29,2
PUREE Bonus U$S 0,0 -6,7 6,7 0,0 -6,7 6,7
NPV U$S 52,3 31,7 20,6 52,3 24,4 27,9
The R1 Customer has more benefits for reducing consumption since the energy variable rate
component is substantially higher. Then, it is observed that annual savings for an R1 customer
amounts to U$ 56.4, and for an R2 customer, U$ 27.9. The results of the study indicate the
economic convenience of substituting the incandescent lamps even within the framework of the
rate stagnation. As soon as rates start corresponding with the costs, there will be a more
favorable situation for the substitution.
87
Incorporation of efficient refrigerators
This example has been applied for the same type of customers as above, and with the same
calculation methodology (48). Estimations indicate that the efficiency of a new refrigerator
amounts to 63%. It was simulated the operation of refrigerators for both alternatives,
determining the consumption per hour band, and the customer-related costs were determined
applying the current tariff structure.
Tables V.18. and V.19. describe the results respectively obtained for each customer category
(with and without financing).

situation buys Situation finances
Refrig. Refrig.
Consumption kWh/year 1.124 416 708 1.124 416 708
Purchase of U$S 104,0 297,2 -193,2 104,0 253,1 -149,2
refrig.
Energy cost U$S 319,7 118,3 201,4 319,7 118,3 201,4
PUREE Bonus U$S 0,0 -23,4 23,4 0,0 -23,4 23,4
/ Penalization
NPV U$S 423,7 392,1 31,6 423,7 348,0 75,7
Source: Lestard/Franke and Fundación Bariloche, December 2005.

situation buys Situation finances
Refrig. Refrig.
Consumption kWh/year 1.124 416 708 1.124 416 708
Purchase of U$S 104,0 297,2 -193,2 104,0 214,5 -110,5
refrig.
Energy cost U$S 162,1 60,0 102,1 162,1 60,0 102,1
PUREE Bonus U$S 5,6 -23,4 29,0 5,6 -23,4 29,0
/ Penalization
NPV U$S 271,6 333,7 -62,1 271,6 251,0 20,6
Source: Lestard/Franke and Fundación Bariloche, December 2005.
It may be noted that, under the current tariff, the substitution of refrigerators is economically
convenient (even for R1 customers). Estimations indicate that the substitution of refrigerators
will imply 66% savings for R1 customers and 26% for R2 customers.
5.2.1.4 Enhancing Energy Security, Barriers to improving Efficiency
There are a number of barriers to increased investment in energy efficiency in household. Some
of these barriers are similar to those at national level.
9 Lack of regulatory incentives to promote energy efficiency.
(48) Lestard/Franke and Fundación Bariloche. “Proyecto de Eficiencia Energética Argentina. Informe Final”. Buenos
Aires, Diciembre 2005.
88
9 Lack of adequate price signals to energy consumers, especially among residential
consumers.
9 Lack of information among residential consumers on the efficiency of energy equipment.
9 Multiplicity of stakeholders and fragmented institutional framework.
9 Lack of environmental awareness in general.
Other typical barriers of the household sector:
Cultural barriers
9 Belief that high-efficiency devices are expensive.

9 Non-recognition of labels
9 Belief that savings are not significant
9 No relation between energy savings and reduction of environmental impact
9 More attention paid to other selection criteria due to lack of consciousness
9 Mistrust in the validity of labels
9 Wrong advice from the sellers of household appliances regarding energy efficiency
9 Habit to reuse (or sell) household appliances after buying a new one.
9 Lack of knowledge of the poor sectors regarding the relation between the rational use of
energy and climate change.
9 Rejection of programs, proportional to the lack of knowledge (mistrust)
Economic barriers
9 High cost of buying a new efficient appliance as compared to the cost of repairing the old
one.
9 Financing offer: affects the decision of buying household appliances.
9 Lack of knowledge of popular sectors, precisely the segment that needs more economic
solutions as it is where the clandestine use of electric power is concentrated.
9 Shortage of high efficiency models in some parts of the distributors' territorial concession.
9 No efficient and accessible equipment lines and materials are manufactured in Argentina.
9 Lack of interest and commitment of partners, e.g.: sellers, manufacturers, distributors, etc.
9 Low rate, which does not encourage the population to save electric power.
Regulatory barriers
9 Need to request a special authorization to ENRE to sell household appliances, an activity not
included in the concession agreement.
9 Restrictive conditions imposed by ENRE to sell household appliances.
9 Lack of standards, test structures and a labeling system for appliances other than
refrigerators.
9 The existing regulations are not spread.
9 Lack of framework sustaining this type of energy efficiency programs.
Specific barriers of some efficiency programs have been detected. The following ones are
shown for illustrative purposes:
89
Lamp substitution project:
9 In general, people believe that low consumption lamps are sumptuary objects.
9 The introduction of low-quality low consumption lamps at a lower cost, generated mistrust in
these devices.
9 People know nothing about the saving capacity of low consumption lamps.
9 Middle class sectors are more permeable to this type of analysis than low income population,
which is precisely the sector that needs more economic solutions.
9 The price of efficient lamps (all of which are imported) is far away from the massive purchase
power.
Project for Low-Income Customers
One of the main Buenos Aires electricity utilities – EDENOR – found three groups of barriers
that must be addressed in order to develop and launch a group of efficiency measures in poor
villages or neighborhoods.
Education, communication and awareness barriers were identified such as:
9 Lack of specialists on Electric Power Efficient Use.

9 Lack of historical data of Efficient Use programs in Poor Neighborhoods.
9 Poor spreading of the existing regulations.
9 Lack of encouraging situations; the experience and change of habits in the use of Electric
Power.
9 Rejection of programs, proportional to knowledge (Mistrust)
9 Lack of stimuli regarding the Electric Power Efficient Use problem.
9 Lack of integration of the poor sector with the Climate Change commitment.
9 Lack of interest and commitment of partners, e.g.: Municipalities, manufacturers,
Universities, etc.
Technology/Consumption Barriers like:
9 Lack of manufacturing of efficient and accessible equipments.

9 Lack of interest in using efficient equipment
9 Inexistence of an offer-demand market for efficient equipment.
9 Lack of interest in reducing the Electric Power expenditure and redistribution of incomes in
households.
9 Lack of regulation, import controls, sale of electrical equipment and materials.
9 Lack of energy efficiency standard accreditation
9 Lack of credit lines and/or financing
Life Quality Barriers like:
9 Lack of stimuli on customers to be incorporated to the system.

