Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
I
MO'
-..
V S OENRII6NE Of MOO_ !NUNN & matt
agia Of !MON
Thomas F. Magner
Pennsylvania State University
Folklore is that body of "traditional wants to be an "old key" teacher or even
customs, beliefs, tales, or sayings, especially one "out of key"! I am assuming here that
those of a superstitious or legendary nature, the audio-lingual method is characterized
preserved unreflectively among a people" by the use of oral pattern drills which equip
(Webster's 2nd.) .* When we use the word the student to manipulate
folklore, we tend to think of it in relation patterns of the target language. the structural
to primitive people; I, for example, see in
my mind's eye a cluster of wooly types Nothing in my teaching experience of
hunched down around a campfire while the fourteen years indicates that the audio-
tribal shaman or memory man spins out lingual method can by itself suffice for the
some tribal lore. Conventions of language effective teaching of a modern foreign lan-
teachers actually present a similar picture, guage. After all, we operate in limited and
though the incidentals of dress and environ- limiting situations: our students use
ment are somewhat different: now the English for most of their waking day; they
university professor is the shaman; he dis- assemble in a classroom to grapple with the
penses his lore in more stately rhythms foreign language only for an hour or even
before a microphone rather than a fire; less each schoolday; the time span of the
instead of uncouth members of a tribe, we school year is punctured by vacations,
see well-groomed members of a language rallies, assemblies, school elections, fire
organization draped in a variety of ways drill, sickness, substitute teachers, not to
over hard Pinks in an over-heated room. mention attacks of boredom or of creeping
I propose to examine some of the folklore adolescence. What language teacher can
of our craft, that is, of language teaching. mention summer vacations without shud-
Specifically, I shall try to identify some of dering at the memories of the open mouths
the beliefs associated with language teach- and dull looks of students returning for the
ing and scrutinize them as closely as we second-year course of some language? We
might those of an alien tribe or unfamiliar have been consistently misled and mislead-
sect. The beliefs will be couched in the form ing by the time statements in connection
of statements (folklore items), statements with language teaching: two years of a
which are frequently made by language foreign language, for example, represents
teachers to language teachers, statements a tiny fraction of two chronological years.
which appear as premises in much of the It seems obvious, at least to me, that, no
pedagogical literature, statements which are
so familiar to language teachers that they matter how worthy the audio-lingual
can be called the cliches of our craft I do not method
by a
is in itself, it has to be supported
variety of what are, if you will pardon
say, indeed I cannot say, that these state-
ments or folklore items are false, because the expression, traditional devices: reading,
most of them reflect a substantial measure exercises, compositions, etc. In our teaching
of valuable experience. I am simply pre- of Russian at Penn State we use a "modified
senting them as generalized statements to audio-lingual" method, modified, that is, to
which you and I might say: "Yes, but . " fit the limitations of time which are real
enough for the present-day college student
and, I feel sure, for the serious high-school
Folklore Item I. The audio-lingual method student as well.
is the best method for teaching a modern
foreign language. Yes, but . . . Brave indeed At Penn State we teach the student a
is the teacher who rises to challenge this limited number of patterns and I have, in
statement of the most cherished dogma of lighter moments, thought of giving each
O the new believers. After all, every teacher student who finishes a particular level a
wants to be teaching "in the new key"; who little card in Russian which he can show
O to the first native speakers he meets; the
card would say: "I know the following
This paper was delivered at the Fall Confer- patterns of your language; please limit
ence at the Pennsylvania State Modern Lan- yourselves to these patterns so that we can
guage Aseoclation at Bracknell University,
communicate?' The trickiness of native
0 Lewisburg, Pa., October 10, 1364.
speakers who will use patterns not in a
0 Dr. Magner is Professor of Slavic Languages
and Head of the Department of Slavic Lan- student's textbook was well illustrated by
0 guages at Pennsylvania State University.
59
(coat. nest page)
62
THOMAS F. MAGNER
Fo'klore Item 11. Works of literature worth remembering, but he may even de-
should be introduced in the early stages of velop habits and attitudes toward foreign
a language program. To this the sophisti- languages which will inhibit his progress
cated professional teacher of a foreign lan- in courses of modern foreign languages. I
guage will immediately respond: "Come am aware that there are now "Spoken
now, nobody believes that any more!" Latin" programs, but they impress me only
Nevertheless, it is my experience, limited as does the Indian rope trick, as an illusion
as it may be, that this article of belief is and nothing more.
widely current among language teachers, I think that teachers of Latin are doing
particularly among native speakers of the their subject a disservice when they imitate
languages being taught. I know for a fact the propaganda, materials and techniques
that some native Russians introduce the used by their colleagues in the modern
works of Pushkin ( a poet of the early 19th foreign languages. The problems and goals
century!) into first and second-year Rus- of Latin teaching are different and deserve
sian courses. And look at the textbooks: in different treatment in a high-school pro-
too many you will find substantial portions gram of at least three and preferably four
of elevated (and difficult) literary material years' length. If a high school can only
or, horrible cliche, you will find "gutted" or allot two years for Latin, I would recom-
simplified versions of literary works; of the mend that Latin not be attempted at that
two types of texts the first is justifiable school but that the two years be used for a
from an idealistic standpoint but indefen- second modern foreign language.
sible from a pedagogical standpoint, while
the second or simplified text is justifiable There are undoubtedly other interesting
from a pedagogical standpoint but indefen- items in the folklore of language teaching.
sible from the standpoint of aesthetics or Whether or not the items I have specified
even of fair play. are indeed valid can be verified by reading
Folklore Item 12. Good students should be relevant articles in our journals and by at-
encouraged to study Latin. Yes, but not just tentive listening at our frequent conclaves.
two years in high school! To be very blunt That we have a folklore in language teach-
and dogmatic, let me say that two years of ing has one major consolation : we are a folk
high-school Latin is a waste of time: not or fraternal group with ideals and values in
only does a student not learn enough Latin common.
63 .