MARKING SHEET DESIGN STUDIO V: EXTERNAL REVIEW JUNE 2018

FINAL PROJECT: Community Library

STUDENT NAME: _____________________________________________ STUDENT ID: ______________________________________TUTOR: __________________________________________________

Have the students developed a community library that is site-specific through its content, formal, legislative, structural and environmental design responses? These will be assessed via the following key criteria:

DISTRIBUTION OF MARKS (Please tick/circle one)

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FAIR/
COMMENTS & MARKS
EXCELLENT GOOD WEAK POOR
AVERAGE

(16-20) (12-16) (10-12) (8-10) (0-8)

DESIGN INTENTION AND EXPLORATION
Design expresses and explores students’ position/interest in architecture Excellently address the spirit of the site,
Relating to urban context, i.e., formulation of clear design strategies to Evidence of position/ Position/topic of No position /Topic
precise design proposition, and excellent Position/ exploration is clear and
respond to the context of the street and city block, social and behavioural exploration but exploration is of exploration not
handling on urban responsive design. well-developed and translated into
patterns of the people, and building programme of a community library lacked rigor and poor and lacking evident/ relevant in
Vigorous exploration and carried through design work
that enhances the legibility and sense of place for an urban community. development in design work design work
from the beginning to the present design work
/ 20
EVIDENCE OF DESIGN (12-15) (9-12) (6-9) (3-6) (0-3)
Design development drawings that demonstrate design intention and site Identified appropriate strategies
Identified and applied appropriate strategies
exploration and design narrative diagrams that translate ideas into the which has the potential to be Appropriate to Lack relationship No strategies
which has the potential to be relevant to
design relevant to context and meaningful context or design to site and design identified
context and meaningful to design
to design / 10
SPATIAL AND FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING (32-40) (24-32) (20-24) (16-20) (0-16)
Relevance and development of programme to the proposed design brief
1200 sqm, 3 – 5 storey. Development of the building programme of Workable planning
community library to address issues of permeability and circulation Good competency in spatial in terms of layout, Poor planning
through multifunctional spaces, interstitial spaces and a public realm that Excellent resolution of spatial planning and Do not meet the
planning in terms of layout, circulation and with minimal
are supported by key ancillary spaces. provide a meaningful programme to the requirement of the
circulation and provide an meeting the evidence of
site/context/users brief
interesting programme minimum response to brief
Façade Design (10%) Design development including façade design and requirement of brief
architectural expression / 40
(12-15) (9-12) (7.5-9) (6-7.5) (0-6)
Appropriate Poor
DESIGN COMMUNICATION Excellent communication of design (self- Good communication of design
communication of communication of Insufficient work
Presentation drawings that demonstrate clarity of information presented explanatory visuals) with clarity from with emphasis on students’
design through design through communicated
inception to design development architectural position
visuals visuals / 20
LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS (8-10) (6-7) (5-6) (4-5) (0-4)
Design considers and includes expanded aspects of design e.g. Appropriate Minimal
Well integrated into design Workable consideration No consideration / 10
regulatory requirements, boundary setback and fire requirements. consideration consideration
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS &
TECHNOLOGICAL INTEGRATION Workable and well integrated into design, Workable consideration
Appropriate Minimal
No consideration
Consideration and integration of appropriate structural system, lighting, consideration consideration
acoustic and façade systems to suit overall building design. Y/N

A(80-100) A-(75-79) B+(70-74) B(65-69) B-(60-64) C+(55-59) C(50-54) D+(47-49) D(44-46) D-(40-43) F(0-39)
Please turn over to write more comments, if any.

Semester 1 Year 3 Architecture Design Studio V ARC 60306 / ARC 3118

MARKING SHEET DESIGN STUDIO V: EXTERNAL REVIEW JUNE 2018

Please write comments (if any)

Reviewer’s Name Reviewer’s Signature Date

Semester 1 Year 3 Architecture Design Studio V ARC 60306 / ARC 3118