You are on page 1of 4

Journal of Materials Science and Engineering 5 (2011) 277-280

Effect of Concentration on Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)


Nanofibers

Ümran Özkoç, Halil İbrahim İçoğlu and Ali Kireçci


Textile Engineering Department, Gaziantep University,27310, Gaziantep, Turkey

Received: July 17, 2010 / Accepted: August 05, 2010 / Published: March 10, 2011.

Abstract: The study investigates the effect of solution concentration on the morphology of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers. PAN
electrospun nanofibers are produced from PAN/DMF solutions at six different concentrations (6%-16%). The morphology of the
nanofibers is analyzed by scanning electron microscope. The experimental results show that the fiber diameter increases and the bead
formation decreases as the concentration increases. On the other hand, the nanofiber diameter becomes finer but less uniform as the
concentration decreases.

Key words: Electrospinning, nanofiber, polyacrylonitrile (PAN), concentration.

1. Introduction
Electrospinning is a straightforward method that
relies on electrostatic forces to produce fibers with
submicron diameter from polymer solutions or melts.
In a typical process, an electrical potential is applied
between a droplet of polymer solution, or melt, held
through a syringe needle and a grounded target.
Electrostatic charging of the droplet results in the
formation of the well-known Taylor cone. When the
electric forces overcome the surface tension of the
droplet from the apex of the cone, a charged fluid jet is
Fig. 1 The electrospinning system.
ejected. The jet exhibits bending instabilities due to
repulsive forces between the surface charges, which is (1) the intrinsic properties of the solution such as the
carried with the jet, and follows a looping and spiraling type of polymer and solvent, polymer molecular weight,
path. The electrical forces elongate the jet thousands of viscosity (or concentration), elasticity, conductivity,
times and the jet becomes very thin. Ultimately, the and surface tension;
solvent evaporates, or the melt solidifies and very long (2) the operational conditions such as the applied
nanofibers are collected on the grounded target [1-6]. voltage, the distance between spinneret and collector
The morphology and diameter of electrospun (tip-target distance), and the feeding rate of the
nanofibers are dependent on a number of processing polymer solution.
parameters that include: In addition to these variables, the humidity and
temperature of the surroundings may also play an
Corresponding author: Ümran Özkoç, textile engineering,
research fields: nanotechnology and echnical textiles. E-mail: important role in determining the morphology and
ozkoc@gantep.edu.tr.
278 Effect of Concentration on Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) Nanofibers

diameter of electrospun nanofibres. For instance, the fibers were collected on the aluminum foil.
polymer solution must have a concentration high
2.3 Characterization
enough to cause polymer entanglements yet not so high
that the viscosity prevents polymer motion induced by The morphological appearance of the PAN
the electric field. The solution must also have a surface nanofiber mats and that of the individual fibers were
tension low enough, a charge density high enough, and investigated by a JEOL JSM-6390LV scanning
a viscosity high enough to prevent the jet from electron microscope (SEM), operating at an
collapsing into droplets before the solvent has acceleration voltage of 10 kV. The diameters of
evaporated [7-11]. During the last 10 years extensive nanofibers were measured using Image-ProPlus 6.0. 30
research has been conducted on various aspects of measurements were performed and average diameter of
electrospinning. the nanofibers was calculated.
Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is the most extensively used
polymer in electrospinning because of its excellent 3. Results and Discussion
properties [12-15]. Effect of concentration is still
Experimental results demonstrate that the average
investigated. Generally as the concentration increases,
nanofiber diameter increases when the concentrations
the fiber diameter increases and the bead formation
increase as given in Fig. 2. The lowest diameter is 216
decreases [1, 7, 12]. The effect of concentration on
nm obtained at 6% concentration, and the highest
PAN nanofibers is investigated.
diameter is 360 nm obtained at 16% concentration.
2. Experiment Fig. 3 shows nanofiber morphologies at different
solution concentrations. Figs. 3a and 3b illustrate that
2.1 Materials and Preparation of Spinning Solutions
the diameters of nanofibers are very fine (216 nm and
PAN (polyacrylonitrile) polymer [Mw 150,000] was 223 nm, respectively), however the bead formations
gently supplied from AKSA Acrylic. The solvent used were obvious at 6% and 8% solution concentrations.
was dimethylformamide (DMF). To conduct the For the concentrations higher than 8%, the bead
experiment a solution was prepared by dissolving PAN formation decreases significantly. The variation
polymer in DMF. The solution (6%-16% of PAN) was between the fiber diameters decreases also when the
arranged by stirring magnetically for one hour at a concentration increases.
temperature of 90 °C.

2.2 Electrospinning

Electrospinning of the PAN solution was carried out


by first loading the solution in a 50-mL plastic syringe.
The high voltage power supply used in the experiment
can provide voltages between 0 to 50 kV. The tests
were done at 35 kV and 0.7 mm jet diameters. The
other parameters such as flow rate, the distance
between capillary and the collector were selected as 0.5
mL/h and 100 mm respectively. The environmental
conditions were kept constant during the experiments
Fig. 2 The relationship between concentration and fiber
(temperature: 25 oC and relative humidity: 40%). The
diameter (distance: 10 cm and voltage: 35 kV).
Effect of Concentration on Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) Nanofibers 279

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(e) (f)
Fig. 3 Effect of concentration on nanofiber diameter distribution from PAN/DMF solution (tip-target distance: 10 cm).
Voltage: 35 kV concentration: (a) 6%, (b) 8%, (c) 10%, (d) 12%, (e) 14%, (f) 16%.

as 10% for PAN nanofibers. Since the fiber diameter


4. Conclusions
was inversely proportional with concentration, the
For PAN polymer, it was observed that as the optimal values of PAN concentration should be
concentration increases the fiber diameter increases selected between 10-12%.
and the bead formation decreases correspondingly.
Acknowledgments
Generally, a mixture of droplets and nanofiber was
observed at low concentration values. The minimum This work was supported by University of Gaziantep
concentration limit for bead formation was determined BAPYB under Grant No.MF.08.04.
280 Effect of Concentration on Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) Nanofibers

References [9] A. Frenot, I.S. Chronakis, Polymer nanofibers assembled


by electrospinning, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interf. Sci. 8 (2003)
[1] R. Jalili, M. Morshed, S. Abdolkarim, Fundamental 64-75.
parameters affecting electrospinning of PAN nanofibers as [10] C.J. Thompson, G.G. Chase, A.L. Yarin, D.H. Reneker,
uniaxially aligned fibers, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 101 (2006) Effects of parameters on nanofiber diameter determined
4350-4357. from electrospinning model, Polymer 48 (2007)
[2] A. Formhals, US Patent 1-975-504 (1934). 6913-6922.
[3] D. Li, Y. Xia, Elelctrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing [11] A.K. Haghi, M. Akbari, Trends in electrospinning of
the wheel, Adv. Mater. 16 (2004) 1151-1169. natural nanofibers, Phys. Stat. Sol. 20 (2007) 1830-1834.
[4] H. Fong, I. Chun, D.H. Reneker, Beaded nanofibers during [12] J.H. He, Y.Q. Wan, J.Y. Yu, Effect of concentration on
electrospinning, Polymer 40 (1999) 4585-4592. electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers, Fiber.
[5] D.H. Reneker, I. Chun, Nanometre diameter fibres of Polym. 9 (2008) 140-142.
polymer, produced by electrospinning, Nanotechnol. 7 [13] S.Y. Gu, J. Ren, G.J. Vancso, Process optimization and
(1996) 216-223. empirical modeling for electrospun polyacrylonitrile
[6] D.H. Reneker, A.L. Yarin, S. Koombhongse, H. Fong, (PAN) nanofiber precursor of carbon nanofibers, Eur.
Bending instability of electrical charged liquid jets of Polym. J. 41 (2005) 2559-2568.
polymer solutions in electrospinning, J. Appl. Phys. 87 [14] S.Y Gu, J. Ren, G.J. Vancso, Process optimization and
(2000) 4531-4547. empirical modeling for electrospun polyacrylonitrile
[7] R. Jalili, S.A. Hosseini, M. Morshed, The effects of (PAN) nanofiber precursor of carbon nanofibers, Eur.
operating parameters on the morphology of electrospun Polym. J. 41 (2005) 2559-2568.
polyacrilonitrile nanofibres, Iran. Polym. J. 14 (2005) [15] F. Agend, N. Naderi, R. Fareghi-Alamdari, Fabrication
1074-1081. and electrical characterization of electrospun
[8] J.M. Deitzel, J. Kleinmeyer, D. Harris, N.C.B. Tan, The
polyacrylonitrile-derived carbon nanofibers, J. Appl.
effect of processing variables on the morphology of
Polym. Sci. 106 (2007) 255-259.
electrospun nanofibers and textiles, Polymer 42 (2001)
261-272.

You might also like