Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
333
334 November, 1967
condition, and one-directional load applications of this type are the C ...
• \ ..,
condition considered herein.
PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
The relationship between volume changes, void ratio and confining pressure
in drained tests on a cohesionless material is illustrated in Fig. 1. If a series
of drained tests is conducted, using a constant confining pressure, on samples
Tuts Conducted
on Somplu wit~
Sam, Vaid Rotio, e0
(o) (dl
Volume
Change
f
-J t----....,..,,--41c,_~-Ra1io,
Void Volume f
Cha119e! t - - - - ~ - - " " " - ~ -
m e ~
Failure D•c • Failure
Dec
(bl (el
Critical
Void Void
Ratio, Ratio
ec,il •c
(cl (f)
having different void ratios, ec, after consolidation under the confining pres-
sure, the relationship between volume change at failure and void ratio after
consolidation will have the form shown in Fig. l(a ). From a plot of this type,
the critical void ratio, ecrit, that is, the void ratio ec of a sample for which
there is no volume change at failure under the confining pressure used in the
test series can readily be determined. If similar series of tests are conducted
using other confining pressures, a series of such relationships can be deter-
mined, as shown in Fig. l(b ), leading to a series of values for the critical
void ratio corresponding to different values of the confining pressure. From
UNDRAINED STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS 337
:hese results, a plot can be made to show the variation of the critical void
:-1tio, ecrit, with the magnitude of the confining pressure, as shown in Fig.
1(r). As the confining pressure increases, the value of the critical void ratio
decreases.
Similarly, a series of drained tests could be conducted on samples initially
consolidated under different confining pressures but having the same void
ratio after consolidation, ec, under these pressures. In this case it would be
found that the volume change at failure would vary with the confining pressure
as shown in Fig. 1 ( d) and it would be possible to establish, for the particular
value of ec used in the test series, the value of a confining pressure for which
there would be no volume change at failure. By analogy with the definition of
the term critical void ratio, the confining pressure for which there would be
no volume change at failure might be termed the critical confining pressure,
a 3 crit, corresponding to a particular value of the void ratio after consolidation,
Critical
Vaid Ratio,
ecril
or
Void Ratio
ofter
Consolidotion
•c
fining pressure 0-3 crit and the void ratio after consolidation under the con.fini?!g
pressure, ec, as shown in Fig. 2.
Stress or Foilure
Volume
Chonge
Inc
i
-!-f ~;::---_"""_--':_:::•_:_~_-=:_·=-:::::::;.=:====-----~====--'-- _Slroin
Dec
pressure. The pore water pressure would continue to change in this way until
one of two limiting conditions were reached:
the sample would ultimately fail with the effective confining pressure equal to
the critical 'Confining pressure.
Based on this approach the strengths of samples of cohesionless materials
in unconsolidated-undrained tests and consolidated-undrained tests can readily
be determined. Hew ever, it should be noted that in addition to the assumption
that the critical confining pressure vs void ratio relationship is essentially
unaffected by stress history~ the above reasoning also ignores the fact that vol-
ume changes inevitably occur even in samples which show no volume change at,
failure. All samples of sand tend to compress to some extent before they
dilate and the volume changes in a sample exhibiting no volume change at
failure in a drained test have the form shown in Fig. 3. The foregoing reason-
ing assumes that there would be no volume changes at all in a sample eY.hib-
iting no v.olume change at failure.
In view of these assumpti.ons it is apparent that the use of values of critical
confining pressure determined from drained tests to compute values of soil
strength under undrained conditions involves ~ome degree of approximation.
However, since stress history effects and volume changes under the critical
confining pressures are likely to be small, the strengths computed on this
basis are likely to be sufficiently accurate for most practical purposes. Fur-
thermore, a simplified and reasonably accurate procedure may often have
advantages for preliminary computations over more elaborate though slightly
more accurate procedures.
pore water pressu:::-e would drop, eventually reaching c:. value of a'r.>0i.:t -1 ;:t~:,
At this stage the stress conditions woudl be those shown in Fig. 4(c). Furtb.·r
deviator stress apJ.?lication beyond this stage would cause cavitation of the por<•
water and failure would be approached with the effective confining pressurt'
remaining constant at the value a 3 cell + 1. Thus, at failure the effective major
principal stress would be
Since the sample would in fact dilate when the pore water pressure cavitated,
the appropriate value of (/)' in this expression would be similar to that deter-
(al -¢-a,.-
(bl
~ 0"3cell
(cl
-o=a, a-3cell
E]
l"
.•
•• ..::_".Envelope of Failure
(dl ..,&;.-.-.•-•""'•..:.,••••••••••..,_!~~.w:~~~VSe
__ .;,. ..................
............·::,,""
....-· .,'' '
.! \.
