Often people make an oath of office such as lawyers, politicians and judges only to undermine the very constitution they are to uphold.
Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness.
Original Title
20180626-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to President Donald J Trump-State Sovereign Rights to Bar Aliens From Entering
Often people make an oath of office such as lawyers, politicians and judges only to undermine the very constitution they are to uphold.
Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness.
Often people make an oath of office such as lawyers, politicians and judges only to undermine the very constitution they are to uphold.
Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness.
info@mail.whitehouse.gov 5 20180626-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to President Donald J Trump- State sovereign rights to bar aliens from entering Sir (Donald), It is of concern to me that as I understand it many constitutional law professors who 10 lecture at US universities somehow seems to fail to understand that DUE PROCESS as to deporting aliens who unlawfully entered the United States of America is not applicable. The US constitution was designed for Americans and not for Aliens! The fact that aliens may desire to benefit from the US constitution must be within the realm of this constitution and not just Cherry pick that lawyers may deem suitable so they can earn a fast 15 buck out of this, regardless as by this to undermine the provisions of the constitution they are to uphold. In my view any lawyer/judicial officer who undermines the right of a government to expel/refuse entry to an alien may be considered a traitor to the people to which the constitution belongs. Lawyers, being it constitutional law professors and/or judges who fail to understand this I view 20 have no placed in being a lawyer and ought to be stripped of their legal qualification as in the process they are abusing/misusing the legal processes undermining by this the health and wellbeing of Americans as well as causing court times to be wasted that might be needed for honourable citizens. As the Privy Council made very clear in Ah Toy's case. 25 20 Mar 1891 - AH TOY V. MUSGROVE. - Trove nla.gov.au/nla.news-article3523792 the Privy Council on the appeal in the case,. Line 2.0.2 ... the appeal in the case of Ah Toy v. Musgrove, ... case, Chun Teong Toy, brought an action. Line 3.2.7.
30 15 Sep 1888 - The Case of Ah Toy v. Musgrove. - Trove
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/228405106/24832987 The Case of Ah Toy v. Musarrove. Line 1.0.0. Melbourne, This Day. ... Line 1.0.3. appeal to the Privy Council in the case of. Line 1.0.4. Ah Loy v. Musgrove,.
35 [PDF]AH TOY v. MUSGROVE. - Parliament of Victoria
www.parliament.vic.gov.au/papers/govpub/VPARL1888NoC23.pdf A COPY of the Report of the Arguments and Judgment in the case of A.h Toy v. liusgrove-. Snpreme .... it "\\'ith the advice of the Executive Council in England, or with the advice of the. Executive ...... For what could the Royal power do alone? 40 This applies to any sovereign nation including the US of A. I view it is long overdue lawyers/judges and politicians are getting some badly needed education in this. This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.
45 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati