Professional Documents
Culture Documents
September 2010 The Newsletter for Informed and Concerned Voters Volume 4, Issue 9
Have you heard of the “Great Outdoors Initiative”? Chances are, you haven’t.
But across the country, White House officials have been meeting quietly with envi-
ronmental groups to map out government plans for acquiring untold millions of
More commentary
acres of both public and private land. It’s another stealthy power grab through ex-
ecutive order that promises to radically transform the American way of life. ping up their public comment solicitation by November 15. The initiative’s taxpayer-
In April, President Obama issued a memorandum outlining his “21st century funded website has been dominated by left-wing environmental activists proposing
strategy for America’s great outdoors.” It was addressed to the Interior Secretary, human population reduction, private property confiscation, and gun bans, hunting
the Agriculture Secretary, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the bans, and vehicle bans in national parks. It’s time for private property owners to send
chair of the Council on Environmental Quality. The memo calls on the officials to their own loud, clear message to the land-hungry feds: Take a hike.
conduct “listening and learning sessions” with the public to “identify the places that
mean the most to Americans, and leverage the support of the Federal Government”
to “protect” outdoor spaces. Eighteen of 25 planned sessions have already been
held. But there’s much more to the agenda than simply “reconnecting Americans to
nature.”
The federal government, as the memo boasted, is the nation’s “largest land
manager.” It already owns roughly one of every three acres in the United States.
This is apparently not enough. At a “listening session” in New Hampshire last week,
government bureaucrats trained their sights on millions of private forest land through-
out the New England region. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack crusaded for “the
need for additional attention to the Land and Water Conservation Fund — and the
need to promptly support full funding of that fund.”
Property owners have every reason to be worried. The Land and Water Conser-
vation Fund (LWCF) is a pet project of green radicals, who want the decades-old
government slush fund for buying up private lands to be freed from congressional
appropriations oversight. It’s paid for primarily with receipts from the government’s
offshore oil and gas leases. Both Senate and House Democrats have included $900
million in full LWCF funding, not subject to congressional approval, in their energy/
BP oil spill legislative packages. The Democrats have also included a provision in
these packages that would require the federal government to take over energy per-
mitting in state waters, which provoked an outcry from Texas state officials, who
sent a letter of protest to Capitol Hill last month:
”In light of federal failures, it is incomprehensible that the United States Con-
gress is entertaining proposals that expand federal authority over oil and gas drilling
in state water and lands long regulated by states... Given the track record, putting
the federal government in charge of energy production on state land and waters not
only breaks years of successful precedent and threatens the 10th Amendment to the
United Sates Constitution, but it also undermines common sense and threatens the
environmental and economy security of our state’s citizens.”
This power grab, masquerading as a feel-good, all-American recreation pro-
gram, comes on top of a separate, property-usurping initiative exposed by GOP
Rep. Robert Bishop and Sen. Jim DeMint earlier this spring. According to an inter-
nal, 21-page Obama administration memo, 17 energy-rich areas in 11 states have
been targeted as potential federal “monuments.” The lives of coyotes, deer and prai-
rie dogs would be elevated above states’ needs to generate jobs, tourism business,
and energy solutions.
Take my home state of Colorado. The Obama administration is considering
locking up some 380,000 acres of Bureau of Land Management land and private
land in Colorado under the 1906 Antiquities Act. The Vermillion Basin and the
Alpine Triangle would be shut off to mining, hunting, grazing, oil and gas develop-
ment and recreational activities. Alan Foutz, president of the Colorado Farm Bu-
reau, blasted the administration’s meddling: “Deer and elk populations are thriving,
and we in Colorado don’t need help from the federal government in order to manage
them effectively.”
Indeed, the feds have enough trouble as it is managing the vast amount of land
they already control. As the Washington, DC-based Americans for Limited Govern-
ment group, which defends private property rights, points out: “The [National Park
Read the Forsyth Precinct newsletter each
Service] claims it would need about $9.5 billion just to clear its backlog of the month by going to www.forsythprecinct.com and
necessary improvements and repairs. At a time when our existing national parks are
suffering, it doesn’t make sense for the federal government to grab new lands.”
clicking on the link either for the Adobe PDF file.
The bureaucrats behind Obama’s “Great Outdoors Initiative” plan on wrap-
September 2010 The Newsletter of the Forsyth Precinct Page 5
The Bureau of Economic Analysis has released its annual data on compensa-
The Nation
tion levels by industry. The data show that the pay advantage enjoyed by federal
civilian workers over private-sector workers continues to expand. This state of Figure 4 shows that in 2009, private sector employees quit at a rate that was more
affairs is a thumb in the eye of the private sector, which continues to struggle with than eight times higher than federal employees This indicates that federal employees
high unemployment. Many private sector employees have been forced to take pay recognize that the generous combination of wages, benefits, and job security is hard
and benefit cuts while continuing to fund generous federal employee compensation to match in the private sector.
with their taxes.