_ _...:::.:.__J.:!:Li---.L-__;:....__ _ _ _ _ _ __i1...-_ __._•-a-
-I
a-le o;cell o;cell + 1
mined by drained tests on samples having an initial void ratio ec. However as
the cell pressure increases the amount of dilation wiU decrease and at a cell
pressure of a3 crit -1 foe appropriate value of if>' would be that corresponding
to constant volume conditions.
The above conditions would only develop provided the pore water pressure
reached a value of -1 kg per sq cm before the effective confiningpressura had
UNDRAINED STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS 341
bc:ilt up to a value of a 3 crit; that is, provided the effective confining pressure
lt failure were less than a 3 crit or
(2)
giving 1 (3)
(0)
-¢-··
(bl A
vv,. ,
,.. n
cr,c,1- O'scrit
L...J
(di ..-·······
.....•·
..:""~·-··-.:-"7"-~---:::--.:.---~~
....- !
,• .
-~--..,_._ ___..__..L-___.,.__ _..1,_.v
cr,C,11 171ct11,
failure for total stress in undrained tests will be parallel to, but somewhat
higher than, the corresponding envelope for effective stresses.
Fir;. 5(c). It may be noted in this figure that at this stage the pore water jm.-.~-
sure is still greater than -1 atm (a3 cell - a 3 crit ). Since there will oe nr;
further tend,~ncy for volume change, further increases in deviator stress will
cause no ·changes in pore water pressure and thus the sample will eventually
fail with the effective confining pressure equal to a 3 crit. The corresponding
value of the effective major principal stress at failure will be
(4)
In this case the appropriate value of 91 in this expression would be that cor-
responcting- to constant vo1ume conditions.
It may be seen that under these test conditions (a3 cell = a 3 crit -1) the ef-
fective stresses at failure are independent of the cell pressure used in the test
and that the deviator stress causing failure will be the same regardless of the
value of the cell pressure. Accordingly the relative positions of the Mohr cir-
cles and envelopes of failure will be as shown in Fig. 5(d), the envelope for total
__ ,,,,,-- --
--
- - ~ - . . . , . : - : _ - - - - - - Envelope for
~, Total Stresses
'\
\
''I
(7"3Cril - I 0"5cril
stresses being parallel to the normal stress axis and displaced from it by an
amount
:.;n the pore water during the consolidation stage of the test and the value of the
back pressure will influence the test results.
(6)
Under this confining pressure the sample will attain an equilibrium void ratio
ec where ec is a function of the initial void ratio, ei, and the effective con-
solidation pressure, a 3 c; that is,
(7)
Corresponding to this void ratio after consolidation, there will be a particular
value of the critical confining pressure, a 3 crit; that is,
(8)
After consolidation, the sample will be loaded to failure under undrained con-
ditions. Duringthis stage of the test one of two conditions· will develop; either
1. The pore water pressure in the sample will decrease until it reaches
a value of -1 atm and cavitation occurs. This will occur provided a 3 cell + 1
< a 3 crit and at failure the effective confining pressure on tile sample will be
(9)
the strength of the sample will be controlled by the cell pressure, a 3 cell, and
the effective major principal stress at failure will be
2. the pore water pressure in the sample will change until the effective
confining pressure becomes equal to a 3 crit . This will occur provided
••• (12)
and under these conditions the strength will be controlled by the critical con-
fining pressure; that is,
a;f = <13crit = f [ei, (<13cell - ub)] • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •, ,(13)
The corresponding value of the effective major principal stress at failure will
be
(a) (b)
11,+1
l .___. . .__________ ~c
I I I
Samples ca•itate 1 No ca•itation 1 str•nqth
,1ren9th determin•d determined by critical
by cell pressura. confinin9 pressur•.
(cl
••.••• (16)
using an appropriate value of ~•. For samples which cavitate the angle of fric-
tion should be one including some effects of dilation but for non-cavitating
samples, an angle of friction corresponding to constant volume conditions
should be used.