9 Lack of a sustainability framework for this type of Electric Power programs
90
9 Lack of interest in improving the security and quality of the electrical installations.
9 Lack of actions securing health by using adequate devices and materials.
5.2.2. Promoting Renewable Energy
Some of the issues already presented in chapter 4 are developed, with more detail as regards
the residential sector.
5.2.2.1 Measures and their impacts to enhance renewable energy
Past, recent and current Government Strategy
The background and actions carried out by consecutive governments towards the study and
implementation of renewable source projects were of a different nature, effectiveness, and
duration. A historical survey of these actions indicates that they were initiated several decades
ago, as an energy self-supply and diversification strategy.
Among the main actions aimed at the promotion of renewable sources, which have somehow
had an impact on the residential sector, the following may be highlighted:
National Decree 2247/85 was promulgated in 1985, promoting a non-conventional energy

development policy through the Conservation and New Sources Office of the National Energy
Secretariat. The Wind Energy Regional Center (CREE) was established in the province of
Chubut within such framework, having as members the Planning Secretariat of that province,
the National University of Patagonia, and the National Energy Secretariat.
A special mention should be made of Law 25019/98 of wind energy promotion. This National
Law was followed by a Provincial Law in Chubut and in Buenos Aires, which established an
additional incentive of 0.5 cent/kWh to be added to the nation’s coffers, yielding a total profit of
1.5 cent/kWh. Other provinces are considering passing similar laws. As a consequence of the
2001 crisis and the following devaluation of the local currency the context suddenly changed.
The relative advantages introduced by this law were drastically reduced.
As a result of the actions implemented based on the Wind Energy Promotion Act, approximately
30 MW have been installed (high capacity equipment), which supply Cooperatives and
Municipalities with a capacity factor that in some cases can reach 45%.
Towards the end of 1999, the board of directors of the World Bank approved a loan to Argentina
for USD 30 million under a different name, PERMER, with an additional donation of USD 10
million from the Global Environment Fund to eliminate the existing barriers for the use of new
technologies, in special PV (supplied by foreign companies) and eventually wind, hydroelectric
or hybrid. This amount, together with the provincial funds, those of the concession holders, and
those of consumers, would allow providing only basic electricity services as lighting and social
communication (radio and TV) purposes to some 85,000 scattered consumers and some 3,500
public services.
Recently, the incorporation of the productive usage supply has been decided. The Project aims
at ensuring electric power supply to residential customers and public sectors of all types
(schools, medical emergency rooms, police departments, etc.) that are out of the scope of
energy distribution centers. The initiative aims at enhancing the quality of life of the rural
91
population and to decrease emigration to urban areas through the sustainable management of
safe environmental energy resources.
As a complement to Act Nº 25.019/1998, Decree-law Nº 1.597/1999 (National Regime for Wind

and Solar Energy), Act Nº 26.190/12-2006 was approved – National Regime for electric power
production from renewable energies also applicable to the other renewable sources (wind,
solar, geothermal, tidal, hydro, biomass, dump gases, depuration plant gases and biogas).
The generation of electric power from renewable energies for the provision of a public service
has been declared of national interest, and the purpose of this regulation is to achieve a
contribution of the renewable energy sources equivalent to the 8% of the national electric power
consumption in a 10-year term as from the effective date of this regulation (year 2006). This
requirement imposes a contour condition at the minimum renewable energies penetration level,
which was taken into consideration in the developed scenarios. In this way the renewable
electricity generation would have to reach around 13000 GWh/year by 2016 from 1520 GWh in
2005.
Act 26.190 updates the remuneration established by Act 25.019 increasing the tax applied for
the creation of the RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST FUND, which will be administered and
assigned by the Federal Board of Electric Power (49).
The equipment to be installed will receive such remuneration for a term of 15 years as from the
request of the beginning of the benefit period.
This law has not been ruled yet (50).
Remarkably, actions towards public awareness in order to take advantage and extend the use
of renewables within the household sector were not identified. Nevertheless some articles
describing the global Climate Change problem are available in massive media like the TV or
newspapers.
Household Sector Impacts and Results
(49) That will be used to pay up to:

i. 0.015 $ per kWh effectively generated by wind systems installed or to be installed delivering their energy to
the wholesale markets and/or destined to the provision of public services.
ii. 0.9 $ per kWh made available to the user through solar photovoltaic generators installed or to be installed,
destined to the provision of public services.
iii. 0.015 $ per kWh effectively generated by geothermal, tidal, biomass, dump gas, depuration plant gas and
biogas energy systems installed or to be installed, delivering their energy to the wholesale markets and/or
destined to the provision of public services. Those included in Act N°26.093 are exempted from this
remuneration.
iv. 0.015 $ pe kWh effectively generated by hydro systems of up to THIRTY MEGAWATTS (30MW) installed or
to be installed, delivering their energy to the wholesale markets and/or destined to the provision of public
services.
(50) Other legislation concerning the renewable energies existing in Argentina that might be relevant includes:
9 ACT N° 12063: Province of Buenos Aires. Generation and production of electric power from renewable
energy sources (Year 2001, not effectively enforced)
9 Act 2796/2005. Province of Santa Cruz. Provincial Regime for Renewable Energies.
9 Act 12503/2005. Province of Santa Fe.
9 Act N° 25.019. Decree-law N° 1597. National Regime for Wind and Solar Energy
9 Wind Energy Act N° 4389/98, Decree-law N° 235/98. Province of Chubut.
9 Act 26.093/06, Decree-law 109/07. Regulation and promotion regime for the sustainable production and
use of biofuels.
9 Act 23.123/06. Regime for the development of the technology, production, use and applications of
hydrogen as fuel and energy vector.
92
There is no centralized record of these projects, which makes very difficult to obtain conclusion
on its true effectiveness towards poverty alleviation. Nevertheless some results can be exhibit in
the context of the Climate Change Knowledge Network (CCKN) (51). It includes an evaluation of
the mentioned PERMER Project in the Jujuy Province, provided by the EJEDSA Utility (1900
rural households - 100 W average each), as well as other PERMER project regarding rural
electrification employing renewables in the Neuquén Province carried on by the Provincial
Energy Entity (475 rural households - 100 W average each).
The joint and active participation of the provincial government (granter of the subsidy), the
regulating body, companies: EJEDSA (private) and EPEN (state) and the community (capacity)
have allowed the materialization of the program. Subsidies provident from federal, provincial,
and international founds, facilitated the access to the service of rural consumers with so lowest
demand.
The main (qualitative) results observed in both programs can be resumes in following list:
9 Improvement of the standard of living of the beneficiaries (households and school-lodges)

