Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POSITION PAPER:
The Difference between Partnerships and
Corporations
MGMT 204
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF PHILIPPINE BUSINESS AND CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT
The liability of the individuals involved behind these business structures would
have differentiated extent of liabilities. The extent of liability that a corporate shareholder
possesses would be only up to the amount of investment (i.e. the value of shares) that he
has with the corporation while a partner would have limitless liabilities to the obligations
of the partnership. A board of directors is elected by the shareholders to manage a
corporation, there is a certain amount of shares that a shareholder must possess in order to
be eligible for the privilege and right to vote as well as to be qualified to become a part of
2
the BOD whereas a partnership’s management is brought about by a consensual decision
by the partners. Minutes are kept and recorded for the meetings held for a corporation and
records for administrative activities; this is not necessitated for partnerships. As to the
right of succession, a partnership would have no such right while a corporation has the
capacity of continuous existence irrespective of death, withdrawal, insolvency or incapacity
of the individual members or stockholders and also regardless of the transfer of their
interest or shares of stock but this does not equate to a corporation’s “immortality”.
3
In contrasting a partnership with a corporation, we could see both the advantages
and disadvantages of forming a partnership. Going on the more negative side of the scale,
one disadvantage of forming a corporation is that it has a more complex formation and
management as compared to other types of business organizations and entails a greater
cost of both formation and operation. The limited liability of the shareholders if seen at a
micro perspective would be beneficial at an individual level but on a larger parlance it
weakens the credit of the corporation. Also, there is a lack of personal element in the view
of the transferability of shares. Also, there is a larger degree of government control and
supervision than any other forms of business. The voting rights of stockholders become
merely theoretical because of their large number in bigger corporations and also due to the
use of proxies and also widespread ownership. Stockholders have a voice that is barely
heard in the conduct of the business and in larger corporations, management and control
are separate from the ownership.
On the brighter side, a corporation has the legal capacity to act as a legal unit. Also, it
has continuity of existence because of its independence from the individuals who compose
it. The weakness of credit due to the limited liability of shareholders is somehow offset and
strengthened by the continuity of its existence. There is centralized management in a
corporation because of the board of directors. The general incorporation law also
standardizes the creation, organization, management and dissolution of a corporation.
Gigantic financial enterprises are bred through corporations because it gives individuals
the freedom to invest their separate funds to the enterprise. Limited liability is also
attractive for potential and existing shareholders, added to that they are not general agents
to the corporation and the shares of stocks can be transferred without need of the consent
of the other stockholders.