Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Basic Reservoir
Engineering
Conglomerate Pebbles - 2 to 64 mm
Sandstone Sand - 0.06 to 2 mm
Siltstone Silt - 0.003 to 0.06 mm
Shale Clay - Less than 0.003 mm
Melting
Magma
Heat and Pressure
rocks
(Metamorphism)
rocks
Igneous
Metamorphic
W
an e at
d he
d e ri
po ng
sit , tr
io an
n sp
or
and deposition
t
Weathering, transport
(Metamorphism)
Heat and Pressure
The Rock Cycle
Weathering, transport
rocks
and deposition
Sediments
Sedimentary
Compression &
Cementation
Hydrocarbon Traps
Conditions Required for
Hydrocarbon Reservoir
• Mother rock
– rich in organic material
• Alteration
– molecular structure change by heat and
hydrocarbon migrate through porous media or
fracture
• Trap
– trapped by a impermeable rock
• Reservoir Rock
– porous and permeable
Accumulation of Oil & Gas into a Reservoir
"Normal" Pressure Distribution from Surface
through a Reservoir Structure
Hydrocarbon Traps
• Trap Types
–Structural
–Stratigraphical
–Combined
Dome Trap
Gas
Oil
er
at
W
Sandstone Shale
Fault Trap
Oil / Gas
Sand
Shale
Structural Traps
Gas
Shale Oil Oil/Gas Closure
Trap
Contact
Se Oil/Water
al
Contact
Oil
Salt
Salt Diapir Oil
Dome
Stratigraphic Traps
Unconformity Pinch out
Uncomformity Oil/Gas
Oil/Gas
Oil/Gas
H C C H H H H
PROPANE
H H
H H
H C H
H C H C C
H C C
METHANE H C H
H
Structure of Several Members of the Arene,
or Aromatic, Series
Other elements found in Reservoir Fluids
• Water (Salinity)
• H2S
• CO2
• N2
• Hg (Mercury)
API Gravity
141.5
API = − 131.5
SG
or
141.5
SG =
API + 131.5
Where
SG: Specific Gravity
API: API Gravity (60degF)
Classification of Hydrocarbon
50000 Black
Dry Wet Retrograde Volatile oil
gas/oil ratio, scf/STB
Dewpoint gas
Bubblepoint oil
0
0 30
Heptanes plus in reservoir fluid, mole %
Hydrocarbon Behavior
(Single component / Constant temp.)
Hydrocarbon Behavior
(Single component / Constant temp.)
Vapor Pressure Curves for Two Pure Components and Phase
Diagram for a 50:50 Mixture of the Same Components
Reservoir Fluid PVT Diagram
Criocondenbar
Critical point
Criocondentherm
Phase Diagram of a Typical Black
Oil
Pressure path
in reservoir
Critical
Point Dewpoint line
Pressure, psia
Black Oil
e 90 0 % Liquid
L in 8
int 790
o 60
lep
bb
50
Bu
40
30
20
10
Separator
Temperature, °F
Phase Diagram of a Typical Volatile
Oil
Dewpoint line
Pressure path Critical
1 point
in reservoir
2
Volatile oil
0
80 9
70
60
Pressure
50
e % Liquid
lin
40
nt
oi
30
lep
bb
20
Bu
3 10
Separator n e
po int li
Dew
Temperature, °F
Phase Diagram of a Typical
Retrograde Gas
Pressure path
in reservoir
1
Retrograde gas
2
e
in
tl
in
po
w
De
Pressure
Critical point
e
lin
% Liquid
nt
oi
40
30
ep
20
l
bb
15
Bu
3
10
5
Separator
0
Temperature
Phase Diagram of a Typical Wet
Gas
Pressure path
in reservoir
1
e
lin
Pressure
Wet gas
t
oin
wp
De
Critical % Liquid
point
e int
2
lin epo
bl
30
b
25
5
Bu
Separator
Temperature
Phase Diagram of a Typical Dry
Gas
Pressure path
in reservoir
1
Pressure
e
t l in
Dry gas
oi n
p
Dew
% Liquid
2
50
25
Separator
1
Temperature
Three Gases
• Dry gas - gas at surface is same as
gas in reservoir
• Wet gas - recombined surface gas
and condensate represents gas in
reservoir
• Retrograde gas - recombined
surface gas and condensate
represents the gas in the reservoir
but not the total reservoir fluid
(retrograde condensate stays in
reservoir)
Relationships between Surface and Downhole Volumes
— Dissolved Gas Systems
Typical PVT Data for Differential Vaporization of an
Undersaturated Oil at Constant Temperature (305°F)
Oil Formation Volume Factor (Bo)
Oil at Surface
Gas at Surface
Oil Volume in Place Pb
Bo =
Oil Volume at Surface
Oil in Place
Production Gas Oil Ratio (GOR)
Oil at Surface
Gas at Surface
Gas Volume at Surface Pb
GOR =
Oil Volume at Surface
Oil in Place
Excercise
• There is 1,000,000 bbls of recoverable oil in
reservoir. If you recover all of the oil to the
surface, how much stock tank volume of oil and
gas (standard condition) you can obtain?