Test data confirming the general form of the results indicated in Fig. 6 has
been presented by Bishop and Eldin, 1c.,, 11 Penman, 13 and Newland and Allely . 14 , 15
However, no attempt has been made in previous studies to check the quantita-
tive relationship between test data from unconsc1lidated-undrained tests and
results predicted from values of the critical confining pressure determined
by drained tests. Accordingly, series of drained and undrained tests were con-
ducted to provide data to check this relationship.
The sand used for these studies was a fine to medium, uniform sand from
the Sacramento River having void ratios at minimum and maximum densities
of 1.03 and 0.61, respectively. the results of several series of drained tests
performed on this sand have been reported by Lee and Seed. 16 This report
also contained a full description of the sand characteristics and the testing
techniques. The undrained test samples were formed and tested following the
same procedures.
The drained test data which are pertinent to the present study are presented
in Figs. 8 to 10. The relationship between the void ratio after consolidation
and the confining pressure for samples compacted initially to four different
void ratio conditions is shown in Fig. 8; the relationship between the critical
void ratio and the critical confining pressure determined by drained tests is
shown in Fig. 9; and the envelopes of failure determined by tests showing no
volume change at failure and by test data for drained tests after dilatancy
effects are deducted as proposed by Bishop 17 and Rowe 18 are shown in Fig.
10. At confining pressures between 5 and 30 kg per sq cm, which covers the
16 Lee, K. L., and Seed, H. B., "Drained Strength Characteristics of Cohesionless
Soils," Soil Mechanics and Bituminous Materials Research Laboratory, University of
California, Berkeley, Calif., June, 1966.
17 Bishop, A. W., "Correspondence on Shear Strength of a Saturated Silt in Triaxial
Compression," Geotechnique, Vol. 4, 1954, pp. 43-45.
18 Rowe, P. W., "The Stress Dilatancy RelationforStatic Equilibrium of an Assembly
of Particles in Contact," Proceedings, RoyalSociety,SerlesA, Vol. 269, Oct., 1962, pp.
500-527.
346 November, 1967 s~.t r.
0.90
•,•o a1
0.85
0.80
•,•0.7'9
0.75
a •,•0.71
..,er: 070
J
0.65
·,•0.61
060
Sacramento River Sand
0-55
T"''' cllmen11ono1 compre•li• llftcllr
\lflilo,M COllfifllllt prH1we. --1-------~,.____ ____j
1.0 - - - - - - - - . . - - - - - . - - - - . . - - - - - . . . - - - - - - ,
a-,. OI 0-.crff
range of values of critical confining pressure for this sand for samples varying
from loose to dense, the various envelopes shown in Fig. 10 are in reasonably
close agreement. The test data for samples showing no volume change at fail-
ure is somewhat intermediate between the other two curves and might there-
fore be considered to provide a reasonable value of the angle of friction under
constant volume conditions. From this envelope, the angle of friction under
constant volume conditions is found to be close to 37°.
From these data, values of the undrained strength of the sand may readily
be predicted. For example, the predicted envelope of failure for total stresses
for a series of unconsolidated-undrained tests on samples of medium dense
sand initially consolidated under a confining pressure of 3 kg per sq cm is
shown in Fig. 11. The position of this envelope was determined as follows.
The initial void ratio of the medium dense sand was ei = 0.71. From Fig. 8,
the void ratio after consolidation under a confining pressure of 3 kg per sq
25.-----.------,..----,-----r----~---"T-"---.----,
,, .,
,,
,.
.·(
20 Envelope for constonl volume conditions ---1---~-T,._"-'3;;...7-t- - - - l - - - - - ~
delermintd by opplyinc;i Bishop dilatoncy
expression to lesl Goto for dense sand
10 -----·--i---
I
--·- ·- 1----- -7---
I ..
1
.I I .
I
Envelopr for conslant volume conditions
delerminrd by applying Rowe dilotancy
- - - - ~ - - - - - upruaian lo lest data for denH sand
I
I
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
••r---,-----r---,r---r----.----,-----,----,,----,--~---,..---·--.
I
$oCUftlMt• Rhier SN
&..,.,.
---I,'----.;_'-----1---r----:----'----+----'--~
e.•0.711 0,-11,.,c-1 I
20 - la1lwal 11iKII ,,.H11t• •O
g ~itfal C.IIIIMIMl!llkm .... ..,,. •1.011:,,,.,-. ca
ll I
-
8_ 1•1---------··f
i
I
. i
I
-- •
i,
..
i ; I I
'------ -l----t -,---~------_,__-
J:
' I
=
~ 10 • • • ,••--•••
i
I - - - - -·--·'---t--+---+---+---4-
,. i I
10
•• )0 40
•• 00
•• 10
" 70
ur----------------,--------.-------.----~
Soc,..,... ...... s....
,_.,... e,•0711 0,•71..,ceet.
20 • IA&...I l90 ltNNWII • 0
.,..._......._,,....... ,.o~,., ..... -----·-------
,o
Normal Strou-k; per aq cm
12•,----,----.---r-----.----r----.--"""T""--....--+.----,---,----,
S.CrwMnti I ! I I
_ __
j Rln, s...}
I
; Awe,, .. t 1 •0.71;, D,•!I ptrc~ I
--·1--
E 100 - - - + · I llal •ac• P'••--•0 ·
1
--~
1
i• ---
a,
-
McfW dtclel e11d .,....1opr1 :
•_-_L•--;:;•-~I~~:;::~;? I
I
ao
11.0
"' lU 10.0
IO
= 10
~
u;
~ zo
&
10
0
0 zo 10 •• 70
Fig. 1 shows how the critical confining pressures for a sand may be deter-
mined from observations of volume changes in a series of drained tests. In
an analogous fashion, values may also be obtained from observations of the
pore-water pressure changes in a series of undrained tests. The changes in
pore-water pressure at failure observed in the undrained tests conducted on
samples having different densities and subjected to different confining pres-
sures are shown in Fig. 15(a). For tests at any one confining pressure, the
void ratio for which there is no change in pore water pressure at failure may
be interpreted as the critical void ratio. Alternatively, for tests at any one
void ratio after consolidation, the confining pressure for which there is no
pore water pressure change at failure may be considered to be the critical
confining pressure. Values of the critical confining pressure are more easily
determined if the datainFig.15(a)arereplotted as shown in Fig. 15(b). Using
either Fig. 15(a) or Fig. 15(b ), it is possible to determine corp.binations of
critical confining pressure and critical void ratio for the whole range of pos-
sible density conditions for this sand; these results are shown in Fig. 16.
An alternative method of determining values of the critical confining pres-
sure from undrained tests is simply to note the effective minor principal stress
at failure in noncavitating tests. From the concepts presented earlier in the
paper, this stress should be equal to the critical confining pressure for the
particular density condition of the sample. Values of the critical confining
pressure determined in this way for all noncavitating tests performed on the
Sacramento River sand are shown in Fig. 17. There is only a little scatter in
the data which defines a curve similar to that shown in Fig. 16.
A comparison of the relationships between the void ratio and the critical
confining pressure determined by observations of (1) volume changes in drained
tests; (2) of pore water pressure changes in undrained tests; and (3) the ef-
fective minor principal stress at failure in uoncavitating undrained tests is
shown in Fig. 18. The relationships are in close agreement over the entire
range of void ratios. The greatest discrepancy occurs in the loose sand range
where .values of the critical confining pressure determined from drained tests
are somewhat smaller th~n those determined from the undrained tests. This
discrepancy is in accord with the difference between the observed and predicted
value of the undrained strengths of loose sand samples shown in Fig. 13.
It may be seen from the preceding results that the critical confining pres-
sure is a significant characteristic determining the undrained strength of a
cohesionless soil at any given state of density. For Sacramento River sand
.-=~I 6 UNDRAINED STR~NGTH CHARACTERISTICS 351
the critical confining pressure ranges from almost zero for samples in the
loosest state to over 15 kg per sq cm for samples with a relative density of
100%. For initially very dense samples consolidated under very high confining
pressures, the dens~ty at the end of consolidation is considerably higher than
40r-------r---ir--....---,---~---r---,
Fig 15 ( a ) Sacramento Rim Sand
§ '
f 40...--....--~ _____
t
f_
I
...I----· -
a.
:1
I
Ii
.
;- 30
f ,o .....
i
-•oo!-::.,--:!-o•.,...---::o;-,.•---=-o'::-,_ _.,,.,a,=----::a~.,---=o'=",- - : - ,a=----',.,
VOid Ra110 After Con10lidot1:,n, e,
Fig.15( bl
251----
I
.,~ II .,
- zo ~· ·-•·· - --- I.i
i
!?
~
~ 10
;;
.
"'
C
a
6 •
!
£a~~~--~~~~~-~--~-~-~
-•
-10 L----'----'---------'----'---.___ _.__~
O $ 10, · IS 20 ZS SO • SS 40
Consolidation ond Conl1n1n9 Prnsure, ,3e-k9 per sq cm
the 100% relative density condition at low confining pressures and under these
conditions the critical confining pressure may be as high as 30 kg per sq cm.
