Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Factual topics for a group are – as the word says – about facts. This is a sample list of speech topics on
current issues and facts:
A controversial group discussion topic is a speech topic that has many controversies, pros and cons. Keep
in mind that all current group discussion topics are not my opinion, but just a sample list of speech topics!
1. Sustainable urban living without the use of excessive natural resources must be our future.
2. Are there extraterrestrials who influence events on Earth?
3. Marijuana has a medical value.
4. Direct mail is a special form of junk mail.
5. The pros and cons of a female President.
6. Online dating chats have nothing to do with a search for a soul mate.
7. Should schools distribute condoms?
8. Most people support embryonic stem cell research.
9. Life imprisonment is a good alternative to capital punishment.
10. What is wrong with child labor?
Abstract group discussion topics are things that cannot be touched, not be easily defined or formulated.
Just think in a creative manner and start a vivid group discussion with one of these abstract topics to talk
about:
The fourth type of group discussion topics are so-called case studies. You determine a problem and
together with the other group members you have to find a satisfying solution. These are small group
discussion topic ideas. Just modify and alter where necessary, these are just guiding light topic ideas:
1. Leadership – What necessary changes are needed in your community organization and how do
you want to lead the process?
2. Malpractice Insurance – Doctors walk out on the job to protest the rising malpractice insurance
costs. What to do about it?
3. Work Ethics – Can we shape workers who have the sense that they serve the company ánd
community?
4. School Violence – What are the real causes of violence and bullying in Schools?
5. Recycling – Sort out how to make money with recycling.
6. Dropouts – Individual attention in safe schools and smaller classes; is that the way to stop
students to drop out?
7. Iraq – What are the best exit strategies?
8. Speech Privacy – What are the best technologies to safeguard the right of free speech privacy on
the internet?
9. Minimum Wage – Why should we have a minimum wage or why not?
10. Burnout – Should everybody check his or herself of burnout signs? How?
Tip: try to make an inventory of various angles of view and opinions of the group discussion topics.
Roles in a GD
The major roles a candidates can play in a GD are as compiled below. You can classify all people in a GD
into these. The first three roles are the positive roles that one can play in a GD and the next three roles are
the negative roles. It is quite possible that a candidate plays more than one role in the same GD. The more
a candidate sticks to the positive roles the better are the chances of his/her selection. The negative roles
should be avoided and as soon as you realise that you are being seen as a negative role player you should
try to mend your ways and switch over to a positive role at the earliest.
INITIATOR : Initiator as the names suggest is the person who sets the ball rolling. One must start the
discussion if he/she has mastery over the subject being discussed or if he/she believes that she can do
justice to the subject topic. Starting the discussion just for the sake of it may put you in soup. When you
start the discussion there are very high chances that you get enough time to speak before you are
interrupted by others. During this period chances of a chaos are very less and the evaluator has his full
focus on you. You if you speak well you score some brownie points there, but if you don’t meet the
evaluator expectation you are likely to give a bad impression and remember the evaluator has his
undivided attention to what you are saying.
CO-ORDINATOR : The co-ordinator usually makes sure that each and every who is willing to speaks get
a chance to speak. He is the one who takes the group out of a chaos in case a heated argument between two
group members. He is usually the one who summarises the discussion at the end and in between helps
others in putting the thought across. This is a very risky role to play as other candidates may not be happy
as you trying to co-ordinate the whole event as presenting yourself as the leader of the group. If you have
the human tacking skills and knowledge on the subject being discussed you are a sure shot winner if you
play this role. You also need to be a good listener to play this role.
NATURAL LEADERS : Speaks elegantly on the subject, does not argue with others just for the sake of it,
influences others with his mannerism and speech. Listens to what others are saying, accepts and
encourages others to come out with different view points, provides relevant data and information to help
others convey their points. Others are comfortable to follow the guidelines laid by him. The Co-ordinator
usually looks to him at time of need and when the situation really gets out of control. This role can be
adopted by person who has in depth knowledge, a balanced personality, clarity thoughts and ability to
convey his thoughts in words . Highly recommended to UrPercentile.com members.
ANTAGONISER : This person assigns himself or someone else as the chairman of the group at the start
of the discussion, starts giving orders to other, is a poor listener, tries to control the time duration each
candidate speaks, shouts at others when they don’t listen to him/her, flaunts his past experience or
education qualification, is dogmatic in expressing his views, uses intimidating gestures while talking and
so on. If you play this role you are sure to be out of the game. This role is NOT Recommended for
UrPercentile.com members.
FICKLER : He speaks for the sake of speaking, agrees with anyone and everyone. Contradicts his own
statements, fails to present his ideas in a cohesive manner, lack rhythm in his speech, gets too emotional
during the speech, abruptly starts talking when others are presenting their views or abruptly stops half way
while talking. This role is NOT Recommended to UrPercentile.com members.
STUPID: Takes no initiative to presents his/her views, is nervous, does not take any responsibility, is
devoid of ideas, tries to find excuses for not contributing, pretends to be good listener and just repeats
what other members said thus not contributing anything positive to the group.
GD | GROUP DISCUSSION
A GD is a methodology used by an organization to gauge whether the candidate has certain personality
traits and/or skills that it desires in its members. In this methodology, the group of candidates is given a
topic or a situation, given a few minutes to think about the same, and then asked to discuss the it among
themselves for 15-20 minutes. Freshersworld.com brings you an elaborate section for GD as you had ever
seen anywhere else.
