Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The present Constitution says the State “values the dignity of every human
person and guarantees full respect for human rights.”
In the proposed charter, the phrase “full respect for human rights” was
replaced by “full respect for the person and the right of all citizens to
participate in all government process.”
Three categories
Puno maintained that even without the explicit use of the term, the draft
Charter expanded the meaning of human rights in the new Bill of Rights.
He said the proposed Bill of Rights had 28 sections — six more than what is
provided by the present Constitution — divided into three categories: civil
and political rights, social and economic rights, and environmental and
ecological rights.
He said the proposed Constitution protected the first, second and third
“generations” of human rights.
The first generation refers to civil and political rights, while the second
generation covers socioeconomic rights. The third generation goes beyond
civil and social rights.
Puno said that the draft Charter gave more power to the Commission on
Human Rights.
Warning
NUPL also said the proposed Constitution would allow the President6 to
appoint all members of the independent Constitutional Commissions and
“practically thousands of government officials, which could include the
judiciary, while exercising both executive and legislative powers.”
‘Lawless violence’
The group also questioned the expansion of the basis for the suspension of
the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus to include “lawless violence,”
which would become a ground for declaring martial law under the proposed
Constitution.
“The Filipino experience under the Marcos dictatorship and the arbitrary and
wanton exercise of this power under the incumbent President are
experiences that should never happen again, much less constitutionalized,”
the group said.
Puno said the opposition to the draft Constitution was due to a lack of
information, which could be dealt with by a massive information drive once it
is endorsed by the President.
Several university heads and more than 500 academics from various schools
also were against a constituent assembly to change the Charter, saying the
abundance of political dynasties in Congress created conflicts of interest.