Assume: Bo = 1.2, GOR = 600, reservoir is
saturated and no free gas is drained.
• If the oil price is $25/bbl and gas price is $3/mscf,
how much revenue can you get? (you do not
have to consider production cost in this
exercise).
Vg 1 + Vg 2 + Vg 3
Surface
GOR ≠ Rs GOR =
Vo
GOR
Vg1 Vg3
GWR Vo
Vg2
Bo
Bg Bw
Rs
Reservoir
Gas-Oil Ratio
(for Pr < Pb and no Free Gas Cap)
⎛ ⎞⎛⎜ µ ⎞⎟⎛ k rg ⎞
GOR = R s + ⎜ B o ⎟ o ⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎜ B ⎟⎜ µ ⎟⎜ k ⎟
⎝ g ⎠⎝ g ⎠⎝ ro ⎠
where:
GOR – Production gas oil ratio
Rs – Gas in solution in oil
Boand Bg – Oil and gas volume factors
µo and µg – Oil and gas viscosities
krg/kro – Gas/oil-relative permeability-ratio
Basic Parameters Used
in Reservoir Engineering
Viscosity (µ)
• A measure of resistance to flow
• Symbols
–µo, µg, µw
• Units – cp
• Source – Lab measurements,
correlations
• Range and typical values
–0.25 – 10,000 cp, Black oil
–0.5 – 1.0 cp, Water
–0.012 – 0.035 cp, Gas
Variation of Viscosity with Pr
Visc
Pb Pressure
Fluid Compressibility (Co, Cg, Cw)
1 ∂Vo ∂ ln(Vo )
co ≡ − =−
Vo ∂p ∂p
•Total Porosity
•Effective Porosity
Cubic Packing of Spheres
Porosity = 48%
Rhombic Packing of Spheres
Porosity = 27 %
Packing of Two Sizes of Spheres
Porosity = 14%
Intergranular Porosity
qµL kA∆p
k= q=
A∆p or µL
• Permeability is the measure of capacity of
rock to transmit fluid.
• Symbol : k
• Units : Darcy or milliDarcy (D or mD)
• Source : Well tests (eff.), core analysis
(abs.)
• Range : 0.001 mD - 10,000 mD
Definition of a Darcy
Effect of Grain Size on Permeability
Same Effective Porosity – Different
Permeabilities
Relative Permeability (Krw, Kro)
Pore Compressibility (Cf)
1 ∂φ ∂ ln(φ )
cf ≡ =
φ ∂p ∂p
Shale
h1 Sand
h2
h3
hnet = h1 + h2 + h3
Saturations (Sw, So, Sg)
H2O
Archie’s Equation
a Rw
Swn = m
φ Rt where:
Sw: water saturation
( sandstone ) a: constant
0.62 Rw φ: porosity
Sw = 2.15
2
φ Rt m: cementation factor
(lim estone ) Rw: formation water resistivity
1 Rw Rt: true resistivity (measured
Sw2 = 2 by deep resistivity
φ Rt measurement)
Types of Openhole Logs to
Determine Saturation
• Resistivity log
– Induction tools
– Laterolog tools
• Porosity log
– Neutron tools
– Density tools
– Sonic tools
– Magnetic resonance tools
Exercise
• Calculate oil saturation in the following case
0.62 0.0912
Sw2 = 2.15
0.2 20
0.62 0.0912
Sw = 2.15
0.2 20
Sw = 0.3
∴ S o = 0 .7
Wellbore Radius (rw)
rw
Bit Size
or
Caliper Reading
Total Compressibility (Ct)
c t = c f + S o c o + S w c w + S gc g
Typically,
Cw : 3E-6
Co : 3E-5(Black oil)
Cg : 1/pressure
Cf : 4E-6
Exercise
• Calculate total compressibility in the following
case
• cf : 3.6E-06
• co : 1.158E-05 So : 0.83
• cw : 2.277E-06 Sw : 0.17
• cg : 6.023E-05 Sg : 0
Exercise Solution
• cf : 3.6E-06
• co : 1.158E-05 So : 0.73
• cw : 2.277E-06 Sw : 0.17
• cg : 6.023E-05 Sg : 0 .1
Compare solution with previous Example
Calculation of
Hydrocarbon Volumes
Oil Initially In Place (OIIP or POES)
OIIP = Ahφ (1 − Sw )
Where;
A: Area
h: Thickness
φ: Porosity
Sw: Water Saturation
Stock Tank Oil Initially In Place
STOIIP =
(
Ahφ 1 − Sw )
Bo
Where:
A: area h: formation thickness
φ: porosity Sw: water saturation
Bo: formation volume factor
What are Reserves?