To throw some light on the range of values of the critical confining pres-
sure to be expected for various types of granular soils, values of this soil
characteristic have been extracted from data presented in previous studies
352 November, 1967
10,-----------------~
Sacr-to Ri- Sanct
Data lrGffl Flq.11; •",•0
-~ 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - 1
j~
O 71-----+----'..,..__ _.__ _ _ _ _ _ __,___ _..._~
~
.2
~ 061-----
:s!
~
05r--......------+----+-
a• o~---,,;-.----1'-0_ ___,os':----,-L20--2--Ls--3..Lo-~
Ctit,cal Confir,ing Pressure, ..._.,.-kc;i per sq cm
1.0-------~---------
Sacramento RiYer Saftd
Data lr0ffl -Dined 11111
0.9 _,___ _,__ _ _ _......._ tracn,••i ot tolU•
I
.§ o . • 1 - - - - - - - - - l ' - - - - - ~ - - - + - - - - I
~
1
~ 0.11---,---
~
4
.si
J!.., O&l----.---•---.-':-...------1---i---~----<
J
0.5~---+----t---
04 0L.--,;----,',-0----,1=--s---±20=----:!-:2s=---:!-:30=-~31
Effective Minor Principal Sir- at Faik.r•, ,;, • ,..,~-kQ per sq cm
•O~-~----~----~------.
, Socro'"""lo Ri'fer Sand
•.. 1
I
L--· 1-----1
•
~ PrtdM:tld from 1111:tral'led t11t1. &11f •O CFl9 16 J.
.t 0.11-----'---- ··t ] ·-·· J._._] ____ -1
j 1'~. M1asure~ u,
1
W\dra1 n1d t11t1,~_..r11 (;it.IT).
" 4
I i
oL..----,'----,',a:----,IS~-~2a=---~21=---~1a::----!H'
By far the highest value of the critical confining pressure determined was
the value of 110 kg per sq cm for dense samples of Ottawa sand. ·The next
highest value was 58 kg per sq cm for dense samples of glass beads. Both of
these materials have well-rounded and very sound particles.
As might be expected in view of the greater ease of crushing, values of the
critical confining pressure for dense sands composed of subangular or an-
gular particles are substantially lower than those for sound, rounded particles.
19 Bishop, A. W., "A Large Shear Box for Testing Sands and Gravels," Proceedings,
2nd International Conference on Soil I\Iechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam,
Netherlands, 1948, Vol. I, pp. 207-211.
°
2 Krazynski, L. M., "An Investigation of the Dilatency Effects in Saturated Sands,"
Graduate Student Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California,
Berkeley, 1960.
21 Bjerrum. L., Kringstad, S., and Kummeneje, 0., "The Shear Strength of a Fine
Sand," Proceedings, 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Engineering, Paris, 1961, Vol. I, pp. 29-37.
22 Wade, N. H., "Plane Strain Failure Characteristics of a Saturated Clay," thesis
presented to the University of London, at London, England, in 1963, in fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
23 Hall, E. B., and Gordon, B. B., "Triaxial Testing Using Large Scale High Pressure
Equipment," Proceedings of the Symposium on Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils,
Special Technical Publication No. 361, American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, Pa., 1963.
24 Insley, A. E., and Hillis, S. F., "Triaxlal Shear Characteristics of a Compacted
Glacial Till Under Unusually High Confining Pressures," Proceedings, 6th International
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, 1965, Vol. I, pp.
244-248.
354 November, 1967
Thus the maximum values of the critical confining pressure for other dense
sands studied to date appear to be on the order of 15 to 30 kg per sq cm.
per sq cm with no internal pressure in the pore water; for Sample B, the same
effective confining pressure is developed by applying an external pressure
of 7 kg per sq cm, together with an internal pore water pressure (back-
pressure) of 4 kg per sq cm. Suppose that the critical confining pressure
corresponding to the void ratio after consolidation is 15 kg per sq cm and the
angle of friction in terms of effective stresses is (/)' = 37°.
If the samples were loaded to failure under undrained conditions, because
the total confining pressures are considerably less than the critical confining
pressures, the pore water pressures in both samples with drop to -1 atm,
cavitation will occur, and the pore water pressure at failure will remain at
this value. Thus, the undrained strengths of the two samples will be determined
by the conditions shown in Table 2. Thus the undrained strength of Sample B
would be twice as great as that of Sample A, even though both samples had the
same density and were consolidated under the same effective confining
pressure.