Figure 1 looks at average wages. In 2009, the average wage for 1.95 million
federal civilian workers was $81,258, which compared to an average $50,462 for
the nation’s 101 million private sector workers (measured in full-time equivalents).
The figure shows that the federal pay advantage (the gap between the lines) contin-
ued its steady increase over the past decade.
Figure 2 shows that the federal advantage is even more remarkable when
worker benefits are included. In 2009, federal worker compensation averaged a
whopping $123,049, which was more than double the private sector average of
$61,051.
The disparity between average federal and private employee compensation
has risen dramatically over the decade: from 66 percent in 2000 to 101 percent in
2009. Defenders of generous federal employee compensation point to the higher Oakland Police: No money to respond to crime
levels of education in the federal workforce. However, it’s doubtful that education
accounts for the growing disparity between federal and private compensation. Newsmax.com
Figure 3 shows that federal employees also enjoy much greater job security . The city of Oakland, Calif., has laid off over 10 percent of its police force after
In 2009, a private sector employee was more than three times more likely to be laid failing to negotiate a settlement with the police union — whose members earn an
off or fired than a federal employee. average compensation of $162,000 a year.
“What’s going on in Oakland is an example of a phenomenon being seen across
the country: states and cities choosing between providing services to the public or
maintaining luxury compensation for public employees,” Josh Barro, the Walter B.
Wriston Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, writes for the Real Clear Markets website.
“More often than not, public employee unions have been winning this fight.
As the result of the loss of 80 police officers, Oakland’s police chief says cops
will no longer respond to 44 categories of crimes, including grand theft.
“At current levels of compensation, Oakland cannot afford to maintain a police
department with 776 employees,” Barro observes. “That’s because total compensa-
tion for an OPD employee averages an astounding $162,000 per year. But at a more
A reasonable level of pay and benefits, Oakland could afford to maintain its force, or
good indicator of the adequacy of federal compensation is the quit rate. Figure 4 even grow it.”
shows that in 2009, private sector employees quit at a rate that was more than eight OPD officers finishing training receive a starting salary of up to $90,459, before
times higher than federal employees. This indicates that federal employees recog- overtime, plus a health plan worth $15,859 last year — compared to California’s
nize that the generous combination of wages, benefits, and job security is hard to private sector mean of about $9,100 — and a pension contribution equal to 9 percent
match in the private sector, so they stay put. of their salary and overtime pay.
The disparity between average federal and private employee compensation The generous wage and benefit package was negotiated with the police union two
has risen dramatically over the decade: from 66 percent in 2000 to 101 percent in years ago. When layoffs were threatened, the union agreed that officers would begin
2009. Defenders of generous federal employee compensation point to the higher making contributions to their retirement benefits if the city agreed that there would be
levels of education in the federal workforce. However, it’s doubtful that education no layoffs for three years. The city offered only a one-year pledge, and the union
accounts for the growing disparity between federal and private compensation. declined the offer.
Figure 3 shows that federal employees also enjoy much greater job security ). So police staffing “will be cut in one of California’s most crime-ridden cities,”
In 2009, a private sector employee was more than three times more likely to Barro notes.
be laid off or fired than a federal employee. “The trouble is that localities have been boxed in by unwise contracts and rigid
A good indicator of the adequacy of federal compensation is the quit rate. labor laws,” and no city should have to “say it can’t afford a large enough police force
because it has to pay each officer $162,000 per year.”
September 2010 The Newsletter of the Forsyth Precinct Page 6
Midsummer Madness today. Donations of any size will go far toward the continued online publication of
the newsletter. To donate, send a check to: Jack Stewart, :Forsyth Precinct Newslet-
ter, 2008 Portia Lane, Kernersville, NC 27284
Continued from page 2
— and a bevy of pals — escaped Potomac
Fever and growing lines of unemployed This issue of the new Forsyth Precinct was underwritten in part by:
Americans by taking a delightful summer
Henry VI, Part II, Act IV, Sc. 2, Ln. 86
sojourn in Spain. The White House, ever
sensitive to photos of Mrs. Obama John A. Richardson III
sightseeing with European royalty while
Americans can’t afford to run their air Attorney and Couselor at Law
conditioners, was quick to point out that 22 Miller Street
the first fam will be taking “a real vaca- Winston-Salem, NC 27103
tion” later this month — at Martha’s Vine- Real Estate Closings Wills & Estates
yard. Just like the rest of us. Personal Injury Social Security Disability
FAX: 336-659-8882
Those of us who cannot afford to jet- Office: 336-659-8384
set around Europe or hobnob with the rich
and famous in the style of the Kennedys
do have an outlet: the summer Freedom
Concerts with Sean Hannity. Here in At-
lanta — despite a deeply troubled Subscribe to Fast Refunds Electronic Filing
24-48 hours
economy, stifling heat and being in the
epicenter of the Jane Fonda Network —
The Kernersville
thousands of our countrymen have turned
Dorothy’s Tax Service, Inc.
out to hear some great patriotic music and News Payroll & Accounting
Dorothy B. Leamon
support our troops. For those who think The voice of eastern Forsyth County President
it’s hot here, it was 107 degrees in and western Guilford County 3770-B Clemmons Road 336-766-5572
Afghanistan’s Helmand province today. Call 993-2161 P.O. Box 326 336-776-5581 Fax
And over there, Americans go to work in Clemmons, NC 27012 Email: momx7@bellsouth.net
flak jackets and helmets.
September 2010 The Newsletter of the Forsyth Precinct Page 7
The debate over same-sex “marriage” is merely a symptom of a society that has
already cast off moral restraint. Those who defend same-sex “marriage” often argue
that whether homosexuals marry or not has absolutely no impact on traditional fami-
lies—that is, the rest of society. But they miss the point—as do most opponents of
same-sex “marriage”: The homosexual cause has already impacted our society. A
debate over homosexual “marriage” would only be possible in a society that has
already cast off moral restraint.
The reality is, as I wrote last week, that same-sex “marriage” is even being
debated perfectly illustrates how steep our slide into deviant behavior has been. And
it’s only getting worse. Ten years ago, for example, 62 percent of Californians were
against same-sex “marriage.” Two years ago, with the passage of Proposition 8, it
was 52 percent.
Where will we be 10 years from now?
And remember—whether homosexuality is or is not morally right is not up for
debate. That matter has already been mostly settled, with a host of laws prohibiting
anything that might be construed as discrimination against homosexuals.
Fact is, while “conservative” media pour scorn on Judge Vaughn Walker for his
ruling to overturn California’s ban on same-sex unions—for being anti-democratic,
anti-intellectual, anti-law, anti-tradition—they are often very quick to defend the rights
of homosexuals in general. The horse has long bolted.
When society turns into Sodom and Gomorrah, ultimately, it does impact every-
one. A biblical example is instructive in this area.
Anti-prayer case dismissed Ancient Sodom
Charlie Butts The word sodomy is derived from a Latin phrase meaning the “sin of Sodom,”
OneNewsNow which is vividly discussed, as most people know, in the biblical book of Genesis.
Ancient Sodom, like its neighboring city Gomorrah, was well-known for its wide-
Two women who filed a lawsuit to block prayer at city council meetings spread practice and acceptance of homosexuality. Jude 7 says that besides going
have been told not only did they lose the case, they can never refile it. after “strange flesh,” the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were “giving themselves
Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. has thrown out a lawsuit against Houston over over to fornication.” Ezekiel tells us that Sodom was a prosperous area, with an
city council prayer. Kelly Shackelford, president and CEO of Liberty Institute, abundance of idleness. But it was also full of pride and abominations (Ezekiel 16:49-
represented Houston in the lawsuit filed by Kay Staley and Ray Hill, two non- 50).
believers. In the Genesis 19 account, the men of Sodom wanted to sodomize two visitors,
”They not only sued the city council, but they actually sued Councilwoman actually angels, who had come to see if the city should be spared God’s wrath. While
Anne Clutterbuck for saying the Lord’s Prayer to begin the council meetings,” the these two angels remained locked inside the home of Lot, an angry mob outside cried
attorney reports. out for the new flesh. Inside the home, the angels proceeded to give Lot and his family
Staley has gained previous recognition for suing for the removal of a Bible clear and precise instructions concerning the future welfare of Sodom and neighbor-
from a memorial display on the county grounds. Even so, the two were forced to ing Gomorrah. “Then the men said to Lot, Have you any one else here? Sons-in-law,
agree with the court’s dismissal of the lawsuit. sons, daughters, or any one you have in the city, bring them out of the place; for we
”The case was not only dismissed, but with prejudice. In other words, they are about to destroy this place, because the outcry against its people has become
can never refile this,” Shackelford explains. “It’s a huge victory for religious great before the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it” (verses 12-13, Revised
freedom.” Standard Version).
