Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AT3 Portfolio
Jing Huan Xie
Ayman Khan
Baruch Tong
Christian Brown
The Environmental Discovery Centre
Views
The landform and topography of the park means the
building is kept hidden within the landscape and
furthermore through careful placing within the tree
canopy. The building is not visible from key viewing
points surrounding the site, e.g. the Castle. Although
it minimises the views overlooking the scheme,
the views out are maximised by large portal frame
structure that give views in northern and southern
directions, the courtyards enhance the views east
and west.
Portals
Steel post and beams create portal frames that capture the picturesque views of the
country park, and become a devices to join the residential and educational blocks
together along with walkways.
Courtyards
The spacing of the portal frames define courtyard spaces that allow nature to in-
tergrate itself with the scheme, the courtyards serve different purposes, firstly the
northern entrance yard, acts as a threshhold for people coming into site. The middle,
is a gatehring space for visitors and nature, and also protecting the ecological pond.
Finally, the third connects the building with a view platform which allows access to
western views.
Finger Pavilions
The long thin shape of these buildings help reduce the visual impact of the scheme
itself. The are constructed from two typologies of modular pre fabricated units, one
each for the educational and residential wings of the sheme.
Geological Analysis of Ground Structure
Borehole Results
1 2
Analysis
Site
The subsoil structure is not paticularly firm with
several metres of non structurally sound soil and
pebbles. The sil becomes finer the further down the
borehole goes. The bedrock is a combination of soft
rocks.
Location of nearest 1
publically accessible
Superficial Layer
Glaciofluvial Deposits
Sand and gravel
Diamicton
Topsoil
Boulder Clay
Bedrock Layer
Fluvio-glacial sands
1. http://mapapps.bgs.ac.uk/geologyofbritain/home
2. http://mapapps.bgs.ac.uk/GeoRecords/GeoRecords.html
Mudstone
Structure
- First, the portals are flat roofed structures made from posts and beams,
with bracing and purlins which support the services that run with in the
walls. The frame is cladded with pre patinated copper.
Foundations
As stated on the previous page the soil structure in Margam Park is not suf-
ficiently dense to warrant the use of deep trench foundations ( which would
defer from the brief concepts of a low-impact sustainable structure. )
As a result of both the physical conditions on site and the ecological considera-
tion of the client the best course of action was to use pile foundations or ‘piloti’
to lift the structure off the ground and evenly distribute the load across several
Portal Frames
The portal frames need to span a distance of 40m from east to west, in a 7mx8m grid for the
roof, the only as it is only a piece3 of structure no live load acts upon it, apart from the weath-
er, but there is a dead load from services that it has to carry and the actuual structure itself. for
stability there are bracing elements that span inbetween the grid to to keep the rigid form in
the wind and not deform under pressure.
The columns that hold up the roof structure is 6.25m and are spaced 8m apart so that it doesn’t
disturb the view.
The long span means that the roof structure needs to be stabilised with bracing with-
in the roof structure to keep the form rigid and unaffected by the loads that act unpon
Structure Span
The Portal frames have a simple, single storey post and beam section, it
spans a distance of 56m, the height of the column is 6m, hence a rolled steel
I beam is used as the vertical support.
1:100 Elevation
Finger Pavilions
The key concept beind the pavillion is that they are pre fabricated units tyhat are modular to allow for
quick and easy construction on site, due to the short time frame there was to build the scheme.
The structural elements of the pre fabricated units are shown in the axonometric drawing below. Both
residential and educational blocks are made from the the same materials and wall constructions.
Chestnut horizontal
cladding
Piloti
1:100 section of entrance portal and residential units
The architects and construction team had just 18months to complete the design process and the bulk of the construction in order to qualify for funding from the European Union.
In order to do this two variations of ‘Modern Methods of Construction’ were utilised ; volumetric/ panel and Post and Beam structures.
The bedroom units were prefabricated off site and then fixed on site by crane; each meaures 3.6m x 6m with a 2.4m wide circulation spine section attached to each unit. The units were constructed out of a steel and timber frame clad in
locally sourced hardwoods. The modules could be rapidly assembled to form a watertight structure which would only require additiobnal aesthetic work.
Construct bedroom framework using steel beams Use timber joist to make each unit structurall sound and clad with Insert Insulation, waterproofing and clad with panels of British
ply-wood. Sweet Chestnut timber.
transport to site
Phase 2 : Assembly
Volumetric Components : Upon arrival on site the bedroom units were lifted into place on the steel frame ontop of the piloti, this was repeated for the entire accomodation
Cranes lifted the prefabricated accomodation onto the frameowrk. The ground and first floors of the accommodation units completed.
