Vitec Equipments PVT LTD Filename: Spreader Beam Calculation

VITEC EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD 1
FileName : Spreader Beam Calculation
1. Bottom Lug At extreme end as per drawing
Indicate material for beam in

calculation sheet
154212675
L =4250 mm
2. Lifting Lug at Centre as per drawing
For SA-106 Gr.B , Minimum Yield strength

is 240 Mpa
Represent lower
lug inside since
3960 is less than
4250
42673500
L=4250mm
3. Bottom lifting at inner as per drawing
240
L=4250 mm
Moment of inertia of Spreader Beam in Corroded Condition
28.58 mm
FileName : Top Lug Of Spreader Beam
56650 x 9.81 = 555737 N
555737 X 1.20 = 666884 N
101 mm
333306 x 102 = 33997212 N-mm

As per Drawing its 101 mm
Ft = 118 MPa
Fy = 241 MPa
262 MPa
21380000 mm4
267250 mm3
604480000 mm4
2628174 mm3
31178333 mm4
459953333 mm4
Tabular Results
Results were generated with the finite element program FE/Pipe®. Stress results are post-processed in accordance with the rules specified in ASME Section III and ASME
Section VIII, Division 2.
Analysis Time Stamp: Sat Jan 20 11:38:35 2018.
 Model Notes
 Load Case Report
 Solution Data
 ASME Code Stress Output Plots
 Stress Results - Notes
 ASME Overstressed Areas
 Highest Primary Stress Ratios
 Highest Secondary Stress Ratios
 Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios
 Graphical Results
Model Notes
Model Notes
Input Echo:
Description:
Lifting Lug
Model Type : Cylindrical Shell
Parent Geometry
Parent Outside Diam. : 323.800 mm.
Thickness : 22.008 mm.
Fillet Along Shell : 10.000 mm.
Parent Properties:
Cold Allowable : 117.9 MPa
Hot Allowable : 117.9 MPa
Material DB # 1008218.
Ultimate Tensile (Amb) : 413.7 MPa
Yield Strength (Amb) : 241.3 MPa
Yield Strength (Hot) : 235.8 MPa
Elastic Modulus (Amb) : 202720.0 MPa
Poissons Ratio : 0.300
Expansion Coefficient : 0.1177E-04 mm./mm./deg.
Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm.(NOT USED)
Structural Attachment Type : "I" Beam
Flange Thickness : 30.000 mm.

Flange Width : 160.000 mm.
Web Thickness : 30.000 mm.
Web Height : 400.000 mm.
Length : 102.000 mm.
Nozzle Tilt Angle : 0.000 deg.
Distance from Top : 855.000 mm.
Distance from Bottom : 5105.000 mm.
Nozzle Properties

Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm. (NOT USED)
Design Operating Cycles : 7000.

Ambient Temperature (Deg.) : 21.10
Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.

Any thermal loads will come through operating forces and
moments applied through the nozzle.
Nozzle Inside Temperature : 48.00 deg.

Nozzle Outside Temperature : 48.00 deg.
Vessel Inside Temperature : 48.00 deg.
Vessel Outside Temperature : 48.00 deg.
Nozzle Pressure : 0.103 MPa

Vessel Pressure : 0.103 MPa
Operating Pressure : 0.1 MPa
The operating pressure is used for secondary and peak stress

cases. The design pressure is used for primary cases. The ratio
of the operating/design pressure = 1.000
User Defined Load Input Echo:

Loads are given at the End of Nozzle
Loads are defined in Local Coordinates
Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)
Load Case FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPER: 333305.9 333305.9 333305.9 33997.2 0.0 33997.2
FEA Model Loads:

These are the actual loads applied to the FEA model.
These are the User Defined Loads translated to the
end of the nozzle and reported in global coordinates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPER: 333305.9 333305.9 333305.9 33997.2 0.0 33997.2
The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

the axial and translational directions.
Stresses ARE nodally AVERAGED.
Vessel Centerline Vector : 1.000 0.000 0.000

Nozzle Orientation Vector : 0.000 1.000 0.000
Table of Contents
Load Case Report

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 11:37am JAN 20,2018
Load Case Report $X
Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

throughout the model. No thermal ratcheting
calculations will be performed.
THE 4 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:
1 WEIGHT ONLY (Wgt Only)

Weight ONLY case run to get the stress range

between the installed and the operating states.
/-------- Loads in Case 1

Loads due to Weight
2 SUSTAINED (Wgt+Pr)
Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

membrane and bending stress limits.

