Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The perennial problem faced by both teachers and administrators is the academic
performance of students. Thus, every school aims to produce quality students, which is
reflected in their excellent academic performance. Lina (1999) stated that quality
education implies high level of instruction, training for critical training, adequate facilities
and learning materials, and provision of resources consonant with the status of the
country. However, Mock Board Examinations are now given emphasis with the vision that
the students can be globally competitive in the science and any field of accounting.
Mock Board Examination is an important simulation for accountancy students for
aspiring Certified Public Accountants. Moreover, it is a practice memento for CPA Board
Examination to become a professional licensed Certified Public Accountant. However,
Student’s academic performances are affected due to social, psychological, economic,
and environmental and personal factors.
The study focuses on the factors affecting the accountancy students’ performance
in the Mock Board Examination including its positive and negative factors and its schedule
among Accountancy students. The study may be helpful for college administrators, and
Accountancy students’ awareness in achieving a high quality education and good
academic performance.
Conceptual Framework
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE DEPENDENT VARIABLE
Student Factor
A. Time Management
B. Preparation
C. Stress
D. Awareness on
STUDENTS’
Grades
PERFORMANCE
IN THE MOCK
BOARD
EXAMINATION
Teacher Factor
A. Communication
B. Teaching Skills
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to answer the following questions:
1. What is the relationship between time management and academic performance in
relation to the Mock Board Examination?
2. What is the relationship between student’s preparation and academic performance
in relation to the Mock Board Examination?
3. What is the relationship between stress and academic performance in relation to
the Mock Board Examination?
Hypothesis
1. The time management, preparation and stress are one of the factors that
greatly affect the Accountancy students’ academic performance with regards
to the Mock Board Examination.
2. Mock Board Examination have significant effect in the Accountancy Students’
academic performance.
Definition of Terms
The terms used in this study are defined for clearer views:
Student Academic Performance – Refers to the scholastic achievement and level
of student’s academic standing. It is the measure of the average of scholastic success in
all areas/subject called GPA.
Mock Board Examination – Refers to the simulation for the actual board exam. In
this study, it particularly refers to the Accountancy Students’ Mock Board Examination
and CPA Licensure Board Examination for the actual board exam.
CHAPTER 2
Research Design
This study used the descriptive research method. This design is appropriate in this
study since it evaluated the factors affecting the work performance of the fourth year
Accountancy students in Notre Dame University.
Respondents
The study focuses on the factors affecting the accountancy students’ performance
in the mock board examination. Therefore, the respondents are fourth year Accountancy
students who are officially enrolled in this semester.
Sample Size/Sampling Technique
The sample size would be 20 respondents chosen from the total population of the
fourth year BS – Accountancy Students in Notre Dame University.
Research Instrument
A survey questionnaire prepare for students used as a data-gathering instrument
in this study
The questionnaire for the student-respondents elicited data on the academic
performance, studying, time management, awareness and teaching method from the
teachers.
Data Gathering Procedure
The questionnaires was distributed with the permission obtained from our Adviser,
Sir Ronald G. Mamaril. After the permission was granted 20 questionnaires were
distributed to students.
Measurements/Treatment to Data
The extent of existence of all variables in the research area was measured on a
five-point scale ranging from, strongly disagree to strongly agree.