Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDUA 5600
Kristin Withoos
685 3083
2
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to read and annotate 10 articles that relate to change
project. The articles that I have found relate not only to my change project but to teaching
in general, I have taken a lot of great information from them and will be using some of
the information not only for my change project but for my teaching in general. The
annotations will provide information on the purpose of each study, the methods used, the
outcomes touched in the study and the implications it will have on my change project.
The change project I have decided to do it to create a small study group with the main
goal of helping one specific struggling student improve not only academically but also
socially. The student in question is currently having a lot of issues building relationships
with students in his class, he does not really have any friends and is often working alone
because he is not comfortable approaching anyone to ask to join their group or to work
with them. He is also very far behind academically is most subjects, despite the fact he is
quite brilliant. The hope is that by providing opportunity for this student to work more
closely with other students that he will become more comfortable with the students in the
small group and start to build relationships with them. The academic side will come from
the work that will be done in the small groups, the focus of these groups will be to
provide extra academic support for the students that join the group. Hopefully by
focusing on the academic side the relationship will be formed more naturally just by
Lefstein, J. S. (2017). “Low Ability,” Participation, and This study follows three teachers that are seeking to
Identity in Dialogic Pedagogy. American include low ability students in class discussion. The
Educational Research Journal, 55 (1), 40-78. purpose is to determine what implications dialogic
Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com pedagogies have on these students with low ability.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five key Write two questions you have about the research.
words.
1. I am wondering why they chose to only follow
Initially it was observed that students with low ability 3 teachers in the school all within the same
were unable to contribute to class discussions, when grade range and not all the teachers in the
called upon to contribute in front of the entire class these school or perhaps teachers within multiple
students freeze up and become uncomfortable. There schools.
were a few main problems with this: 2. How would the findings have changed if the
These students never felt as though they had study would have been conducted over a longer
anything meaningful to say period of time? Perhaps if they followed the
They slowly became uninterested in the group same group of kids and the same teachers for a
discussions know that they could not contribute few years.
Students would fall behind in certain areas as a
result of not being engaged in these discussions
Students felt segregated from the others
Students lacked confidence
This study looks into the implications of low ability students not being able to contribute to group discussions. With
pedagogical changes that are pushing towards more group discussions and more “math talks” it is important to find
ways to bring these low ability students into the group discussions. With this in mind it is imperative that time is
taken to ensure that students are able to contribute something to discussions with the class. One way of doing this
would be to work with the low ability students on certain problems (in math for example) and go through the way
the answer could be explained so that the student has the confidence of knowing exactly what to say before the class
discussion. Another thing would be to start small in groups where the pressure is lower, and students feel more
comfortable.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five key words. Write two questions you have about the
research.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five key words. Write two questions you have about
the research.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five key words. Write two questions you
have about the research.
5
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five key words. Write two questions you have about
the research.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five key words. Write two questions you
have about the research.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five key words. Write two questions you
have about the research.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five Write two questions you have about the research.
key words.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five Write two questions you have about the research.
key words.
List the outcomes in point form, underlining five Write two questions you have about the research.
key words.
Bibliography
Lefstein, J. S. (2017). “Low Ability,” Participation, and Identity in Dialogic Pedagogy. American
Educational Research Journal, 55 (1), 40-78.