Loads due to Weight
Pressure Case 1
3 OPERATING
Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

secondary, peak and range calculations as needed.

Pressure Case 1
Loads from (Operating)
4 RANGE (Fatigue Calc Performed)
Case run to get the RANGE of stresses.

as described in NB-3222.2, 5.5.3.2, 5.5.5.2 or 5.5.6.1.
/-------- Combinations in Range Case 4

Plus Stress Results from CASE 3
Minus Stress Results from CASE 1
Table of Contents
Solution Data
Solution Data
Maximum Solution Row Size = 1446

Number of Nodes = 9691
Number of Elements = 3236
Number of Solution Cases = 3
Summation of Loads per Case
Case # FX FY FZ
1 0. 0. 0.
2 7368. 0. 0.
3 340674. 333306. 333306.
Table of Contents
ASME Code Stress Output Plots

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X
1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 2

2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 2
3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 2
4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 2
5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 2
6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 3
7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 3
8) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 3
9) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 3
10) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (OPE,S1+S2+S3) Case 3
11) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Inside) Case 4
12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 4
13) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Inside) Case 4
14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 4
Table of Contents
Stress Results - Notes

- Results in this analysis were generated using the finite

element solution method.
- Using 2013-2015 ASME Section VIII Division 2
- Use Polished Bar fatigue curve.
- Ratio between Operating and Design Pressure = 1.000000

Assume pressure increases all other stresses.
- Assume free end displacements of attached pipe

(e.g. thermal loads) are secondary within the limits
of nozzle reinforcement.
- Use Equivalent Stress (Von Mises).
- Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation for operating stress.

Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation in primary case evaluation.
Assume bending stress not local primary for S1+S2+S3.
- Use local tensor values for averaged and not

averaged stresses.
Table of Contents
ASME Overstressed Areas

ASME Overstressed Areas $X

*** NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL ***
Table of Contents
Highest Primary Stress Ratios

Highest Primary Stress Ratios $X
Shell SCR at Plate # 1
Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 2

1 236 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 2
0%
Circ Plate SCR for Plate # 1

0%
Long Plate SCR for Plate # 1

0%
Shell in Plate # 1 Vicinity

0%
Table of Contents
Highest Secondary Stress Ratios

Highest Secondary Stress Ratios $X
Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 3

MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 3
89%


MPa MPa 12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 4
89%

73%

73%
Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 3

MPa MPa 6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 3
27%

MPa MPa 11) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Inside) Case 4
27%

86%

86%
Table of Contents
Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios

Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios $X
Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 4

288 0.984 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.350
MPa 0.995 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 7,115.
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 294.8
289.9 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 287.5
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 41,640.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 9,673.
99% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 13,430.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 8,855.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 0.544
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.648
Plot Reference:

Plot Reference:
Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Inner) Load Case 4

Plot Reference:

Plot Reference:
Table of Contents
3d
3d(Small) 3d 3d(Deformed)
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Small) 3d
FileName : Extreem End-Bottom Lug of Spreader Beam
Lifting Lug Calcs: Left Side
Lifting Lug Calculations: Lug(s) on Left End of Vessel
Input Values:
Lifting Lug Material SA-516 70

Lifting Lug Yield Stress Yield 262.00 MPa
Total Height of Lifting Lug w 400.0000 mm

Thickness of Lifting Lug t 40.0000 mm 30 mm
Diameter of Hole in Lifting Lug dh 100.0000 mm
Radius of Semi-Circular Arc of Lifting Lug r 100.0000 mm
Height of Lug from bottom to Center of Hole h 200.0000 mm
Offset from Vessel OD to Center of Hole off 100.0000 mm
Lug Fillet Weld Size tw 20.0000 mm
Length of weld along side of Lifting Lug wl 400.0000 mm
Length of Weld along Bottom of Lifting Lug wb 20.0000 mm
Thickness of Collar (if any) tc 0.0000 mm
Diameter of Collar (if any) dc 0.0000 mm
Impact Factor Impfac 1.20
Sling Angle from Horizontal 105.0000 deg
Number of Lugs in Group 1
Lifting Lug Orientation to Vessel: Perpendicular

Lift Orientation : Horizontal Lift
PV Elite does not compute weak axis bending forces on the lugs. It is
assumed that a spreader bar is used.
Computed Results:
Total vessel weight (No Liquid) 503826.97 N

Design Reaction force at the tailing lug 302296.19 N
Design Reaction force at the lifting lug 302296.19 N
Force Along Vessel Axis Fax -81000.02 N

Force Normal to Vessel Fn 302296.19 N
Force Tangential to Vessel Ft 0.00 N
Converting the weld leg dimension (tw) to the weld throat dimension.
Weld Group Inertia Calculations:
Weld Group Inertia about the Circumferential Axis Ilc 0.175E+09 mm^4
Weld Group Centroid distance in the Long. Direction Yll 214.140 mm
Dist. of Weld Group Centroid from Lug bottom Yll_b 200.000 mm
Weld Group Inertia about the Longitudinal Axis Ill 2098523.000 mm^4
Weld Group Centroid Distance in the Circ. Direction Ylc 20.000 mm
Note: The Impact Factor is applied to the Forces acting on the Lug.
Primary Shear Stress in the Welds due to Shear Loads [Ssll]:

= sqrt( Fax2 + Ft2 + Fn2 )/(( 2 * (wl + wb) ) * tw )
= sqrt(-810002+02+3022962)/((2*(400+20))*14.14)
= 26.35 MPa
Shear Stress in the Welds due to Bending Loads [Sblf]:

= (Fn*(h-Yll_b)) *Yll/Ilc + (Fax*off *Yll/Ilc) + (Ft*off *Ylc/Ill)
= (302296 *(200 -200 )) * 214.1/175087696 +
(-81000 *100 * 214.1/175087696 ) +
(0 *100 * 20/2098523 )
= -9.91 MPa
Total Shear Stress for Combined Loads [St]:

= Ssll + Sblf
= 26.35 + -9.907
= 16.44 MPa
Lifting Lug Calcs: Left Side
Allowable Shear Stress for Combined Loads [Sta]:

= 0.4 * Yield * Occfac (AISC Shear Allowable)
= 0.4 * 262 * 1
= 104.80 MPa
Shear Stress in Lug above Hole [Shs]:

= sqrt( Pl2 + Fax2 ) / Sha
= sqrt( 3022962 + -810002 )/4000
= 78.25 MPa
Allowable Shear Stress in Lug above Hole [Sas]:

= 0.4 * Yield * Occfac
= 0.4 * 262 * 1
= 104.80 MPa
Pin Hole Bearing Stress [Pbs]:

= sqrt( Fax2 + Fn2 ) / ( t * dh )
= sqrt( -810002 + 3022962 )/( 40 * 100 )
= 78.25 MPa
Allowable Bearing Stress [Pba]:

= min( 0.75 * Yield * Occfac, 0.9 * Yield ) AISC Bearing All.
= min( 0.75 * 262 * 1, 235.8 )
= 196.50 MPa
Bending Stress at the Base of the Lug [Fbs]:

= Ft * off/(w * t2/6) + Fax * off/(w2 * t/6)
= 0 * 100/(400 * 402/6) +
-81000 * 100/(4002 * 40/6)
= -7.59 MPa
Tensile Stress at the Base of the Lug [Fa]:

= Fn / (w * t)
= -81000/(400 * 40 )
= 18.90 MPa
Total Combined Stress at the Base of the Lug:

= Fbs + Fa
= -7.594 + 18.9
= 11.30 MPa
Lug Allowable Stress for Bending and Tension:

= min( 0.66 * Yield * Occfac, 0.75 * Yield )
= min( 0.66 * 262 * 1, 196.5 )
= 172.92 MPa
Required Shackle Pin Diameter [Spd]:

= sqrt[(2 * sqrt(Fn2 + Fax2)/( Pi * Sta))]
= sqrt[2 * sqrt(3022962 + -810002)/( Pi * 104.8 )]
= 43.6036 mm
Lifting Lug Calcs: Right Side
Lifting Lug Calculations: Lug(s) on Right End of Vessel
Input Values:
Lifting Lug Material SA-516 70

Lifting Lug Yield Stress Yield 262.00 MPa
Total Height of Lifting Lug w 400.0000 mm

Thickness of Lifting Lug t 40.0000 mm 30mm
Diameter of Hole in Lifting Lug dh 100.0000 mm
Radius of Semi-Circular Arc of Lifting Lug r 100.0000 mm
Height of Lug from bottom to Center of Hole h 200.0000 mm
Offset from Vessel OD to Center of Hole off 100.0000 mm
Lug Fillet Weld Size tw 20.0000 mm
Length of weld along side of Lifting Lug wl 400.0000 mm
Length of Weld along Bottom of Lifting Lug wb 20.0000 mm
Thickness of Collar (if any) tc 0.0000 mm
Diameter of Collar (if any) dc 0.0000 mm
Impact Factor Impfac 1.20
Sling Angle from Horizontal 105.0000 deg
Number of Lugs in Group 1
Lifting Lug Orientation to Vessel: Perpendicular

Lift Orientation : Horizontal Lift
PV Elite does not compute weak axis bending forces on the lugs. It is
assumed that a spreader bar is used.
Computed Results:
Total vessel weight (No Liquid) 503826.97 N

Design Reaction force at the tailing lug 302296.19 N
Design Reaction force at the lifting lug 302296.19 N
Force Along Vessel Axis Fax -81000.02 N

Force Normal to Vessel Fn 302296.19 N
Force Tangential to Vessel Ft 0.00 N
Converting the weld leg dimension (tw) to the weld throat dimension.
Weld Group Inertia Calculations:
Weld Group Inertia about the Circumferential Axis Ilc 0.175E+09 mm^4
Weld Group Centroid distance in the Long. Direction Yll 214.140 mm
Dist. of Weld Group Centroid from Lug bottom Yll_b 200.000 mm
Weld Group Inertia about the Longitudinal Axis Ill 2098523.000 mm^4
Weld Group Centroid Distance in the Circ. Direction Ylc 20.000 mm
Note: The Impact Factor is applied to the Forces acting on the Lug.
Primary Shear Stress in the Welds due to Shear Loads [Ssll]:

= sqrt( Fax2 + Ft2 + Fn2 )/(( 2 * (wl + wb) ) * tw )
= sqrt(-810002+02+3022962)/((2*(400+20))*14.14)
= 26.35 MPa
Shear Stress in the Welds due to Bending Loads [Sblf]:

= (Fn*(h-Yll_b)) *Yll/Ilc + (Fax*off *Yll/Ilc) + (Ft*off *Ylc/Ill)
= (302296 *(200 -200 )) * 214.1/175087696 +
(-81000 *100 * 214.1/175087696 ) +
(0 *100 * 20/2098523 )
= -9.91 MPa
Total Shear Stress for Combined Loads [St]:

= Ssll + Sblf
= 26.35 + -9.907
= 16.44 MPa
Lifting Lug Calcs: Right Side
Allowable Shear Stress for Combined Loads [Sta]:

= 0.4 * Yield * Occfac (AISC Shear Allowable)
= 0.4 * 262 * 1
= 104.80 MPa
Shear Stress in Lug above Hole [Shs]:

= sqrt( Pl2 + Fax2 ) / Sha
= sqrt( 3022962 + -810002 )/4000
= 78.25 MPa
Allowable Shear Stress in Lug above Hole [Sas]:

= 0.4 * Yield * Occfac
= 0.4 * 262 * 1
= 104.80 MPa
Pin Hole Bearing Stress [Pbs]:

= sqrt( Fax2 + Fn2 ) / ( t * dh )
= sqrt( -810002 + 3022962 )/( 40 * 100 )
= 78.25 MPa
Allowable Bearing Stress [Pba]:

= min( 0.75 * Yield * Occfac, 0.9 * Yield ) AISC Bearing All.
= min( 0.75 * 262 * 1, 235.8 )
= 196.50 MPa
Bending Stress at the Base of the Lug [Fbs]:

= Ft * off/(w * t2/6) + Fax * off/(w2 * t/6)
= 0 * 100/(400 * 402/6) +
-81000 * 100/(4002 * 40/6)
= -7.59 MPa
Tensile Stress at the Base of the Lug [Fa]:

= Fn / (w * t)
= -81000/(400 * 40 )
= 18.90 MPa
Total Combined Stress at the Base of the Lug:

= Fbs + Fa
= -7.594 + 18.9
= 11.30 MPa
Lug Allowable Stress for Bending and Tension:

= min( 0.66 * Yield * Occfac, 0.75 * Yield )
= min( 0.66 * 262 * 1, 196.5 )
= 172.92 MPa
Required Shackle Pin Diameter [Spd]:

= sqrt[(2 * sqrt(Fn2 + Fax2)/( Pi * Sta))]
= sqrt[2 * sqrt(3022962 + -810002)/( Pi * 104.8 )]
= 43.6036 mm
35

Tabular Results
Results were generated with the finite element program FE/Pipe®. Stress results are post‐processed in accordance with the rules specified in ASME
Section III and ASME Section VIII, Division 2.
Analysis Time Stamp: Sat Jan 20 11:55:10 2018.
 Model Notes
 Load Case Report
 Solution Data
 ASME Code Stress Output Plots
 Stress Results ‐ Notes
 ASME Overstressed Areas
 Highest Primary Stress Ratios
 Highest Secondary Stress Ratios
 Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios
 Graphical Results
Model Notes
Model Notes
Input Echo:
Description:
Bottom Lifting Lug
Model Type : Cylindrical Shell
Parent Geometry
Parent Outside Diam. : 323.800 mm.
Thickness : 22.008 mm. 12"Sch 140
Fillet Along Shell : 10.000 mm.
Parent Properties:
Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm.(NOT USED)
Structural Attachment Type : Longitudinal Lug
Thickness : 40.000 mm.

Height : 400.000 mm.
Length : 200.000 mm.
Nozzle Tilt Angle : 0.000 deg.
Distance from Top : 330.000 mm.
Distance from Bottom : 5630.000 mm.
Nozzle Properties
Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm. (NOT USED)
Design Operating Cycles : 7000.

Ambient Temperature (Deg.) : 21.10
36

Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.
Any thermal loads will come through operating forces and
moments applied through the nozzle.
Nozzle Inside Temperature : 48.00 deg.

Nozzle Outside Temperature : 48.00 deg.
Vessel Inside Temperature : 48.00 deg.
Vessel Outside Temperature : 48.00 deg.
Nozzle Pressure : 0.103 MPa

Vessel Pressure : 0.103 MPa
Operating Pressure : 0.1 MPa
The operating pressure is used for secondary and peak stress

cases. The design pressure is used for primary cases. The ratio
of the operating/design pressure = 1.000
User Defined Load Input Echo:

Loads are given at the End of Nozzle
Loads are defined in Local Coordinates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPER: -302296.2 81000.0 81000.0 8103.3 8103.3 8103.3
FEA Model Loads:

These are the actual loads applied to the FEA model.
These are the User Defined Loads translated to the
end of the nozzle and reported in global coordinates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPER: -302296.2 81000.0 81000.0 8103.3 8103.3 8103.3
The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

the axial and translational directions.
Stresses ARE nodally AVERAGED.
Vessel Centerline Vector : 1.000 0.000 0.000

Nozzle Orientation Vector : 0.000 1.000 0.000
Table of Contents
Load Case Report

Load Case Report $X
Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

throughout the model. No thermal ratcheting
calculations will be performed.
THE 4 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:
1 WEIGHT ONLY (Wgt Only)
Weight ONLY case run to get the stress range

between the installed and the operating states.

Loads due to Weight
2 SUSTAINED (Wgt+Pr)
Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

membrane and bending stress limits.

37

Loads due to Weight
Pressure Case 1
3 OPERATING
Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

secondary, peak and range calculations as needed.

Pressure Case 1
Loads from (Operating)
4 RANGE (Fatigue Calc Performed)
Case run to get the RANGE of stresses.

as described in NB-3222.2, 5.5.3.2, 5.5.5.2 or 5.5.6.1.
/-------- Combinations in Range Case 4

Plus Stress Results from CASE 3
Minus Stress Results from CASE 1
Table of Contents
Solution Data
Solution Data
Maximum Solution Row Size = 1098

Number of Nodes = 8707
Number of Elements = 2908
Number of Solution Cases = 3
Summation of Loads per Case
Case # FX FY FZ
1 0. 0. 0.
2 7368. 0. 0.
3 -294928. 81000. 81000.
Table of Contents
ASME Code Stress Output Plots

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X
1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 2
2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 2
3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 2
4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 2
5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 2
6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 3
7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 3
8) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 3

38

9) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 3
10) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (OPE,S1+S2+S3) Case 3
11) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Inside) Case 4
12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 4
Table of Contents

- Results in this analysis were generated using the finite

element solution method.
- Using 2013-2015 ASME Section VIII Division 2
- Use Polished Bar fatigue curve.
- Ratio between Operating and Design Pressure = 1.000000

Assume pressure increases all other stresses.
- Assume free end displacements of attached pipe

(e.g. thermal loads) are secondary within the limits
of nozzle reinforcement.
- Use Equivalent Stress (Von Mises).
- Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation for operating stress.

Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation in primary case evaluation.
Assume bending stress not local primary for S1+S2+S3.
- Use local tensor values for averaged and not

averaged stresses.
Table of Contents
ASME Overstressed Areas

ASME Overstressed Areas $X
*** NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL ***
Table of Contents
Highest Primary Stress Ratios

39

Highest Primary Stress Ratios $X

0%

0%

0%
Long Plate for Plate # 1

0%
Table of Contents
Highest Secondary Stress Ratios

Highest Secondary Stress Ratios $X

71%

71%

80%

40

80%

75%

75%

37%

37%
Table of Contents
Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios

Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios $X

Plot Reference:

Plot Reference:
41


Plot Reference:

Plot Reference:
Table of Contents
3d
42

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
43

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
44

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
45

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
46

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
47

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Small) 3d
48

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Small) 3d

Vitec Equipments PVT LTD Filename: Spreader Beam Calculation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vitec Equipments PVT LTD Filename: Spreader Beam Calculation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

VITEC EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD 1

FileName : Spreader Beam Calculation

1. Bottom Lug At extreme end as per drawing

Indicate material for beam in

2. Lifting Lug at Centre as per drawing

For SA-106 Gr.B , Minimum Yield strength

3. Bottom lifting at inner as per drawing

Moment of inertia of Spreader Beam in Corroded Condition

56650 x 9.81 = 555737 N

555737 X 1.20 = 666884 N

333306 x 102 = 33997212 N-mm

As per Drawing its 101 mm

 Load Case Report

 ASME Code Stress Output Plots

 Stress Results - Notes

 ASME Overstressed Areas

 Highest Primary Stress Ratios

 Highest Secondary Stress Ratios

 Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios

Model Type : Cylindrical Shell

Structural Attachment Type : "I" Beam

Flange Thickness : 30.000 mm.

Yield Strength (Amb) : 262.0 MPa

Design Operating Cycles : 7000.

Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.

Nozzle Inside Temperature : 48.00 deg.

Nozzle Pressure : 0.103 MPa

Operating Pressure : 0.1 MPa

The operating pressure is used for secondary and peak stress

User Defined Load Input Echo:

Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)

FEA Model Loads:

Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)

The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

Stresses ARE nodally AVERAGED.

Vessel Centerline Vector : 1.000 0.000 0.000

Load Case Report

Load Case Report $X

Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

THE 4 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:

1 WEIGHT ONLY (Wgt Only)

Weight ONLY case run to get the stress range

/-------- Loads in Case 1

Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

/-------- Loads in Case 2

Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

/-------- Loads in Case 3

4 RANGE (Fatigue Calc Performed)

Case run to get the RANGE of stresses.

/-------- Combinations in Range Case 4

Maximum Solution Row Size = 1446

Summation of Loads per Case

ASME Code Stress Output Plots

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X

1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 2

2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 2

3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 2

4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 2

5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 2

6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 3

7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 3

8) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 3

9) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 3

* NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL *