Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STUDENT’S NAME:
LOGIN:
0,5 0,25 0
0,5 0,25 0
1. Is the information well-structured, clear and specific to the type of
project completed? (Additional information must be located in the
Appendix).
2. Is the project written in an adequate style, and free of grammar or
spelling mistakes?
3. Is the structure adequate to the type of project?
4. Does the work have the required length?
5. Does the project follow presentation standards?
6. Does the project follow the correct citation style?
SCORE: ---/3,0
1 If this criterium does not obtain any point, the FP supervisor must tell the program coordinator, the FP
will be failed automatically and the student will have to start over a new project. That is, present a new
research proposal and go through all the stages of the FP.
FINAL PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT
4. Other comments
DATE:
2 If the Oral Defense tribunal detect that the student is not the author of the final project, they must
inform the program coordinator, the FP will be failed automatically and the student will have to start over
a new project with a different research proposal.