due to, among other things, a better use of the day to carry out activities (schoolwork, family
and social meetings, etc.)
9 Development of more local community social and economic activities: mothers’ club,
cooperative associations
9 Drop in expenditure in energy sources for lighting and social communication
9 Less pressure on non-renewable resources, especially through power generator small
groups substitution
9 Access to further and more diversified information (television, radio, etc.), e.g. all schools
have satellite TV
9 Less isolation or integral marginalization as to the possibility of cutting off difficulties to
access a better education, health, cultural and information development, communication,
recreation and the development of productive activities (whose potential energy needs are
being studying at this moment)
9 Future possibilities of diversifying the economy of the social group through the incorporation
of service and secondary-sector activities (workshops, carpenters’ shops, metal-mechanics’
shops, etc.); dietary improvement as from the incorporation of short-life foodstuff; and
decrease in the number of illnesses or dysfunctions due to the preservation of food products
in refrigerators
9 Training of locals in the maintenance of the installations, although with scarce development
of new jobs as a result of the procurement of foreign units.
9 High dependence on subsidies, with risks for future sustainability
9 Reduction of carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere through the combustion of
kerosene in the burners to be replaced with electrical lamps
9 Decrease in the inadequate disposal into the environment of low-quality polluting batteries,
as those currently used in radio units and night lighting devices
9 Indirectly, the higher access to information may result in the modification of consumption
habits and domestic activities, which could in turn lead to less pressure on the scarce
vegetation in those cases where firewood is used for cooking, by incorporating the
alternative of using bottled gas.
9 Afterwards, it was detected that the implementation of this type of costly installations for
semi-nomadic populations that leave their homes for long periods of time require
installations that may be better protected from potential furtive thieves.
(51) Venema, H. D. and Cissem M, Eds. 2004.
93
The success of these programs is based between others, on the following aspects:
9 Agreement and pledge of the provincial government to accept subsidy to this areas, in the
electric service and in consequence to the company,
9 Coordination institutional between the sectorial and other government areas actors.
9 A regulatory frame adapted and flexible,
9 Good scheme and management of available founds and subsidies, and
9 Capacity of adaptation and collaboration of the companies with the complex situation of the
local settlements
These results could be judged as representatives of many other projects implemented within
the country.
5.2.2.2 Potential for renewable energy use in household sector
A scenario of energy efficiency that encourages renewable should be understood as the real
potential penetration given de actual and foreseen situation of the country.
Solar Energy
The use of solar energy could represent 4% of the final energy consumption of the sector by the
year 2025.
In the case of water heating, it is assumed that there will be an installed capacity of
approximately 4,000,000 m2, which represents 13% of the energy consumption for water
heating in the residential sector.
In the case of heating, there will be approximately 25,000 urban homes with solar heating,
which represents 0.6% of the urban residential consumption for heating.
In the case of cooking, all rural homes in the areas of Argentina with optimum direct sun will
have a solar stove. The rural population will represent 108,000 homes with solar kitchens,
which will substitute approximately 23ktep/year of other energies (5.6% of the rural residential
consumption for heating). It is possible that some restrictions may come up during the winter
months in which solar radiation is lower. For such periods, as well as during the times when
weather conditions are adverse, a solar stove promotion program could include as a
complement a more efficient use of technologies using PLG, firewood or charcoal.
Wind Energy
In households with electric energy, wind energy penetrates slowly, reaching 98% of the energy
demand for water pumping in the year 2025 within a favorable scenario to this type of energy. In
households without Electric Energy, wind pumping meets 100% of the energy demand for water
pumping.
Biomass
Charcoal could reduce its use in 9.3% to 4.5% in the horizon year. Firewood, on the other hand,
reduces its use from 0.38% to 0.2% in cooking. On the other hand, use of firewood for water
heating and heating is slowly reduced until almost disappearing from urban areas. In rural
94
areas, firewood strongly goes backward from 11.5% to 2.86%. Charcoal reduces its use up to
0.36% in an Energy Efficiency scenario.
Solar Photovoltaic
The total of photovoltaic panels installed in rural households with resources deriving from the
PERMER programs reaches 2000 (200 kW – capacity peak). In construction there are other
3250 panels (335 kWp).
Table V.20. Households’ solar photovoltaic
2004 2008 2015 2025

Installed Capacity (MW) 6.5 13.5 48.3 1397
Generation (MWh/year) 11,863 20,498 73,450 2,125,000
The figures indicated a maximum potential. It is considered that one part corresponds to
interconnected photovoltaic energy (roofs, solar), where a double-control system is used.
Additionally, the first two lines in Annex II tables, summarize the participation of renewable in
the household consumption, breaking it down into urban and rural sectors for the base year
(first table) and for year 2030 (second table). It is the case of possible penetration objectives
given the current situation.
Note that while in the urban sector it is expected to almost double the renewable consumption,
in the rural sector its participation would decrease upon penetration of LPG, even though it is
not renewable, it is of better quality for the uses of this sector.
At the total consumption, it is expected that the participation of these sources will duplicate,
basically because it has been assumed that the objectives proposed by the new Law regulating
them will be complied with. However, even if such objectives were met, the role of new
renewable sources does not seem to represent a significant share due to the barriers to be
mentioned.
5.2.2.3 Enhancing Energy Security, Barriers to promote renewable energy use in household
sector
The main barriers detected in the implementation of renewable energy projects are presented
below:
Institutional, political and legal barriers
The official programs in charge of boosting rural energization –main penetration sector- tend to
satisfy the electricity and caloric use requirements of the scattered rural population by using
local energy resources, mainly wind and solar energy, without fully incorporating the possibility
of using the residue of forest activities, both of the field (forest management) and of the wood
industry, as well as the use of dung concentrated in feed lots, dairies, and others, as source of
energy (biogas production) and soil improvers.
95
One of the reasons for this partial use of the multiple resources available in the rural sector in
general, is the absence of an active comprehensive policy for the implementation of rural
energizing, that is to say, a policy that supports the industry for the production of the necessary
means for the use of renewable energy resources; one that supports users for the acquisition
of such means; technical assistance for the proper operating and maintenance of them; training
for the efficient and effective use of the available energy; and the integration, in a single
political-institutional instance, of the management of the resources generically called RES.
Economic and financial barriers.
Renewable require more initial capital for its implementation, which may turn investments
unattractive in a context of high financing costs, or even inaccessible for the low-income sectors
of the society and, much more for the poor ones. Therefore, the lack of alternative financial
mechanisms and incentives recognizing the non-economic benefits of the RES/T, is an
important barrier.
Technical barriers
Lack of detailed information on the distribution of population and their energy needs per type of
use, as well as the energy service payment capacities.
For many local production technologies, the lack of quality, production and equipment
installation standards is an important barrier. The implementation of projects with bad-quality
equipment and/or components is one of the reasons for the rejection of certain technologies by
the potential users.
Another important aspect has been the lack of operation and maintenance services and/or the
lack of training of the involved personnel, which has caused the failure of many demonstrative
projects.
Another barrier may be ascribed to the lack of sustained training and technical assistance
actions to secure the adequate operation, maintenance and general management, of the
infrastructure necessary not only to generate energy but also to use it.
5.2.3. Other Measures
In general terms, the deficiencies of the infrastructure reduce the productivity of the poor and
restrict the development of human resources; such aspects include the energy security as
regards the evolution of service infrastructure. The poor at urban areas are generally deprived
of proper sanitary facilities, drinking water, and electric power and gas grids. The priority seems
to concentrate it in the surge of communities, especially in urban areas lacking well defined
streets, public lighting, or other services, nor do they have legal titles to their lands (52). Then the
pressure on energy infrastructure is incorporated, which aggravates the situation.
There is a generalized consensus in the sense that the solution to the dilemma between the
capacity to access basic infrastructure services and the financial sustainability requires certain
kind of social policies to protect the poorest sectors from the impact of any rate increase. As
the income recovers and the access capacity improves, the focus of the social problem for
infrastructure sectors should move from social tariffs to social connection programs,
especially between water sectors, the sewer system -that is not included in the scope of this
(52) Hicks, Norman, 2003.
96
work-, natural gas and, to a lesser extent, electric networks. In these items there is a significant
deficit in coverage, and those who do not have access suffer considerable economic and social
costs. This is a key aspect not only to the energy security but to all the services of the social
type provided to the community.
Despite of the endless discussions on the need of social tariffs, no action has been taken for the
estimation of the cost of such policies. As a form of illustration of the possible costs, it is
assumed that the objective of the policies would be to maintain the subsistence
consumption cost of water, sewer system, electric power and gas for poor households
below 15% of their income. In view of the current prices, the total cost of this policy would be
of about $300 million per year (53), which would be widely below the general portfolio of
subsidies for such sectors, considering, above all, the increasing purchases of oil derivatives for
the generation of electric power.
Although some specific measures can be listed in here, it is not easy to separate them form
energy efficiency in a broad sense. Nevertheless some proposals can be mentioned.
Diversification of energy sources, on one hand this involves the use of more alternatives,
which might be more expensive than relying on a few fuels, on the other hand a complementary
source would probably help to make energy provision more reliable. A good example could be
the introduction of solar energy in households in order to reinforce existing hydrocarbons
heating, but this belongs to the renewable measure.
A good example of fuel diversification is the very successful introduction of Compressed Natural
Gas for transport sector in Argentina, but time prove additional complications due to the lack of
new oil/gas field in the Country, as well as the lack of investments in the expansion of the gas
system. So if a new fuel is to be introduced it must be carefully assessed the availability over
time, and the proper share that it can reach. Nevertheless additional care should rest on energy
rents allocation and profits disbursements. As the argentine case shows, it is inconvenient to
disconnect earnings from long term investments within a sector like Energy.
Other diversification alternatives do not count in the Household sector, as a final user. For
example the nuclear energy or electricity generation related options.
Awareness rising and public campaigns are definitively a necessary measure towards energy
security objective. The habits of the household sector are very difficult to modify, require long
time periods and could be expensive. But once the patterns of consumption are modified –
introducing energy saving behavior, permanent long term benefits can be achieved. The
programs aimed at informing the community of clean and save alternatives are also necessary
as complement for both energy efficiency measures and renewable energy penetration.
Energy efficiency policies in the residential sector should target both building construction -
including insulation quality - as well as the efficiency of heating appliances. However, a lack of
both consciousness and awareness prevent the design also being well insulated. There might
be several reasons for this particular situation, but the availability of cheap gas or the
expectation of it becoming available within the near future prevents from improving insulation.
As mentioned study concludes (54), policy measurements should be introduced gradually, in

order to improve building insulation, both current status and the availability of construction
materials and methods should be addressed by policy.
(53) Hicks, Norman, 2003.

(54) Gonzalez , 2007.
97
9 The very first step is related with awareness and public education on current energy status.
9 Develop regional and local technical offices for information directed at professionals,
builders and households
9 Research on low-cost building materials and methods should be promoted
9 Loans and subsidies to improve insulation quality
9 Building codes should include insulation requirements:
Another key group of measures – which in fact belong to energy efficiency in a broad sense
- is the construction characteristics of the buildings. Promote more energy-efficient
houses will largely reduce energy requirements.
On the other hand as an example of existing isolated measures, a small program with
subsidies on firewood for the poorest part of the southern Patagonia population – which runs
during the winter season - can be mentioned. In this program, some firewood is directly given at
no cost in certain locations, to people in neighborhoods at social risk. The program does not
include any education on how to improve the efficiency of dwellings and appliances. Therefore
the firewood provided is used in a somehow primitive way, avoiding the overcome of the energy
poverty and hence energy security problems (55).
Perhaps some alternatives or other measures aimed at securing energy provision are related
with the policy instruments available. From Command and Control to Economic Instruments a
wide range of alternatives can be employed by the energy planners in order to improve the
energy security issue, not only from the supply but also from the demand side. An example of
policy instrument aimed at social purposes that could also contribute to energy security, would
be linking company benefits to the actual consumption of electricity or natural gas. Some
reasons for the convenience of utilities’ commitment would be (56):
9 The interest of securing basic electricity or gas consumption (threshold), relevant in

presence of externalities like public health, home safety or water and sanitation provision.
9 If the consumption of electricity or gas - therefore the use of some appliances - by low
income households is a component of the welfare function of society, a good option to cash
transfers is found. A proper example may be when electricity allows educational activities in
poor areas.
9 Welfare programs involving services are less prone to fraud, if the consumptions of
electricity of low income households is clearly differential (smaller), again a key issue.
9 The introduction of distributive considerations in an energy prices restructure program can
be politically necessary. This was the case of Colombia’s 1991 constitution, which required
utility tariff to include social solidarity principles (57).
Of course this falls beyond the scope of the analysis, but it is useful to think in novel ways of
ruling or regulating utilities in order to reach social objectives within the profit path required by
private actors.
(55) Sagar, A.D., 2005.