The attorney also points out that Lot relayed this sobering message to the two young men who were to marry his
similar complaints are not uncommon. daughters. Now these were two decent men—heterosexuals who had not taken ad-
vantage of Lot’s daughters. There had probably been numerous instances where they
For a “There are lawsuits like this around
the country that are trying to scrub any sat around the table with their future father-in-law decrying the evils and perversions
reference to God in the public square, of society. And yet, without realizing it, much of that evil had rubbed off on them!
reminder and they attempt to deny our religious They might have recognized many of the more extreme evils in Sodom, but they had
heritage in this country and the reli- grown accustomed to living there—and actually enjoyed much of it.
for the Forsyth Precinct How strong society’s pull must have been for these two men, at this most criti-
gious freedom that this country was
newsletter, email your built upon,” the Liberty Institute presi- cal hour, to mock God’s warning, as it was delivered through His servant Lot.
name and address to dent laments. Their ridicule even caused a seed of doubt to sprout in Lot’s mind. The next
jtstewart2@earthlink net. So he concludes the loss in Hous- morning, even after the constant prodding from the two angels, Lot began to linger,
ton was a heavy one for the pair who delaying his departure—so much so that the angels seized Lot and his wife and two
We’ll send you an daughters by the hands and forcibly led them out of the sinful city! Upon leaving the
filed the case.
email notice when the new city, the angels shouted at Lot’s family, Run for your lives! And don’t even stop to
edition of the newsletter “Technological progress is look back, lest you be consumed as well!
has been posted on the “Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire
like an axe in the hands of a
from the Lord out of heaven; And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all
Internet. pathological criminal.”
the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground” (verses 24-25,
Albert Einstein
See ‘Sodom,’ page 9
September 2010 T he Newsletter of the Forsyth Precinct Page 9
For an up-to-date look at what Conservatives are Join the FPN now!
thinking and doing on a local, state and national level, read each To receive the Forsyth Precinct newsletter reminders, send
month’s issue of The Forsyth Precinct Newsletter. The current
your e-mail address to forsythprecinct@earthlink.net.
edition, plus three years of back issues, can be read online at
September 2010 The Newsletter of the Forsyth Precinct Page 10
The American Bar Association (ABA) adopted a resolution this week calling
for same-sex marriage nationwide, and urging government at every level to “elimi-
nate” any restrictions on homosexual unions.
The ABA’s policy-making House of Delegates adopted Resolution 111, which
states: “RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges state, territorial,
and tribal governments to eliminate all of their legal barriers to civil marriage
between two persons of the same sex who are otherwise eligible to marry.”
The Lighter Side
The only voice of opposition came from former Ohio Bar Association Presi-
dent Leslie Jacobs, who said that it would be “cowardice” for him to remain silent
about the issue. Jacobs urged his ABA colleagues to avoid overreaching into ar-
eas of contentious social policy.
”We owe it to this House [of Delegates] to avoid action that would jeopar-
dize the Association,” he said. “I personally believe it can be suicidal for the
House to defer to an impulse to impose social and political and cultural values on
the entire membership of the ABA – rather than to reflect some clear consensus of
the bar.”
”When an attitudinal value is not broadly shared, and when people of good-
will have sharply divergent views that are fundamental and – frankly – irreconcil-
able, it is axiomatic I believe that lawyers will be found not only to disagree with
each other but to be engaged as advocates on both sides of the proposition on the
merits, whether in litigation or in legislation,” Jacobs said.
Incoming ABA President Stephen Zack, speaking in favor of homosexual
marriage, said there was no reason why anyone would want to redefine marriage
to ignore traditional gender roles.
”Why would anyone in this country not want two people who love each other
to enjoy the blessings of marriage and the protections of law?” he asked.
Douglas Napier, senior legal counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund, told
CNSNews.com that Jacobs’ caution was well founded, adding that the ABA had
gone “far afield” of its founding mission to address issues affecting the legal
community.
”They [the ABA] aren’t speaking for the majority of attorneys,” Napier said.
“They don’t represent the majority of attorneys in the United States, yet they put
themselves out as the voice of the American legal profession.
”This is just another very, very clear indication that they’re out of sync with
the majority of Americans and that they don’t speak for American attorneys,” said
Napier.
Napier likened the ABA’s stance on homosexual marriage to its controver-
sial stance in the 1990’s in support of abortion rights, saying that now, as then,
the association seemed intent on advancing a political, social agenda rather than
focusing on legal issues.
”This is so far afield from their primary purpose that this is nothing more
than using the ABA to advance a political agenda – a social political agenda,” he
said. “They did it with the abortion issue in the 90’s, and now they’re doing it with
marriage.” ####