Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN
wp-2821/17.
P. C. :
the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 2 and the
learned APP for the State. Petition is filed for quashing FIR bearing CR.
No. 445 of 2017 registered with Dindoshi Police Station at the instance
them, present petition is filed for quashing the above FIR, by consent
of Respondent No. 2.
patilsr 1/ 5
ground that offence alleged against the Petitioner is a serious one and
affidavit dated 17th July 2017. In paragraph 3 she has stated that the
subject FIR was lodged out of misunderstanding. She has also stated
that she does not desire to prosecute the Petitioner in the subject FIR.
She has solemnly affirmed that she has no objection if the subject FIR
before the Court. On specific query made by us, she submitted that
she has made the said affidavit on her own free will, without there
that she has no objection for quashing FIR in question initiated by her
against the Petitioner for the offence punishable under section 376(2)
(n) of IPC.
of Punjab [2014 AIR SCW 2065] , wherein the Apex Court has held as
under :
patilsr 2/ 5
the Court cannot decline to quash the FIR merely because the FIR
offence against the society. The Court has to endeavour to find out
whether the FIR indeed discloses ingredients of such offence and that
the Court can accept the settlement and quash the FIR / Charge-sheet
patilsr 3/ 5
through the FIR. We have also gone through the earlier complaint
laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs.
State of Punjab [2014 AIR SCW 2065] we are of the considered view
patilsr 4/ 5
(a). As the police machinery and the Court machinery was used by the
ill cancer patients. For the quashment to take effect, the Petitioner
shall pay the said cost and produce the receipt thereof on the file of
this Court within the period of four weeks from today. Failing to pay
cost and produce receipt within stipulated time, petition shall stand
subject FIR. Since we have quashed the subject FIR, the Petitioner is
patilsr 5/ 5