(56) Estache, A., Gomez-Lobo, A and Leipziger, 2000.
(57) Corredor, G., 2005.
98
VI. Summary, Conclusions and follow up
A schematic summary of main conclusions is presented below, Executive Summary in turn

provides a brief description of our findings.
6.1. Summary of threats, measures, impacts and stakeholders
The objective of next tables is to summarize the threats/problem/vulnerability. Key energies are
Oil and Oil Products; Natural Gas and Electricity. Shown information is based on the analysis
done through the report and present in each column, the household sector specific issues are
remarked in blue.
i. first column presents a core diagnostic issue as a main weaknesses;

ii. then the tendency (▲,▼,=) indicating whether the weaknesses is expected to get worse,
better or equal and the time dimension expressing short term (ST), medium term (2-4
years) (MT) or long term (LT);
iii. third column indicates the nature of the threat (R: regulatory, I: institutional, P: physical or
PL: political) originated by the weaknesses;
iv. next shows the direct and indirect impacts of the threat over the energy system and the
economy - household sector is remarked in blue
v. a final column lists the stakeholders involved, with is relevant for addressing solutions or
measures (stated in general terms on final row) to overcome or mitigate the impacts. The
intention is to identify the complexity of the solution, as different stakeholders, with not
necessarily coincident or compatible objectives and strategies are involved.
99
Table VI.1.Summary of threats, impacts and stakeholders
Diagnostic
Time
Issue, as a Tendency
Threat / Problem / Vulnerability Direct/ Indirect Impacts Stakeholders involved
Weaknesses
9 Restrictions and limitations on supply.
9 Evidences of parallel/black market.
9 Growing level of derivates’ importations.
R: Lack of compliance of Hydrocarbons Law 9 Reduction of commercial balance (external trade) as
(concession contracts signed). exportation is reduced. 9 Energy Secretariat
9 Non-complied contracts are being renewed. 9 Reduction of fiscal revenues from royalties and other 9 National
9 Low royalties level (national oil exportations). taxes to oil exportation. Government
9 Oil companies are allowed to send a 70% of 9 Increase of electricity generation cost and hence, 9 Provincial
exportation proceedings to matrix house at home electricity tariff Governments
countries - disbursed earnings, dividends. 9 Restrictions to self generation of electricity 9 Environment &
9 Prices partially linked to international ones. 9 Most critical sectors affected by lack of fuel and Sustainable
9 Provinces (instead of the whole country) have the increment of energy costs are Agriculture and Development
property of reserves; they have weaker capacity of Transport. Most affected industrial activities: basic 9 Secretariat
negotiation than counterpart oil companies. chemistry, mineral extraction, and the sectors related 9 ENARSA - new
Difficulties for contracts enforcement, reserves to construction assets. Energy State
audit, among others. 9 Transport sector (both passengers and cargo) critical Company
situation due to lack of fuel. Increase in the public 9 Oil companies
I: There is a single Energy Secretariat department, subsidy, increase in transport costs for final goods,
ST ▲ concentrating the whole issue, isolated.
9 Producers,
High Oil inflation pressures - low income households more retailers, refiners
MT ▲ 9 Strong supply concentration (oligopoly under lax
dependence affected as they spent higher income share on final 9 Exportation and
LT ▲ regulation). consumption goods. Importation
9 Stakeholders’ pressures with high relative power 9 Encouragement, of Diesel consumption, due to companies
(compared to regulator) distortions in final price (lower taxes aimed at cargo 9 Transport Sector
9 Newly created energy company ENARSA is not transport) compared to gasoline cars. Difficulty of 9 Users and
endowed with enough budget, resources, staff, in refineries structure’s adjustment: lack of diesel, excess Consumers,
order to play a stronger role in the sector. of gasoline. (ADELCO Liga de
9 Stakeholders not interested in national market 9 Higher share of poor households’ income (even larger Acción del
(investments in new exploration, production, refining in terms of expenditure) is absorbed by energy Consumidor, etc.)
take place in other countries). sources and services. 9 CAMMESA-
9 LPG price increments are also having impact on poor Wholesale
P: Substantive reduction of reserves wellbeing, reducing their quality of life. Substitution for Electricity Market
wood and other dirtier sources in the short run. Administrator
PL: Regulatory signals given in opposition to Rational 9 Governing functions are threatened as crisis spreads, Company
Use of Energy. aggravated by the general insecurity as basic services
9 Lack of long term planning. provision is in risk. Energy sector impacts can trigger a
9 Absence of coherence between actions. major crisis if manifested together with other structural
impacts (unemployment, increase in offenses and
crimes).
Solutions: Rational use of Energy in transport, services, and household sector. Increased and empowered regulatory function from the State. Political and Institutional intervention is necessary.
100
Diagnostic
Time Stakeholders
Threat / Problem / Vulnerability Direct/ Indirect Impacts involved
Weaknesses
9 Energy
Secretariat
R: The legal framework of the reform remains almost 9 National
9 Restrictions and limitations on supply.
unmodified. Government
9 Non-complied contracts are being renewed. 9 Lack of pipes’ capacity during winter, due to residential
9 Environment &
9 Lack of control and monitoring of concessionaries activity. heating use in cities. Interruption to industrial and
Sustainable
9 Increasing production prices paid, while privates actors electricity generation sectors (switch to oil derivates).
Development
express that they are not attractive enough (for developing 9 Reduction in quality of service provision.
9 Secretariat
further investments) 9 Substitution by imported oil derivates (fuel oil for
9 increasing Bolivian gas prices (imported alternative supply) 9 ENARSA
electricity generation).
9 Importations from Bolivia are not warranted. 9 Gas companies
9 Reduction of commercial balance (external trade) funds.
9 Compromising exportations to Chile are not warranted. 9 Producers,
9 Problems for gas network expansion, lack of connection
9 Tariff structure do not encourage rational use retailers,
(encouragement of extracting as much as possible) and between earnings and further investments obligation.
9 Exportation and
are uneven among final users, 9 The network does not expand towards poor households,
Importation
9 Regulation and Control are weak. very high costs of connection.
companies
9 Renegotiation of contracts (post devaluation) and 9 Further difficulties by lack of LPG, and low cost of
9 Transport
international Court legal claims (sues) from private actors electricity induces electrical appliances bought for caloric
are pending. Sector
uses. Non rational use of energy, pressures on electricity
9 I: There is a single Energy Secretariat department, 9 Users and
High Natural ST ▲ demand.
concentrating the whole issue, isolated. Consumers:
Gas MT▲ 9 Interruption of CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) provision
9 Strong supply concentration (oligopoly under lax (ADELCO Liga
dependence LT ► regulation).
triggers more consumption of gasoline (as big share of
de Acción del
9 Stakeholders’ pressures with high relative power public transport uses dual fuels).