I II III
Range of
Increasing Recovery Estimates
Recovery
True Ultimate
Recovery
Cumulative
Production
Time
Wells Abandonment At
Completed Economic Limit
Exercise
• What is the STOIIP in the following case (in
bbls)?
A: 300m x 500m h: 200m φ: 20%
Sw: 25% Bo: 1.35
1m3 = 6.289bbls
• If ultimate RF of this reservoir is 30% and oil
price is $20/bbl, how much is the total revenue?
Assume there is no market for the gas in this
case.
Probabilistic Estimation
Monte Carlo Approach
Probability Density
Probability Density
1.0
Cumulative Probability
Frequency of
0 Min Max
Recoverable Reserve
Probabilistic Representation
1.0
Proven reserve
Probability that the reserve is at least (10% level)
RR=STOIIP x RF
as large as indicated
Proven + Probable
(50% level)
Proven + Probable
+ Possible (90%
level) Max
0 Min
Recoverable
Reservoir Drive Mechanism
Oil Reservoir Drive Mechanisms
• Solution-gas drive
• Gas-cap drive
• Water drive
• Combination drive
• Gravity-drainage drive
Reservoir Energy Sources
• Liberation, expansion of solution gas
• Influx of aquifer water
• Expansion of reservoir rock and
compression of pore volume
• Expansion of original reservoir fluids
- Free gas
- Interstitial water
- Oil, if present
• Gravitational forces
Solution Gas Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Solution Gas Drive in Oil Reservoirs
• No original gas cap or aquifer
• Main source(s) of reservoir energy
• liberation and expansion of dissolved gas
• Possible secondary gas cap
• liberated free gas can migrate up-structure
• Typical production characteristics
• Rapid GOR increase after Pb
Solution Gas Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Formation of Secondary Gas Cap
Solution Gas Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Typical Production Characteristics
Initial reservoir
Reservoir pressure, psig
pressure
Bubblepoint
pressure
0 5 10
15 Oil recovery, % of OOIP
Reservoir pressure behavior
Solution Gas Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Typical Production Characteristics
400
Oil production rate, STB/D
800 400
Gas/oil
600 300 ratio 300
0 0 0
Time, years
Production data
Gas Cap Drive
Oil Oil
zone Gas cap zone
Cross Section
Gas Cap Drive
• Free gas phase exists as an original gas cap
• Pure gas-cap drive reservoir has no aquifer
• Main source(s) of reservoir energy
• Expansion of gas cap and liberation and expansion of
solution gas in the oil zone
• Gas cap expands pushing GOC down and
maintaining higher pressure
• Good sweep
• Typical production characteristics
• dramatic GOR increase when gas breakthrough
Gas Cap Drive
Typical Production Characteristics
Pressure, psia
1300
Reservoir pressure
1200
1100
400
2 200
MSTB/D
0
Oil
1
0
Time, years
Production data
Water Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Oil Zone
Water Water
Cross Section
Water Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Bottom-Water Drive
Oil Zone
Water
Cross Section
Water Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Typical Production Characteristics
Pressure, psia
Water cut, %
1
0 30
Oil production rate,
100 Water
20
80 10
MSTB/D
60 0
Oil
40
20
0
Time, years
Production data
Water Drive in Oil Reservoirs
Effect of Production Rate on Pressure
Pressure, psia
2000
Water Cut, %
0 60
Water
40
Oil production,
20 20
MSTB/D
15 0
Oil
10
5
0
Time, years
Gas cap
Oil zone