Post and Beam Components : The classroom spaces and refactory required larger spans of timber and steel in order to span the structures as large areas of glazing or open facades were required as
part of the design. In order to maitain the speed of assembly all the posts were of standard length and easily assembled on site using basic techniques as highlighted by the Segal method.
Steel framework fo the classroom walls to be attached onto. The timber walkway being constructed with protective weather buffer. External panel cladding being applied to the classrooms.
Phase 3 : Finishes
EDUCATION PORTAL
Ceiling Finshes
Plasterboard
Ceiling Finishes
Plasterboard
Firerated Plasterboard
ENTRANCE, RECEPTION, KITCHEN, DINING AREA
Ceiling Finishes
Plasterboard
Ceiling Finishes
Plasterboard
2
5
1. Curtain wall glazing with sliding doors; see plan for locations.
5. Structural Colum.
6. Floor Finish / Cement Screed / Visqueen Vapour Barrier / 75mm Kingspan thermafloor Insulation / Damp proof membrane / Structural Deck
Roof : Type 1
1
5
3 4
3. Rodeca Panels
4. Structural Colum
5. TPO Single ply broofing membrane / 150mm Kingspan Thermaproof rgid insulation / Visqueen Vapour barrier / 18mm plywood decking painted on underside / Metsec Purlins set in steel frame.
Roof : Type 2
SW treated timbers
1 2
1. Ribbed timber decking
Timber joists
1 Timber joists
Models
Number Of Floors - 2
Restaurant / Multi Use Space
Tempratures where found by averaging the winter and summer optimums. This means that the graphs produced by the table are comparable. In reality the optimum tempratures would be slightly lower
during the winter months and slightly higher during summer months due to different clothing.
The rooms are only heated to the required temprature during hours of use.
Example of Internal Gains
These are the input numbers for the restaurant. There are several variables that the spread sheet cannot acount for. For instance the room will not always need artifical lighting and will not always have 15 people in the room from 08:00
to 20:00
Air changes, lighing and internal gains only apply when the room is occupied.
The spreadsheet does not account for mechanical ventilation or accidental ventilation eg a door or window being left open.
Hour Desired Internal Temperature Number of air change in the room (ach) OCCUPANTS (W) SMALL POWER (W) LIGHTING (W)
01:00 15 0 0
02:00 15 0 0
03:00 15 0 0
04:00 15 0 0
05:00 15 0 0
06:00 15 0 0
07:00 15 0 0
08:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
09:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
10:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
11:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
12:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
13:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
14:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
15:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
16:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
17:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
18:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
19:00 21 0.5 2600 43 2304
20:00 15 0 0
21:00 15 0 0
22:00 15 0 0
23:00 15 0 0
24:00 0 0 0
Teaching Space
Heating energy demand (24 hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (24 hours) (kWh)
2,000 0
1,800
-50
1,600
1,400 -100
1,200 -150
1,000
800 -200
600 -250
400
The energy demand shows the energy needed per
200
-300 month to keep the building at optimum temprature and
0 -350 the cooling energy demand shows how much energy
needs to be lost to maintain the building at its optimum
-400
temprature.
-450
140.0 -14.0 The total occupancy - the total 24hour = the wasted
energy
120.0
100.0 -14.5 This is the same for the total cooling energy demand.
80.0
-15.0
60.0
40.0
-15.5
20.0
0.0
TOTAL - 24 hours: TOTAL - Occupancy: -16.0
Heating energy demand (occupancy hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (occupancy hours)
1,600 (kWh)
1,400 0
1,200 -50
1,000 -100
800 -150
600 -200
400 -250
200 -300
0 -350
-400
-450
Accommodation Units
Heating energy demand (24 hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (24 hours) (kWh)
7 0
6
-50
5
4 -100
3
-150
2
1 -200
0
-250
-300
Total Energy Demand over the year Total Cooling Energy Demand over the year
1.2 0.0
TOTAL - 24 hours: TOTAL - Occupancy:
1.0 -20.0
0.8
-40.0
0.6
-60.0
0.4
-80.0
0.2
-100.0
0.0
TOTAL - 24 hours: TOTAL - Occupancy: -120.0
Heating energy demand (occupancy hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (occupancy hours)
7 (kWh)
6 0
5 -20
4 -40
3 -60
2 -80
1 -100
0 -120
-140
-160
Restaurant / Multi Use Space
Heating energy demand (24 hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (24 hours) (kWh)
3,000 0
2,500
-2,000
2,000
-4,000
1,500
1,000 -6,000
