Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
1 − 20
0.12
1 +
140 2 1000
Bond price =
0.12 + 20
= 1114 .70
2 0.12
2 1 +
2
2. Limbaugh and Liddy bonds have the same risk, therefore the same required rate
of return (YTM). Liddy’s bonds are selling at par, which means that the coupon
rate is equal to the YTM which is 8%. This will be Limbaugh’s bonds YTM as
well.
1
1 − 20
0.08
1 +
50 2 1000
Bond price = 2 0 .08 + 20
= 796 .15
0.08
2 1 +
2
3. a. Since the dividends are growing at a constant rate forever, we can use the
constant growth model to determine the value of the stock:
D1
P0 =
r −g
None of these values are provided to us, however we can calculate them using the
information provided.
b. The only input that will change if the beta changes is the required rate of
return.
4. In this question, dividends are growing at 6% for 2 years and 3% forever after
that. We can use a two-stage model to value the stock.
D1 = $3 * (1.06) = $3.18
D2 = $3 * (1.06)2 = 3.37
The value of all remaining dividends, stage 2 dividends, (D3, D4, ….) can be
calculate at time 2 as:
To calculate R-to-R of B, we must first determine what the expected return is:
Since B has a R-to-R ratio greater than a correctly priced asset, it is mispriced,
and lies above the security market line (SML).
The R-to-R for A also represents the slope of the SML, which means that for each
unit of risk, for a correctly priced asset, investors require 7.5% in additional return
(beyond the risk-free rate).
Investors will buy B (because it has a rate of return greater than that required by
the SML) until the price reaches 31.76.
6. We are provided past performance of the two stocks. We would like to have in
our portfolio stocks that outperform expectations. This means we would like to
include stocks with positive Jensen’s alphas.
Stock 2:
8. We want to determine whether one portfolio has a higher return and a lower risk
(beta). If so, we can claim that it is superior to the other portfolio.