GROUP PROJECT Results – MGT522

ESLAH AND TEAM

Table 1: Sample Details

Middle Manager Top Management

Respondents (R) % Respondents (R) %
Gender Male
Female
20-30
Age Group 31-40
41-50
51-60
61-70
High School
Education Level Diploma
Bachelor
Master
Doctoral
Number of Up to 30
employees 31-80
81-130
131-180
181-230
230+

Table 2: Descriptive statistics, reliability and correlations

Mean SD Reliability
Coefficient 1 2 3 4 5
1 OLC 5.24 1.13 .924 1

2 KOL 5.72 0.72 .727 .758** 1

3 ED 5.33 0.81 .818 -.133 .107 1

4 OI 5.16 1.02 .909 .202 .086 .571** 1

5 FIRCOMPT 6.10 0.65 .886 .090 -.107 .705** .565** 1

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-
tailed).

Wherein OLC = Organizational learning culture, KOL = Knowledge oriented leadership, ED =

Environmental dynamism, OI = Open innovation, FIRCOMPT = Firm competiveness

Page 1 of 3
Table 3: Knowledge-oriented Leadership and Organizational Learning Culture

Model R R Square β F Significance

Knowledge Oriented Leadership 0.758 0.575 0.758 29.720 0.000

Table 4: Knowledge-oriented Leadership and Open Innovation

Model R R Square β F Significance

Knowledge Oriented Leadership 0.086 0.007 0.086 0.164 0.690

Table 5: Knowledge-oriented Leadership and Firm Competitiveness

Model R R Square β F Significance

Knowledge Oriented Leadership 0.107 0.011 0.107 0.256 0.618

Page 2 of 3
Table 6: Organizational Learning Culture and Open Innovation

Model R R Square β F Significance

Organizational Learning Culture 0.202 0.041 0.202 0.933 0.344

Table 7: Organizational Learning Culture and Firm Competitiveness

Model R R Square β F Significance

Organizational Learning Culture 0.090 0.008 0.090 0.181 0.674

Table 8: Open Innovation and Firm Competitiveness

Model R R Square β F Significance

Open Innovation 0.565 0.320 0.565 10.340 0.004

Page 3 of 3