Consumidor,
(compared to regulator) 9 Reduction in Industrial production and productivity,
etc.)
9 Newly created energy company ENARSA is not endowed eventual problems of employment.
9 CAMMESA
with enough budget, resources, staff, in order to play a 9 Problems in electricity supply to all sectors.
stronger role in the sector. 9 Gas Regulatory
9 Increased lack of Thermal Generation Availability, and
9 Increasingly open questions regarding public binding Entity-
reduction in emergency capacity reserve.
contracts for gas pipes and infrastructure building. ENARGAS
9 Increase of electricity generation cost and hence,
Interrupted Works due to sound corruption cases. 9 Electricity
P: Substantive reduction of reserves, but real dimension is not electricity tariff
Regulatory
known by government. 9 Problems with non energy provision (petrochemical
Entity-ENRE
9 Strong dependence on gas for Electricity Power industry), cost increases,
Generation 9 Negative environmental impact, as Gas replacement
Chile, Bolivia, Brazil
PL: Regulatory signals given in opposition to Rational Use of involves more emissions of GHG.
Energy. Governments
9 Impacts on poor wellbeing, reducing their quality of life,
9 Lack of long term planning. as prices of final consumption goods increases,
9 Absence of coherence between actions. Transport
triggering inflation.
9 Limited public awareness efforts towards a more efficient equipment
final use of gas Exportation and
Importation
companies
Solutions: Rational use of Energy in services, household sector and large electricity users, In depth revision of tariff and concession contracts. Electricity generation diversification: hydro,
renewable, nuclear, coal, nuclear. Equitable Regional Energy Integration. Increased and empowered regulatory function from the State. Political and Institutional intervention is necessary.
101
Diagnostic
Time
Threat / Problem / Vulnerability Direct/ Indirect Impacts Stakeholders involved
Weaknesses
Remains almost unmodified.
9 Un clear incentives for investment in generation.
9 Full costs are not fully transferred to all users, 9 Restrictions on supply. 9 Energy Secretariat
distortions in electricity tariff, regressive structure. 9 Increased lack of Thermal Generation Availability, 9 National
9 Tariff structure opposite to rational use of energy, and reduction in emergency capacity reserve. Government
as the more consumption, the lower the price paid 9 Increase of electricity generation cost and hence, 9 Environment &
per kWh. electricity tariff Sustainable
9 Weak control and regulation. 9 Reduction in quality of service provision. Development
9 Renegotiation of contracts (post devaluation) and 9 Increased Electricity Importation (Brazil). Secretariat
international Court legal claims (sues) from private 9 Reduction of commercial balance (external trade)
actors are pending. funds. 9 Utilities
9 Problems in electricity supply to all sectors. 9 Generators
I: Stakeholders acting also in hydrocarbons production 9 Electricity grids do not expand towards poor 9 Transporters
put pressures on regulator, higher relative power households, high costs of connection and provision
Electricity (compared to regulator) to poor households. 9 Users and
Supply ST ▲ 9 Impacts on poor wellbeing, reducing their quality of Consumers
P: in the short run the supply would not mach demand life, as prices of final consumption goods increases, (ADELCO Liga de
Restrictions: MT▲ 9 Strong dependence on gas for Electricity Power triggering inflation. Acción del
Equipment and LT ► Generation. 9 Further difficulties by lack of LPG, and low cost of Consumidor, etc.)
fuels 9 Reduced dual thermal supply (gas & fuel oil). electricity induces electrical appliances bought for 9 CAMMESA
9 Limitation in liquid fuels’ logistic provision. caloric uses. Non rational use of energy, pressures 9 Gas Regulatory
on electricity demand. Entity-ENARGAS
Pl: Regulatory signals given in opposition to Rational 9 Reduction in Industrial production and productivity, 9 Electricity
Use of Energy. eventual problems of employment. Regulatory Entity-
9 Lack of long term planning. 9 Governing functions are threatened as crisis ENRE
9 Absence of coherence between actions among spreads, aggravated by the general insecurity as
different chains (sources) of energy basic services provision is in risk. Energy sector Brazil Government
9 Reduced public awareness efforts towards a more impacts can trigger a major crisis if manifested
efficient final use of electricity. together with other structural impacts 9 Appliances /
9 Signals in opposition to Rational use of energy. (unemployment, increase in offenses and crimes). Generation
9 equipment
manufacturers
Solutions: Increased and empowered regulatory function from the State. Political and Institutional intervention is necessary. Rational use of Energy in transport, services, and household sector. In
depth revision of tariff and concession contracts. Electricity generation diversification: hydro, renewable, nuclear, coal, nuclear. Equitable Regional Energy Integration.
Source: authors’ elaboration. Notes:
• It is not unambiguous to identify in which column the issue should go. E.G. the increase on productive costs due to gas importations, due to the absence of connection between the sales proceedings and
the required investment to maintain the hydrocarbons chain sustainable, is a clear impact of the verified threat, but also a response or measure from the industry. Something similar can be said regarding the
households and the decision of buying electrical appliances for home heating – instead of more efficient gas appliances - due to the very low price of electricity and the lack of extension of the gas grids.
• Some of the measures adopted by a stakeholder might enhance its own situation regarding energy insecurity, but the Country get worse.
102
6.2. Follow up
The report presents a diagnosis of the principal reasons that threaten the safety of supply in
case of Argentina, for both the macroeconomic level as well as the Household sector.
Alternatives scenarios presented potentials actions or strategies that identify the existing
possibilities related to energy efficiency, energy matrix diversification - particularly renewables
encouragement - or specific strategies for the Household Sector.
Nevertheless the topic is far from being exhausted; the possibility of advancing in offers major
specificity would need to develop additional studies concentrated in the sectors identified like
the most vulnerable.
The analyses developed here are preliminary approaches, whose principal contribution must be
associated to an initial diagnosis and some general proposals that do not include overall
strategies, actions and specific measures.
For a future phase some important pending issues can be further developed.
Especially the determination of priorities among the problems brought by both, the threats and
the vulnerabilities detected, considering the level of complexity and the real possibilities once
the limitations of existing resources are recognized. It is suggested that the above mentioned
analysis should be carried on for each of three principal detected weaknesses summarized in:
the High Oil and Natural Gas dependence, and the Electricity Supply restrictions (Equipment
and fuel oils).
1. At the national level a core contribution would be to propose and develop a strategy to
diminish the pressure on the fossil liquid and gaseous fuels; and to extend the offer of
Nuclear power, Hydro energy, Mineral Coal and Renewables.
2. At the level of final consumption sectors, it is necessary to analyze the implementation

