Professional Documents
Culture Documents
– Biology Assessment 2.
Alex McLennan – 18803088
Infectious disease is a topic that students can find particular relevance and connection to.
Being able to relate and connect to content is identified as good pedagogical practice (Gore,
2007; Ludwig & Gore, 2003) as well as a way to empower disengaged students through
building confidence in relatable content they may have prior knowledge in (Hulleman &
ICT is a widely used pedagogical practice across a variety of subjects (Dawson, 2008).
Utilising ICT in the classroom has a positive impact on student engagement and learning
success (Chandra & Briskey, 2012; Fatma Taskin, 2015). ICT is best used as a complement to
the classroom lessons as students familiar with ICT tend to do better than students from
disadvantaged backgrounds, whose access to ICT outside of the school environment may be
The video lesson in part “A” is designed to be part of a flipped lesson. ICT based flipped
lessons can have a positive impact on student engagement and understanding as part of an
overall pedagogical approach (Bishop & Verleger, 2013; Heyborne & Perrett, 2016; Janotha,
2016). This video looks at two recent epidemics, Zika and Ebola (World Health organisation,
2016a, 2016c) to provide a connection for students to the real world whilst also touching on
the recent measles cases in Sydney to enhance connection to local content (Ludwig & Gore,
2003). This video can also be used as a basic exemplar for students to follow.
The intention of the task “B” was to create a project-based, summative assessment that
differentiation through choice of media for their project. Weighting, the content to be
assessed and its format were based on the new syllabus (NSW Education Standards
and reliable (consistency of results) way of determining a student’s content knowledge (He,
environment like the HSC, summative assessment is needed as part of the formal reporting
on student achievement and it can be used as a guide to the content taught and student
learning (McMahon, 2006). One of the criticisms of summative assessment is it too often
results in poor learning through teachers “teaching to the test” (Fehring & Nyland, 2012),
however this task aims to combine formal summative assessment with informal formative
assessment to result in a deeper learning and knowledge experience for the students in the
Project-based learning is when students take an active role in their learning by working
collaboratively in answering a question with real world implications (Holmes & Hwang,
2016). The process of working on a project where the student is responsible for their own
researching and understanding leads to stronger student engagement with, and deeper
understanding of, the content (Gary, 2015). Students who already have a conceptual
understanding of the content often excel in these type of projects. To ensure that lower
ability students are not disadvantaged during this project, it is important to allow for peer
collaboration, social support and sharing of ideas (Gore, 2007; Li, Zhang, & He, 2015).
Project-based learning is traditionally carried out in groups (Hattie & Anderman, 2013).
Because some students may feel disadvantaged by having their high stakes assessment
influenced by other student’s efforts, this task was shifted to an individual assessment. To
facilitate effective learning, social support and peer collaboration, students assess their
peers work and provide constructive feedback. The teacher will act as a facilitator during
individual project-based task, however, it fulfils the criteria of project based learning that
has been modified for an HSC assessment task (Hattie & Anderman, 2013).
Despite being a formal summative HSC assessment (NSW Education Standards Authority,
learning through feedback from peers and self-assessment (NSW Education Standards
Authority, 2017c; Trauth-Nare & Buck, 2011). Formative assessment ensures that students
are familiar with the concepts that are being formally assessed and to not become too
overwhelmed by the scope of their project (Barrow, 2009). Assessment as learning is also
facilitated by providing guiding questions and the marking rubric, with the document of
There are some areas of potential student difficulty that need to be accounted for in this
assessment task. One such difficulty is access to the internet and ICT, that may be
problematic for some students from lower SES backgrounds (Luu & Freeman, 2011). To
counteract this, class time is provided in the school’s computer labs, and students are made
aware that they will need to access the school-based ICT resources to complete their
assessment.
the task, rather than lowering the task requirements to meet the student (L. Fenwick, 2012;
Lisl Fenwick & Cooper, 2012) which can be unfair in high-stakes summative assessments
the teacher who alters the amount of scaffolding they provide to their students. Further
and using familiar keywords of assessment (NSW Education Standards Authority, 2012). This
is to make explicit what the expectations of the assessment are. There is also a suggested
timeline for completion of each stage of the project to help less organised students stay on
track.
Another form of differentiation in this assessment is allowing student choice, which aims to
motivate students and promote student self-regulation (Evans & Boucher, 2015; Waters,
Smeaton, & Burns, 2004). The choice of medium allows differentiation through students
discerning where their skills and strengths lay within ICT, as part of the curriculum general
capabilities (ACARA, 2016; AITSL, 2016), whilst the choice of pathogens allows students to
This assessment also has a focus on literacy so choosing their project medium is important
for Indigenous and LOTE students (Shipp, 2012) who may have a deficit in the
communication skills being assessed (NSW Education Standards Authority, 2017b). These
groups tend to have poor outcomes in standardized testing that assess literacy skills
(Castejón & Zancajo, 2015; Ford, 2013) so supporting these students to succeed needs to be
the focus of scaffolding and differentiation measures (Mills et al., 2014). By combing the
choice of project, connection to the content and appropriate differentiation it is hoped that
Indigenous and LOTE students can produce at their best level, and not be disadvantaged by
References.