Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Example: “I’m Howard Silver. For twenty-five years I led an organization called the Consortium
of Social Science Associations that advocated for federal funding for social and behavioral science
research. The kind of research used often by journalists in their many stories about society and its
politics.” (Panel Discussion Presentation featuring Jeffrey Goldberg, Rosie Gray, and Graeme Wood,
The Rise of Populism and Nationalism (June 20, 2017), sponsored by The Atlantic Magazine and
Sixth & I synagogue. Retrieved 09/05/2017 from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcWaIcEq6fg&t=351s)
“contextualize” facts to justify them within the parameters of their faith. They move to
derail argument with ad hominem attacks and argue trivilities to avoid substantive
engagement. The corporate media overwhelm discourse and interrupt the dissemination of
information by polluting the informational ecosystem and occupying the field. With the
disintermediation of the media, one can hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth of
“journalists” as they lose their grip as the gatekeepers of information.
The corporate media includes the entertainment industry, particularly the media that
emanates from Hollywood. The most insidious, evil utilization of re-education propaganda
are those targeted toward young men and boys. Hollywood movies, video games and comic
books that anticipate a young male audience are injected with critical theory euphemisms
and feminist themes.2
Moral Jihadists: True believers - Jesuits of the faith. They attempt to change reality
through their faith and sheer will. Obstinate, self-righteous, with a belief in their own
moral superiority, they justify their villainization, dehumanization, and violence towards
non-believers. Freedom of speech and thought are unwelcome intrusions, particularly if it
challenges the faith’s orthodoxy or its proponents. They seek to define and confine the
parameters of acceptable discourse, and prevent the dissemination of ideas, arguments,
and concepts they oppose. They are hypocrites and without shame. They are both easily
offended, and yet profoundly offensive.
2
Examples of the corporate media pushing their propaganda:
● Gamergate was coordinated, sexist, harassment campaign to push women out of
video games. This narrative was promulgated by the New York Times, Washington
Post, and the Los Angeles Times, in addition to those “news” media held in lesser
esteem.
● Those against illegal immigration are “white nationalists,” and “xenophobic.”
● Former Google senior software engineer James Damore, after having written a
tame criticism of Google’s mandated re-education curriculum and environment of
thought-conformity, was slandered in the corporate media. The ubiquitous theme
presented was that he: is the “new face of the alt-right” (Quartz), wrote a “sexist
screed” (Vox), an “anti-diversity screed” (Gizmodo/Vice), an “anti-woman screed”
(Time) . The Washington Post flat out just lied in an article entitled, “A Google
engineer said women may be genetically unsuited for tech jobs.”
● Dr. Matt Taylor, an astrophysicist and project scientist on the Rosetta Project,#
was ideologically battered by a corporate media generated #shirtstorm, after
being interviewed about the mission’s success while wearing a bowling shirt, made
and given to him as a birthday gift by his friend Elly Prizeman, which featured a
comic book styled, pin-up girl design.
The Proletariat: Vapid, conformist, and cowardly, i.e. polite society - like cows to the
slaughter, they are passive supporters of the Leftist Jihad. The proletariat incorporate
the language of the faith into their expression and self-identity. Ironically, they don’t
tend to do real work, but are college-educated, middle-class urbanites with social-science
degrees and job titles like “Entrepreneur-in-Residence,” “Social Media Capability
Architect,” and “Serial Entrepreneur.” They are concerned about maintaining
correct-think and “being on the right side of history.” They parrot Leftist propagandistic
talking points, voice all the correct opinions, and appropriately take offense.
Anarchy/Anarchists: A mislabeled form of totalitarianism. “The sin of nearly all
left-wingers from 1933 onward is that they have wanted to be anti-Fascist without being
anti-totalitarian.” [George Orwell] Purposefully misidentified by The Enemy as
“anti-fascists,” and “counter-protesters,” they are, in fact, an authoritarian collection of
doctrinaire hive-minders. They are inept revolutionaries, who would make tragic
statesmen. Despite their self-identification, anarchists agitate against “the government,”
but not against government itself. Far from being “radicals,” they are acute-conformists,
who try to enforce conformity. They serve as the Brownshirts of the movement.
C. The Enemy - Foundational Belief System
“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and
slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guildmaster and journeyman, in a word,
oppressor and oppressed…” (Marx, K. & Engels, F., The Communist Manifesto, (1848))
In the modern vernacular, “oppressor and oppressed,” must be understood as a particular
form of polarized political (rather than economic) opposition - the justified “Us” versus
indefensible “Them.” Yet, the purveyors of the faith (rather than its apologists, activists,
and proselytizers) are actually engaged in a looking-glass economic war. They’ve deformed
Marxism, transforming its application away from societal economic justice, into a political
tool to wage war on the economically vulnerable, ensuring the retrogressive, effete elite
are free to continue oppressing.
Their corruption of the Marxist faith makes The Enemy’s application of it particularly
venal. They’ve twisted the paradigm, focusing away from those that “control the means of
production,” with their undue political and economic power, and refocus their attack on the
weak. Thus, the oppressor/oppressed narrative has deformed into an attack by The
Enemy against the average Joe - pitting every man against every man against every woman,
in the mutually assured destruction of family and community. As the virus continues to
infect the weakened host, each individual’s lived reality becomes a self-fulfilling
confirmation of their own oppression, as the strength of the community withers away and
their lives with it. This is the initial indication of those behind the renaissance of this
bastardized religion.
If something has a direct benefit to a class of people, and a theoretical, abstract, or
amorphous benefit to everybody else, the proponents’ intentions are to benefit the
former, not the latter, no matter what bullshit they try to feed you.