of actions orientated at a major equity in the safety of supply. This will imply
incorporating, for example, the regions not supplied by Natural Gas and guaranteeing
the access to the GLP to the sectors of minor level of revenue. Another relevant aim
would be to guarantee the access to the energy to reasonable prices to the industrial
sector, especially in small and medium establishments.
In other words, it would give priority to the study of the problematic concerns to key
sectors. Once priorities are defined, there might be established specific aims and
strategic lines of action, which might be discussed by the principal actors related to the
definite problematic.
3. Another proposal, linked with a pending issue, is the evaluation of the real impacts that
generates the lack of energy, as well as the inefficiencies (energetic, economic, political,
etc.) that are generated, not only at the demand level, but also at the supply level.
To this respect, the following stage should center, at least in case of Argentina in three
consumers' modules:
9 The industrial sector of small and medium companies

9 The Residential Urban sector of minor level of revenue
9 The Residential Rural Sector of minor level of revenue.
103
ANNEX I. Questionnaire
Fundación Bariloche is presently working on a brief paper on the topic of Supply Security and
Energy Efficiency, on the basis of the Argentine Case Study.
According to the methodology we intend to apply, the opinion of qualified experts is to be

sought out on topics related to supply security, along the lines of the following questionnaire.
We kindly request you devote a few minutes of your time to fill in the questionnaire or add any
comments you consider appropriate. You are not expected to answer all the questions; it is up
to you to choose which ones to answer. Write your answers on the line below the question.
Thanks for devoting your valuable time to this.
Questionnaire
1- What do you understand by Energy Supply Security?
2- Which objectives underlie supply security? Well-being, smooth running of the economy,
physical permanent availability at an affordable price for everybody, environmental restrictions,
sustainable development? Others? Which ones?
3- Is Supply Security synonymous with maximization of autonomy or minimization of

dependence? Yes? No? Why?
4- What’s the role of efficient use of energy? Why?
5- Promoting savings in demand requires the definition of priority sectors. Which are they, in
your opinion?
6- Is there something like “perfect energy”, or is it necessary to rely on a mix of all kinds?
7- Is final price important, or is supply security to be achieved at any cost?
8- Do regional cooperation and energy integration contribute to reducing energy vulnerability? On

what conditions? What can guarantee it?
9- The diversification of fuels on the offer side must be understood by products (types of fuels) and
by regions (countries of origin). What’s the importance of these two topics in supply security?
10- Which sectors are the most vulnerable to supply insecurity? Why?
11- Regarding energy matters, are we in the face of a more uncertain future at a global level?
Why?
12- Is it more difficult nowadays to fully understand the way the system is run? Why?
13- Which could be the most suitable policy instruments to improve supply security? Is it
possible to achieve a robust situation?
14- How should the poorest and more marginal sectors be incorporated to public energy
policies regarding supply security?
Your comments
104
ANNEX II. Estimates of Renewable Energy Use the final energy demand by usage
Base Year and Year 2030.
Other Primary
Energy Solar Wind Firewood Charcoal Biofuels Hydrogen Total
Sources
Sector
Cooking: 0.38%
Cooking:
Urban residential - - Heating: 0.22% - - - 2.40%
9.28%
Water heating: 0.04%
Water heating: 7.6%

Water pumping: Cooking:
Rural residential - Cooking: 17.4% - - - 21.49%
93.3% 4.4%
Heating: 30.6%
Commercial, Services and Public - - All uses: 2.03% - - - - 2.03%
Transportation - - - - - - - -
Farming - - - - - - 1.48% 1.48%

All uses
Cattle - (pumping): - - - - - 16.68%
16.68%
Non-metallic minerals:
2.93% + 5.11%
Industry - - 1.46% - - - 9.09%
(husks)
Other industries: 7.57%
Total - 0.28% 0.63% 0.48% - - 2.09% 3.48%
Source: Final Report of the Technical Assistance Project for the preparation of the “Strategic Energy Plan of the Argentine Republic” designed by IDEE/FB for the Energy
Department, 2007.
105
Use of renewable energies in the final energy demand by use.
Alternative Scenario – Year 2030
Other
Energy Solar Wind Firewood Charcoal Biofuels Hydrogen Primary Total
Sources
Sector
Water heating:
Cooking: 0.2% Cooking:
Urban residential 12% - - 4.9%
Heating: 0.1% 4.5%
Heating: 0.6%
Water heating: Water heating: 0.5%

Water pumping: Cooking:
Rural residential 34.5% Cooking: 1% - 19.2%
98% 1%
Cooking: 5.6% Heating: 15%
All uses (Water

Commercial, Services and heating, All uses BD All uses:
All uses: 0.1% - 2.1%
Public Cooking and (pumping): 0.78% 0.04%
Heating): 1.14%
BD Road:
7.55%
Transportation - - - - Road: 0.64% 9.4%
BE Road:
1.88%
Farming Drying: 12% - - - BD: 14.3% 0.23% 15.59%
All uses BD: 15%

