9182018 APreliminary Stay on Machinatilityof Super Austerite Stirtess Stel | Volume 2A: Advanced Mar facturing IMECEZ015] Proceedings |ASME. A Preliminary Study on Machinability of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel Ashwin Polishetty, Mohanad Fakhri Abdulqader Alabdullah, Nihal Pillay and Guy Littlefair [Author Affliations Ashwin Polishetty, Mohanad Fakhri Abdulqader Alabdullah, Nihal Pillay, Guy Litlefair Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia Paper No. IMECE2015-50224, pp. VO2ATO2A037; 8 page prom: doi:10.1115/IMECE2015-50224 ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Volume 2a: Advanced Manufacturing Houston, Texas, USA, November 19-19, 2015 Conference Sponsors: ASME ISBN: 978-0-7018-5735.9 Copyright © 2015 by ASME ABSTRACT abstract Stainless steel is the most widely used alloys of steel. The reputed variety of stainless steel having customised material properties as per the design requirements is Duplex Stainless Steel and Austenitic Stainless Steel, The Austenite Stainless Steel alloy has been developed further to be Super Austeritic Stainless Steel (SASS) by increasing the percentage of the alloying elements to form the half or more than the half of the material composition. SASS (Grade-AL4XN) is an alloy steel containing high percentages of nickel (24%), molybdenum (6%) and chromium (21%). The chemical elements offer high degrees of corrosion resistance, toughness and stability in a large range of hostile environments like petroleum, marine and food processing industries, SASS is often used as a commercially viable substitute to high cost non-ferrous or non-metallic metals, The ability to machine steel effectively and efficiently is of utmost importance in the current competitive market. This paper is an attempt to evaluate the machinability of SASS which has been a classified material so far with very limited research conducted on it, Understanding the machinability of this alloy would assist in the effective forming of this material by metal cutting. The novelty of research associated with this is paper is reasonable taking into consideration the unknowns involved in machining SASS, The experimental design consists of conducting eight milling trials at combination of two different feed rates, 0.1. and 0.15 mmitooth; cutting speeds, 100 and 150 m/min; Depth of Cut (DoC), 2 and 3 mm and coolant on for all the trials. The cutting tool has two inserts and therefore has two cutting edges. The trial sample is mounted on a dynamometer (type 92578) to measure the cutting forces during the trials. The cutting force data obtained is later analyzed using DynaWare supplied by Kistler. The machined sample is subjected to surface roughness (Ra) measurement using a 3D optical surface profilometer (Alicona Infinite Focus). A comprehensive metallography process consisting of mounting, polishing and etching hipirocesdings asmedigtalclletion asme.crgfproceeding.aspx?aricleid= 25004048,esulClck=19182018 APreliminary Stay on Machinatilityof Super Austerite Stirtess Stel | Volume 2A: Advanced Mar facturing IMECEZ015] Proceedings |ASME. was conducted on a before and after machined sample in order to make a comparative analysis of the microstructural changes due to machining. The microstructural Images were capture using a digital microscope, The microhardness test were conducted on a Vickers scale (Hv) using a Vickers microhardness tester, Initial bulk hardness testing conducted on the material show that the alloy is having a hardness of 83.4 HRb, This study expects an increase in hardness mostly due to work hardening may be due to phase transformation, The results obtained from the cutting trials are analyzed in order to judge the machinabilty of the material. Some of the criteria used for machinability evaluation are cutting force analysis, surface texture analysis, metallographic analysis and microhardness analysis. The methodology followed in each aspect of the investigation is similar to and inspired by similar research conducted on other materials. However, the novelty of this research is the investigation of vatious aspects of machinabllity and drawing comparisons between each other while attempting to justify each result obtained to the microstructural changes observed which influence the behaviour of the alloy. Due to the limited scope of the paper, machinability criteria such as chip morphology, Metal Removal Rate (MRR) and tool wear are not included in this paper. All aspects are then compared and the optimum machining parameters are justified with a scope for future investigations. Copyright © 2015 by ASME Topics: Machinability , Stainless stee! hipirocesdings asmedigtalclletion asme.crgfproceeding.aspx?aricleid= 25004048,esulClck=1