Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract:
Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) is a cement-based composite material that consists of high-strength fibers in the form of textiles
combined with inorganic matrices, such as cement-based mortars. The application of textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) as a means of
increasing the flexural capacity of two-way reinforced concrete (RC) slabs is experimentally investigated in this study. In this paper, the
effectiveness of textile-reinforced mortars (TRMs), the strengthening configuration on the basis of different orientation and the role of
initial cracking in the slab is to be investigated experimentally. Here, a new type of textile (nylon-based textile) is used as strengthening
material. Also Polymer-modified cementitious mortars were used as binding material for the textile sheets. For this purpose three large
scale RC slabs were casted and tested under point loading in loading frame equipment. It is concluded that TRM increases the cracking load
and hence the flexural capacity of two-way RC slabs, also the strengthening configuration plays an important role in the effectiveness of the
technique.
Keywords — Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM), Nylon textile, Ultimate load, Initial cracking
Table I
Properties of Nylon textile
Sl.
Property Value
No
E. Experimental Results
Fig.3 TRM strengthening application steps of specimen C1: (a) Specimen C1 The control slab reached a maximum load of 61.9kN with
casted(b) first mortar layer application (c) nylon textile application (d) final
finished surface
central deflection of 7.63 mm. The first flexural cracks
appeared at a load level of 31.9 kN.
D. Experimental Setup and Procedure
Slab C1, which was strengthened with Nylon TRM layer,
All specimens were subjected to point loading and were tested failed in a similar way but at a higher load, equal to 70.7 kN,
as simply supported at their center. The test specimen was laid owing to the contribution of the TRM to the flexural
on rigid steel frame and the effective flexural span in both resistance. This slab exhibited a stiffer behavior with respect
directions was 980 mm. The load was applied at a to the control slab and as indicated by the change in the slope
displacement rate of 1 mm/ min by using a 200 kN capacity of the load-displacement curve in Fig.5. Beyond cracking, a
hydraulic jack. For the better observation of the development rapid change in the slope of the load deflection curve was
of cracks all the specimen was white washed. The Linear observed. The first cracking load was also increased, reaching
variable differential transducers (LVDT) were placed at the 46.9kN. The Table II shows the summary of experimental
bottom of the slab to measure the displacement of the test results.
Slab C2 which was strengthened with same as thattha of slab C1 While comparing specimen C1 and C2 the strength of
but in a cross configuration
ion and is failed at maximum load of specimen C1 (TRM applied over the full tensile face) was
67.2 kN and the corresponding central deflection obtained is improved and the deflection at maximum imum load has got reduced
17.68mm (see Fig.6 and Fig.7). Compared to the specimen C2 specimen
C1 has a load increment of 5.2%. This means that covering
the full face of the slab with a textile layer is more effective
Load Vs Deflection than applying two strips in a cross configuration. From Table
II it is clear that the load at first crack of slabs strength
strengthened
80 with TRM applied over the full tensile face (C1) and applied
in a cross configuration (C2) is higher as compared to load at
70
first crack of control specimen.
Load (kN)
60
CON
50
40 C1
20
Deflection (mm)
30 C2
15
20
10 10 Deflection
0
5
0 10 20 30
Deflection (mm) 0
CON C1 C2
Fig.5 Load Vs Deflection graph
From the above graph, it is clear that for control specimen, the Fig.7 Central deflection of all specimens
strength is less compared to Specimen C1and C2. The
ultimate load and deflection of entire specimen is plotted 2) Crack pattern: The control slab (CON) failed in
using a bar chart as shown in Fig.6 and Fig.7 flexure after yielding of the steel reinforcement and the
. development of significant plastic deformations. The
failure pattern of control slab at the bott bottom face is
illustrated in Fig.8a.Here
.Here the diagonal cracks were
Ultimate load (kN )
72
70 generated propagating from the cent
centre of the specimens to
68 the cornersrs and also several major and minor cracks are
66 developed. The corners of the slab were progressively
64 Ultimate uplifted as a result of the significant
ficant twisting moments
62 load (Fig.9).
). After the flexural capacity was reached, the load
60 graduallyly dropped and a circular shaped crack appeared at
58 the top of the slab as a part of collapse mechanisam
56 (marked red in Fig. 8d).This
This type of crack is visible in all
slabs as a result of moment redistribution at very large
CON C1 C2 displacements.
Fig.6 Ultimate load of all specimens
F. Strengthening Configuration
The specimen C2 failed in flexure after yielding of the steel This paper presents an experimental investigation on the
reinforcement and slippage of the textile fibers through the effectiveness of a nylon textile-reinforced mortar (TRM). And
mortar, but in a different crack pattern at the face of TRM as also the strengthening configuration on the basis of different
illustrated in Fig.8c.The major cracks were developed on the configuration and the role of initial cracking in the slab is to
face of TRM at the overlapping region of the two strips be investigated experimentally. The application of TRM layer
(marked blue in Fig.8c). The fibers crossing these cracks were increased the flexural capacity of two-way RC slabs. Total of
highly stressed and ultimately experienced partial rupture and three specimens are casted, one control specimen and other
slippage within the mortar. two are strengthened with TRM applied over the tensile face.
REFERENCES