Group Discussion session is an important part of the company selection and admission procedure followed
by the B-Schools worldwide. This session is conducted to analyze the ability of the candidates to think on a
situation and present their views on the respective subject. This examination also helps the examiners
judge the ability of the applicants to perform in groups. Participants in a Group Discussion are always
advised to practice group discussion sessions, so that they can come out with their best foot forward on the
day of the examination. Group discussion topics are carefully selected from various fields to judge the
qualities of the candidates.
Topics that are selected for group discussion are chosen from various fields like sports, politics, social
issues, environmental issues and current events. It is always difficult to guess the group discussion topics
as it can be chosen from any field of work. However, students are always advised to read a lot of
newspapers and business magazines to stay aware of the current events and happenings. Participants
might not possess thorough information about the GD topics, but common sense and familiarity with the
issue can be of great help during the time of group discussion. This always helps to present your ideas in a
proper manner.
In order to contribute meaningfully in the verbal test, it is essential for you to go through newspapers and
other articles available online on a regular basis. Most of the GD topics are selected from current events, so
profound knowledge on the recent issues is a must. You can also collect various group discussion topics
online and start preparing yourself. This would help you build your confidence for the upcoming session.
The examiners are there to see your psychological poise and temperament during the examination. You
need to be confident about yourself and be smart and clear while presenting your ideas on the subject.
Why GDs:-
The reason why institutes and companies put you through a Group discussion and an interview, after
testing your technical and conceptual skills in an exam, is to get to know you as a person and gauge how
well you will fit in their institute or Company. The Group discussion tests how you function as a part of a
team. As a manager, you will always be working in teams, as a member or as a leader. Therefore how you
interact in a team becomes an important criterion for your selection. Managers have to work in a team and
get best results out of teamwork. That is the reason why management institutes include GD as a
component of the selection procedure.
Company’s Perspective:-
Companies conduct group discussion after the written test so as to check on your interactive skills and how
good you are at communicating with other people. The GD is to check how you behave, participate and
contribute in a group, how much importance do you give to the group objective as well as your own, how
well do you listen to viewpoints of others and how open-minded are you in accepting views contrary to
your own. The aspects which make up a GD are verbal communication, non-verbal behavior, conformation
to norms, decision-making ability and cooperation. You should try to be as true as possible to these
aspects.
1. Team Player
It is essential for managers to be team players.
The reason: Managers always work in teams.
At the beginning of his(manager) career, a manager works as a team member. And, later, as a team leader.
Management aspirants who lack team skills cannot be good managers.
2. Reasoning Ability
Reasoning ability plays an important role while expressing your opinions or ideas at a GD.
For example, on India\’s growth and its effect\’s:
Any Answer for this should be based on reasons, not assumptions.
3. Leadership
There are three types of situations that can arise in a GD:
~ A GD where participants are unable to establish a proper rapport and do not speak much.
~ A GD where participants get emotionally charged and the GD gets chaotic.
~ A GD where participants discuss the topic assertively by touching on all its nuances and try to reach the
objective.
Here, a leader would be someone who facilitates the third situation at a GD.
A leader would have the following qualities:
~S/he shows direction to the group whenever group moves away from the topic.
~S/he coordinates the effort of the different team members in the GD.
~S/he contributes to the GD at regular intervals with valuable insights.
~S/he also inspires and motivates team members to express their views.
Caution: Being a mere coordinator in a GD does not help, because it is a secondary role.
Contribute to the GD with your ideas and opinions, but also try and steer the conversation towards a goal.
4. Flexibility
You must be open to other ideas as well as to the evaluation of your ideas: That is what flexibility is all
about.
But first, remember: Never ever start your GD with a stand or a conclusion.
Say the topic of a GD is, \’Should India Ban night work for Women at night hours?\’
Some participants tend to get emotionally attached to the topic and take a stand either in favour or against
the topic, ie \’Yes, India should\’, or, \’No, India should not\’.
By taking a stand, you have already given your decision without discussing the topic at hand or listening to
the views of your team members.
Also, if you encounter an opposition with a very strong point at the 11th hour, you end up in a typical
catch-22 situation:
~If you change your stand, you are seen as a fickle-minded or a whimsical person.
~If you do not change your stand, you are seen as an inflexible, stubborn and obstinate person.
5. Assertiveness
You must put forth your point to the group in a very emphatic, positive and confident manner.
Participants often confuse assertiveness with aggressiveness.
Aggressiveness is all about forcing your point on the other person, and can be a threat to the group. An
aggressive person can also demonstrate negative body language, whereas an assertive person displays
positive body language.
6. Initiative
A general trend amongst students is to start a GD and get the initial kitty of points earmarked for the
initiator.
But that is a high risk-high return strategy.
Initiate a GD only if you are well versed with the topic. If you start and fail to contribute at regular
intervals, it gives the impression that you started the GD just for the sake of the initial points.
Also, if you fumble, stammer or misquote facts, it may work against you.
Remember: You never ever get a second chance to create a first impression.
8. Inspiring ability
A good group discussion should incorporate views of all the team members.
If some team members want to express their ideas but are not getting the opportunity to do so, giving them
an opportunity to express their ideas or opinions will be seen as a positive trait.
Caution: If a participant is not willing to speak, you need not necessarily go out of the way to ask him to
express his views. This may insult him and hamper the flow of the GD.
9. Listening
Always try and strike a proper balance between expressing your ideas and imbibing ideas.
10. Awareness
You must be well versed with both the micro and macro environment.
Your awareness about your environment helps a lot in your GD content, which carries maximum
weightage.