Cattle - - - 42.7%
(pumping): 25% BG: 2.7%
Other industries Non-metallic minerals:
1.86% +
Industry (Process heat): - 0.49% - BD: 0.10% 6.29%
3.83% (husks)
1.1%: Other industries: 2.8%
BD: 3.2%
Total 0.97% 0.36% 0.17% 0.20% BE: 0.45% 0.15% 1.67% 7.2%
BG: 0.02%
Source: Final Report of the Technical Assistance Project for the preparation of the “Strategic Energy Plan of the Argentine Republic” designed by IDEE/FB for the Energy
Department, 2007.
106
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• AIT. Concept Note for the “Energy Security” Theme – Revised Version – November
2007.
• Annecke Wendy, Marialba Endelli and Claudio Carpio. Report on the Acceptability and
socio-economic impact of prepayment meters in Merlo, Buenos Aires
• Arza Camila, La privatización de los servicios públicos y sus impactos distributivos,
Universidad de Quilmes, FLACSO, Idep, 2002
• Bauman, Z. “En busca de la política (In search for politics)”. Fondo de Cultura
Económica –FCE–, Buenos Aires 2001.
• Bertero, Raúl, Greco, Esteban; and Rodríguez, Felipe. CEARE. Equidad Distributiva y
Tarifa. Documento preparado en el marco del convenio entre el Centro de Estudios para
la Actividad Regulatoria Energética (CEARE) y el Ente Nacional Regulador de la
Electricidad (ENRE). May 2005.
• Bravo, 2004 a. Estudio de requerimientos básicos y mínimos de los pobladores urbanos
y rurales pobres e indigentes de Argentina, IDEE/FB, 2004
• Bravo, 2004 b. Requerimientos de los pobladores pobres e indigentes en el sector
servicios, IDEE/FB, 2004
• Bravo, 2004 c. Requerimientos de energía para el sector productivo urbano y rural
agrupado, IDEE/FB, 2004
• CAMMESA. Cammesa, 2004. Evaluación de riesgos – Mediano y largo plazo – Periodo
2006-2008, 2006
• CAMMESA. Wolesale Electricity Market Administrator Company, “Annual Reports”.
• Corredor, G. Electricity Research Group, National University of Colombia.
“Continuidades y Rupturas: Veinte años del Sector Eléctrico Colombiano” (Continuities
and Ruptures twenty years of Colombian Electricity Sector). unpublished, 2005.
• De Dicco, R., December 2004, http://www.lafogata.org/04arg/arg12/ar_notas.htm.
• Dubrovsky. Hilda. “The Role Of Renewable Energy In Electricity Access For The Poor In
Argentina”, IDEE/FB, GNESD – Access. Argentina 2004
• ECONOLER INTERNACIONAL “Support to the energy efficiency program design in
electric power distribution companies”, November 2007.
• ENARGAS. Commissions’ plenary session, Argentine National Senate. “Social Interest
tariff”. June 5th 2003.
• Energy Secretariat, Energy Balance. Series
• Energy Secretariat, Energy Efficiency, Project Executive Summary. Gef Council Work
Program Submission. March 2006
• Energy Secretariat. “Annual Reports”.
• ESENER S.A. “Analysis of the Potential reduction of Greenhouse Gas emissions in the
Electric Power Sector of the Argentine Republic (Part I: Energy Efficiency)”. March, 2006
• Estache, A., Gomez-Lobo, A. and Leipziger, D. “Utilities "Privatization" and the Poor's
Needs in Latin America: Have we learned enough to get it right?”. World Bank, London,
2000 p. 21-22.
• Fundación Bariloche. “Renewable Energy Technologies for Poverty alleviation in
Argentina – Niche Assessment and Policy Outlines”. 2006.
• Fundación Bariloche. Final Report of the Technical Assistance Project for the
preparation of the “Strategic Energy Plan of the Argentine Republic” designed by
IDEE/FB for the Energy Department, 2007
• Fundación Bariloche. Renewable Energy Technologies for Poverty alleviation in
Argentina – Niche Assessment and Policy Outlines. GNESD - RETs II. final draft.
December 2006.
107
• Fundación Bariloche. UPEA Theme case study: poor neighborhoods of Villa Fiorito and
Budge, southern Greatest Buenos Aires. GNESD – UPEA. Final Report, 2008.
• Gonzalez A.D et.al. “Residential energy use in one-family households with natural gas
provision in a city of the Patagonian Andean region”. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 2141–
2150.
• Grubb, Michael; Butler, Lucy and Twome, Paul. Diversity and security in UK electricity
generation: The influence of low-carbon objectives. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 4050–4062.
• Hicks, Norman, et.al. “Argentina – Crisis and Poverty”. Poverty Evaluation Report, World
Bank, July 2003. pages 48-49.
• INDEC, Permanent Home Survey. Series
• INDEC. Basic unsatisfied needs. Series
• INDEC. Nacional Agricultural Census
• INDEC. National Population Census. Series
• Kozulj, R. Fundación Bariloche. “Energy, Development and Poverty in the 21st. Century:
which are the challenges? Which are the answers?”. (to be printed).
• Lestard/Franke and Fundación Bariloche. “Proyecto de Eficiencia Energética Argentina.
Informe Final”. Buenos Aires, December 2005.
• Lestard/Franke y Fundación Bariloche. PROYECTO DE EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA
ARGENTINA. Contrato de Consultoría en el marco del Préstamo BIRF 4454. Nota
Permer Nº 195/2005 - ACU CODESPA 1647. INFORME FINAL. Buenos Aires,
Diciembre 2005
• ÑUKE. Wood stoves. www.mmjsrl.com.ar
• OLADE, Energética 21. Magazine p.36
• Sagar, A.D., “Alleviating energy poverty for the world’s poor”. Energy Policy 33, 1367–
1372. 2005.
• Torcuato Di Tella Foundation and Institute. National Communication: National
Adaptation Program and Regional Adaptation Plans. Chapter: Energy Sector
vulnerability and adaptation. November 2006.
• Undersecretariat of Technical Programming and Labor Studies, Ministry of Labor,
Employment and Social Security, based on data from the Permanent Home Survey by
INDEC (National Institute of Statistics and Censuses).
• Venema, H. D. and Cissem M, Eds. 2004., Seeing The Light. Adapting to climate
change with decentralized renewable energy in developing countries “Decentralized
Renewable Energy and the Clean Development Mechanism: Embracing the Delhi
Declaration. Part I: The Mitigation-Adaptation Nexus through Energy Access. Country
Case Study: Argentina”. CCKN, IISD, Winnipeg, Canada.
108

Energy Security

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Energy Security

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fundación Bariloche

“Energy Security and Energy Efficiency”

(peer reviewed version November 2009)

Buenos Aires, October 2008

ADELCO League of Action(Share) of the Consumer

ADT Added Value Tax

1.1. Background of the study

Energy Security is a key energy policy objective in a framework of sustainable energy

9 diversification of energy supply,

1.2. Objective of the study

a) At the household level:

1.3. Scope and limitations

Information sources and expected results

The following information will be obtained:

The main information sources are:

1.4. Why energy security is a potential threat for Argentina?

Demand growth and Energy Intensity

(3) Further developed in sections 3 and 4.

As mentioned, the diversity of energy resources in the region is remarkable. Venezuela,

The relevance of energy security in the household sector

They are reflected in:

9 Power capacity general shortage, due to lack of investments.

1.5. Report structure

2.2. Description of the Methodology

Analysis at National Level

9 Energy integration in socioeconomic programs

3.1. Main socio-economic indicators

3.1.1. Population growth

Natural growth Births Mortality Net migration

Table III.2.Trends in population and number of dwellings (%)

2004 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2004-2030

Population (millon) 37.4 40.1 42.1 44.1 46.3 48.7 11.3

Figure III.1.GDP Trend in million of pesos (base year: 1993)

(Billion $ 04) 2004 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2004-2030

Source: own estimation from INDEC data.

3.1.3. Poverty and Inequity

Figure III.2.Poverty and unemployment trends in GBA from 1988

People below the poverty line

date of the survey

Less than 10 years old Pensioners Unemployed Employed

Source: INDEC, Permanent Home Survey.

Figure III.4.Gini index for income distribution (1993 – 2005)

Source: INDEC National Population Census

Figure III.5.b) Percentage of population with unmet basic needs. By Provinces

Source: INDEC National Population Census

Source: Energy Secretariat, Series BEN National Energy Balance.

Figure III.7.Total supply of primary energy (2004)

Hydraulic Energy Nuclear Natural Gas Oil

Coal Firewood Bagasse Other primary resources

Source: Energy Secretariat, Series BEN National Energy Balance.

Table III.4. Fuel consumption for conventional power generation

2002 2003 2004 2005 ∆ 05/02

Source: Energy Secretariat, Series BEN National Energy Balance.

Grid distributed gas Electricity Others Total gasoline

Source: Energy Secretariat, Series BEN National Energy Balance.

Figure III.9. Population with access to electricity by grid (%)

Source: Energy Secretariat

Figure III.10. Percentage of population with access to grid-distributed gas

Pampa region 58.9

Source: Energy Secretariat

Table III.5. General Indicators

As mentioned a BAU scenario has been considered. It includes technological innovations as

3.3.1. Energy Demand Scenario

Source: own elaboration.