Water
Cross Section
Gravity Drainage in Oil Reservoirs
• Main energy - gravitational force
• Good drainage efficiency and recovery
factor
Gas
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil Point C
Point B
Oil
Point A
Pressure Trend
100
Water drive
80
Reservoir pressure,
Percent of original
60
Gas-cap drive
40
20
Solution
-gas drive
0 0 20 40 60 80 100
Cumulative oil produced, percent of original oil in place
Reservoir pressure trends
GOR Trend
5
Solution-
gas drive
4
Gas/oil ratio, MSCF/STB
Gas-cap drive
3
1
Water drive
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
• Water drive
Volumetric Gas Reservoirs
• Gas reservoir with no acquifer
• Main source(s) of reservoir energy
• expansion of gas
• Pressure decline slowly and continuously
• No water production
• Flowing life can be increased by reducing
surface back-pressure through installing
compression
Water Drive in Gas Reservoirs
• Gas reservoir with acquifer
• Main source(s) of reservoir energy
• expansion of gas and water influx
• Pressure decline slower than volumetric gas
reservoir
• Water production may start early and increases
with time
• Flowing life can be increased by installing
continuous or intermittent water removal
equipment
Oil Reservoir Drive Mechanisms
(summary)
• Solution-gas drive
• Gas-cap drive
• Water drive
• Combination drive
• Gravity-drainage drive
Gas Reservoir Drive Mechanisms
(summary)
• Water drive
Exercise
• What is the drive mechanism of your reservoir?
• What are the characteristics of pressure, GOR,
water production evolution?
Average Recovery Factors
Oil Reservoirs
Average Oil Recovery
Drive Mechanism Factors,
% of OOIP
Range Average
Solution-gas drive 5 - 30 15
Gas-cap drive 15 - 50 30
Water drive 30 - 60 40
Gravity-drainage 16 - 85 50
drive
Average Recovery Factors
Gas Reservoirs
0.1741⎤
⎛ pb ⎞
(S wi )
0.3722
⎜ ⎟ ⎥
⎝ pa ⎠ ⎥⎦
Estimation of Oil Recovery Factors
• Water drive - API study
⎡⎛ φ (1 − S ) ⎞ 0.0422 ⎛ kµ ⎞ 0.0770
ER = 54.9 ⎢⎜ wi
⎟ ⎜ w⎟
⎢⎣⎝ B oi ⎠ ⎝ µ oi ⎠
− 0.2159 ⎤
⎛ pi ⎞
(S wi )
− 0.1903
⎜ ⎟ ⎥
⎝ pa ⎠ ⎥⎦
Estimation of Oil Recovery Factors
• Water drive : Guthrie-Greenberger study
q
PI =
p − p wf
Productivity Index (PI or IP)
q
PI =
p − p wf
k×h
⇒
⎡ ⎛ re ⎞ 3 ⎤
141 .2 × µ × B0 × ⎢ln ⎜ ⎟ − + S⎥
⎣ ⎝ rw ⎠ 4 ⎦
Productivity Index (PI or IP)
Rule of Thumb
8
Pr odRatio =
8 + Skin
Skin Concept:
Introduced in 1953 by Van Everdingen and Hurst for
differences in observed and calculated bottomhole pressure
2000
Pressure, psi
1500
1000
∆ps
500
1 10 100 1000 10000
Distance from center of wellbore, ft
Skin Concept:
Introduced in 1953 by Van Everdingen and Hurst for
differences in observed and calculated bottomhole pressure
qµB0 ⎛ re ⎞ qµB0
Pe − Psf − ∆Ps = 141.2 × × ln⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ −141.2 × ×S
Kh ⎝ rw ⎠ Kh
Skin Concept:
Introduced in 1953 by Van Everdingen and Hurst for
differences in observed and calculated bottomhole pressure
141.2qBµ
∆p s = s
kh
S = Skin Factor as per Van Everdingen and Hurst
S = Adimentional number. Not related to any physical
phenomena
Extra pressure drop “at the wellbore”
Zero thickness ==> Skin
Skin Concept:
In 1956 Hawkins introduces the concept of “Thick Skin”
- Zone of altered permeability around the Wellbore (ra / Ka)
- Extra Pressure drops occurs not in the “Skin”of the wellbore
but in a “Thick Zone”.
Skin Concept:
In 1956 Hawkins introduces the concept of “Thick Skin”
2000
Pressure, psi
1500
1000
∆ps
500
1 10 100 1000 10000
Distance from center of wellbore, ft
Skin Concept:
In 1956 Hawkins introduces the concept of “Thick Skin”
qµ B0 ⎞
⎛ ra q µ B0 ⎛ ra ⎞
∆ Pa = 141 .2 × × ln ⎜⎜ ⎟ − 141 .2 ×
⎟ × ln ⎜⎜ ⎟
⎟
Kah ⎠
⎝ rw Keh ⎝ rw ⎠
qµ B0 ⎡ K e − K a ⎛ ra ⎞ ⎤
⇒ 141 .2 × ⎢ × ln ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎥
K e h ⎢⎣ K a ⎝ rw ⎠ ⎥⎦
⎡ Ke − Ka ⎛ ra ⎞⎤
⇒S=⎢ × ln ⎜⎜ ⎟⎥
⎟
⎢⎣ K a ⎝ rw ⎠ ⎥⎦
s = -2
1500
Pressure, psi
s = +5
1000
s=0
500
1 10 100 1000 10000
Distance from center of wellbore, ft
Skin Concept:
So ==> Skin is CHANGE IN PRESSURE DROP that exists
near the wellbore in “real wells” compared to a “Darcy-model”
of the well
What can cause this change in pressure drop near the wellbore??:
•Geometrical factors:
•Inclined Well (S<0)
•Spherical flow (Partial completion / Penetration)
•Perforations (phase, density)
Skin Concept:
Mechanical Skin “Damage”:
•Zone of altered permeability around the wellbore
•Change in stress distribution
•Drilling completion damage
•Perforations ==> Crushed zone
•Others
•Gas liberated from solution near the wellbore
•Gravel Packs completions
•Fracture / Stimulations
Damage Caused by Drilling Fluid
Mud filtrate
invasion
Damage Caused by Production
P > Pb P < Pb
Damage Caused by Injection
“Dirty” Incompatible
Water Water
Geometric Skin - Converging Flow
to Perforations
Completion Skin
rw
s = s p + sd + sdp
kdp rdp
rp
kR
Lp
⎛ h ⎞⎛ rdp ⎞⎛ k R k R ⎞
sdp =⎜ ⎟⎜ ln ⎟⎜ − ⎟
kd ⎜ L p n ⎟⎜ rp ⎟⎜ k dp k d ⎟
⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
rd
After McLeod, JPT (Jan. 1983) p. 32.
Geometric Skin - Partial Penetration
hp
h
Gravel Pack Skin
Cement
k R hLg
s gp = 2
2nk gp rp
Lg
Geometric Skin - Deviated Wellbore
hsecθ
h
θ
Geometric Skin - Well With Hydraulic
Fracture
Lf
Skin Concept:
Pressure Build ups measures TOTAL Skin
Individual components of Skin can NOT be simply added
ht
st = × sd + s p
hp
⎛ ht ⎞ ⎡ ⎛ ht kh ⎞ ⎤
sp = ⎜ − 1⎟ × ⎢ ln ⎜⎜ × ⎟ − 2⎥
⎟
⎜h ⎟
⎝ p ⎠ ⎢⎣ ⎝ r w kv ⎠ ⎥⎦
St = Total Skin , Sd = Mechanical Skin, Sp=Partial Comp Skin
ht = Total Net Thickness, hp = Perforated thickness
Kh = Horiz Perm, Kv = Vert. Perm.
Skin Concept:
Example:
Partial completion and damage (after Saidikowski 1979)
Given:
ht= 50 ft , hp = 10ft, Kh=100md, Anisotropic ratio=10
Bs = 8.5 in
We perform a BU and we obtain a S = 11
Should we stimulate?
Skin Concept:
Example:
Partial completion and damage (after Saidikowski 1979)
Ei-Function Solution
• Exponential integral solution
qBµ ⎛ 948φµc tr 2⎞
p = pi + 70.6 Ei⎜⎜ − ⎟
⎟
kh ⎝ kt ⎠
Exercise
• There is a oil producing well and pressure
observation well in one field. What is the
pressure at the observation well on the following
case?