The effect of the initial pore water pressure on the undrained strength may
also be illustrated by the data obtained for Sacramento River sa."ld. The test
data for consolidated-undrained tests with nobackpressure, shown in Fig. 14,
may be replotted as illustrated in Fig. 19 to show the relationship between the
356 November, 1967
effective confining pressure on any sample and the deviator stress at fa ibre
for that sample. On the same figure are shown the values of the cteviator
stresses at failure for tests conducted with the same effective confining pres-
sures during consolidation, but with different values of the initial pore water
pressure in the samples during the consolidation stage. The large influence
of the initial pore water pressure on the undrained strength of samples in
which cavitation occurs is readily apparent.
These results emphasize the importance, in testing saturated sands, of
correct laboratory representation, not only of the initial effective stress
70 ,---------,----------r-------,--------,
60 l---------+-----------1-------+-------~
...
Cl
.:!
·s
u.
0 30
~" 5 kg per sq cm
"'"'
~ ub =10kg per sq cm
in 20 ·
...
0
0
">Cl
0 10
00 10 20 30 40
Initial Consolidation Pressure, a-3 c- kg per sq cm
condition on a soil element, but also of the initial pore water pressure in soil
elements which may be subjected to undrained loading conditions.
dense samples were prepared to the same initial void ratio, ei = 0.61 and
each of these was consolidated under a confining pi essure of 40 kg per sq cm.
At this stage the confining pressures on the samples were reduced, each to a
different value, and t~e samples were allowed to rebound to an equilibrium
condition. The over-consolidated samples were then loaded to failure under
undrained conditions.
The strengths of both normally and over-consolidated samples are plotted
as a function of the void ratio at the end of consolidation in Fig. 20. It may
be seen that the data define a unique relationship and for this soil, the un-
10
E
.
u
er
70
go " '~0~
'
I
_;
& 40 ~
;; '
.
Soc:ranw1to Ri,,er Sand
_ e; •0.61; o,•100 percent
0 Normally COIIIOlidated
• Over-camalidoted
10
0
0.50 0.50
Void Ratio ot Starl of Undrained Tes ls, ec
oc,-----,----.....-----,---,-----,--....----,.-.....------~
II
SoctOl'NfltO Ri._., .$4nd
•G)0.•017
Ii •O 71 ; __
j
I
; I·
!
_..._~_.._---J-_~__,___,
Ol.•071CNlboct"'9•M•I
•e.•0711..tl'lloel,,....,,I:
;
,
I
•
i
I
•
: I 1
,
i l j
U - - · · ,.0,1
•e.-0,,1....,.......,, I l
-+-_j__---~-,-.&·-----'
I l · ! -1----+---✓-------1
.. ___...,..... ..,_ r-·- --1------l-
1 ~- --.l.... - -1
•••o•• i I
S
:r .... g• '
I
'
I ' ,
i l4-•--:-··-·-r---r (···-··'1··-···
I : L
1··-··
I
!
= ao
• · 1' ·-----1-····
: r . I
I
,..
- -I-· •
••••· ··-·
•.. ~ : I -
tr •• l ....:.. j_ __ .
; o ·· - - ·-
rl---1-------1----+--
IZ -• ----· ! .
1___ L_____ (_
iI I !
- -- . ---- ,.__ __..__._____,
I .
0
. ,, . .
I
I
14HH
Clli;•• -lltpwacacm
5140 4• .. IIHeCI
2•,---~--.....---~----~------,---,
E
u
20
i 1-·-
5r
~
0.
~
1• -- -!------~-- --
Effectr-,e enelopt olt..-wd
..
1trH1
-----1
I
Soeramenlo Ri .. r Sand
10 1• 20 25 30 40
consolidated samples, loose and dense sand, and high and low confining pres-
sures, define an essentially linear relationship corresponding to an angle of
friction of 36°. This result is compared with the range of values determined
from drained tests (see Fig. 10) in Fig. 22. It is in good general agreement
:~.! UNDRAINED STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS 359
6
-
;:;ith the envelopes of failure determined by deducting dilatancy effects from
tte results of drained tests on dense sand and in excellent agreement with the
envelope of failure determined by drained tests showing no volume change at
failure.
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
'
The investigations described herein were supported by a research grant
from the National Science Foundation for studies of Soil Behavior During
Earthquakes. The support of the National Science Foundation is gratefully
acknowledged.