500 -8,000
0
-10,000
-12,000
Total Energy Demand over the year Total Cooling Energy Demand over the year
80.0 -298.0
TOTAL - 24 hours: TOTAL - Occupancy:
70.0
-300.0
60.0
-302.0
50.0
-304.0
40.0
30.0 -306.0
20.0 -308.0
10.0
-310.0
0.0
TOTAL - 24 hours: TOTAL - Occupancy: -312.0
Heating energy demand (occupancy hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (occupancy hours)
1,000 (kWh)
900 0
800
700 -2,000
600
500 -4,000
400
300 -6,000
200
100 -8,000
0
-10,000
-12,000
Interia Circulation
Heating energy demand (24 hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (24 hours) (kWh)
2,500 0
2,000 -1,000
1,500 -2,000
-3,000
1,000
-4,000
500
-5,000
0
-6,000
Total Energy Demand over the year Total Cooling Energy Demand over the year
80.0 -146.0
TOTAL - 24 hours: TOTAL - Occupancy:
70.0 -147.0
60.0 -148.0
50.0
-149.0
40.0
-150.0
30.0
-151.0
20.0
-152.0
10.0
-153.0
0.0
TOTAL - 24 hours: TOTAL - Occupancy: -154.0
Heating energy demand (occupancy hours) (kWh) Cooling energy demand (occupancy hours)
1,600 (kWh)
1,400 0
1,200 -500
1,000 -1,000
800 -1,500
600 -2,000
-2,500
400
-3,000
200
-3,500
0
-4,000
-4,500
-5,000
January Teaching Space
2,000
The following graphs show the Energy Gains and Losses over a twenty four hour period. First in
January then in July. 1,000
The location of the data is set to Port Talbot, Wales.
0
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00:00
As you would expect the solar gains (Qs) during the day time are significantly higher than in the
night and the Qs is higher in July than it is in January -1,000
-2,000
There is more energy lost through Inflitration (Qinf) and Ventilation (Qv) in the winter months
because of the larger temprature gradient, between the interia and exteria and the increase in average
wind speed.
-3,000
During the winter months more energy is lost through Fabric Conduction (Qc) as there is a larger -4,000
temprature graident between the interia and exteria.
-5,000
These graphs fail to show the difference in internal gains from occupance as the optimum tem-
pratures where found by averaging the winter and summer optimums. This means that the graphs
produced by the table are comparable. In reality the optimum tempratures would be slightly lower
-6,000
during the winter months and slightly higher during summer months due to different clothing.
QI (W) Qc (W) Qs (W) Qv (W) Qinf (W)
Accommodation Units
500
400
300
200
100
0
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00:00
-100 Key
QJ Internal Gains
-200
Qc Fabric Conduction
-300
Qs Solar Gains
-400
Qv Ventilation
QI (W) Qc (W) Qs (W) Qv (W) Qinf (W)
Qinf Infiltration
January Restaurant / Multi Use Space
15,000
10,000
5,000
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00:00
-5,000
-10,000
-15,000
Interia Circulation
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00:00
-2,000
-4,000 Key
QJ Internal Gains
-6,000
Qc Fabric Conduction
-8,000
Qs Solar Gains
-10,000
Qv Ventilation
QI (W) Qc (W) Qs (W) Qv (W) Qinf (W)
Qinf Infiltration
July Teaching Space
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
-500
-1,000
-1,500
-2,000
Accommodation Units
600
500
400
300
200
100
Key
0
QJ Internal Gains
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
-100 Qc Fabric Conduction
Qinf Infiltration
July Restaurant / Multi Use Space
In this Graph you can see that at around mid day the 40,000
energy gained/lost through Qc becomes almost negliga-
ble. This is because the low average U-Value created by
35,000
the large windows.
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
-5,000
Interia Circulation
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Key
QJ Internal Gains
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Qc Fabric Conduction
Qs Solar Gains
-5,000
Qv Ventilation
QI (W) Qc (W) Qs (W) Qv (W) Qinf (W)
Qinf Infiltration
Outgoing Costs
On average houses in the UK consume 84% of their energy bill on Space Heating and Hot Water
and the remaining 16% on electrical appliances.3
4
The public released emission /year / m2 are 9.09 kgCO2/m2
Gas
= 28524.42kgCO2 x 0.84
= 23960.51kgCO2
23960.51kgCO2 / 0.19kgCO2/kWhr
= 126107kWhr
126107kWhr x 9.01p
= £11349
Electric
The above Calculation are the Annual energy/Co2 Consumption for the building released by the architects.
= 28524.42kgCO2 x 0.16
After visting the building the users said it didn’t meet the standards the architects published. The calculations where released by
= 4563 kgCO2 / 0.43kgCO2/kWhr
Lloyn & Co Architects for a competition so would have been biased.
= 10613kWhr
10613 x 9.01p
= £955
= £12,304
3. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7262747.stm
4. https://www.ukpower.co.uk/home_energy/tariffs-per-unit-kwh
5. http://www.petrolprices.com/the-price-of-fuel.html