D. The Enemy - Fundamental Objectives
The fundemental objectives of The Enemy are formed by and for the retrogressive,
effete elite, but protheletized by cosmopolitanist professionals in a rhetorical expression
soothing to their souls. In broad strokes, the utopianistic vision includes:
● Globalism
● “Free trade,” so called.
● Economic liberalization of the monied class
● Primacy of corporatists and banksters. Government by technocrats/”experts” on
behalf of the monied interests. Hostility to democracy, republicanism and the
working class.
● Open borders, to crush the working class
● Destruction of community identity and attachments (and therefore, destruction of
community and identity). Atomization of Le Peuple. Without community, individuals
are dependant on, and subservient to, the establishment.
● Destruction of The West. “The West” - the traditions, beliefs and moral
imperatives arising from the Age of Enlightenment, and the philosophical ideas
therefrom, including Locke, Hume, Kant, and Voltaire, as well as the folk culture and
traditions of Europe, from Spain to Russia.
● Degradation of the virtues of traditional expressions of masculinity
E. The Enemy - The Canon
The canon is a catalogue of lazy thought, drowned in verbose prose so incomprehensible
that it could be mistaken for bad poetry.
● Sigmund Freud - Sex is good. The West represses sex. The West is bad. Mother
fetishism, father hate, and anti-Catholicism.
● Marxism - A prediction (rather than a prescription) that in advanced industrialized
societies, the “meek shall inherit the earth.”
● Trotskyism - Marxist permanent revolution, proletarian internationalism.
● Leninism - Vanguard as a condition precedent to Marxist revolution, resulting in the
dictatorship of the proletariat.
● Maoism - Marxism without the industrial condition precedent. Utopianism,
continuous war against traditionalism, feudalism, i.e. the pre-revolution established
order.
● Critical Theory - Subversive political academic movement to undermine western
civilization and cultural expectations. Preaches radical individualism for the masses.
Born of an unholy mating of Marx and Freud. Brought to the United States by a
cabal of pseudo-intellectual, fraudster “scientists” chased out of Germany.
Trumpeted by the corporate media.
● Second Wave Feminism and its progeny, i.e. “next wave” feminism, queer theory,
transgender studies, ethnic studies, ect. Seemingly redundant with the
aforementioned, but mentioned here because the language of SJW Leftists is
expressed through the dialect of feminism’s distillation of Freud, Marx, Trotsky,
Mao, and Critical Theory.
F. The Enemy - Methodology (Politics By Proxy)
The constant underlying The Enemy’s war against The West are their fundamental
objectives. Political issues blossom and wither, but they are merely tools in service of The
Enemy’s unchanging objectives. For instance, The Enemy’s fundamental objective of open
borders is sold in various forms: “The criminal elite seeks new ways to camouflage their
project. First, their immigrant pawns were ‘temporary guest workers.’ Then, it was a
‘multiracial experiment.’ Then they were ‘refugees.’ Then the answer to a shrinking
population. Different excuses. Different lies. And asylum is just another one. But, the
real aim stays the same.” [Nick Griffin]
The Enemy does not change. They just want to be on the side that winning. Whatever side
is winning, and whatever side they’re on, the subversives don’t stop subverting.3 Realize
3
For example: The self-preserving temper-tantrum that was the anti-war movement of
the 1960’s and 70’s served as a justification for the cowardice of draft dodgers to indulge
in the sexual revolution and burgeoning (and ultimately disastrous) drug culture. This was
all made possible by the economic affluence of their generation, paid for by their
depression surviving, world war fighting parents. The “thought leaders” of the anti-war
movement, a collection of northeastern Trotskyites no longer threatened by induction,
that neoconservatives and neo-liberals are the same people, attacking Western society
from two different fronts, but with the same goals.
The Enemy forms a narrative, primarily created by their intelligentsia within the walls of
the bag men funded academies and think tanks. They manufacture crises from whole
cloth. Never letting a crisis go to waste, The Enemy propagandizes the narrative to pollute
the field of ideas, proselytizing it as a moral imperative, and psycho-pathologizing dissent.
They engage in what Bernard Goldberg called, “journalism by sentiment.” They take
discrete issues affecting discrete populations, and “universalize” the issue onto the wider
population. They misrepresent the scope of limited issues for subversive political
purposes.
The propaganda is predominantly unsophisticated, but is broadcast repeatedly and
forcefully through the corporate media. “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the
truth” (law of propaganda, attributed to Joseph Goebbels).
The Enemy instinctively relies on the most vulgar and childlike of rhetorical argument, that
of ad hominem ridicule - invectively epithetizing their opposition as immoral, and therefore
indefensible. They’ll falsely accuse the innocent of thought-crimes by association, all they
while casting themselves as victims on which outrages have been visited. These tactics are
utilized because their narratives cannot survive scrutiny. The Enemy cringes when
questioned or contradicted, because their propaganda is patently false and demonstrably
so. Because of the tenuousness of their arguments, The Enemy tries to shut down
discourse, altogether.4
Ultimately, the The Enemy are control freaks, desperately trying to control the
dissemination of information through professionalized media that ignores, re-interprets or
reframes inconvenient facts for purely political ends.
5
“While standing in the middle of a spanning wood, is it not easier to appreciate a great
oak, than to view the whole of the forest? Likewise, does one not fail to appreciate the
individual tree while overlooking a spanning woodland? Two men may each pursue
righteousness from their different perspectives, and where one man’s path is true, the
other’s path is in error. One must know what is important, and what can be sacrificed.
For, who would think a man wise who chops wood in preparation for the winter as his home
burns down around his fireplace?”